Opinion
Press As Defender Of Democracy
Gentlemen of the Forth Estate have of recent become the most endangered specie in Nigeria. Many have been killed and some are now placed on death row with death threat letters already delivered to them by unknown persons.
A journalist in Bayelsa State, Mr Oyins Egrenbido was bundled into a waiting police van, on Sunday, May 16, 2010, by officers of the Nigerian Police. The police was said to have acted on the instruction of a local government chairman over alleged report on the chairman aired on Rhythm FM. Recently, a journalist was handcuffed and led out of an Abuja Magistrate Court on the instruction of the magistrate.
The journalist was in the court simply to perform his constitutional duty when the magistrate identified him and said if you are a journalist leave my court. Intimidation of journalists by those in control of top government offices sends a signal that the future of Nigerian media is still unpredictable.
The fact that journalists are poorly remunerated is not an excuse by those in “juicy jobs” to reason that they are stupid. They are rather men and women who have dedicated their life, mind and eloquent pen to ensure that our democracy is not sterilized. In modern society, it is the citizens right to ventilate his views without the fear of fellow men who regard themselves as small gods on earth.
A success news story requires a journalist, subject matter, sources, audience and if fortunate enough feed back. A positive interplay between the four subjects yields a better story and credibility.
Providing false information to the media will not help fight graft, corruption or abuse of office. Occasionally, arrogant public officials in their air conditioned offices will not respect the journalist appearing before them in search of clarity on specific issues of public interest. Since most public officials are physically unavailable or can’t be traced, media resorting to use of telephone in conducting interviews with majority of public officials has been the only solution.
However, due to the fact that most public officials have not taken short courses in public relations or journalism to acclimatize themselves with media, they are always caught off-guard when a journalist reaches them on telephone. While on telephone, they have no time to consult with hard copy books and probably they aren’t in offices and will make sweeping comments or arrogantly intimidate the journalist on phone. “Who gave you my number? I don’t talk to people like you” they usually say before prematurely terminating the call.
However, in the News Business, no comment is a comment and whenever efforts to contact a source are successful; whatever the source tells the journalist will always be a comment for the story.
Surprisingly enough, when such a source that had earlier made arrogant and disrespectful comments and later reads them in the published story will quickly pick his phone and call the journalist hurling all sorts of insults at him or her forgetting that he had misused his earlier opportunity to comment. It is unfortunate that many leaders in Nigeria continue to undermine the importance of the media ignoring the fact that the media is the “voice of the voiceless” and that journalists have the right to access information and that freedom of expression is guaranteed in the constitution. It is important to note that the dissemination of information if executed properly stands out as a key element in good governance and democracy. A flourishing and independent media in any country is a good indicator of good governance and democracy.
Due to denial and suppression of information, many top government officials have managed to put behind their backs a lot of misdeeds. It is therefore important for our leaders to understand that freedom and access to information is a human right enshrined even in the United Nations Charter. In 1964 the United Nations Assembly adopted resolution 59 (1) which states that freedom of information is a fundamental human right and”… the touchstone of all the freedoms to which the United Nation is consecrated”.
As stated by the United Nations Assembly and universal Declaration of Human Rights, it is crystal clear that freedom of expression and access to information is a right that every government and citizen should strive for. The media should, therefore be given opportunity to publish factual stories for the interest of the public.
If all those in authority should do things the right way then they have nothing to fear let alone newsmen. Journalists are capable of checking the abuse of press freedom. The press should not be used as a medium for political dog-fights or witch-hunts by some pressure groups, politicians, potential politicians or political aspirants. The press should not indulge in harassment of individuals for their purely private affairs. Journalists cannot collectively disappoint their audience. They realise that the tools for their trade, WORDS are dangerous. They have thus always heeded to the warning of “let mortals beware of words for with words we lie.”
As in other modern states, Nigerian journalists should be allowed to fulfill their vital functions of informing the people without hindrance. If the request for the passage of the freedom of information bill is granted and ingrained in the new constitution and charged with utopianism, we shall be traveling in the right direction to utopia, or perhaps more realistically to a democracy that works for the people and not just the power brokers. It is only then that we can foster good government and development to make Nigeria one of the twenty most developed nations in the world by the year 20-20.
Both the Senate President, Senator David Mark and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Rt. Hon. Dimeji Bankole, have recently on separate occasions assured the nation that the freedom of information bill before the National Assembly will soon be passed. The two leaders are men that I can read their lips at any given time. Do it now please.
And the on-going request for improved wages for members of the Fourth Estate is quite apt. Thanks to the Hon. Minister of Information and Communications, Prof. Dora Akunyuli for speaking in support of the quest.
Sir Ichoku wrote in from Port Harcourt.
Anothony Ichoku
Opinion
A Renewing Optimism For Naira
Opinion
Don’t Kill Tam David-West
Opinion
Fuel Subsidy Removal and the Economic Implications for Nigerians
From all indications, Nigeria possesses enough human and material resources to become a true economic powerhouse in Africa. According to the National Population Commission (NPC, 2023), the country’s population has grown steadily within the last decade, presently standing at about 220 million people—mostly young, vibrant, and innovative. Nigeria also remains the sixth-largest oil producer in the world, with enormous reserves of gas, fertile agricultural land, and human capital.
Yet, despite this enormous potential, the country continues to grapple with underdevelopment, poverty, unemployment, and insecurity. Recent data from the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS, 2023) show that about 129 million Nigerians currently live below the poverty line. Most families can no longer afford basic necessities, even as the government continues to project a rosy economic picture.
The Subsidy Question
The removal of fuel subsidy in 2023 by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has been one of the most controversial policy decisions in Nigeria’s recent history. According to the president, subsidy removal was designed to reduce fiscal burden, unify the foreign exchange rate, attract investment, curb inflation, and discourage excessive government borrowing.
While these objectives are theoretically sound, the reality for ordinary Nigerians has been severe hardship. Fuel prices more than tripled, transportation costs surged, and food inflation—already high—rose above 30% (NBS, 2023). The World Bank (2023) estimates that an additional 7.1 million Nigerians were pushed into poverty after subsidy removal.
A Critical Economic View
As an economist, I argue that the problem was not subsidy removal itself—which was inevitable—but the timing, sequencing, and structural gaps in Nigeria’s implementation.
- Structural Miscalculation
Nigeria’s four state-owned refineries remain nonfunctional. By removing subsidies without local refining capacity, the government exposed the economy to import-price pass-through effects—where global oil price shocks translate directly into domestic inflation. This was not just a timing issue but a fundamental policy miscalculation.
- Neglect of Social Safety Nets
Countries like Indonesia (2005) and Ghana (2005) removed subsidies successfully only after introducing cash transfers, transport vouchers, and food subsidies for the poor (World Bank, 2005). Nigeria, however, implemented removal abruptly, shifting the fiscal burden directly onto households without protection.
- Failure to Secure Food and Energy Alternatives
Fuel subsidy removal amplified existing weaknesses in agriculture and energy. Instead of sequencing reforms, government left Nigerians without refinery capacity, renewable energy alternatives, or mechanized agricultural productivity—all of which could have cushioned the shock.
Political and Public Concerns
Prominent leaders have echoed these concerns. Mr. Peter Obi, the Labour Party’s 2023 presidential candidate, described the subsidy removal as “good but wrongly timed.” Atiku Abubakar of the People’s Democratic Party also faulted the government’s hasty approach. Human rights activists like Obodoekwe Stive stressed that refineries should have been made functional first, to reduce the suffering of citizens.
This is not just political rhetoric—it reflects a widespread economic reality. When inflation climbs above 30%, when purchasing power collapses, and when households cannot meet basic needs, the promise of reform becomes overshadowed by social pain.
Broader Implications
The consequences of this policy are multidimensional:
- Inflationary Pressures – Food inflation above 30% has made nutrition unaffordable for many households.
- Rising Poverty – 7.1 million Nigerians have been newly pushed into poverty (World Bank, 2023).
- Middle-Class Erosion – Rising transport, rent, and healthcare costs are squeezing household incomes.
- Debt Concerns – Despite promises, government borrowing has continued, raising sustainability questions.
- Public Distrust – When government promises savings but citizens feel only pain, trust in leadership erodes.
In effect, subsidy removal without structural readiness has widened inequality and eroded social stability.
Missed Opportunities
Nigeria’s leaders had the chance to approach subsidy removal differently:
- Refinery Rehabilitation – Ensuring local refining to reduce exposure to global oil price shocks.
- Renewable Energy Investment – Diversifying energy through solar, hydro, and wind to reduce reliance on imported petroleum.
- Agricultural Productivity – Mechanization, irrigation, and smallholder financing could have boosted food supply and stabilized prices.
- Social Safety Nets – Conditional cash transfers, food vouchers, and transport subsidies could have protected the most vulnerable.
Instead, reform came abruptly, leaving citizens to absorb all the pain while waiting for theoretical long-term benefits.
Conclusion: Reform With a Human Face
Fuel subsidy removal was inevitable, but Nigeria’s approach has worsened hardship for millions. True reform must go beyond fiscal savings to protect citizens.
Economic policy is not judged only by its efficiency but by its humanity. A well-sequenced reform could have balanced fiscal responsibility with equity, ensuring that ordinary Nigerians were not crushed under the weight of sudden change.
Nigeria has the resources, population, and resilience to lead Africa’s economy. But leadership requires foresight. It requires policies that are inclusive, humane, and strategically sequenced.
Reform without equity is displacement of poverty, not development. If Nigeria truly seeks progress, its policies must wear a human face.
References
- National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). (2023). Poverty and Inequality Report. Abuja.
- National Population Commission (NPC). (2023). Population Estimates. Abuja.
- World Bank. (2023). Nigeria Development Update. Washington, DC.
- World Bank. (2005). Fuel Subsidy Reforms: Lessons from Indonesia and Ghana. Washington, DC.
- OPEC. (2023). Annual Statistical Bulletin. Vienna.
By: Amarachi Amaugo
-
Business5 days ago“W’Bank To Invest $14bn In Agric Transformation
-
News5 days agoNECO Opens UK Exam Centre For Nigerians In Diaspora
-
Opinion5 days agoA Renewing Optimism For Naira
-
Business5 days agoFG Fixes Uniform Prices for Housing Units Nationwide, Approves N12.5m For 3-bedroom Bungalow ……..Says Move To Enhance Affordability, Ensures Fairness
-
News5 days agoReps Summon NAFDAC, Police, Others For Illicit Drug Probe
-
News5 days agoDangote Begins Refinery Expansion To 1.4mbpd
-
Business5 days agoNDDC Unveils Naval Facilities To Boost Region’s Security
-
Sports5 days ago“Nigeria will go to World Cup”
