Connect with us

Opinion

Environmental Impact Of Noise

Published

on

Noise is any sound which irritates the mind. It incapaci
tates listening, understanding and productivity. Planners of universities take noise into consideration before siting any university. This is why most universities are sited at the outskirts of cities, far away from industries. People are not conscious of the possible dangers of noise. Whereas, people living in Europe and America, not merely conscious of the dangers of noise but react against those who generate noise with musical instruments, plants and speech. They sue them to court and make them pay for damage done.
Noise hinders listening. Although, a good listener does everything possible to overcome distractions, push out unnecessary sounds from the mind to aid concentration and listening. Noise that is at the highest pitch can frustrate listening. It can affect the ears and cause ear sickness. Every ear doctor advises people against tuning radio or television to its highest pitch to save the eardrums from being damaged. It is much more deplorable if an individual tunes any of the sound devices to the highest pitch and never uses an earphone to listen to music.
The destructive capacity of noise is perhaps not glaring to most persons. Students are most likely to fail examinations if Pavlov conditioning is adopted to prove the capacity of noise for a period of one semester. Scholars will reap the same result if they are kept in a noisy environment for a long period of time; results will be altered, or delayed, while some will suffer academic abortions.
The body requires rest after much work. All humans sleep naturally after working for several hours. But if the environment is noisy, sleep will be disturbed and a person is forced to wake from sleep like fish forced out of water with dynamite. The initial impact may be small but if the same problem re- occurs several times, the body will slack and break down eventually.
Institutions that are involved in research will never take it kindly with those who make noise deliberately to hinder research. They will sue the agents of noise to court for losing millions or billions of naira. Noise has its economic disadvantages to individuals, groups, institutions, states and nations. This consciousness will never allow workers to compromise noise making or love noise makers who will make them risk their jobs.
Is the noise ofa plant pleasant? The answer is Yes and No Such sound which is accommodated for purposes of electrification, ironing, watching television, listening to radio, using computer, reading makes man more comfortable. But if there are several plants of different ages which produce different sounds, the environment will be very noisy and uncomfortable for active minds who want to engage them.
How can this problem be solved?
America, Europe and the advanced nations ofthe world give the job to companies or governments to produce electricity. This reduces the many plants that disturb communication, learning and other activities. The authorities site them in places that are conducive. One can drive through sections of a city without knowing where the plant is located. Indeed, it is possible to go through the whole city without coming close to a noisy plant which distracts the neighbourhood.
African countries should be armed with this consciousness in planning for their environment. Electrification is not a luxury, nor an impossible task to accomplish.
A noisy atmosphere generates an inauspicious surrounding. Why do people commit crimes easily in ghettoes? The noise, rowdy and cloudy atmosphere makes criminals to elude vigilance easily. The atmosphere permits the possibility of lawlessness: dancing and blocking streets in Lagos, Port Harcourt and other places. Street fighting is not impossible in such all atmosphere.
One wonders why enlightened persons can not use civic centres and other places provided for partying and other acti vities.
Churches and mosques are not supposed to be built in residential areas. When the congregations sing and pray on the pitch oftheir voices, they disturb their neighbourhood. Residents may complain of the inactivity microphones and human voices cause them. If they do not, it is simply because government has not made a firm law against noise or, they are not aware of it, or they accommodate it without asking for peace legally. If they are sited in residential areas, the alternative is to reduce noise to the barest minimum. The sounds produced in the religious groups should be for the hearing of members alone. Members should adopt silent but effective means of evangelism. Noise does not do that job.
Some Nigerian drivers think that horning often is a sign of good driving. They horn several times without rationality. Some use the tap style to horn in a chain. Others press their horns ceaselessly for minutes. The rational act should be to horn when pedestrians are seen crossing the road at a close range. Some are ignorant of this and feel that they could use their horns as drums beaten stylishly for aesthetic caution and enlightenment.
Markets are places where one expects a certain degree of noise in Nigeria, as well as other countries that adopt haggling as the pattern of selling and buying. Individuals talk, react and bargain over goods and prices. They laugh, argue, disagree or agree. Individuals meet coincidentally after weeks, months and years.
They exchange pleasantries – scream, hug, laugh and ask after members of their families. People within the environment expect no less.
There are other disturbing situations usually caused by people selling and buying on railways and other unauthorised areas in Rivers State and other states in Nigeria. They obstruct traffic, impose themselves on neighbourhoods, break the law and generate noise in such areas. Visitors are given the wrong impression that people are lawless. The truth is far fetched ; government has driven them from such places several times. They are the stubborn ‘ogbanjes’, ‘abikus’ and ‘patas’ coming back at short notices. The traders are clamorous; they shout at passers-by, calling them to come and buy, while they arc struggling to pass through the routes that have been blocked to their various destinations
What kind of consciousness does such an atmosphere evoke? None than a clamorous one painted with poverty, pursuit of money wrongly and taking economic and physical risks. The sellers are ready to go straight to the lowest prices. Everyone is in a hurry. Thieves walk sluggishly, tryings to steal from buyers. The passers-by and buyers who know their traits hold their purses and wallets firmly.
The traders who dress neatly and walk into offices to sell in Nigeria during office hours are those who provoke individuals, who believe in orderliness to think ofthe degeneration of decency and order. Why should such persons walk into institutions like universities, federal and state ministries to hawk? If the authorities discourage or prevent them, order will be re-established. Those areas are meant for brains to work-and get results of development for states and the nation. The sellers distract the workers and
make noise. They are like fish out of water, they are not meant to be seen in such places.
People shout, laugh, run, dance, sing and drum during festivals in reserved areas. The sound made is not offensive. It is a pleasant means of expelling unwanted emotions from the minds of people. Minds are prepared for them, settings accommodate them, participants and audience rejoice in production and performance.
In conclusion, individuals, groups and institutions may be aware of the effects of noise but have done very little to eliminate them from unwanted places. People should be conscious of the disadvantages and effects of noise on minds at work. We gain
more to eliminate noise from areas that have been planned for serious research works and residence.
Ngaage is of the Dept of English, Niger Delta University.

 

Sarine Saana Ngaage

Continue Reading

Opinion

Trans-Kalabari  Road:  Work In Progress 

Published

on

Quote:”This Dream project  is one of  the best things that have happened  to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas in recent times.”
This is the concluding part of this story featured in our last edition.
Good road network helps farmers to convey their agro-allied products to  commercial hubs where buyers and sellers meet periodically to transact business. Road network engineers and motivates people resident in unfriendly geographical terrains, like riverine areas,  to own property and shuttle home with ease. Some people will prefer living in their own houses in a more serene and nature-blessed communities to living in the city that is fraught with  pollution, and other environmental, social and economic hazards. Prior to the cult epidemic that ravaged parts of Rivers State, the Emohuas, Elemes, Ogonis, and Etches were known for rural dwelling. Most public servants from these areas do their official and private transactions from  their villages. For them it was comparatively easier to live in the village and engage in a diversified economic endeavours through farming, fishing or other lucrative business without outrageous charges and embarrassment associated with doing business in Port Harcourt, where land is as scarce as the traditional needle.
That is why the decision to construct the Trans-Kalabari Road by the administration of Dr. Peter Odili was one of the best decisions that administration took. When Dr. Odili vacated office as the Rivers State Governor, Rt. Hon. Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi took over and awarded contracts for continuation of the road project which in my considered view is the felt need of  the people of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. Unfortunately, Rt. Hon. Amaechi’s efforts to drive the project was sabotaged by some contractors some of whom are Kalabari people. The main  Trans-Kalabari Road is one project that is dear to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas of Rivers State. This is because through the road commuters can easily access several communities in the three local government areas. For instance, the road when completed will enable access to eight of the ten communities in Degema Local Government Area,  namely: Bukuma, Tombia,  Bakana, Oguruama, Obuama, Usokun, Degema town  and the Degema Consulate. It will also link 15 of the 16 communities in Asari Toru Local Government Area. The communities are: Buguma, the local government headquarters, Ido, Abalama, Tema, Sama, Okpo, Ilelema, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama, Krakrama, Omekwe-Ama, Angulama. The road will also connect  14  of 17 wards in Akuku Toru Local Government Area, and other settlements. It is interesting to note that It is faster,  and far more convenient and economical for the catchment Communities on the Trans-Kalabari Road network to go to the State Capital than the East West Road.  The people of the three local government areas will prefer  to work or do their transactions in Port Harcourt from their respective communities to staying in Port Harcourt where the house rent and the general cost of living is astronomically high.
 Consequently, development will seamlessly spread to the 28 out of 34 communities of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. The only Communities that are not linked by the road project are Oporoama in Asari Toru,  the Ke and  Bille Communities in Degema Local Government Area and the “Oceania” communities of Abissa, Kula, Soku, Idama, Elem Sangama of Akuku Toru Local Government Area. But because of the economic value of the unlinked Communities to Nigeria, (they produce substantial oil and gas in the area), the Federal, State Governments and the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC), can extend the road network to those areas just as Bonny is linked to Port Harcourt and the Lagos Mainland Bridge is connecting several towns in Lagos and neighbouring States.Kudos to previous administrations who  had constructed the Central Group axis.
 However, what is said to be the First Phase of the Trans-Kalabari Road project is actually a linkage of the “Central Group” Communities which consists of Krakrama, Angulama, Omekwe. Ama, Omekwe Tari Ama, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama. It is the peripheral of the Trans-Kalabari Road. The completion of the  Main Trans Kalabari project will free Port Harcourt and Obio/Akpor areas from congestion. It will motivate residents and people of the three local areas to contribute to the development of their Communities. If the Ogonis, Etches, Emohuas, Oyigbos, Okrikas, Elemes can feel comfortable doing business in Port Harcourt from home, residents and people whose communities are linked to Port Harcourt through the Trans-Kalabari Road will no doubt, do likewise. The vast arable virgin land of the Bukuma people can be open for development and sustainable agricultural ventures by Local, State and Federal Government.
It is necessary to recall that the Bukuma community was host to the Federal Government’s Graduate Farmers’ Scheme and the Rivers State Government moribund School-to-Land Scheme under Governor Fidelis Oyakhilome. Bukuma was the only community in Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas that has the capacity to carry those agricultural programmes. However the lack of road to transport farm produce to Port Harcourt and facilitate the movement of the beneficiaries of the scheme who lived in the community which is several miles away from the farms, hampered the sustainability of the programme. The main Trans-Kalabari Road remains the best gift to the people of Degema, Asari Toru, and Akuku-Toru Local Government Areas. Kudos to Sir Siminilayi Fubara.
By: Igbiki Benibo
Continue Reading

Opinion

That  U.S. Capture of Maduro

Published

on

Quote:”Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction.”
The first part of this story was published in our last edition.
 
In Africa and the Middle East, regime change—whether by invasion, proxy warfare, or sanctions—has often left behind fractured states, weakened institutions, and prolonged instability. Washington’s motivations in Venezuela are widely understood: vast oil reserves, alliances with U.S. rivals, and symbolic defiance of American influence in the Western Hemisphere. But none of these reasons confer legal or moral legitimacy. Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction. If every powerful nation acted on its grievances in this manner, global chaos would inevitably follow. International law provides mechanisms for accountability. Under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), individuals accused of crimes against humanity or other grave offences are subject to investigation and prosecution through judicial processes.
Likewise, extradition treaties, mutual legal assistance agreements, and Interpol mechanisms exist to ensure accountability while respecting due process. These frameworks were designed precisely to prevent unilateral enforcement of “justice” by military force. The most profound consequence of America’s action may not be in Caracas, but in the precedent it sets. If the world accepts that a superpower can unilaterally depose another country’s president, then the foundation of the international system is weakened. Sovereignty becomes conditional—no longer a right, but a privilege tolerated at the discretion of the powerful. Going forward, if another country invades its neighbour, will the United States retain the moral authority to impose sanctions or demand restraint? Some analysts already warn that parallels between Russia’s actions in Ukraine and America’s conduct in Venezuela risk further eroding global norms. Selective adherence to international law breeds cynicism and accelerates the drift toward a world governed by force rather than rules.
Power—military, economic, or political—should serve human progress and collective well-being, not domination and destruction. For African nations, many of which emerged from colonial rule through bitter struggle, this precedent is especially alarming. Sovereignty is not an abstract legal concept; it is a hard-won shield against external domination. Any erosion of that principle anywhere weakens it everywhere. Africa’s painful history of foreign interference makes this lesson especially urgent.  For me, the real issue is not whether Nicolás Maduro is a good or bad leader. That judgment belongs, first and foremost, to the Venezuelan people. The larger issue is whether the international system still operates on law—or has quietly reverted to hierarchy. If America insists it is defending global order, it must ask itself a difficult question: can an order survive when its most powerful guardian feels entitled to violate it? Until that question is answered honestly, the capture of a foreign president will remain not a triumph of justice, but a troubling symbol of a world drifting from law toward force.
If the United States felt so strongly about the allegations of terrorism, drug trafficking  against Maduro, were there no other lawful options? Judicial accountability, diplomacy, regional mediation, and multilateral pressure may be slow and imperfect, but they reflect respect for international law and sovereign equality. Military seizure is a blunt instrument. It humiliates institutions, radicalizes populations, and hardens resistance. It may remove a leader, but it rarely resolves the underlying crisis. History teaches that military interventions seldom result in stable democratic outcomes. More often, they breed resentment, resistance, and long-term instability. For the sake of global order and the rule of law, the United States should reconsider this path and recommit to diplomacy, legal cooperation, and respect for the sovereign equality of states. Former U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris reportedly described the invasion of Venezuela as “unlawful and unwise,” warning that such actions “do not make America safer, stronger, or more affordable.” Her words reflect a growing recognition, even within the United States, that force without legitimacy undermines both moral authority and global stability.
Should what happened in Venezuela serve as a wake-up call for corrupt African leaders who undermine the people’s right to choose their leaders? The answer is yes. The capture of Maduro should alarm African leaders who manipulate elections, weaken institutions, suppress opposition, undermine citizens’ rights, or cling to power at all costs. Venezuela faced widespread criticism over disputed elections and repression long before this episode, and that context shaped how the world reacted. This does not justify foreign military intervention, but it highlights an uncomfortable truth: prolonged democratic decay isolates nations and invites external pressure—from sanctions to diplomatic censure. Global opinion matters, and legitimacy at home strengthens sovereignty abroad. The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and several African leaders have rightly condemned the events in Venezuela, invoking the principles of sovereignty and non-interference enshrined in international and regional law.
Beyond condemnation, however, African leaders must look inward. The continent’s future cannot be built on repression, constitutional manipulation, and personal greed. Leadership must reflect the will of the people, not desperation for power. Two days ago, a social commentator on a radio station argued that Trump’s action—though condemnable—demonstrates how far a leader can go for his country’s interest. According to this view, he did not intervene in Venezuela for personal enrichment, but to strengthen his nation. In stark contrast, many African leaders plunder their own countries. They siphon public resources, impose crushing taxes and harmful policies, and leave their citizens poorer—all for selfish gain. That contradiction is the deeper lesson Africa must confront.True sovereignty is protected not only by international law, but by accountable leadership at home.
 By:  Calista Ezeaku
Continue Reading

Opinion

Kudos  Gov Fubara

Published

on

Please permit me to use this medium to appreciate our able governor, Siminalayi Fubara for the inauguration of the 14.2-kilometre Obodhi–Ozochi Road in Ahoada-East Local Government Area.  This inauguration marks a significant milestone in the history of our communities and deserves commendation. We, the people of Ozochi, are particularly happy because this project has brought long-awaited relief after years of isolation and hardship.
The expression of our traditional ruler, His Royal Highness, Eze Prince Ike Ehie, JP, during the inauguration captured the joy of our people.  He said, “our isolation is over.”  That reflects the profound impact of this road on daily life, economic activities, and social integration of the people of Ozochi and other neighbouring communities. The road will no doubt ease transportation, improve access to markets and healthcare, and strengthen links between Ahoada, Omoku, and other parts of Rivers State.
The people of Ahoada, Omoku, and indeed Rivers State as a whole are grateful to our dear governor for this laudable achievement and wish him many more successful years in office. We pray that God endows him with more wisdom and strength to continue to pilot the affairs of the state for the benefit of all. As citizens, we should rally behind the governor and support his development agenda. Our politicians and stakeholders should embrace peace and cooperation, as no meaningful progress can be achieved in an atmosphere of conflict. Sustainable development in the state can only thrive where peace prevails.
Samuel Ebiye
Continue Reading

Trending