Business
Reps Indict NPA Over N70bn Tax Evasion
The House of Representatives Committee on public accounts has indicted the Nigeria Ports Authority (NPA) of tax evasion to the tune of about N70 billion spanning between 1999 and 2009.
The committee’s indictment is coming as the Chairman of Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), Ifueko Omoigui- Okauru, has sought for defence from NPA. The indictment was the fallout of an interactive session between the House Committee and FIRS boss.
A source close to the committee chairman told The Tide that the committee as in receipt of documents and was ready to probe the matter.
The committee, it was learnt wants more documents on all taxes being owned by the Nigeria Ports Authority to FIRS totaling about N70 billion for the last 10 years.
Details of the alleged tax evasion were not made available to The Tide, although it was confirmed that the FIRS met with the law makers with the intention of making NPA to clear their debt owned.
In another development, the NPA amendment bill when passed into law is expected to address critical issues concerning port concessioning.
Stakeholders and private operators have expressed worry that the present NPA regulatory law does not adequately provide cover for the transactions leading into the concessioning of the nation’s seaports.
A source at National Assembly revealed that the draft amendment bill proposes to increase the directorates in the authority to reflect its role as well as fine-tune the fiscal provisions of the ports act.
It also hopes to empower NPA for port acquisition through purchase, in order to beat the land allocation constraints contained in the land use act even as the bill seeks to empower NPA to promote and regulate private port developments and off-dock facilities among others.
A cargo ship in flames at the NPA wharf in Port Harcourt. Photo: King Osila
Cornerstone of Financial Services
A survey of more than 1 000 global finance leaders undertaken by digital payment network Ripple shows that 72% of respondents believe they need to offer a digital asset solution to remain competitive.
According to Ripple, leaders from the banking, fintech, corporate and asset management sector have made it clear that the “digital asset revolution is happening now”.
“Digital assets are quickly becoming a cornerstone of financial services, underpinned by progressive regulation, growing interest from Tier-1 banks, a steady consumer shift from banks to fintech providers, and booming stablecoin adoption,” Ripple says.
The survey was conducted in early 2026 and the findings released in March.
Stablecoin Boon or Bane?
Ripple has experienced significant success in the stablecoin sector since launching its Ripple USD (RLUSD) stablecoin in 2024.
With a market cap of $1.56 billion, it is considered a major regulated player in the market.
No doubt the platform was pleased to learn through its own survey that financial leaders were most bullish about stablecoins.
Roughly three-quarters of respondents believed they could boost cash-flow efficiency and unlock trapped working capital.
Ripple noted that finance leaders were thinking about stablecoins as more than “just a new way to execute payments”; instead, they viewed them as effective tools for treasury management.
In March 2026, Ripple began testing a new trade finance model built around RLUSD in a bid to increase the speed of cross-border payments.
The pilot initiative, developed alongside supply chain finance company Unloq [https://unloq.com], is running on the XRP Ledger inside a testing framework developed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
The Asian city-state is one of the platform’s biggest growth markets.
The idea behind the project is to see whether stablecoin-based settlement can streamline trade finance, too often hampered by reliance on intermediaries and slow reconciliation.
The only potential drawback is that if the initiative takes off, the Ripple to USD price could be negatively affected.
Ripple has always championed its native XRP token as a bridge asset, the “middleman” in the process of a financial institution turning dollars in the US into pounds in the UK, for example.
Ripple converts dollars into XRP and then back into pounds.
If RLUSD can do exactly the same thing, questions will be asked about XRP’s relevance.
That is a bridge Ripple will have to cross if it gets to that point.
Tokenisation Partners
Another interesting finding from Ripple’s survey is that most banks and asset managers are seeking tokenisation partners to help execute their strategies.
Some 89% of respondents said digital asset storage and custody were top priority. “Token servicing/lifecycle management also ranks highly for banks at 82%, while asset managers place greater emphasis on primary distribution at 80%,” Ripple found.
The survey also revealed that just more than half of fintechs and financial institutions want an infrastructure provider that can offer a “one-stop-shop solution”. This rose to 71% among corporate financial leaders.
Ripple attributes this to institutions and firms wanting uncomplicated, cohesive systems.
Infrastructure Rules
In its final analysis, Ripple says companies across the board are looking for partners and solutions that are “secure, compliant, battle-tested and that enable growth and execution”.
“The message is clear: infrastructure decisions made today will shape competitive positioning tomorrow.”
No surprise that this is precisely where Ripple is placing much of its focus.