Opinion

The Last Temptation Of Jonathan

Published

16 years ago

April 6, 2010

Like the proverbial cat detailed to watch over a smoked fish, Acting President Goodluck Jonathan could be faced with the challenges of several temptations to assume full control or not, since the constitution recognises him as the other part of the leadership pair in the presidency.

Again, whether to exercise powers derived from the directive by the president especially, when he returned to the country almost two months ago and declared to Nigerians through his spokesperson, Mr. Olusegun Adeniyi that Jonathan’s should continue to attend to all state matters in the capacity of Acting President and Commander-in-Chief.

We are also reminded that right from the on-set, Goodluck Jonathan dilemma was almost a complete replica of Richard Nixon’s. We remember Dwight David Eisenhower (1890-1969), who was disabled on several occasions: by a heart attack in 1955; an ileitis attack in 1956, and a severe stroke in 1957. The first two attacks got him disabled for almost six months. A Presidential Assistant, Sherman Adams, took over the President’s responsibilities while Vice President Richard Nixon watched helplessly as he had no legal authority to take over and he had to be extremely cautious because any attempt to assume presidential duties while the president was still alive could be viewed as a coup de-e-tat.

For example, with the swearing-in of ministers characterised by minor changes, it can also be safely presumed that while Jonathan was making most of the changes, he was following the laid down plans of the president. Many had talked of the plan by the president to remove former attorney-general and minister of justice, Mike Aondoakaa (SAN) from the revered office following controversies trailing some of his activities which has turned the Bar against him even though he was supposed to be the official leader or number one legal officer of the Bar.

The acting president implemented that decision after the first meeting of the Executive Council of the Federation (EXCOF) over which he presided following the National Assembly resolution proclaiming him acting president. Also, President Yar’Adua was said to have planned that a holistic cabinet reshuffle would be carried out before he would celebrate the third anniversary of his administration. The new cabinet as planned by Yar’Adua before he fell ill, would help him to run the last stretch of his first term so that he could end the race powerfully and at least deliver some of the programmes on his Seven Point Agenda. The swearing-in of ministers which began with cabinet dissolution and nomination of ministers-designate was therefore in furtherance of the president’s plan.

Therefore, it is right to presume that Jonathan was faced with several temptations whether to write or rewrite a script which may not be viewed as a coup d-e-tat against a president that is still alive. The unknown part of the temptation or the unfolding game plan was whether the president would have appointed the same individuals that the acting president had put in the various positions if he was to be in charge of the cabinet reshuffle.

And since there is still no information to the effect that the acting president has met Yar’Adua since the president returned from Saudi Arabia, then it is doubtful that Yar’Adua has considerable input into the changes. There are also claims that the appointment of Murtala, the president’s nephew, as one of the ministers was an indication that the acting president had carried along the president in the changes. Perhaps another smart political move by the acting president for people not to view the changes as coup de-e-tat against the president who is claimed by a group of Islamic clerics that they visited and prayed with at the Presidential Villa, is the scheming out of coalition of parties on the ministerial nomination list.

The ANPP and PPA in the Government of National Unit (GNU), arrangement under the president had accused Acting President Goodluck Jonathan of scheming them out in the ministerial nomination. With the unfolding scenario, the acting president is engulfed in several thoughts. Again, he is not oblivious to the obstacle that will undoubtedly come on his way should the president shows up and revise the purported dumping of the coalition parties for ministerial appointment. Another temptation he may be faced with was the issue of his party dumping him for the 2011 elections, whether he is to join another party to complete his second term as president or become irrelevant after the 2011 elections.

What happen if the ministers do not perform the miracle expected of them to get another mandate from the ruling Peoples Democartic Party (PDP), in the 2011 elections? To confront the issue if suddenly President Yar’Adua shows up and appears in public and declares that he is ready to resume work.

Acting President Goodluck Jonathan had nothing to fear as he was still writing the script of his principal. Besides, some of the changes in the ministerial appointment was to strike a balance so that nobody will view his action as a coup de-e-tat against his boss. The president if he shows up and publicly declare that he is ready to resume work, will also be cautious in making any pre mature and hasty change so that he does not further destabilise the nation. Because the ship of state has suffered a lot from his illness and the actions of the acting presideent have helped in steadying the ship and giving it the desired focus.

For example, the sending to the National Assembly the unedited version of Justice Mohammed Uwais Panel on Electoral Reform. And the constitutional amendment that would institutionalise some of the measures proposed as part of the electoral reform is almost completed in the Senate. The House of Representative is expected to follow suit in establishing some of the measures proposed in the constitutional amendment. The governors have expressed their preparedness to work with their legislature to approve the amendment in the second week of this month. After this, the Electoral Act of 2006 will also be amended to pave way for a re-brand electoral process. All these are means to actualise the president’s programme of political reforms.

Therefore, the acting president should not allow the temptation to take decisive actions to draw him back. He should know that some ministers on the last cabinet given sensitive portfolios did not meet the tall expectation of the people. The energy which governmental leadership should demonstrate was not there. You cannot point to four ministers who demonstrated zeal and fervour which could provide confidence to their country men that things are moving forward. So, let us have those ministers with sensitve portfolios that will deliver the core value of the Seven Point Agenda of the present administration.

Such ministers having realised that they have little time would have no option but to device short term plans to get the nation working. The acting president should no longer watch a helplessly as he has legal authority to act decisively to move the nation forward. However, he should be extremely cautious to take actions on safe ground so that he will not be led into more temptations.

Opinion

Trans-Kalabari Road: Work In Progress

Published

4 days ago

January 12, 2026

The Tide

Quote:”This Dream project is one of the best things that have happened to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas in recent times.”

This is the concluding part of this story featured in our last edition.

Good road network helps farmers to convey their agro-allied products to commercial hubs where buyers and sellers meet periodically to transact business. Road network engineers and motivates people resident in unfriendly geographical terrains, like riverine areas, to own property and shuttle home with ease. Some people will prefer living in their own houses in a more serene and nature-blessed communities to living in the city that is fraught with pollution, and other environmental, social and economic hazards. Prior to the cult epidemic that ravaged parts of Rivers State, the Emohuas, Elemes, Ogonis, and Etches were known for rural dwelling. Most public servants from these areas do their official and private transactions from their villages. For them it was comparatively easier to live in the village and engage in a diversified economic endeavours through farming, fishing or other lucrative business without outrageous charges and embarrassment associated with doing business in Port Harcourt, where land is as scarce as the traditional needle.

That is why the decision to construct the Trans-Kalabari Road by the administration of Dr. Peter Odili was one of the best decisions that administration took. When Dr. Odili vacated office as the Rivers State Governor, Rt. Hon. Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi took over and awarded contracts for continuation of the road project which in my considered view is the felt need of the people of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. Unfortunately, Rt. Hon. Amaechi’s efforts to drive the project was sabotaged by some contractors some of whom are Kalabari people. The main Trans-Kalabari Road is one project that is dear to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas of Rivers State. This is because through the road commuters can easily access several communities in the three local government areas. For instance, the road when completed will enable access to eight of the ten communities in Degema Local Government Area, namely: Bukuma, Tombia, Bakana, Oguruama, Obuama, Usokun, Degema town and the Degema Consulate. It will also link 15 of the 16 communities in Asari Toru Local Government Area. The communities are: Buguma, the local government headquarters, Ido, Abalama, Tema, Sama, Okpo, Ilelema, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama, Krakrama, Omekwe-Ama, Angulama. The road will also connect 14 of 17 wards in Akuku Toru Local Government Area, and other settlements. It is interesting to note that It is faster, and far more convenient and economical for the catchment Communities on the Trans-Kalabari Road network to go to the State Capital than the East West Road. The people of the three local government areas will prefer to work or do their transactions in Port Harcourt from their respective communities to staying in Port Harcourt where the house rent and the general cost of living is astronomically high.

Consequently, development will seamlessly spread to the 28 out of 34 communities of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. The only Communities that are not linked by the road project are Oporoama in Asari Toru, the Ke and Bille Communities in Degema Local Government Area and the “Oceania” communities of Abissa, Kula, Soku, Idama, Elem Sangama of Akuku Toru Local Government Area. But because of the economic value of the unlinked Communities to Nigeria, (they produce substantial oil and gas in the area), the Federal, State Governments and the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC), can extend the road network to those areas just as Bonny is linked to Port Harcourt and the Lagos Mainland Bridge is connecting several towns in Lagos and neighbouring States.Kudos to previous administrations who had constructed the Central Group axis.

However, what is said to be the First Phase of the Trans-Kalabari Road project is actually a linkage of the “Central Group” Communities which consists of Krakrama, Angulama, Omekwe. Ama, Omekwe Tari Ama, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama. It is the peripheral of the Trans-Kalabari Road. The completion of the Main Trans Kalabari project will free Port Harcourt and Obio/Akpor areas from congestion. It will motivate residents and people of the three local areas to contribute to the development of their Communities. If the Ogonis, Etches, Emohuas, Oyigbos, Okrikas, Elemes can feel comfortable doing business in Port Harcourt from home, residents and people whose communities are linked to Port Harcourt through the Trans-Kalabari Road will no doubt, do likewise. The vast arable virgin land of the Bukuma people can be open for development and sustainable agricultural ventures by Local, State and Federal Government.

It is necessary to recall that the Bukuma community was host to the Federal Government’s Graduate Farmers’ Scheme and the Rivers State Government moribund School-to-Land Scheme under Governor Fidelis Oyakhilome. Bukuma was the only community in Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas that has the capacity to carry those agricultural programmes. However the lack of road to transport farm produce to Port Harcourt and facilitate the movement of the beneficiaries of the scheme who lived in the community which is several miles away from the farms, hampered the sustainability of the programme. The main Trans-Kalabari Road remains the best gift to the people of Degema, Asari Toru, and Akuku-Toru Local Government Areas. Kudos to Sir Siminilayi Fubara.

By: Igbiki Benibo

Opinion

That U.S. Capture of Maduro

Published

4 days ago

January 12, 2026

The Tide

Quote:”Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction.”

The first part of this story was published in our last edition.

In Africa and the Middle East, regime change—whether by invasion, proxy warfare, or sanctions—has often left behind fractured states, weakened institutions, and prolonged instability. Washington’s motivations in Venezuela are widely understood: vast oil reserves, alliances with U.S. rivals, and symbolic defiance of American influence in the Western Hemisphere. But none of these reasons confer legal or moral legitimacy. Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction. If every powerful nation acted on its grievances in this manner, global chaos would inevitably follow. International law provides mechanisms for accountability. Under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), individuals accused of crimes against humanity or other grave offences are subject to investigation and prosecution through judicial processes.

Likewise, extradition treaties, mutual legal assistance agreements, and Interpol mechanisms exist to ensure accountability while respecting due process. These frameworks were designed precisely to prevent unilateral enforcement of “justice” by military force. The most profound consequence of America’s action may not be in Caracas, but in the precedent it sets. If the world accepts that a superpower can unilaterally depose another country’s president, then the foundation of the international system is weakened. Sovereignty becomes conditional—no longer a right, but a privilege tolerated at the discretion of the powerful. Going forward, if another country invades its neighbour, will the United States retain the moral authority to impose sanctions or demand restraint? Some analysts already warn that parallels between Russia’s actions in Ukraine and America’s conduct in Venezuela risk further eroding global norms. Selective adherence to international law breeds cynicism and accelerates the drift toward a world governed by force rather than rules.

Power—military, economic, or political—should serve human progress and collective well-being, not domination and destruction. For African nations, many of which emerged from colonial rule through bitter struggle, this precedent is especially alarming. Sovereignty is not an abstract legal concept; it is a hard-won shield against external domination. Any erosion of that principle anywhere weakens it everywhere. Africa’s painful history of foreign interference makes this lesson especially urgent. For me, the real issue is not whether Nicolás Maduro is a good or bad leader. That judgment belongs, first and foremost, to the Venezuelan people. The larger issue is whether the international system still operates on law—or has quietly reverted to hierarchy. If America insists it is defending global order, it must ask itself a difficult question: can an order survive when its most powerful guardian feels entitled to violate it? Until that question is answered honestly, the capture of a foreign president will remain not a triumph of justice, but a troubling symbol of a world drifting from law toward force.

If the United States felt so strongly about the allegations of terrorism, drug trafficking against Maduro, were there no other lawful options? Judicial accountability, diplomacy, regional mediation, and multilateral pressure may be slow and imperfect, but they reflect respect for international law and sovereign equality. Military seizure is a blunt instrument. It humiliates institutions, radicalizes populations, and hardens resistance. It may remove a leader, but it rarely resolves the underlying crisis. History teaches that military interventions seldom result in stable democratic outcomes. More often, they breed resentment, resistance, and long-term instability. For the sake of global order and the rule of law, the United States should reconsider this path and recommit to diplomacy, legal cooperation, and respect for the sovereign equality of states. Former U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris reportedly described the invasion of Venezuela as “unlawful and unwise,” warning that such actions “do not make America safer, stronger, or more affordable.” Her words reflect a growing recognition, even within the United States, that force without legitimacy undermines both moral authority and global stability.

Should what happened in Venezuela serve as a wake-up call for corrupt African leaders who undermine the people’s right to choose their leaders? The answer is yes. The capture of Maduro should alarm African leaders who manipulate elections, weaken institutions, suppress opposition, undermine citizens’ rights, or cling to power at all costs. Venezuela faced widespread criticism over disputed elections and repression long before this episode, and that context shaped how the world reacted. This does not justify foreign military intervention, but it highlights an uncomfortable truth: prolonged democratic decay isolates nations and invites external pressure—from sanctions to diplomatic censure. Global opinion matters, and legitimacy at home strengthens sovereignty abroad. The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and several African leaders have rightly condemned the events in Venezuela, invoking the principles of sovereignty and non-interference enshrined in international and regional law.

Beyond condemnation, however, African leaders must look inward. The continent’s future cannot be built on repression, constitutional manipulation, and personal greed. Leadership must reflect the will of the people, not desperation for power. Two days ago, a social commentator on a radio station argued that Trump’s action—though condemnable—demonstrates how far a leader can go for his country’s interest. According to this view, he did not intervene in Venezuela for personal enrichment, but to strengthen his nation. In stark contrast, many African leaders plunder their own countries. They siphon public resources, impose crushing taxes and harmful policies, and leave their citizens poorer—all for selfish gain. That contradiction is the deeper lesson Africa must confront.True sovereignty is protected not only by international law, but by accountable leadership at home.

By: Calista Ezeaku

Opinion

Kudos Gov Fubara

Published

2 weeks ago

January 2, 2026

The Tide

Please permit me to use this medium to appreciate our able governor, Siminalayi Fubara for the inauguration of the 14.2-kilometre Obodhi–Ozochi Road in Ahoada-East Local Government Area. This inauguration marks a significant milestone in the history of our communities and deserves commendation. We, the people of Ozochi, are particularly happy because this project has brought long-awaited relief after years of isolation and hardship.

The expression of our traditional ruler, His Royal Highness, Eze Prince Ike Ehie, JP, during the inauguration captured the joy of our people. He said, “our isolation is over.” That reflects the profound impact of this road on daily life, economic activities, and social integration of the people of Ozochi and other neighbouring communities. The road will no doubt ease transportation, improve access to markets and healthcare, and strengthen links between Ahoada, Omoku, and other parts of Rivers State.

The people of Ahoada, Omoku, and indeed Rivers State as a whole are grateful to our dear governor for this laudable achievement and wish him many more successful years in office. We pray that God endows him with more wisdom and strength to continue to pilot the affairs of the state for the benefit of all. As citizens, we should rally behind the governor and support his development agenda. Our politicians and stakeholders should embrace peace and cooperation, as no meaningful progress can be achieved in an atmosphere of conflict. Sustainable development in the state can only thrive where peace prevails.

Samuel Ebiye