Connect with us

Oil & Energy

Gas Flaring: Can Oil Firms Meet 2012 Deadline?

Published

on

It  is no longer news that gas is becoming much more important to Nigeria’s economy since its production began years ago. Since its discovery, many companies have set up operations in the country but the flaring of the product has posed a very high challenge as it is not properly utilised for the benefits of the economy.

It is against this backdrop that the Nigerian government deems it necessary to develop gas resources to supply it for the provision of sufficient electricity for domestic and industrial use as well as for exportation. The nation’s power plants are not functioning adequately to generate required electricity and cannot meet domestic demand to end blackouts which now become a political priority.

The government is currently planning to produce enough gas to export as soon as gas flaring is ended in the country and also bring the President’s gas-to-power scheme to fruition.

The last House of Representatives before exist perfected the legislative framework pegging the deadline for gas flaring in Nigeria’s petroleum sector at December 31, 2012 in realisation of the government’s plan to develop and capture gas that is being flared or burned off in parts of the country, especially the oil producing areas. Some million cubic feet of gas resources are being flared daily and the quality is sufficient to generate about 4, 500 megawatts of power. The House also imposed stiff penalties on oil firms that may flout new  regulation s on gas flaring.

The action of the House of Representatives followed the adoption of the report of its committee on gas resources on a bill for an Act to Amend the Associated Gas Reinjection Act No. 99 of 1999 Cap. A25 Laws  of the Federation of  Nigeria Further Amendment of the gas flare deadline is not among the many legislative responsibilities before the present House of Representatives.

Oil companies operating in the country had failed to meet the Federal Government’s umpteenth time shifted deadline for the anti-safety and environment Act, under which violators are meant to be penalised. The end of this year is the battle line for gas flaring to end in this country but the question now is, can the oil companies meet the deadline? It is gathered that the President Goodluck Jonathan-led administration which will be empowered by the Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB) may not allow the continuation of the flaring beyond this year, so it is in the best interest of oil companies to race towards meeting the deadline.

Nigeria is currently making progress towards optimising its gas and power industries and that has been the focus of the government. The Group Managing Director of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), Austin Oniwon is quoted as assuring that the Gas Revolution programme for the country would not be abandoned and that to this end, two Memoranda of Understanding (MoU) had been signed. One between Xenel and NNPC and the other among India’s Nagarjuna Fertilisers, NNPC and Chevron as well as the award of the Akwa Ibom/Calabar area gas Control  Progressing Facility (CPF) to Agip and Oando in Abuja, to show how serious and committed NNPC and government are to the Gas Revolution Programme.

In pursuance of the programme, the Brass Liquefied Natural Gas plant is put in place for the production of gas in greater quantity and transmission.

The president is very passionate about the project and the journey has started. We do know that we have large deposit of natural gas resources. Before now, most of the product was being wasted through flaring because of the system we adopted, but with what is happening now, that will change.

Just like the crude oil, natural gas is money, so there should be a concerted effort to commit this natural resources into money for the benefit of Nigerians. The status report of the Nigerian Gas Masterplan, if sincerely and optimally implemented in line with the gas-to-power framework, will support the president’s power agenda and make power available for many ‘dead’ industries to come back to life. Not only that, it will also provide gas as fuel for industries such as the textile mills in Kano and Kaduna that went down because of lack of fuel and they will be able to have clean, cheap and affordable fuel to run their business.

In its commitment to ending routine gas flaring and consolidating leadership position in the domestic gas market, the Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC) has said it will continue to make good progress in bringing projects that will reduce flares and boost gas supply to the domestic market as well as sustain economic growth and kick-start new industries that will provide jobs for Nigerians.

Ending gas flaring in the country should be a long-term programme and there must be continuing commitment on the part of the oil companies because the project will help the economy and generate billions of naira or dollars to enhance development funding.  Nigeria holds about 8 per cent of global proven natural gas reserves and about 10 per cent of proven oil reserves but for Nigeria to continue to attract international investments, it needs to sustain confidence and stability and respect the sanctity of contracts.

There is ambition and expectation in the gas sector, but there is also uncertainty about who is going to gain and who is going to lose now that the federal Government is gearing efforts towards optimal utility of our gas resources. Nigerians are scared at the rate things are going in the country and people are no longer interested in the way funds are managed as they want to see practical things on ground.

Our social set-up has been shaken and we are yet to come to terms with it. Other countries use their funds to develop the people by providing infrastructure and social amenities but Nigeria’s case is different and not sure to understand. President Goodluck Jonathan has launched the “Roadmap for the power sector reform, so great majority of Nigerians are waiting for dramatic improvements to their quality of life. More gas and more power will raise living standards and support the economy, so lessons should be drawn from countries that have successfully executed gas-to-power and gas industry optimisation reforms with a view to enabling Nigeria learn from and possibly replicate the best practices of these countries.

Because the expectations of government and the societies they represent evolve over time, it is inappropriate to expect that what was obtaining when the oil  and gas industry was at its infancy, 50 years ago would still be obtainable today. This follows that with both the socio-political climate and the oil and gas industry changing, the International Oil Companies/National Oil Companies relationship must also evolve. A lot of things are expected when changes occur. This is why the Federal Government should ensure that all recommendations made to it are fully implemented to engender growth and change in the oil/gas industry.

To make the whole dream come true, the partnership between international oil companies and national oil companies needs to be strengthened to enhance the full exploitation of natural resources and develop capability that will bring more value to the industry. The basis of mutual benefit should exist between the two or more parties.

Nigeria has been finding it difficult to maximize its gas-to power potential because of certain factors which create imbalances in the value chain, which include gas pricing. That is why the new price regime put in place by the federal government is commendable as it will give investors reasonable returns on their investments and allow those who build gas transmission infrastructure to achieve certain returns that would justify their investments. In Nigeria, the gas price before 2010 was put at less than $1 per million scf, but with the recent review of the price, which is about $2 per million scf for the domestic gas-to-power, the gap between the international and our local price has been narrowed and with that, people can now invest in gas development.

When there are opportunities  for people to invest in gas development and power distribution and generation then the private sector would be able to take control of gas and power, and that will be the right way to guarantee power supply in the country.

The government should try to address the issue of regulation for the downstream gas sector which has become the bane of the sector’s development. The regulation must take into consideration the non  and partial deregulation and closed access of gas infrastructure, while other issues bordering on security in operational communities should also be visited as well. There is the need to do this because it has been discovered that the problem of insecurity is causing extra expenditure for most oil and gas companies as most engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) contractors also use this as reason for their premium and prohibitive charges.

As soon as government’s increased focus on appropriate pricing is welcomed, it should further extend the focus to the full value chain rather than restricting it to the upstream argument alone. If there is gas in the country, which we know,we, the indigenes should benefit more than everybody else. The rate of economy growth is expected to double from what it has been over the years when gas flaring ends at the end of this year. Not just foreign or intentional oil companies should participate in the gas project but indigenous firms should be given priority consideration. The gas-to-power distribution is a boost the country badly needs, so there must be a corrupt-free national strategy for managing the gas revenues because the worry about monies generated from the oil and gas sector in the country is the ‘curse’ of embezzlement and misappropriation or mismanagement, ie, the judicious utilisation of funds accruing from the sector for the benefit of the ordinary citizens rather than using it to fuel conflict and corruption.

We hope we will avoid the mistakes.

Nigeria is a democracy and everybody is watching. So it is expected that there is going to be improvement when gas flaring will become a thing of the past by December 31, 2012.

With a proven reserves of 182 tonnes per cubic feet, Nigeria is adjudged the world’s seventh largest producers of  high grade gas with zero per cent sulphur and rich in natural gas liquids. Though the huge reserve has not translated to abundant domestic supply, investment in gas distribution is capable of helping to achieve the gas-to-power aspiration of the federal government and make gas readily available to industrial consumers and guarantee accelerated growth of manufacturing and power sectors.

 

Shedie Okpara

Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

Resource Wars Are Here and Oil Is the First Casualty

Published

on

In just over a year, the world saw several instances of a choked supply of commodities indispensable for today’s economies and military capabilities.
From China’s restrictions on rare earths and critical minerals supply to the de facto closure of the Strait of Hormuz, policymakers and analysts began to realize that the control of oil, critical minerals, rare earths, and magnets is as important as building and maintaining stockpiles of advanced weapons. It also became clear that without these resources, defense and military capabilities could be weakened. The actual arms race goes hand in hand with the new battle for the resources that underpin economic, manufacturing, and advanced military development.
“Great-power competition has returned to basics: who controls the physical resources that modern economies and militaries run on,” Alice Gower, a partner at London-based political-risk advisory firm Azure Strategy, told the Wall Street Journal.
“Energy, critical minerals and industrial capacity are leverage, not just economic assets,” Gower added.
The war in the Middle East and the blockage at the Strait of Hormuz laid bare the reality of choked energy supply. The world’s most vital oil and LNG chokepoint, through which 20% of daily global trade flowed before the Iran war, has been essentially closed for most tanker traffic for more than three weeks.
The massive supply shock, the worst disruption in the oil market in history, showed that the world is dependent on energy resources, and that geography and actual physical supply matter. With so much oil and gas stranded in the Middle East, oil prices spiked to above $100 per barrel, natural gas prices in Europe doubled, and Asian spot LNG prices hit multi-year highs.
The precarious situation in the Middle East is reverberating across Asia, the region most dependent on oil and LNG supply from the Persian Gulf. Asian refiners pay sky-high premiums for non-Middle Eastern crude, many are considering cutting or have already cut processing rates, and countries have started to enact fuel-preserving measures, from four-day work weeks to bans on fuel exports.
In Europe, the gas refilling season will be the toughest yet, as Asia is outbidding Europe for spot LNG supply after Qatar’s LNG is effectively sidelined and full capacity may not return for up to five years following Iranian missile attacks last week.
Even the ‘energy independent’ United States, the world’s top oil producer, is not independent when it comes to global supply shocks of such magnitude.
The national average price of gasoline is approaching $4 per gallon nationwide, more than $1 a gallon compared to a month ago, before the start of the war.
Oil is a global resource, traded on a global market, and prices reflect fundamentals, although they have been driven by hectic trading activity on geopolitics in recent weeks. But the fundamentals show that there is no resource available to plug the gap that has opened in Middle Eastern supply. Producers are slashing output due to a lack of storage capacity, which further delays a rapid recovery in supply when this mess ends.
All this goes to show that whoever controls the Strait of Hormuz has enormous leverage on inflicting global economic pain.
While the world is focused on the Strait of Hormuz, the race for rare earths and critical minerals continues, with the U.S. and Western countries scrambling to dent China’s dominance.
Since China restricted exports of rare earth elements early in 2025, Western countries have raced to create mine-to-magnet supply chains to reduce dependence on Chinese supply in the key military and automotive industries.
China holds a 59% share of the mining of rare earths, 91% in refining, and a whopping 94% in magnet manufacturing, the International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates.
The U.S. has responded by taking stakes in minerals mining companies, the launch of a U.S. Strategic Critical Minerals Reserve, known as Project Vault, and is leading efforts to break the Chinese stronghold on the pricing of these minerals critical for the defense and auto industries and national security.
Chinese dominance could be eroded, but it would take years.
Still, rising neodymium-praseodymium (NdPr) supply from countries like the U.S. and Australia is set to reduce China’s market share to 69% by 2030 from 90% in 2024, Bloomberg Intelligence (BI) said in new research this month.
“We’re seeing a surge in rare-earth investment as modern technologies demand more critical materials,” said Jack Baxter, Global Metals & Mining Analyst at BI and co-author of the report.
“That said, we anticipate a significant shortfall in supply due to trade uncertainties, with lead times as long as 10 years to get new material out of the ground,” Baxter added.
“This will give pricing power to the few producers that currently are able to supply critical materials outside of China, fracturing the globalized market.”
Amid fractured markets and high geopolitical uncertainty, one thing is certain – the next arms race, alongside the actual arms race, will be for control of key resources such as oil and critical minerals.
By Tsvetana Paraskova
Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

Transcorp Energy, Renewvia Partner On Renewable Energy Gap

Published

on

Transcorp Energy Limited and Renewvia Solar Nigeria Limited have signed a Memorandum of Understanding to jointly develop renewable energy projects across Nigeria.
The move is aimed at addressing the persistent power deficit that has crumble businesses in the nation.
The agreement also outlines a longer-term plan to expand operations across Africa, positioning both firms to tap into growing demand for clean and reliable electricity.
The partnership would target commercial, industrial and residential consumers, as well as underserved communities, through a mix of off-grid and grid-connected energy solutions.
Beyond electricity provision, the collaboration would explore the aggregation and monetisation of Renewable Energy Credits generated from the projects, adding a commercial layer to the clean energy rollout.
The Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer, Transcorp Energy, Chris Ezeafulukwe, said the initiative aligns with the company’s broader strategy to expand access to sustainable power.
He noted that combining grid and decentralised energy systems would enable the company to deliver reliable electricity directly to end-users across different segments of the economy.
Chief Executive Officer of Renewvia, Trey Jarrard, described Nigeria as a critical market for the company’s African ambitions.
According to him, the partnership provides a platform to scale operations rapidly by leveraging established infrastructure and local expertise, while delivering cost-effective and resilient energy solutions.
Both companies said the agreement lays the foundation for a scalable pan-African renewable energy business, capable of supporting diverse markets and accelerating the continent’s transition to cleaner power sources.
The collaboration comes amid increasing pressure on governments and private sector players to deploy sustainable energy solutions to bridge electricity gaps, reduce reliance on fossil fuels, and support economic growth across Africa.
Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

IYC Tasks Niger Delta Governors On  Oil Field Bidding  ….Decries Exclusion of Host Communities

Published

on

The Ijaw Youth Council (IYC) Worldwide has raised concerns over the continued exclusion of host communities from the governance of oil resources, urging Niger Delta governors to take decisive steps by bidding for oil blocs and marginal fields.
The council warned that failure to act would allow external interests to continue dominating the region’s oil assets, despite their location within host communities.
Secretary-General of the council, Maobuye Nangi-Obu, started this at the stakeholders’ meeting organised by the Pipeline Infrastructure Nigeria Limited , with participants drawn from Rivers, Abia and Imo States, in Port Harcourt, recently.
“It is time for state governments in the Niger Delta, especially Rivers State, to form oil companies that can bid for marginal fields within their territories”, he said.
Nangi-Obu expressed concern over the reported listing of about 25 marginal oil fields for allocation, noting that many were located in host communities but allegedly being assigned to non-indigenes.
In his words “They sit in Abuja and decide what happens in our region, yet we are not part of the oil governance of our own resources”.
He explained that marginal fields, though considered uneconomical by major oil firms, remain viable for indigenous operators, adding that their allocation had continued to fuel grievances in the Niger Delta.
The IYC scribe also warned of the implications of directional drilling, describing it as a growing threat to host communities.
“There could be oil wells in your community, and somebody elsewhere could be drilling that oil without your knowledge,” he cautioned.
On environmental concerns, Nangi-Obu condemned the persistent gas flaring in the region, blaming both international and local operators for failing to invest in gas processing infrastructure.
He, however, commended Pipeline Infrastructure Nigeria Limited for its engagement with host communities.
“Pipeline Infrastructure Nigeria Limited is doing the right thing by engaging stakeholders. Not all companies are doing what they are doing,” he stated.
Traditional rulers at the meeting, further acknowledged improvements linked to the company’s activities in their areas.
The Eze Ekpeye-Logbo, King Kevin Anugwo, represented by Dr Patricia Ogbonnaya, noted that “aquatic life that disappeared due to pollution is gradually returning,” attributing the development to improved environmental conditions.
Similarly, Chairman of the K-Dere Council of Chiefs, Chief Batom Mitee, said, “There is now peace in our community,” stressing,  increased oil production must translate into tangible benefits for host communities.
By: King Onunwor
Continue Reading

Trending