Opinion
Checking Maternal And Child Mortality
Procreation remains a key characteristic of living
things including mankind. In fact, the Holy Bible in Genesis chapter nine verse seven commands mankind to be fruitful and multiply and replenish the earth among others.
Unfortunately, reproductive process particularly in man is not without health challenges. This is where maternal and child mortality as well as morbidity comes to mind.
It is pertinent to explain that maternal mortality has to do with pregnancy-related deaths in women of reproductive age. lt encompasses the death of women while pregnant and also death within forty-two days of termination of pregnancy.
Experts agree that maternal mortality could occur as a result of direct complications of pregnancy, delivery or management of both. On the other hand, maternal mortality could occur as a result of pre-existing health challenge unrelated to pregnancy.
This could be due to the presence of disease in mothers such as the case of malaria, tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS not detected early enough in pregnant women.
The concept of maternal and child morbidity is applicable to the presence of infections otherwise referred to as sepsis in pregnant women and new born children.
According to World Health Organization in its 2005 World Health Reports titled: “Make Every Mother and Child Count”, the major causes of maternal death include severe hemorrhage which accounts for twenty-five per cent infection, thirteen per cent; unsafe abortion, thirteen per cent also, eclampsia or convulsion related complication twelve per cent, obstructed labour, eight per cent.
This is not to undermine the challenges of lack of early antenatal care, teenage pregnancies, poor referral system, patronage of unskilled traditional birth attendants as well as lack of access to health care services and ruptured uterus.
Infant deaths occur largely in children within five years while more than half of total deaths in children truly take place in children under one year.
Doctor Roland Obed-Whyte of the Rivers State Primary Healthcare Management Board disclosed in an interview that over ninety-five per cent of the total death of children occur in developing countries including Nigeria.
It is also on record that pneumonia, diahorrhoa, toxaenia, malnutrition, malaria, preterm birth complications and birth asphycia account for child mortality.
Interestingly, maternal and child health have received global attention in the past decades.
For instance, maternal and child health form the crux of the United Nations MDG’s four and five.
Millenium Development Goals four (4) specifically emphasises reduction of child death while goal five (5) places emphasis on maternal health.
Today, maternal mortality ratio which deals with risks associated with pregnancy is largely described as obstetric risk and in some climes MDG indicator.
The joy of live birth otherwise regarded as successful expulsion or extraction from a mother of a product of conception irrespective of duration of pregnancy remains a thing of joy and one that evokes celebration by family members worldwide.
Available records by relevant international organizations show that all regions of the world have recorded significant progress in checking maternal and child mortality even though increased interventions are of utmost necessity.
In Nigeria, for instance, the Federal, State, and Local Governments are collaborating and working assiduouslv not only to reduce poverty but to make maternal and child mortality a thing of the past.
It is gratifying that the Federal and State Governments synergize efforts to providing routine immunization exercises nationwide to reduce child deaths in the country.
In Rivers State, government provides free medicare which accommodates pregnant women including free surgery for registered women under the scheme.
Besides, the avalanche of primary health centres across the State has provided access to healthcare delivery and in turn bridge rural- urban gap which hitherto existed.
No doubt, the setting-up of Rivers State Primary Health Care Board remains a proactive strategy to truly bring health care to the masses and to coordinate efforts of government and intervention agencies.
To this end, to check maternal and child mortality in Nigeria, all hands must be on deck.
Women particularly those who are pregnant and those of reproductive age must take advantage of various healtty care initiative of government at federal, state and local government levels to meet their health care needs.
There cannot be an overdose of awareness campaign to this effect.
Rivers State Government must make its free health care service truly free and efficient and must not wait for medical doctors and other health care workers to embark on industrial action to provide relevant funds.
Government must also provide relevant vaccines including tetanus toxoid which is reportedly lacking in some states including Rivers State.
Pregnant women should embrace orthodox medication by registering for antenatal care and reduce dependence on harmful traditional practices that may lead to death of mother and child as well as infection.
Mothers and guardians must present their children and wards for free routine immunization programmes available in the nation and save them from childhood killer diseases such as polio, tuberculosis etc.
Attention must be drawn to training and retraining of doctors and other health care workers to nib in the bud fatalities associated with incompence on their part while out-of-stock syndrome in public hospitals must be fought with a sense of responsibility.
Similarly, government must not politicise the procurement of hospital equipment to check irregular laboratory results in public hospitals.
Above all, the biblical injunction of “Go ye into the world and multiply” may be threatened if conscious efforts are not made to overcome maternal and child morbidity and mortality.
A stich in time saves nine.
Sika is of Radio Rivers, Port Harcourt.
Baridorn Sika
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Opinion4 days ago
Ancestorial Worship: My Take (1)
-
Education22 hours agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta22 hours ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Rivers21 hours ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education22 hours agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News23 hours agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News23 hours ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
News4 days agoFG Must Address Nigerians’ Concerns On Reforms -Shettima …Warns Against Misuse of AI, Social Media
