Editorial
Anambra Poll: Litmus Test For INEC
With the stage set for the 36 candidates to slug it out in the Anambra state governorship election tomorrow, November 18, 2017, Nigerians are waiting with bated breath for a free, fair and transparent election process. Before now, there have been allegations of moves by stakeholders to subvert the electoral process.
First was the rumour of the interception of two truck load of sensitive materials in a hotel in the Okpuno axis of Awka. The rumour, which first surfaced on the social media, pointed fingers at the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) as the mastermind.
But the national Chairman of the party, Chief Victor Oye, quickly called together a press conference to authenticate the interception of the materials and also accused the opposition parties as being responsible.
Oye said the Police had possession of the confiscated materials, and that two persons, who were suspected to be members of the All Progressives Congress (APC) were behind the importation of the materials. Oye said his party would not tolerate any form of rigging in the election and urged the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to remain resolute in the delivery of its promise of a free, fair and credible election.
But in what seemed like a funny twist to the entire situation, the Anambra State Police Commissioner and the Resident Electoral Commissioner, Mr. Garba Umar and Dr. Nkwachukwu Orji respectively, faulted the report of the interception of electoral materials in Okpuno. While the Police Commissioner feigned ignorance of any such arrest in the state, the INEC REC insisted that its materials were not missing and could not have been intercepted in a hotel.
Another issue that has also rocked the political space was the recent interception of a voter’s register belonging to INEC in the possession of some politicians in the state. But again, the REC, Nwachukwu, who was presented with the register after it was retrieved from politicians, dismissed it as just a printout from the electronic copies.
Equally worrisome is the threat by the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) to deal with anyone found voting in tomorrow’s election. The threat of IPOB seems to be more worrisome and catching the attention and reaction of the public.
As grievous as these issues are to the successful conduct of tomorrow’s election in Anambra State, The Tide holds that the success or failure of the election will largely depend on the commitment of INEC and security agencies to fairness to all and transparency in handling the election.
We believe that the outcome of the Anambra election will further testify whether the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) can truly conduct a free and fair election in Nigeria come 2019. More importantly, the election is crucial for the consolidation of stable democratic practices and harnessing of the potentials and endowments in Anambra State.
We recall that signals from the elections so far organised by the INEC under the President Muhammadu Buhari’s administration have not given the nation cause for joy that Nigeria is out of the woods of corrupt electoral processes.
In fact, most elections organised by INEC under the APC- led Federal Government have been plagued by lack of credibility as the ruling party at the national level is widely believed to manipulate the process.
The governorship elections in Koji, Edo and Ondo states where the ruling party, through its Governors Forum, reputedly interfered with the process, leading to loud outcries by opposition parties and the public, gave a lot of room for concern.
The Anambra election is the third state wide election to be organised by the current Chairman of INEC, Professor Mahmmed Yakubu, and expectations are high that INEC would this time discharge itself creditably.
Mindful of Nigeria where cynicism nurtured by opportunism and inordinate ambition of political contestants rules the day, we insist that the prospect of any “inconclusiveness” over the Anambra election should be banished by INEC with thoroughness and fairness in its conduct of the poll.
INEC should ensure that politicians are not given any room for shouting to the news media when technology disrupts election flows or certain hiccups occur. It should work hard to plug all loopholes and save itself any further embarrassment.
We equally call on the politicians in Anambra State to behave in a decorous manner if they are truly out for service to the people. The same peaceful manner they have conducted themselves during the campaigns must be applied during and after the casting of vote.
While we welcome the prompt intervention of President Buhari in checking the excesses of the Inspector General of Police (IGP), Ibrahim Idris who suddenly withdrew the security details attached to the incumbent Governor, Willie Obiano, we condemn the meddlesomeness of the IGP in the electoral process.
We view the action of the IGP as an attempt by the ruling APC to emasculate the opposition and intimidate the electorate in favour of its candidate. The police and all other security agencies must apply themselves strictly to the rules.
Election is a process that has many components and stages. The election day is, however, the most critical, when INEC’s integrity can be easily compromised and outcome discredited. That makes the Anambra election a litmus test for INEC.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Politics1 day agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics1 day ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics1 day agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
Rivers4 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News1 day agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
News4 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics4 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured4 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
