Opinion
Between Orthodox And Homoeopathic Medicine
The indubitable truth is that all principles and philosophies of Allopathic (orthodox medicine) is disappointingly empirical. Allopathic system of medicine is an animal system (by virtue of its using-guinea-pig, giant rat etc. In experiments that are later slated to humans it is therefore speculative, and without a “law of cure” guiding the practice. This is why anybody can practice it, based on trial and error. This is unlike the homoeopathic system of medicine which is a rational human medicine (by virtue of its proving-directly on man) there is no guess work in the practice and prescription of homoeopathy, as there is a “law of cure” guiding its principles (Similia Similibus Curantur), which means “let like treat like”. Homoeopathic remedies are therefore prescribed based on stringent principles.
Even the very practitioners of Allopathy, know it as system replete with transcendental speculations, and if they can anaesthetise their minds very well, would properly attest to its chaotic mode of prescription without logical reasons. Its mode of healing is suppressive and most times injurious to health. Hippocrates and Parace1sus, the father of Allopathic (orthodox) Medicine also knew this fact, and had wished they developed medicine to logical conclusion. It then behooved Dr. Hahnemann Samuel the proponent of homoeopathy to develop medicine to a logical reasoning called Homoeopathy.
That is why inspite of intensive and incessant .campaign against maternal and infant mortality rate, mothers and children still hopelessly die during and after delivery.
What the doctors have resorted as alternative to mass death is to coarse pregnant women, old and young into elective surgery, where certain incidental attacks during and after labour would be inimically silenced.
Consequently, some years ago, it was Health- for- all by the year 2000 (this failed woefully). Again Health -for- all by the year 2015 has been extended to Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) 2020 (prophetically this is mere fantasy and beating about the bush).
Based on these characteristics of Allopathy and Allopaths, there cannot be any best medical college and practice (as under proposal for RSUST by His Excellency), even when built with silver and gold. The new college would only be exceptional and competitive only when there is a reformation of the curriculum for training of doctors. This reformation is possible only when orthodox medicine is allowed to dovetail with complementary and .. alternative medicine in both State, Federal Teaching and Specialist Hospitals, then you and I, your families, friends and well wishers will give glory to God for a perfect healing.
There are two systems of Alternative Medicine that can adequately complement orthodox, because they use drugs in the treatment of diseases and are as broad as Allopathy. They arc Homoeopathy and Radionics or Electronic Medicine.
Unlike Allopathy, which is a term applied to that system of therapeutics in which diseases arc treated by producing a condition opposite and incompatible to the diseases to ‘be cured (Dorland’s illustrated Medial Dictionary, 30th Edition).
Homoeopathy is a system of therapeutics founded by Dr. Samuel Hahnemann (1755-1843)in which diseases are treated with remedies which are capable of producing in a healthy individual, symptoms like those diseases to be treated. It has its natural “Law of cure” (Similia Similibus Curantur) that guides practice.
Dr. Hahnemann, the originator of homoeopathy was a brilliant scholar and a noted linguist being familiar with English, Latin, French, Italian, Greek and Arabic languages. A celebrated and consummate allopathic doctor of his time. As an authority, at a particular time, he got -dissatisfied with the practice of medicine. This is because he sort with verification the grues about Allopathy. when, he could not deduce any original ideas, and logical explanation to the practice of medicine of his time, he thought of resigning from medical practice. Until he gave himself up to solitary reflection, before the idea for more investigation and research gave rise ‘to holistic medicine called homoeopathy. In my next edition, I will educate you on classical homoeopathy. I will also devote a column to discuss Electronic Medicine.
In 1982, Federal Government of Nigeria set up and sponsored a panel to investigate the science of homoeopathy in Indian, Germany and England. This was in collaboration with the British, Homoeopathic Council and the . Royal London Homoeopathic Hospital, and headed by a Royal member -Dr. Peter Fitsher. The recommendation by this panel was in favour of homoeopathy as a superlative and highly scientific system of medicine. Nigerian government was advised to integrate it into their health-care system. Substantiating this claim, in 1992, Major-General Ibrahim Badamosi Babangida endorsed Deoree 73 of 1992. recognising the practice of hemeopathy in Nigeria. Rather than implementing this by the Nigeria Ministry of Health, the Allopaths swept the papers under the carpet.
Perhaps for fear of competition or professional jealousy, I do not know.
In Britain for instance, homoeopathy enjoys royal patronage. It is recognised by Iegislation. The Queen of England has a Homoeopath as a personal phyaician. In India, there is over 124 or 125 homeopathic Medical Colleges and over 100 thousand homeopathic doctors. In France and Germany, Medical schools include curriculum for both orthodox and alternative medicines.
Hon. Commissioner for Health, Dr. Sampson Parker instead of partnering with the state government for another old school, may I appeal to you as the cock’ to crow presently in the Ministry of Health to break this territorial jinx, shun this ambivalence, establish posterity and recommend to His Excellency to build a college including Alternative Medical Curriculum to make a difference and integrate it into particularly BMSH where he has monopoly. The masses are suffering so much under the influence of poisonous chemicals without any alternative. He will listen to you because he desires good thing for his people. Homoeopathy is cheap to procure, it has no chemical, it has no side effects, best at empty stomach, and its healings can be magical.This is the concluding part of this piece started last Wednesday.
Dr. Mpamugo holds a Master’s Degree in Homeopathic and Electronic Medicine and practices in Rivers State.
A.B.C. Mpamugo
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Opinion4 days ago
Ancestorial Worship: My Take (1)
-
Education16 hours agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta17 hours ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Rivers15 hours ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education16 hours agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News17 hours agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News17 hours ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
News4 days agoFG Must Address Nigerians’ Concerns On Reforms -Shettima …Warns Against Misuse of AI, Social Media
