Business
Customs Agents Seeks Regulation Of Shipping Charges
Worried by the apparent neglect of the Nigeria Shippers’
Council (NSC) the National President of the Association of Nigeria Licensed
Customs Agents (ANCLA), Alhaji Olayiwola Shittu, called for the crating of a
department under the Ministry of Transport to regulate shipping charges in the
nation’s maritime sector instead of delegating the power to NSC.
Shittu made the call recently at a one-day clinic on
arbitrary shipping charges in the port organised by the Nigeria Shippers
Council in conjunction with Akabogu and Associates.
According to him, “highly placed persons at the federal
ministry of transport were colluding with some industry operators to scuttle
the actualisation of a commercial regulator for the maritime industry.
He stated that NSC has done well to raise importers’
confidence at the gateways, adding that the council qualified as a commercial
regulator but some powerful forces at the ministry of transport were rendering
the NSC irrelevant in the discharge of its duties as the substantive commercial
regulator despite arbitrary shipping charges Nigerians were being made to pay
in the process of importing and shipping goods.
The NSC at the one-day clinic had revealed that it had
finished benchmarking of all charges in the maritime sector and compiled all in
a report but lacked the political will to implement the report because it
lacked the power of a commercial regulator.
Representative of the Executive Secretary NSC Barrister
Hassan Bello, however explained that the clinic would address all contentious
issues in the maritime sector development in the country.
He said the council needed the support and prayers of
stakeholders for it to receive the desired attention as economic regular.
Barrister Emeka Akabogu, while presenting his paper, stated
that the shipping charges at the gateways were not acceptable as they were not
in line with charges at neighboring port and in other countries.
He lamented the role of the Federal Government which , he
said has not done enough to assist the importers and exporters.
A cursory look at terminal/shipping charge for a 20ft import
reveals that most of the terminal operators in the nation maritime sector
charge between N45,500 to N65,000 for Terminal Handling Charges (THC) while
import delivery charge varies between N2,250 to N40,000 with Lillypond
Container Terminal charging the highest at N40,000 for import delivery charges.
APM terminal charges N9,750 for scanning of charges while it
collected N2,500 for logistics for scanning charge. At the various customs
examination desk across the terminal, APM terminal charges N11,667 which is the
highest form any terminal operator in the national seaports.
Earlier the chairman of the clinic, Otunba Kunle Folarin, a
maritime expert tasked maritime stakeholders to look into such questions as
what really constitutes the numerous charges slammed on importers and shippers
of goods to Nigeria, like Terminal Handling Charges (THC), containers
demurrage, who should be charging and how much is the international charge? Why
pay Value Added Tax on CIF when it is also charged on Custom Duty?
Business
Wealth Creation: GCPBS Convenes Strategic Investment Workshop In PH
Banking/ Finance
Ripple Survey Reveals Appetite for Digital Assets
Cornerstone of Financial Services
A survey of more than 1 000 global finance leaders undertaken by digital payment network Ripple shows that 72% of respondents believe they need to offer a digital asset solution to remain competitive.
According to Ripple, leaders from the banking, fintech, corporate and asset management sector have made it clear that the “digital asset revolution is happening now”.
“Digital assets are quickly becoming a cornerstone of financial services, underpinned by progressive regulation, growing interest from Tier-1 banks, a steady consumer shift from banks to fintech providers, and booming stablecoin adoption,” Ripple says.
The survey was conducted in early 2026 and the findings released in March.
Stablecoin Boon or Bane?
Ripple has experienced significant success in the stablecoin sector since launching its Ripple USD (RLUSD) stablecoin in 2024.
With a market cap of $1.56 billion, it is considered a major regulated player in the market.
No doubt the platform was pleased to learn through its own survey that financial leaders were most bullish about stablecoins.
Roughly three-quarters of respondents believed they could boost cash-flow efficiency and unlock trapped working capital.
Ripple noted that finance leaders were thinking about stablecoins as more than “just a new way to execute payments”; instead, they viewed them as effective tools for treasury management.
In March 2026, Ripple began testing a new trade finance model built around RLUSD in a bid to increase the speed of cross-border payments.
The pilot initiative, developed alongside supply chain finance company Unloq [https://unloq.com], is running on the XRP Ledger inside a testing framework developed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
The Asian city-state is one of the platform’s biggest growth markets.
The idea behind the project is to see whether stablecoin-based settlement can streamline trade finance, too often hampered by reliance on intermediaries and slow reconciliation.
The only potential drawback is that if the initiative takes off, the Ripple to USD price could be negatively affected.
Ripple has always championed its native XRP token as a bridge asset, the “middleman” in the process of a financial institution turning dollars in the US into pounds in the UK, for example.
Ripple converts dollars into XRP and then back into pounds.
If RLUSD can do exactly the same thing, questions will be asked about XRP’s relevance.
That is a bridge Ripple will have to cross if it gets to that point.
Tokenisation Partners
Another interesting finding from Ripple’s survey is that most banks and asset managers are seeking tokenisation partners to help execute their strategies.
Some 89% of respondents said digital asset storage and custody were top priority. “Token servicing/lifecycle management also ranks highly for banks at 82%, while asset managers place greater emphasis on primary distribution at 80%,” Ripple found.
The survey also revealed that just more than half of fintechs and financial institutions want an infrastructure provider that can offer a “one-stop-shop solution”. This rose to 71% among corporate financial leaders.
Ripple attributes this to institutions and firms wanting uncomplicated, cohesive systems.
Infrastructure Rules
In its final analysis, Ripple says companies across the board are looking for partners and solutions that are “secure, compliant, battle-tested and that enable growth and execution”.
“The message is clear: infrastructure decisions made today will shape competitive positioning tomorrow.”
No surprise that this is precisely where Ripple is placing much of its focus.
