Connect with us

Oil & Energy

Need For Sustainable Power Supply

Published

on

The problem of poor power supply in Nigeria has been terribly lamentable  and the situation seems to have defied  all efforts by previous governments since in the 80s. one is tempted   to now  ask what  the present  administration under President Goodluck Jonathan can do to salvage  the country from the ugly trend.

From on-set, the Federal Governemnt has been matching words with action on how better to improve the power sector by ensuring that the mega watt rose to 150 from less than 50, even within the short period of this present dispensation. This was after the Chief executive officer of Olornrisogo Power Station was redeployed to the headquarters for efficiency.

The redeployment followed the warning by the Minister of Power, Professor Barth Nnaji that all managers of the different sections of the utility company –Power Holding Company of Nigeria (PHCN), from generation, transmission to distribution should either sit up or be prepared to be booted out. Nnaji first had a meeting with the Chief Executive officers of the different sections of the utility’s value chain when he stressed the need for them to show commitment to duty to give Nigerians the long expected power supply.

Although he agreed that the sector had suffered grave or gross neglect in a couple of decades ago, particularly under the military    administration, he was optimistic that if the capacity Nigeria currently has fully utilized, there would be considerable improvement in power delivery. The question now is, who is the cause of Nigeria’s predicament in the power sector. Is it the government or the authorities of the utility company?

With the efforts so far made by the government, one would think that the utility firm, PHCN is to be held responsible for the incessant epileptic power supply in the country. The helmsmen of the company just as the former  Nigeria Electricity Power Authority (NEPA), feel that their duties and at coming to defend  their budgets and collecting electric bills and  share same among themselves  and  sit back and seek frivolous reasons to justify spending such funds without practical evidence on ground.

Unlike in the past when all the funds that come to the different sections of PHCN pass through the headquarters, the CEOs of the different units currently go to government to defend their annual budgets and spend the money according to their discretions thereby and up at not utilizing the money to provide constant electricity for the people. Some utilize the money in providing poor service leaving undone what the money is meant for.

However, the Chief executive officers saw that it was no business as usual when the minister clamped down on four of their colleagues and that the ministry didn’t come to the combat in child’s gloves. Although, ever since that was done, the situation changed in terms of power supply but a lot needs to be done.  The minister needs to tour all the power facilities across the country including the South-South and Port Harcourt in particular to see for himself or have a practical feel of what the people of the area are suffering. All is not well with the PHCN formations across the country and for the Niger  Delta region that produces the bulk of the nation’s wealth, special attention should be paid to give the a sense of belonging and to compensate  them for the  long neglect.

The minister should extend his “Capacity Recovery” to Rivers State because from the look of things lack of commitment and human errors account for considerable power failure in the state. There is need to ensure sustainable electricity supply in Rivers State considering its population and economic contribution coupled with the fact that sustainable and successful business is bi-product of constant electricity supply.

An auto manufacturing company could not be built in Nnewi, Anambra State because of poor power supply in the country. According to the Minister of Power, his efforts as a key player in the do were fruitless as the planned power supply.

In a paper he presented during the 20th anniversary of Anambra State Nnaji said “it was the fledging auto industry in Nnewi which inspired me in the late 1990s to take steps to establish in Nigeria a state-of-the-art company to manufacture auto parts including engines, when I was the ALCOA foundation Professor of Manufacturing Engineering at the University of Pitts burgh”.

The only way to attract investment to Nigeria is for the government to ensure steady and uninterrupted electricity at all levels. The country is blessed with all kinds of natural resources which can attract foreign investors but because of the non-availability of uninterrupted electricity, investors are scared.

Most investors after carrying out feasibility study of the kind of investment they intend to bring into the country will end up being deterred because of the huge, cost of acquiring and fueling a generating plant that would be able to power their investment. Reports have shown that everyday industries and other manufacturing concerns are collspsing and unemployment rate rising as investors are not willing to come and do business in the country because of lack of sustainable power supply.

Sadly, an average Nigerian home spends more than the N18,000 minimum wage  which is yet to be paid, a month to power its generator  to have power. Much of the economic undevelopment in the country today is because of lack of power, at trend all patriotic Nigerians must not allow to continue. This power has risen to a point that the President, Dr. Goodluck Jonathan and all the state governors should make steady power supply their one-point agenda and do everything humanly possible to ensure that this is achieved before the end of 2012.

Obviously, the government at federal and state levels should partner with other stakeholders or establishments in ensuring that the power problem becomes a thing of the past because until  that is done, no matter how much we spend  on jingles and advertisements in the local and foreign media to woo investors to come and invest here, it will continue to be a mirage.

Ghana and other industrialized countries did not advertise in international media before virtually multinational and local companies were attracted to invest there. The issue of power supply is however, over-flogged because it is the main key to industrialization and  self-reliance in any country and any country without steady electricity remains impoverished with its people.

It has become necessary to suggest that Nigerian governments should send delegations to China and other countries and engage energy companies that will give the country steady power supply so that we can become economically viable, as that is the only way to generate to generate employment for our teeming youths.

In pursuance of its regulatory functions, the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) in collaboration with the Standards Organization of Nigeria (SON) and the National Environmental Standards and Regulations Enforcement Agency (NESREA) has approved standards and guidelines for the issuance of clearance certificates for importers of generating sets and broken-down parts. This is to ensure that all generating sets to be imported into the country meet all the approved standards and quality and to stop the indiscriminate importation of generating sets into the country.

There has been little or no difference in the state of power supply in the country since the power reform was initiated by former president Olusegun Obasanjo’s government in 2005. This is why the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) has embarked on a process of consulting with stakeholders over the need or otherwise to increase electricity tarriff in the country. Chief executive officer of NERC, Dr Sam Amadi, at a workshop on major Review of the Multi-year Tarriff Order (MYTO) urged the shareholders to be objective over the review process, noting that “public power supply in the country is still a standby in most homes and offices, as it was in 2005 when the reform in the power sector began.”

If we must achieve the goal of giving every citizen access to stable, reliable and fairly priced electric power, a reliable and sustainable framework must be put in place to ensure the robust interaction of market forces with social policy to attain equilibrium. This we can do by establishing a pricing regime that will sustain massive private sector investment and guarantee a positive return on investment, while also being fair to underprivileged consumers.  The power industry is characterized by lack of a transparent price determination process and abysmally low tariffs, all based on the political whims and considerations of the PHCN, as opposed to the economic principle of full cost recovery.

Shedie Okpara

Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

Global Energy Crisis Is Reviving Green Hydrogen

Published

on

The global energy crisis has reshaped global energy priorities seemingly overnight. The Strait of Hormuz has been closed to virtually all commercial traffic for well over a month now, severely restricting global flows of oil and gas. As a result, global energy prices have skyrocketed, and supplies have tightened, pushing many countries to explore alternative energy pathways in a big hurry. This has led to an unfortunate resurgence of coal-fired power, especially in Asia – but it is also set to supercharge the clean energy industry on a global scale. And one of the unlikely benefactors of this groundswell of new investment may be the green hydrogen industry.
China, the world’s top hydrogen producer, is planning to ramp up production of hydrogen, and especially green hydrogen, more quickly than previously planned in order to shore up its energy security as import-dependent Asian markets are rocked by skyrocketing oil and gas prices. China’s National Energy Administration (NEA) has referred to hydrogen as a “strategic lever” for national energy autonomy and resilience, and has pledged to accelerate the development of the domestic sector accordingly.
China’s 15th five-year plan, released last month, flagged hydrogen as a “future industry.” But, apparently, the future is now. According to a recent report from the South China Morning Post, the rhetoric around hydrogen coming out of China signals a shift away from research and toward rapid practical development of the sector.
Last year, the NEA earmarked 41 projects in nine regions across the country to lead hydrogen pilot projects all along the value chain “from production and transport to storage and application.” Now, leadership is pushing to bring those projects out of demo phases and into industrial applications as quickly as possible.
European leaders, too, are pivoting to embrace green hydrogen production with renewed enthusiasm. Earlier this month, ministers from Austria, Germany, the Netherlands, Poland, and Spain petitioned the European Union to loosen production regulations to encourage investment into the sector. And Italy successfully approved a €6 billion state aid plan to support renewable hydrogen.
Even the United States is getting on board. This week, the Trump administration instructed the Department of Energy to save $5 billion worth of hydrogen hubs that were slated for closure. The hydrogen projects – though not green hydrogen ventures – were funded under the Biden administration in order to promote cleaner-burning fuel sources.
Hydrogen could potentially be a critical pathway for decarbonization, as it combusts at high heat like fossil fuels. But, unlike fossil fuels, when it burns, it leaves behind nothing but water vapor. This could make it indispensable for the decarbonization of hard-to-abate sectors like steelmaking and shipping. However, the vast majority of commercial hydrogen is made with fossil fuels. Green hydrogen, by comparison, is made using renewable energies.
But while hydrogen, and especially green hydrogen, could be a key part of the global clean energy transition, research and development in the sector had been cooling for years, as commercial and cost-effective green hydrogen production methods largely failed to materialize. “Even if production costs decrease in line with predictions, storage and distribution costs will prevent hydrogen from being cost-competitive in many sectors,” Roxana Shafiee, a postdoctoral fellow at the Harvard University Center for the Environment, told The Harvard Gazette in 2024. Shafiee led a study that found cause to believe “that the opportunities for hydrogen may be narrower than previously thought.”
But the economics of energy are changing as we speak, and the global hydrogen market is likely about to see a windfall as the world rushes to replace geopolitically risky fossil fuels, which have become prohibitively expensive overnight. Clearly, global leaders are already reembracing the fledgling sector as part of an all-of-the-above approach to energy security and independence. While hydrogen may not be a silver bullet solution, it could be a critical part of a more diverse and therefore more resilient global energy landscape going forward.
By Haley Zaremba
Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

PETAN Tasks Indigenous Oil Firms On Investments Attraction    … Global Engagement Sustenance

Published

on

The Petroleum Technology Association of Nigeria (PETAN) has urged indigenous oil and gas companies to deepen global engagement and attract investment.
The Association urged intending participants to leverage the forthcoming 2026 Offshore Technology Conference (OTC) in the U.S. to expand their access to new technologies and partnerships.
PETAN said its participation at the global event would be driven by a deliberate strategy to position Nigerian firms as competitive players within the international energy value chain.
In a statement issued  by the Association’s Publicity Secretary, Dr Joan Faluyi, In Lagos, at the weekend,  PETAN would anchor its activities at the Nigerian Pavilion, with the theme: “Africa’s Energy Transformation: Scaling Investment, Technology, and Local Capacity for Sustainable Growth”.
Faluyi noted that the conference, scheduled for May 4 to May 7 in Houston, Texas, remained a leading platform for offshore energy dialogue, partnerships and innovation.
According to her, PETAN’s participation goes beyond routine attendance and reflects a focused effort to strengthen Nigeria’s visibility and influence in global energy discussions.
“At OTC 2026, PETAN is returning with stronger alignment and a clearer objective, to ensure Nigerian companies are not just present, but actively engaged and recognised as credible global partners,” she said.
Faluyi explained that the association had consistently showcased the capabilities of indigenous oil and gas service providers at previous editions of the conference, reinforcing their capacity to compete internationally.
She added that the Nigerian Pavilion would serve as a strategic hub for investment discussions, technical exhibitions and direct engagement with global stakeholders.
The association is also scheduled to participate in key engagements, including the African Energy Forum, the NCDMB–OEM Investment Forum and the PETAN Golf Tournament slated for May 7 at Quail Valley Golf Course, Texas.
Faluyi described OTC as a critical gateway for Nigerian companies seeking international opportunities, noting that visibility and engagement at the event often translate into commercial partnerships.
“In an increasingly competitive energy landscape, securing a seat at the global table is essential. Through sustained participation, PETAN continues to assert Nigeria’s place in that conversation,” she said.
Also speaking, PETAN Chairman, Mr Wole Ogunsanya, said the Association’s focus was to ensure that indigenous capacity is fully integrated into global energy decision-making processes.
“We have seen firsthand how global energy decisions are shaped at OTC. This year, we are returning to ensure indigenous Nigerian capacity is not just present but recognised, engaged and heard.
“We are taking our businesses to the table where real partnerships are formed,” he said.
Faluyi added that under Ogunsanya’s leadership, PETAN was prioritising strategic positioning to ensure Nigerian companies are not only visible but considered credible partners in major international energy projects.
Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

Solar Panels Imports Ban: Experts Recommend Phase -out Approach 

Published

on

Stakeholders in Nigeria’s energy sector have warned that an abrupt restriction on solar panels imports would undermine electricity access.
The experts called for a gradual phase-out of imports over several years rather than an outright ban.
Recall that the federal government had announced plans to halt solar panel imports after investing more than N200 billion to encourage domestic production.
Speaking at the Solar Power Media Training, in Abuja, last week, the Campaign Director, Secure Energy Project (SEP), Joseph Ibrahim, said stakeholders support the goal of building local manufacturing capacity but cautioned against sudden policy shifts.
“Let me be clear, we wholeheartedly support local manufacturing of solar panels”.
“We want to see factories in our states, jobs for our youth, and a supply chain that begins and ends on our soil”, he stated.
Ibrahim insisted that the most effective path forward is a carefully managed roadmap implemented over three to five years to give investors and workers time to adjust.
“If we rush this, we risk making solar power too expensive for the millions who currently rely on it for survival.
“By taking a phased approach, we allow time for investors to build their plants, for our workers to learn specialised skills, and for our economy to adjust without losing power”, he said.
The SEP director said policy stability, access to financing, and strict quality standards are essential to building a sustainable local solar manufacturing industry.
“To make local manufacturing a reality, we don’t just need new laws; we need an enabling environment. This means stability — policies that don’t change with the wind,” he said.
Also speaking, Tosin Asonibare,  said renewable energy has become a critical solution to Nigeria’s persistent electricity supply challenges.
He cited findings by the Global Initiative for Food Security and Ecosystem Preservation, indicating that many Nigerians remain unaware of the proposed import restrictions and their potential implications.
According to him, respondents in the report largely favoured a phased ban supported by incentives for importing raw materials needed for local production.
“The report also shows that infrastructure for locally manufactured panels is not fully available, so there is need for foreign direct investment improvement in government policy.
“So that the local manufacturers and assembling companies can have higher capacity to meet demand. If that is not done, the price of solar panels will go up”, he said.
He warned that affordability could become a major concern for consumers if restrictions are implemented without adequate preparation.
Continue Reading

Trending