Connect with us

Opinion

Need To Develop Rivers Mangrove Forests

Published

on

A study on the industrial uses of the Mangroves, con
ducted by (FENCO) in 1976 indicated  that Rivers State is roughly cropped of 30,000 hectares of such species with approximately 5.6  cubic meters of wood. In fact this provides a clear vegetative zone along the entire coastline,  stretching through most riverine towns and villages like Bonny, Buguma, Okrika to mention a few.
This Mangrove forests which comprise of three major different types of tree species, is predominantly stocked with the species locally called ‘Angala’ by the people of ‘Wakirike’ Kingdom. The ‘Angala’, a tropical tree growing in swamps with visible extensive breathing roots, forms a clear vegetative band along the entire coastline, stretching through coastal towns and fishing villages of most riverine communities in Rivers State.
In respect to  forestry activities in Rivers State, one could rightly conclude that successive governments at both state and local levels have not done enough to pursue effectively programmes in the area conservation, research and adequate protection of the abundant mangrove forest situation in the State.
With the conception that the mangrove forest has the ability of natural regeneration, a notion which exposes the mangroves of Rivers State to brutalization and under-utilization as merely sources of fire-wood, fish trap making and poles for local building construction.
This neglect and apparent under-utilization of the abundant mangrove forests resources of the State is considered by forestry experts as an economic waste. It has thus become an issue upon which it is difficult to further be silent. Riverine communities cannot afford to lose capacity to foresee and forestall particularly in a time like this in which the consequences of  ‘Nigeria’ oil exploitation have continued to pose grave concern to the people.
The conservation and allowable exploitation of the mangrove forests resources to redress this situation should be seen as a vital commitment to Rivers State.
It is possible that the apparent lack of seriousness towards the conservation and sustainable exploitation of the mangrove forests in Rivers State, is brought about by inaccessibility and perhaps unacceptability due to lack of sufficient technical knowledge of the swamp and  mangrove socio-economic potentialities. It is for this reason that qualified and practicing foresters should be  detailed by the respective local government councils to educate co-operatives, business executives and the general public on the viability and sustained management of the abundant mangrove forests, in addition to state government participation.
Mangrove forest can be managed to serve as adequate protection of coastal shore-lines against flood and erosion, drought and fire. It can also be used to control water quality for human and agricultural uses. For instance, mangrove highly populated areas such as the ‘Wakirike’ environment can serve a good process for waste recycling, and could be put into other uses like fish/wild life conservation, maintenance of scenic beauty for recreation and tourism. It is a known fact that mangrove forests can transform barren matter into a colony of living organisms. The Avicenis germimans ‘Okor’ and Languncularia racemosa ‘Atabaka two of the three major mangrove tree species highly populated in Rivers State are known for their  ability to trap soil, silt and their own dead leaves in their aerial roots. The trapping of matter, creates an ideal conditions for the multiplication of organisms. Consequently, the submerged banks are colonized by shrimp larvae and plankton. Their roots and crown canopy is known to provide a conducive habitat for fish hatchings. Mangrove trees are also useful for the production of timber for building construction, sleepers for railway tracks, pit-props for mines, electric and telephone transmission poles, fish traps, racks and various raw materials for wood based industries.
Mangrove trees particularly the Rhizophora racemosa,  is very medicinal. Barks,  leaves and roots of Rhizophora, which is classified into three distinct species namely: Rhizophora racemosa; Rhizophora harrisonii and Rhizophora Mangle, is locally administered to the sick by herbalists.
It is envisaged with high optimism that mangrove tree species can be very useful to modern medical researches. Okrikans, in time immemorial knew that apart from the mangrove trees, the mangrove ecozone is an important source of proteinous sea food. It is the natural habitat of the crustacean, molluses and fishes such as crab (ipa), lobster (ipoli), periwinkle (isam) and mud-skippers (ichila) and also the spawning, nursery and feeding ground for other coastal fin-fishes.
Crustaceans are the most conspicuous group of marine animals habitating the ‘Wakirike’  mangrove ecozone. For instance, Fiddler crabs (akanga) are quite characteristic of the mangrove swamp forests as they burrow into the soft mud and at low tide, when the ground is exposed, they emerge in large numbers with a rhythmic display of body movement believed by Okrikans to be beckoning on the tide to come back. Different species or crabs are found in different substrate of the ecosystem. Some of these are eaten by man, while others form the food chain of other animals and could be used as bates in fishing traps .
It is not just the saline flord and fauna that is of benefit to Okrikans in the mangrove  ecosystem. Animals of terrestrial origin also inhabit the mangrove swamps. They include: reptiles, small and large animals and birds such as crocodiles (seki), iguana (awakiba); monkeys (ibuko), tortoise (ikaki), antelopes (tubara), hippopotamus (otobo) and kingfisher (akiama), wood pecker (arukara), dove (okuku), weaver-bird (pulopulo-feniba), etc.
Unfortunately, these species of fishes, reptiles, animals and birds are getting near extinction, resulting from the continued environmental maladjustment.
The mangrove ecosystem of ‘Wakirike’ Kingdom is variously subjected to the activities of oil prospecting, dredging and construction companies prominent amongst which is the gas flaring and marine effluent discharges pollution by SPDC and NNPC, major operatives within the zone. The volume of carbondioxide and effluent discharges into the ‘Wakirike’ air and water environment, is silently battled by the luxuriant green, vegetation and the swampy nature of the mangrove ecosystem in playing its role as purifier of air and water qualities for human and agricultural use.
The riches derivable froin the mangrove ecosystem are immeasurable. Nevertheless, the mangrove ecology is relatively ‘Very fragile and once destroyed, it takes many years to recover. We therefore, will like to call on the Federal Ministry of Environment to consider the establishment of a Mangrove Forests Research Centre for Rivers State. When established, this body will certainly indicate too, the quick and easy way the riches buried in these mangrove forests could be converted into commercial use. It may equally be pertinent to call Rivers State University of Science and Technology, to supplement whatever work such a centre will do, by developing extra interest in carrying out its own research into the diverse uses of the mangrove forests and the industries that should spring from them.
Fuayefika, a public afffairs analyst, writes from Port Harcourt.

 

Tonye Fuayefika

Continue Reading

Opinion

Trans-Kalabari  Road:  Work In Progress 

Published

on

Quote:”This Dream project  is one of  the best things that have happened  to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas in recent times.”
This is the concluding part of this story featured in our last edition.
Good road network helps farmers to convey their agro-allied products to  commercial hubs where buyers and sellers meet periodically to transact business. Road network engineers and motivates people resident in unfriendly geographical terrains, like riverine areas,  to own property and shuttle home with ease. Some people will prefer living in their own houses in a more serene and nature-blessed communities to living in the city that is fraught with  pollution, and other environmental, social and economic hazards. Prior to the cult epidemic that ravaged parts of Rivers State, the Emohuas, Elemes, Ogonis, and Etches were known for rural dwelling. Most public servants from these areas do their official and private transactions from  their villages. For them it was comparatively easier to live in the village and engage in a diversified economic endeavours through farming, fishing or other lucrative business without outrageous charges and embarrassment associated with doing business in Port Harcourt, where land is as scarce as the traditional needle.
That is why the decision to construct the Trans-Kalabari Road by the administration of Dr. Peter Odili was one of the best decisions that administration took. When Dr. Odili vacated office as the Rivers State Governor, Rt. Hon. Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi took over and awarded contracts for continuation of the road project which in my considered view is the felt need of  the people of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. Unfortunately, Rt. Hon. Amaechi’s efforts to drive the project was sabotaged by some contractors some of whom are Kalabari people. The main  Trans-Kalabari Road is one project that is dear to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas of Rivers State. This is because through the road commuters can easily access several communities in the three local government areas. For instance, the road when completed will enable access to eight of the ten communities in Degema Local Government Area,  namely: Bukuma, Tombia,  Bakana, Oguruama, Obuama, Usokun, Degema town  and the Degema Consulate. It will also link 15 of the 16 communities in Asari Toru Local Government Area. The communities are: Buguma, the local government headquarters, Ido, Abalama, Tema, Sama, Okpo, Ilelema, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama, Krakrama, Omekwe-Ama, Angulama. The road will also connect  14  of 17 wards in Akuku Toru Local Government Area, and other settlements. It is interesting to note that It is faster,  and far more convenient and economical for the catchment Communities on the Trans-Kalabari Road network to go to the State Capital than the East West Road.  The people of the three local government areas will prefer  to work or do their transactions in Port Harcourt from their respective communities to staying in Port Harcourt where the house rent and the general cost of living is astronomically high.
 Consequently, development will seamlessly spread to the 28 out of 34 communities of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. The only Communities that are not linked by the road project are Oporoama in Asari Toru,  the Ke and  Bille Communities in Degema Local Government Area and the “Oceania” communities of Abissa, Kula, Soku, Idama, Elem Sangama of Akuku Toru Local Government Area. But because of the economic value of the unlinked Communities to Nigeria, (they produce substantial oil and gas in the area), the Federal, State Governments and the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC), can extend the road network to those areas just as Bonny is linked to Port Harcourt and the Lagos Mainland Bridge is connecting several towns in Lagos and neighbouring States.Kudos to previous administrations who  had constructed the Central Group axis.
 However, what is said to be the First Phase of the Trans-Kalabari Road project is actually a linkage of the “Central Group” Communities which consists of Krakrama, Angulama, Omekwe. Ama, Omekwe Tari Ama, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama. It is the peripheral of the Trans-Kalabari Road. The completion of the  Main Trans Kalabari project will free Port Harcourt and Obio/Akpor areas from congestion. It will motivate residents and people of the three local areas to contribute to the development of their Communities. If the Ogonis, Etches, Emohuas, Oyigbos, Okrikas, Elemes can feel comfortable doing business in Port Harcourt from home, residents and people whose communities are linked to Port Harcourt through the Trans-Kalabari Road will no doubt, do likewise. The vast arable virgin land of the Bukuma people can be open for development and sustainable agricultural ventures by Local, State and Federal Government.
It is necessary to recall that the Bukuma community was host to the Federal Government’s Graduate Farmers’ Scheme and the Rivers State Government moribund School-to-Land Scheme under Governor Fidelis Oyakhilome. Bukuma was the only community in Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas that has the capacity to carry those agricultural programmes. However the lack of road to transport farm produce to Port Harcourt and facilitate the movement of the beneficiaries of the scheme who lived in the community which is several miles away from the farms, hampered the sustainability of the programme. The main Trans-Kalabari Road remains the best gift to the people of Degema, Asari Toru, and Akuku-Toru Local Government Areas. Kudos to Sir Siminilayi Fubara.
By: Igbiki Benibo
Continue Reading

Opinion

That  U.S. Capture of Maduro

Published

on

Quote:”Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction.”
The first part of this story was published in our last edition.
 
In Africa and the Middle East, regime change—whether by invasion, proxy warfare, or sanctions—has often left behind fractured states, weakened institutions, and prolonged instability. Washington’s motivations in Venezuela are widely understood: vast oil reserves, alliances with U.S. rivals, and symbolic defiance of American influence in the Western Hemisphere. But none of these reasons confer legal or moral legitimacy. Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction. If every powerful nation acted on its grievances in this manner, global chaos would inevitably follow. International law provides mechanisms for accountability. Under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), individuals accused of crimes against humanity or other grave offences are subject to investigation and prosecution through judicial processes.
Likewise, extradition treaties, mutual legal assistance agreements, and Interpol mechanisms exist to ensure accountability while respecting due process. These frameworks were designed precisely to prevent unilateral enforcement of “justice” by military force. The most profound consequence of America’s action may not be in Caracas, but in the precedent it sets. If the world accepts that a superpower can unilaterally depose another country’s president, then the foundation of the international system is weakened. Sovereignty becomes conditional—no longer a right, but a privilege tolerated at the discretion of the powerful. Going forward, if another country invades its neighbour, will the United States retain the moral authority to impose sanctions or demand restraint? Some analysts already warn that parallels between Russia’s actions in Ukraine and America’s conduct in Venezuela risk further eroding global norms. Selective adherence to international law breeds cynicism and accelerates the drift toward a world governed by force rather than rules.
Power—military, economic, or political—should serve human progress and collective well-being, not domination and destruction. For African nations, many of which emerged from colonial rule through bitter struggle, this precedent is especially alarming. Sovereignty is not an abstract legal concept; it is a hard-won shield against external domination. Any erosion of that principle anywhere weakens it everywhere. Africa’s painful history of foreign interference makes this lesson especially urgent.  For me, the real issue is not whether Nicolás Maduro is a good or bad leader. That judgment belongs, first and foremost, to the Venezuelan people. The larger issue is whether the international system still operates on law—or has quietly reverted to hierarchy. If America insists it is defending global order, it must ask itself a difficult question: can an order survive when its most powerful guardian feels entitled to violate it? Until that question is answered honestly, the capture of a foreign president will remain not a triumph of justice, but a troubling symbol of a world drifting from law toward force.
If the United States felt so strongly about the allegations of terrorism, drug trafficking  against Maduro, were there no other lawful options? Judicial accountability, diplomacy, regional mediation, and multilateral pressure may be slow and imperfect, but they reflect respect for international law and sovereign equality. Military seizure is a blunt instrument. It humiliates institutions, radicalizes populations, and hardens resistance. It may remove a leader, but it rarely resolves the underlying crisis. History teaches that military interventions seldom result in stable democratic outcomes. More often, they breed resentment, resistance, and long-term instability. For the sake of global order and the rule of law, the United States should reconsider this path and recommit to diplomacy, legal cooperation, and respect for the sovereign equality of states. Former U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris reportedly described the invasion of Venezuela as “unlawful and unwise,” warning that such actions “do not make America safer, stronger, or more affordable.” Her words reflect a growing recognition, even within the United States, that force without legitimacy undermines both moral authority and global stability.
Should what happened in Venezuela serve as a wake-up call for corrupt African leaders who undermine the people’s right to choose their leaders? The answer is yes. The capture of Maduro should alarm African leaders who manipulate elections, weaken institutions, suppress opposition, undermine citizens’ rights, or cling to power at all costs. Venezuela faced widespread criticism over disputed elections and repression long before this episode, and that context shaped how the world reacted. This does not justify foreign military intervention, but it highlights an uncomfortable truth: prolonged democratic decay isolates nations and invites external pressure—from sanctions to diplomatic censure. Global opinion matters, and legitimacy at home strengthens sovereignty abroad. The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and several African leaders have rightly condemned the events in Venezuela, invoking the principles of sovereignty and non-interference enshrined in international and regional law.
Beyond condemnation, however, African leaders must look inward. The continent’s future cannot be built on repression, constitutional manipulation, and personal greed. Leadership must reflect the will of the people, not desperation for power. Two days ago, a social commentator on a radio station argued that Trump’s action—though condemnable—demonstrates how far a leader can go for his country’s interest. According to this view, he did not intervene in Venezuela for personal enrichment, but to strengthen his nation. In stark contrast, many African leaders plunder their own countries. They siphon public resources, impose crushing taxes and harmful policies, and leave their citizens poorer—all for selfish gain. That contradiction is the deeper lesson Africa must confront.True sovereignty is protected not only by international law, but by accountable leadership at home.
 By:  Calista Ezeaku
Continue Reading

Opinion

Kudos  Gov Fubara

Published

on

Please permit me to use this medium to appreciate our able governor, Siminalayi Fubara for the inauguration of the 14.2-kilometre Obodhi–Ozochi Road in Ahoada-East Local Government Area.  This inauguration marks a significant milestone in the history of our communities and deserves commendation. We, the people of Ozochi, are particularly happy because this project has brought long-awaited relief after years of isolation and hardship.
The expression of our traditional ruler, His Royal Highness, Eze Prince Ike Ehie, JP, during the inauguration captured the joy of our people.  He said, “our isolation is over.”  That reflects the profound impact of this road on daily life, economic activities, and social integration of the people of Ozochi and other neighbouring communities. The road will no doubt ease transportation, improve access to markets and healthcare, and strengthen links between Ahoada, Omoku, and other parts of Rivers State.
The people of Ahoada, Omoku, and indeed Rivers State as a whole are grateful to our dear governor for this laudable achievement and wish him many more successful years in office. We pray that God endows him with more wisdom and strength to continue to pilot the affairs of the state for the benefit of all. As citizens, we should rally behind the governor and support his development agenda. Our politicians and stakeholders should embrace peace and cooperation, as no meaningful progress can be achieved in an atmosphere of conflict. Sustainable development in the state can only thrive where peace prevails.
Samuel Ebiye
Continue Reading

Trending