Last year,  the Senate Committee on Information and Media canvassed an increase in the funding of Radio and Television Broadcasting in Nigeria. The committee chaired by Senator Ayogu Eze also called for an upward review of the salaries of the staff of Government owned media establishments.

According to the committee, the upward review of remuneration of staff would enhance the march towards deepening democracy and transparency in information dissemination and governance. The call come when society expects so much from media practitioners – in terms of accuracy and prompt reportage of events. It was apt and most commendable.              

To whom much is given, much is expected. And what you sow is what you reap. This natural law guides every affair of man. Therefore a poorly funded corporation will always produce below average. Just as a poor remunerated media house staff would perform minimally. It is a give and take situation.

The social responsibility foisted on the media as catalysts of change is trite. It therefore behooves on the media to serve as the moulder of public opinion by sensitising the public to the effects of public policies on the society. One reason why the society and indeed government at all levels have not taken media practitioners seriously is because they sometime misconstrue the fundamental roles of the press vis-a-vis expectations of government. That is why it becomes pertinent to review the constitutional base of Nigeria press and the ethical base of the same. This will to some extent clarify and put issues in proper perspective.

The obligation of the mass media in section 21 of the 1979 constitution was retained in section 23 of the 1995 draft constitution. Not only that, the same section was reproduced as a right under chapter iv, which deals with fundamental rights. Even more far reaching was the right granted to everyone under section 35 and that included the press, to ensure the eradication of corrupt practices and abuse of power; protect and preserve public property; and fight against misappropriation and squandering of public funds.

Indeed section 40 of the 1979 constitution spells out Right to Freedom of Expression and the press. Number 4 of that section states that “Every citizen of Nigeria shall be entitled to know and be informed of the activities of the state and any of its organs and agencies”. Number 5 states “Nothing in this section shall invalidate any law that is reasonably justifiable in a democratic society.

Section 41 of the 1979 constitution, provided for limitations on the exercise of the rights guaranteed under section 40. From the constitutional provision, it is obvious that what under section 21 could not be accepted by the courts was available to be pronounced on where the press itself was threatened by anyone wanting to be arbitrary in the exercise of legislative, executive and judicial power.

Besides, reportage of economic and social rights which provide the effective content, and fulcrum upon which other rights are founded particularly the civil and political rights is most essential. The rights classified as economic and social Rights, are empowering rights to adequate housing, food, health, social security, to work, and adequate standard of living etc. They are found in the 1979 constitution and other relevant municipal statutes.

Economic, social and cultural rights acronymed ‘ECOSOC’ Rights are classified under the Fundamental Objectives and Directive Principles of State Policy. Chapter 2 of the 1979 Constitution shows clearly therein is our Bill of duties just as the fundamental rights provisions in chapter four have been referred to as our Bill of Rights. These rights remain valid and claimable under municipal, international law and covenants. These ratified and domesticated laws by Nigeria are recognised under African charter on Human and People’s Rights and is enforceable. Recognizing and understanding the nitty gritty of responsibilities of the press and government easily brings appreciation to in enormity of the problems.

Complimenting these constitutional provisions is the ethical base of the Nigerian press. Media codes of conduct is put in place to ensure monitoring and strict supervision of performance of practitioners. Nigerian journalists have had for themselves codes of conduct before the ‘constitution imposed on them the obligation to monitor governance on behalf of the people. There should therefore be more to the code that regulates performance in Nigerian media than the argument posed in other places and other professionals.

The boldness-of the Senator Ayogu Eze led committee to inform government on the need for an enhanced welfare package for media workers particularly those on the pay roll of government is most appreciated. Appreciated too, is the fact that journalists of government owned media houses are labeled by the society as errand boys who only report censored stories by government. At other times, they are called government informants who should not be trusted nor taken seriously. Ironically, they are neither here nor there.

The State Council of the Nigeria Union of Journalists (NUJ) and that of the Radio, Television and Theatre Arts Workers Union (RATTA WU) should open up discussion with the state government on an enhanced take home pay for media workers. I have no doubt in my mind that government will respond  to the issue.

Truly, one is addressed by what he or she wears. Mere looking at news reporters at public functions should tell Government that all is not well in iterms of reward for services rendered. The ban on Okada in Port Harcourt and environs is telling seriously on staff as that was the easiest and less cost effective means of meeting daily assignments. Who respects the view and opinion of a man who although borrows a shirt to look good, yet sweating and looking like Christmas goat in it? Which highly placed personality gives listening ears to a man seen to be dressing as a tout but yet asking for an interview?

Let us know that this class of people equally have challenges and responsibilities to take care of.

This is the only way we can have robust information dissemination and proper monitoring of activities of government for an ensured accountability.

Nwiku resides in Port Harcourt.

Dick Saaronee Nwiku