Connect with us

Opinion

Emergency Rule Extension; How Desirable?

Published

on

Last week, President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan
sent a proposal to the National Assembly seeking the extension of the state of emergency in the North Eastern States of Borno, Yobe and Adamawa even as Senators from these states have vowed to ensure that the proposal does not sail through.
What do the public think about the contentious issue? Our chief correspondent, Calista Ezeaku and photographer went round the town to seek answers to the question.

Comrade Larry Owhonda – Chairman National Union of Printing Publishing Rivers State.
Well, the proposal by the president to extend the state of emergency in the three North Eastern States of Borno, Yobe and Adamawa is good because the insurgency in these states is still not settled. If not for the emergency rule probably the number of casualties would have been more than what we are currently experiencing. On the issue of National Assembly members from the North East kicking against the extension and claiming that the emergency rule has not been effective, I think they are not being sincere. They can not say the emergency rule has not benefited them. If they say it has not benefitted them, they should go home and see whether they can stay. They can’t stay in Abuja and say it has not benefitted them while their people are suffering at home. They should even be grateful to the president because he cares for the people or else they cannot stay in Abuja and be talking about voting against the president and yet they say they are representing the people. They are not representing the people if that is the case. Because as legislators, they are even the ones who should give support to the president, making sure that this insurgency comes to an end by supporting the emergency rule.
I will even advocate that there should be total emergency, the governors should all go so that the military can take full control of that area, because even among the politicians there are informants to Boko Haram. So if there is total emergency rule, the military can now be on top of the security situation in that area.

Mr. Paul Daga – Journalist. I think that proposal is very appropriate. I say so because the rate of insurgency in the north is becoming alarming.  Just recently, over 200 Chibok School Girls were abducted and there is rampant cases of criminality. Every now and then, you hear people being killed. What that means, is that if the emergency rule was not in place, there would have been nobody in that region. Everybody would have ran away from there.
Yes, the emergency has been effective despite the abduction of the Chibok girls. But you don’t expect the military to be every where. Even we, over selves, have to be security conscious.
Even if we know that some security officials are around, we still have to employ some measure of security for ourselves. Those girls were taken in the night and you don’t know the terrain, you don’t know the nature of the area.
I disagree with the legislators from the north east saying the emergency rule has not yielded any positive result. During the last presidential media chat, the president rightly said that if we think the emergency rule is not working let’s ask all the security personnel to withdraw and you will see what happens there. So, it is working and the extension is necessary. It should be extended by six months after which we review the situation and if there is need for more extension, the president should go ahead and extend it. That place must be sanitised, I would have wished that the emergency rules should be total, every political structure should be disbanded, the army should take over the whole place so, that they can be very effective.

Mr. Abel Ohiomoje- Banker. Personally, I don’t think it is the extension of the state of emergency  that will solve the issue of insurgency in Nigeria. We really need to look at the root causes of this problem. I think it is politically motivated more than what they are portraying in the media. All these issues came into play when somebody from the minority ethnic group took over the mantle of leadership of the country. If Boko Haram is really a terrorist organization, how come we were not hearing much about them, they weren’t this active. I know they’ve been on ground for some years now but it wasn’t up to this scale. The issues of suicide bombing and so on just started when somebody from the minority took over power. The truth is that our mentality as Nigerians have to change especially the mentality of having three major tribes. I have never been a fan of it. I don’t see a country where you say that it is just three tribes out of so many that are meant to rule. That has been our problem from the genesis.
Secondly, our political offices are just too attractive financially. If our political offices are not that financially attractive, if it such that if you are going there, you know that you are going there for the service of humanity not to make millions, I don’t see how politicians will make it a do or die thing, such that they will go to the extent of arming youths to get their selfish interests carried out.
So far with the state of emergency in place, insecurity problem has not be  tackled. It is even growing by the day. So I don’t think extending it will be called for rather should be called off but the people from these communities must be involved in securing their localities. If they are involved I don’t see how Boko Haram members will be succeeding. This people are not spirits. They stay somewhere, they have neighbours. You can’t just tell me they disappear into tin air. From all the scenario being played out especially in the case of the Chibok girls kidnapping it is obvious that our security has been compromised. It has gone beyond what we are actually seeing on TV.

Comrade Kelvin Acha – Student. For me, I like the idea of extending the emergency rule because really the terrorists have been disturbing and if the state of emergency is not extended they will begin to disturb the nation the more I believe the state of emergency reduces the activities of Boko Haram a bit compare to when they are free. But if you ask me, I would have suggested that the extension should be for only four moths instead of six months that the president proposed.

Mr. Hope Solomon – Civil Servant. It is a good proposal. It’s a good thing to extend the emergence rule so that the place can be sanitised. As far as I am concerned, the emergency rule has been effective if it has not been effective Boko Haram would have taken over the North East. The way they came, they would have taken over the place. Northern Senators said they would vote against the emergency rule proposal. Tell me, is this country their own? But the president has the power to veto it even if they vote against it. For the lives of the people there, let the emergency rule continue. I will even prefer a total state of emergency. Let the military take absolute control. The senators are in Abuja and do not suffer what the people in their villages are passing through. They should go to their villages, let the terrorists come and lets see what will happen. Let’s see if they can defend themselves.

Daerefama Anabraba – Legal Practitioner.  For me, what we should ask ourselves is, prior before now the emergency rule has been on, what effect has it created and why should we extend it? That is what we should think about. And I think if the thing is not working out we should find any other means of solving the problems of the northerners and not by always extending the emergency rule.
Let us see the state of emergency from the perspective of the senators from the affected states. Although Goodluck Jonathan is our brother but let us see it from those legislators perspective. How far, how well has it gone? So I think for now let the president look for a better panacea than always extending the emergence.
I think the involvement of foreign nationals in the fight against Boko Haram is a good development. So I think government should go for that one instead of extending the emergency rule. There shouldn’t be any extension for now.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Trans-Kalabari  Road:  Work In Progress 

Published

on

Quote:”This Dream project  is one of  the best things that have happened  to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas in recent times.”
This is the concluding part of this story featured in our last edition.
Good road network helps farmers to convey their agro-allied products to  commercial hubs where buyers and sellers meet periodically to transact business. Road network engineers and motivates people resident in unfriendly geographical terrains, like riverine areas,  to own property and shuttle home with ease. Some people will prefer living in their own houses in a more serene and nature-blessed communities to living in the city that is fraught with  pollution, and other environmental, social and economic hazards. Prior to the cult epidemic that ravaged parts of Rivers State, the Emohuas, Elemes, Ogonis, and Etches were known for rural dwelling. Most public servants from these areas do their official and private transactions from  their villages. For them it was comparatively easier to live in the village and engage in a diversified economic endeavours through farming, fishing or other lucrative business without outrageous charges and embarrassment associated with doing business in Port Harcourt, where land is as scarce as the traditional needle.
That is why the decision to construct the Trans-Kalabari Road by the administration of Dr. Peter Odili was one of the best decisions that administration took. When Dr. Odili vacated office as the Rivers State Governor, Rt. Hon. Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi took over and awarded contracts for continuation of the road project which in my considered view is the felt need of  the people of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. Unfortunately, Rt. Hon. Amaechi’s efforts to drive the project was sabotaged by some contractors some of whom are Kalabari people. The main  Trans-Kalabari Road is one project that is dear to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas of Rivers State. This is because through the road commuters can easily access several communities in the three local government areas. For instance, the road when completed will enable access to eight of the ten communities in Degema Local Government Area,  namely: Bukuma, Tombia,  Bakana, Oguruama, Obuama, Usokun, Degema town  and the Degema Consulate. It will also link 15 of the 16 communities in Asari Toru Local Government Area. The communities are: Buguma, the local government headquarters, Ido, Abalama, Tema, Sama, Okpo, Ilelema, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama, Krakrama, Omekwe-Ama, Angulama. The road will also connect  14  of 17 wards in Akuku Toru Local Government Area, and other settlements. It is interesting to note that It is faster,  and far more convenient and economical for the catchment Communities on the Trans-Kalabari Road network to go to the State Capital than the East West Road.  The people of the three local government areas will prefer  to work or do their transactions in Port Harcourt from their respective communities to staying in Port Harcourt where the house rent and the general cost of living is astronomically high.
 Consequently, development will seamlessly spread to the 28 out of 34 communities of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. The only Communities that are not linked by the road project are Oporoama in Asari Toru,  the Ke and  Bille Communities in Degema Local Government Area and the “Oceania” communities of Abissa, Kula, Soku, Idama, Elem Sangama of Akuku Toru Local Government Area. But because of the economic value of the unlinked Communities to Nigeria, (they produce substantial oil and gas in the area), the Federal, State Governments and the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC), can extend the road network to those areas just as Bonny is linked to Port Harcourt and the Lagos Mainland Bridge is connecting several towns in Lagos and neighbouring States.Kudos to previous administrations who  had constructed the Central Group axis.
 However, what is said to be the First Phase of the Trans-Kalabari Road project is actually a linkage of the “Central Group” Communities which consists of Krakrama, Angulama, Omekwe. Ama, Omekwe Tari Ama, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama. It is the peripheral of the Trans-Kalabari Road. The completion of the  Main Trans Kalabari project will free Port Harcourt and Obio/Akpor areas from congestion. It will motivate residents and people of the three local areas to contribute to the development of their Communities. If the Ogonis, Etches, Emohuas, Oyigbos, Okrikas, Elemes can feel comfortable doing business in Port Harcourt from home, residents and people whose communities are linked to Port Harcourt through the Trans-Kalabari Road will no doubt, do likewise. The vast arable virgin land of the Bukuma people can be open for development and sustainable agricultural ventures by Local, State and Federal Government.
It is necessary to recall that the Bukuma community was host to the Federal Government’s Graduate Farmers’ Scheme and the Rivers State Government moribund School-to-Land Scheme under Governor Fidelis Oyakhilome. Bukuma was the only community in Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas that has the capacity to carry those agricultural programmes. However the lack of road to transport farm produce to Port Harcourt and facilitate the movement of the beneficiaries of the scheme who lived in the community which is several miles away from the farms, hampered the sustainability of the programme. The main Trans-Kalabari Road remains the best gift to the people of Degema, Asari Toru, and Akuku-Toru Local Government Areas. Kudos to Sir Siminilayi Fubara.
By: Igbiki Benibo
Continue Reading

Opinion

That  U.S. Capture of Maduro

Published

on

Quote:”Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction.”
The first part of this story was published in our last edition.
 
In Africa and the Middle East, regime change—whether by invasion, proxy warfare, or sanctions—has often left behind fractured states, weakened institutions, and prolonged instability. Washington’s motivations in Venezuela are widely understood: vast oil reserves, alliances with U.S. rivals, and symbolic defiance of American influence in the Western Hemisphere. But none of these reasons confer legal or moral legitimacy. Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction. If every powerful nation acted on its grievances in this manner, global chaos would inevitably follow. International law provides mechanisms for accountability. Under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), individuals accused of crimes against humanity or other grave offences are subject to investigation and prosecution through judicial processes.
Likewise, extradition treaties, mutual legal assistance agreements, and Interpol mechanisms exist to ensure accountability while respecting due process. These frameworks were designed precisely to prevent unilateral enforcement of “justice” by military force. The most profound consequence of America’s action may not be in Caracas, but in the precedent it sets. If the world accepts that a superpower can unilaterally depose another country’s president, then the foundation of the international system is weakened. Sovereignty becomes conditional—no longer a right, but a privilege tolerated at the discretion of the powerful. Going forward, if another country invades its neighbour, will the United States retain the moral authority to impose sanctions or demand restraint? Some analysts already warn that parallels between Russia’s actions in Ukraine and America’s conduct in Venezuela risk further eroding global norms. Selective adherence to international law breeds cynicism and accelerates the drift toward a world governed by force rather than rules.
Power—military, economic, or political—should serve human progress and collective well-being, not domination and destruction. For African nations, many of which emerged from colonial rule through bitter struggle, this precedent is especially alarming. Sovereignty is not an abstract legal concept; it is a hard-won shield against external domination. Any erosion of that principle anywhere weakens it everywhere. Africa’s painful history of foreign interference makes this lesson especially urgent.  For me, the real issue is not whether Nicolás Maduro is a good or bad leader. That judgment belongs, first and foremost, to the Venezuelan people. The larger issue is whether the international system still operates on law—or has quietly reverted to hierarchy. If America insists it is defending global order, it must ask itself a difficult question: can an order survive when its most powerful guardian feels entitled to violate it? Until that question is answered honestly, the capture of a foreign president will remain not a triumph of justice, but a troubling symbol of a world drifting from law toward force.
If the United States felt so strongly about the allegations of terrorism, drug trafficking  against Maduro, were there no other lawful options? Judicial accountability, diplomacy, regional mediation, and multilateral pressure may be slow and imperfect, but they reflect respect for international law and sovereign equality. Military seizure is a blunt instrument. It humiliates institutions, radicalizes populations, and hardens resistance. It may remove a leader, but it rarely resolves the underlying crisis. History teaches that military interventions seldom result in stable democratic outcomes. More often, they breed resentment, resistance, and long-term instability. For the sake of global order and the rule of law, the United States should reconsider this path and recommit to diplomacy, legal cooperation, and respect for the sovereign equality of states. Former U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris reportedly described the invasion of Venezuela as “unlawful and unwise,” warning that such actions “do not make America safer, stronger, or more affordable.” Her words reflect a growing recognition, even within the United States, that force without legitimacy undermines both moral authority and global stability.
Should what happened in Venezuela serve as a wake-up call for corrupt African leaders who undermine the people’s right to choose their leaders? The answer is yes. The capture of Maduro should alarm African leaders who manipulate elections, weaken institutions, suppress opposition, undermine citizens’ rights, or cling to power at all costs. Venezuela faced widespread criticism over disputed elections and repression long before this episode, and that context shaped how the world reacted. This does not justify foreign military intervention, but it highlights an uncomfortable truth: prolonged democratic decay isolates nations and invites external pressure—from sanctions to diplomatic censure. Global opinion matters, and legitimacy at home strengthens sovereignty abroad. The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and several African leaders have rightly condemned the events in Venezuela, invoking the principles of sovereignty and non-interference enshrined in international and regional law.
Beyond condemnation, however, African leaders must look inward. The continent’s future cannot be built on repression, constitutional manipulation, and personal greed. Leadership must reflect the will of the people, not desperation for power. Two days ago, a social commentator on a radio station argued that Trump’s action—though condemnable—demonstrates how far a leader can go for his country’s interest. According to this view, he did not intervene in Venezuela for personal enrichment, but to strengthen his nation. In stark contrast, many African leaders plunder their own countries. They siphon public resources, impose crushing taxes and harmful policies, and leave their citizens poorer—all for selfish gain. That contradiction is the deeper lesson Africa must confront.True sovereignty is protected not only by international law, but by accountable leadership at home.
 By:  Calista Ezeaku
Continue Reading

Opinion

Kudos  Gov Fubara

Published

on

Please permit me to use this medium to appreciate our able governor, Siminalayi Fubara for the inauguration of the 14.2-kilometre Obodhi–Ozochi Road in Ahoada-East Local Government Area.  This inauguration marks a significant milestone in the history of our communities and deserves commendation. We, the people of Ozochi, are particularly happy because this project has brought long-awaited relief after years of isolation and hardship.
The expression of our traditional ruler, His Royal Highness, Eze Prince Ike Ehie, JP, during the inauguration captured the joy of our people.  He said, “our isolation is over.”  That reflects the profound impact of this road on daily life, economic activities, and social integration of the people of Ozochi and other neighbouring communities. The road will no doubt ease transportation, improve access to markets and healthcare, and strengthen links between Ahoada, Omoku, and other parts of Rivers State.
The people of Ahoada, Omoku, and indeed Rivers State as a whole are grateful to our dear governor for this laudable achievement and wish him many more successful years in office. We pray that God endows him with more wisdom and strength to continue to pilot the affairs of the state for the benefit of all. As citizens, we should rally behind the governor and support his development agenda. Our politicians and stakeholders should embrace peace and cooperation, as no meaningful progress can be achieved in an atmosphere of conflict. Sustainable development in the state can only thrive where peace prevails.
Samuel Ebiye
Continue Reading

Trending