Politics
INEC: The Row Over New Polling Units
About six months to the
2015 elections, politicians have began for a attention and relevance and in some cases exchanging political missiles designed to shut down their opponents’ using subtle and direct campaigns even when the umpire, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has not officially flagged off campaigns. The INEC, which has not denied that there are mistakes and lessons to be learnt from previous conduct of elections especially the last three Anambra, Ekiti and Osun governorship polls, is however, hopeful that it would improve in its subsequent conduct of elections.
This dictates the commission’s decision for constant re-examination to see whether it is still on the path of reforming and improving the electoral process that will promote free, fair and credible elections.
The fallout of INEC’s strategy to reform the electoral process in line with international best practices is the creation of 30,000 polling units(PUs), bringing the total number to 150,000 nationwide from 119,973 that had existed since 1996. Out of the 30,000 PUs, the North got 70 per cent of the new units (more than 21,000 units) while the balance of a little more than 8,000 polling units were allocated to the South. The wide disparity int he collection has therefore sparked up a row. The commission is accused of shortchanging other parts of the country in favour of the North in terms of the new polling units.
The South East region under the aegis of the South East Leaders of the Peoples Democratic Party rejected the recent allocation of the new polling units, describing the allocation as “a gross injustice against Ndigbo.”
“We reject entirely the allocation of polling booths by INEC. We view it as a great disservice to the unity and progress of this country if the entre South will have 8,000 polling booths and the North gets 21,000. We demand that the issue be suspended forthwith. This is a prelude to undermine the interest of the zone in the 2015 elections. It is completely against the spirit of one Nigeria and progress of the country,” the PDP National Publicity Secretary, Olisa Metuh declared while briefing the Press at the end of the zone’s meeting at Abia State Government House, Umuahia.
Ogun State PDP chairman, Bayo Dayo expressed similar dissatisfaction with the allocation of the additional PUs. He is worried about the lopsidedness in the allocation.
He said, “Professor Attahiru Jega is an intelligent and honest man but if his honesty is not in the best interest of the South West, we will react and if need be, we will seek redress in court.”
Though civil rights activist, Comrade Moshood Erubami said it would be premature to fault INEC’s wisdom in the distribution of the PUs when we don’t know the criteria used, Afenifere chieftain, Chief Supo Shonibare agreed that the distribution was lopsided.
“I am not aware that INEC is an authorized body on population census. If it is based on estimate, it is wrong to give a section of the country more polling units at the expense of the other,” Shonibare said.
Another body that did not spare INEC over the allocation of the additional PUs is the Electoral Integrity Network.
Apart from doubting the operations of the commission in the electoral process, the Network was categorical that the exercise was a calculated move to favour certain section of the country, and malign others in the electoral process. The Network which also accused the commission of playing the script of powerful political individuals, also insisted that INEC’s new move is capable of inducing acrimony and hatred in the system which if not properly managed could trigger off crisis before, during and after polls.
The Plateau State Leaders said the political interest of the State has been undermined by INEC’s new allocation of PUs. In their press statement, the leaders asked the commission to re-visit the exercise as a whole, saying that in the spirit of national unity, no section of the country should be short- changed in any socio-political and economic process.
However, Attahiru Jega-led INEC, while absolving itself of what it called “spurious allegations”, explained the rationale for the creation of the new polling units which it argued were meant to facilitate ease access of voters to polling units in the forthcoming elections. INEC also justified the current move from past exercise and structure.
How did it all start?
The defunct National Electoral Commission of Nigeria (NECON), in 1996, created the present structure of polling units. INEC, inherited this structure but in 2010 went further to verify them and their locations. It ascertained a total of 119,973 units. Quite revealing was the fact that substantial number of the identified PUs are located in public buildings (primary and secondary schools, recreation centres/packs, community halls etc). Yet, there are some other PUs located in public open spaces (village /town/market squares, community grounds) and the remaining ones located in the premises of traditional rulers, places of worship, frontage of private houses, compounds etc).
The decision to align with global best practice, the electoral body argues, informed its plan to situate polling units within enclosures in public institutions and buildings, and where this is not possible, in places where tents / canopies’ can be erected for greater convenience of everyone involved in the electoral process.
When the current polling units were put to use in 1996, the estimated population of Nigeria was put at about 110 million, and by 2011, when INEC conducted the general voters registration exercise, the population was estimated at 160 million. Presently, this figure has grown to an estimate of 175 million.
Apart from the issue of population growth, INEC’s move may have been influenced by “severe demographic shifts”. According to INEC advertorial, there has been a notable growth in the number and sizes of new settlements across the country, especially in urban centres.
INEC argues that the reconfiguration of the PUs is apparently a strategy to break large polling units into manageable structures known as voting points and this increased the number from the present 119,973 units to 150,000 PUs. Under this arrangement, large polling units are disaggregated into multiples of 300 registered voters per voting point-with a polling unit having multiples of voting points, depending on the overall population of voters. The voting points are not autonomous units, per se; they remained integral to respective polling units.
The usage of these units may have elicited suspicions from interest groups and some political parties who accused the electoral body of secret agenda in the operations of the units. Whereas the electoral law provides for every political party to have one polling agent each at a PUs, some parties demanded to have polling agents at every voting point.
Also significant is the decision of the INEC to increase the technology content of the electoral process. For the 2015 elections, the commission intends “to use chip-embedded smart-card (as voter cards)and companion smartcard readers. Using the voting points as presently constituted, the commission said it will “require some 250,000 units of the smartcard readers to operate.” This has high cost implication to the economy.
As far as addressing electoral challenges are concerned, INEC believes that reconfiguration of the polling units is the answer, and the guiding principles for the reconfiguration include that polling units will now be located as much as possible in enclosure such as classrooms and halls of public schools, institutions, community centre, town halls, and where they are to be situated in open spaces, tents or canopies will be erected.
Furthermore, a public institution that accommodates more than one polling unit will be designated as a polling station and polling units will be located within a reasonable distance to voters at least a maximum radius of one kilometer in urban areas and two kilometers radius in rural areas. Each polling unit will have a maximum of 500 registered voters.
Proportional distribution of the newly created 150,000 polling units, however, shows that Lagos state has the highest number with 2,870 to bring the total number of its polling units to 11,565 to serve its 5,426,391 registered voters, while Kano State with 4,751,818 registered voters got additional 2,053 polling units to bring its total number to 9,809. Kaduna State, with registered voters of 3,743,815 benefitted additional 2,878 polling units to bring the total number of polling units in the state to 7,485. Bayelsa State, which has the lowest voting strength of 590,679 in the country got additional 121 polling units, making a total of 1,925 voting centres in the state.
The concern of the critics over of the allocation of additional 21,000 polling units to the North as against 8,000 allocated to the South may have been prompted by unsavory reports emanating from polling units during electoral activities.
A member of Delta PDP, Col Joseph Achuzia (rtd), described INEC’s allocation of the new PUs as illogical and wondered the rationale behind the move. The inference from the INEC move, he said, is that majority of the voters in the country are in the North, whereas the cleaning up of the voters register done recently by INEC has belied that notion.
He recalled that enumerators who registered voters in the North usually based their figures on estimates by virtue of their inability to get into certain areas to carry out the national assignment because of Islamic restriction. According to him, this Northerners always use the Islamic restriction as an excuse to stage-manage enumerations in their favour.
The decision of the electoral commission may sound logical especially when it is viewed against the background that the new polling units were previously known as voting points and were appendages of existing polling units. What this means is that INEC only acted from existing structures. But the people have the right to know the details of the reconfiguration so as to rebuild their confidence that were shattered overtimes by previous electoral mistakes.
On its part, the electoral body should consider it necessary to embark on massive sensitization and enlightenment programme for the citizens to allay their fears and educate them that its move has best intentions to ease the logistic challenges confronting electoral activities.
Another option of defence open to INEC in the creation of more polling units is the 2010 Electoral Act which provides that each polling units shall not have more that 500 voters. The need to comply with the provision of the Act, it would be argued, puts the commission on a sound footing for its action.
Samuel Eleonu
INEC Chairman, Prof Attahiru Jega
He said he would not hesitate to activate the recall process against any lawmaker found wanting, if he returns for a second term in office.
He stated this while addressing members of the All Progressives Congress (APC), including those who lost out at the recently held national and state assemblies primaries and have become aggrieved and disrespectful to the party.
While emphasizing the supremacy of the party, he said decisions were taken in the overall interest of the party and the state and must, therefore, be respected by all members.
He warned lawmakers against being insolent and arrogant to their people to the extent of shutting them out after each election cycle, saying such would no longer be condoned.
“So I am appealing to all of you. If you were born with arrogance, please just drop that ticket here”, he said.
The governor hinted that after the next cycle of elections, the process of recalling lawmakers who made themselves “tin gods” would be activated.
“Well, they say they don’t recall people from parliament, but this will be the first time.
“Anybody whom the people say they are tired of will be brought back home. Anybody who goes and forgets his people completely and doesn’t care, thinking that during elections he will come and pretend to be a good man, will be brought back.
“And we are making this very, very clear. We will not fail in what we have said. I am working tirelessly; I don’t sleep. If you are going into office during this period, there will be no sleep for you”, he said.
He advised politicians not to ignore their people who hold the power, insisting: “You cannot overlook them and become so arrogant and pompous that you don’t know your people.”
Gov. Otu also advised members of the ruling APC, who lost at the just-concluded party primaries in the state, not to defect to opposition parties like the Nigerian Democratic Congress (NDC) or the African Democratic Congress (ADC), warning that they would suffer untold hardship and would not make any political headway, if they did.
“There are some kwashiorkor parties that are registering people. Such parties are wasting their time and not even my time. They cannot do anything.
“I don’t want anybody to suffer the fate I suffered. That’s why I’m warning those aggrieved aspirants who lost not to go the way of those parties to avoid unnecessary suffering.
“I don’t want anybody to go that route. It’s an absolute waste of time, energy and people’s future, because at the end of the day, you will drag people into that bottomless pit.
“And when you drag them there and can’t take care of them, you begin to rot, you begin to die. May God give me the energy and power to sustain.”
He appealed to the aggrieved APC members, saying: “There’s nothing that we cannot settle. God’s time is the best. Whatever we’ve done is for the common good of all of us.”
2027: INEC APPEALS JUDGMENT ON ELECTION GUIDELINES
The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has appealed the judgment of the Federal High Court in Abuja which nullified aspects of the Commission’s 2027 General Election Guidelines.
The appeal, filed before the Court of Appeal, seeks to overturn the judgment delivered on May 20, 2026, by Justice Muhammed Umar of the Federal High Court, Abuja.
The trial court had nullified the provision in the guidelines directing political parties to submit their membership registers and databases by May 10, 2026, as part of the conditions for participation in the 2027 General Election.
The suit challenging the directive was instituted by the Youth Party, which argued that the Commission’s timeline was inconsistent with provisions of the Electoral Act 2026.
In his ruling, Justice Umar held that INEC could not lawfully shorten the timeline stipulated under Section 29(1) of the Electoral Act 2026 regarding the submission of party membership records and candidates’ particulars.
However, INEC, through its counsel, Chief Alex Izinyon, SAN, filed a notice of appeal dated May 25, 2026, asking the appellate court to set aside the judgment.
The Commission also filed a motion seeking an order staying the execution of the judgment pending the hearing and determination of the appeal.
INEC raised nine grounds of appeal, arguing among others that the trial court failed to determine the jurisdictional issue concerning whether the suit was hypothetical and academic in nature.
The Commission further contended that the respondent lacked the locus standi to institute the suit and urged the Court of Appeal to strike out the case accordingly.
INEC maintained that its actions were in line with its constitutional mandate to ensure the orderly conduct of elections and effective electoral administration ahead of the 2027 General Election.
WHY I ENDORSE TINUBU’S SECOND TERM BID — ADELEKE
Governor Ademola Adeleke of Osun State has explained that his decision to support President Bola Tinubu’s bid for a second term in 2027 was influenced by moral responsibility and the need to sustain developmental progress.
The governor said his endorsement was not based on political calculations alone but on what he considers appropriate in view of the relationship between Osun State and the President, as well as ongoing projects benefiting the region.
The position of the governor was disclosed in a statement issued on Monday by his spokesperson, Mr Olawale Rasheed.
According to the statement, Gov. Adeleke spoke on Sunday after conducting an inspection of the ongoing construction work on the Ibadan–Ile Ife–Ilesa Expressway.
During the visit, the governor reportedly commended President Tinubu for embarking on major infrastructure projects across Osun State and other parts of the South-West.
Gov. Adeleke noted that infrastructure development remains essential to economic growth and improved connectivity among communities.
He acknowledged the significance of road projects currently underway, stressing that such investments are expected to contribute to easier transportation, commercial activities, and broader development outcomes within the region.
The governor also highlighted the importance of leadership support in facilitating projects that have direct effects on residents.
He indicated that recognition should be given where efforts are being made to improve public infrastructure, particularly projects capable of enhancing movement between states and strengthening economic interactions in affected areas.
According to the statement, Gov. Adeleke’s remarks came while assessing the progress of the expressway project, which has continued to attract attention due to its strategic role in linking major cities within the South-West.
The governor reportedly used the opportunity to express appreciation for federal involvement in projects impacting Osun State.
His comments further reflected his view on political and regional ties, especially considering Osun State’s historical connection to President Tinubu.
Gov. Adeleke suggested that such considerations, alongside visible developmental initiatives, shaped his decision to openly support the President’s anticipated re-election effort in 2027.
He said, “I am the governor of the ancestral birthplace of Mr President. How can I have my own in the saddle and think twice before embracing him?”
IPAC specifically said that INEC guidelines cannot supersede constitutional provisions or extant electoral laws.
The Council, which stated these while appraising the judgement of the Federal High Court, stressed that the court judgement specifically addressed exclusionary conditions capable of disenfranchising aspirants and party members during primaries.
This is contained in a statement by the National Publicity Secretary of IPAC, Mr Martins Egbeola, stating that the judgment was a reaffirmation of constitutional supremacy, democratic principles and the rule of law within Nigeria’s electoral process.
IPAC said that even though INEC possesses powers to issue election guidelines, such powers must however, operate strictly within constitutional provisions and electoral laws.
It noted that the court judgment represented a major victory for democracy, political parties and citizens participating in Nigeria’s electoral process.
IPAC also said that the court judgement had restored the constitutional rights of political parties to manage their internal affairs democratically without unlawful interference through administrative directives.
“The judgment would ensure equal opportunities for eligible members to participate in party primaries without discriminatory or exclusionary conditions.
“The INEC Chairman should deepen engagement and consultation with political parties on issues concerning electoral administration and reforms.
“Greater dialogue and collaboration between INEC and political parties would help prevent avoidable disputes and litigation arising from controversial guidelines,” IPAC stated.
Prof. Yilwatda stated this while speaking on a live television interview programme.
According to him, the ruling APC was not focused on fighting opposition parties, claiming that the political battle was currently between the African Democratic Congress (ADC) and the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC).
He said, “In the last three weeks, the APC has not been fighting ADC or NDC. It is NDC versus ADC or ADC versus NDC.
“Actually, I watched with fun all the insults that the ADC is raining on the NDC and the NDC is returning those fireworks on the ADC.
“I watched the videos, and I laughed. The self-implosion is in the opposition rather than in the APC.”
When asked whether he was orchestrating the crisis in the opposition, Prof. Yilwatda denied the allegation but said weakening the opposition was part of politics.
He said, “No, I can’t. But I will be happy if I can do it. That’s my job.
“If you are opposing me, should I be happy? If you oppose me because you are in the opposition, what’s my job? Of course, to stop the opposition.”
The APC chairman also said the ruling party had stronger conflict resolution mechanisms than other political parties.
According to him, the party had committees at national and state levels to resolve internal disputes arising from congresses and other activities.
Speaking on the APC membership register and the votes secured by President Bola Tinubu during the party’s presidential primary, Prof. Yilwatda said the party relied on data from the National Identity Management Commission (NIMC) for its registration process.
“To register as a member of the APC, your name and primary data are sourced from NIMC. That’s the same primary data that is used across the country to open a bank account, get a driver’s licence and secure an international passport.
“So we’re the only political party that sources our primary data from NIMC. This is why people have seen the APC as one of the most politically viable and stable parties. We are a data-driven political party,” he stated.
RIVERS ADC PRIMARY: ASPIRANT REJECTS OUTCOME, ACCUSES AMAECHI OF IMPOSITION
The governorship primary of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) in Rivers State has been thrown into turmoil after aspirant Mr Allen Idaso Ezekiel-Hart rejected the outcome and accused former governor, Mr Rotimi Amaechi of imposing a candidate.
Mr Ezekiel-Hart described the exercise as a “shambolic charade” and said it had produced three separate governorship primary “winners” within the same party.
“Right now, we have three governorship candidates in one party, all thanks to Amaechi’s high-handedness,” he told journalists in Abuja on Monday.
He warned that the situation could plunge the opposition party into crisis ahead of the 2027 elections if the national leadership fails to intervene.
According to him, while the party’s timetable fixed May 23 for the primary, aspirants were informed late Friday that the exercise had been moved forward.
Mr Ezekiel-Hart said he was mobilising supporters across the 23 local government areas when fellow aspirant, Hon. Farah Dagogo, informed him that a parallel process had already been conducted.
He accused the state party chairman, Mr Chukwudi Dimkpa, of inviting only five aspirants loyal to Mr Amaechi while excluding himself and Hon. Dagogo. The arrangement, he alleged, was designed to clear the path for Dr Gabriel Pidomson, whom he described as Mr Amaechi’s preferred candidate.
He further alleged that three aspirants were persuaded to step down for Dr Pidomson in what he described as a disguised consensus arrangement, despite the party’s public stance against consensus.
Mr Ezekiel-Hart claimed Hon. Dagogo later approached him to jointly resist Mr Amaechi’s camp but asked him to publicly congratulate him as the winner.
“He told me to go on air and congratulate him, saying we are from Atiku Abubakar’s political family and should unite. I told him to stop rubbishing Atiku’s name. Atiku will not be part of this nonsense,” he said.
The aspirant said he rejected the offer and subsequently declared himself winner after Hon. Dagogo made a similar announcement.
“As it stands, Farah declared himself winner, Thompson was declared winner by the state exco, and I also declared myself winner. Three winners in one primary that never held. This cannot stand,” he said.
Mr Ezekiel-Hart accused the Rivers ADC leadership of sidelining him despite being the only aspirant who formally notified the party in writing of his intention to contest.
He also faulted Mr Amaechi for allegedly imposing candidates while demanding transparent presidential primary at the national level.
“How can someone who is demanding transparent presidential primaries at the national level turn around and impose a governorship candidate in Rivers?”, he queried.
He urged the ADC National Working Committee to nullify the exercise and either conduct a fresh primary or adopt a lawful consensus arrangement in line with the timetable of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).
“The most pragmatic thing now is for the NWC to order a rescheduled primary or quickly adopt a lawful consensus option. Time is running against us,” he said.
Mr Ezekiel-Hart said he would pursue all grievances within the party’s constitution and warned Hon. Dagogo against invoking Atiku’s name to bolster his claim.
“We will exhaust every legal channel within the party. I will not rock the boat unnecessarily, but the party must recognise that I won the primaries,” he said.
-
News2 days agoCourt Sentences Seven To Death Over Murder Of Cleric In Rivers
-
Politics1 day agoAPC PRIMARIES: FUBARA’S WITHDRAWAL, HISTORIC SACRIFICE FOR NATIONAL STABILITY ……. GROUP
-
Sports1 day agoPH Arsenal Community Set For Streets Procession, Saturday
-
Politics1 day agoIPAC Flays INEC Over Election Guidelines Judgement
-
Politics1 day agoNDC To Adopt Electronic Voting For Future Primaries
-
Sports1 day agoStakeholders Laud GTI On NPFL Partnership
-
Sports1 day agoNPFL: Rivers United Finishes Second, Secures Continental Ticket
-
News2 days agoGroup Hails Tinubu, Chinda Emergence