Opinion
Christianity And National Development
Christianity is a belief and practice built on the foundation of moral rectitude which is based on life and teachings of our Lord Jesus Christ.
Christianity all over the world has exhibited one important characteristic. It has proved to be an unchangeable changer. This special feature has impacted positively on the individuals and the society as a whole. Individuals, under the doctrine of Christian faith have to live and interact in a social setting making their own contributions to the goals of their society.
A particular question that however arises is, to what extent does commitment to Christianity enhance socio-economic development today?
In Nigerian context, the Christian faith is beset with a host of problems which have intended to keep, only latent, its contribution to national development Internally, there have been emergence of various sects, cults, clubs, fraternities and denomination of untold variations. This development would not have presented much problems, but for their negative contributions which come in the form of religious sectionalism, bigotry, parochialism and indiscrimate misinterpretation of the Holy Bible to the further detriment of the society.
Besides, there is widespread hypocrisy in those so-called Christian circles to the extent that today, the question rings from disappointed observers, “who is a Christian afterall?.”
It is now common place to see people tagging themselves “Christians” for utilitarian and honourary purpose, and thus waving aside the practical aspects that qualify one as a true Christian. This unfortunate situation has led many to the unwise decision of throwing away all the coins in their pockets simply because they happen to discover some counterfeits among them.
Such people turn hostile and combatant irrationally against anything associated with Christianity. External hostility has come to the church in forms of unfounded criticism and the use of authority against weaker Christian communities. Yet in the face of these pressures, strains and distortions, the Christian faith has remained a most powerful force for transformation.
It is common knowledge that economic pursuits and politics without a moral base can not help this country. We are now at a point in our development efforts where we do two contradictory things. We cry over falling moral standard; while at the same time operate structures and uphold values that make it difficult for competent institutions to contribute to the evolution of good society. Why do we kill the hen and still cry for egg supply?
It will be recalled that Nigeria witnessed a religious revival during and shortly after the civil war. This phenomenon can partly be sociologically explained. The search for security and emotional and psychological fortune at that time drove people to embrace religion. Immediately after the war, the Christian virtues of hope and industriousness sustained Nigerians, especially southerners who experienced most the ravages of war.
Presently, we are in a society which has lost moral and ethical balance, notwithstanding Nigeria’s quest for transformational change. Nigeria is undergoing a rapid change in the areas of culture, economy and politics. Unfortunately, most of these changes are neither directional nor well co-ordinated.
If given the chances, the Christians faith is poised to give this country the needed moral base. But unfortunately, the potentials of Christianity as a moving force of history and economic development has not been fully exploited in this country. Individual faithful Christians have stopped short of demonstrating the practical ingredients of development contained in their personal commitment to our Lord Jesus Christ.
Christianity is the preferable position through which the Christian ethical principle, stand as a prerequisite for lasting socio-economic change. I want to say right away that the actual application of Christian ethics by the kingdom is diminishing. It is obvious that Christendom has been polluted with certain negative settings by some religious administrators, who confine themselves to the natural instincts which work contrary to the divine instincts.
Frankly speaking, we are living in the era where truth is relegated to the background by some religious bigots, who have decided to drink from their own cistern, instead of drinking from the spring of life. Let the Bible be the monitor and advisor of all true believers to know the truth in order to avoid misguidance through false teaching of religious stalwarts. Christians should beware of false prophets.
Asiemiea Amachree
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers2 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News2 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics2 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured2 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
-
News2 days ago
FG Explains Supply Disruption As Power Generation Drops To 3,659MW
-
Metro3 days ago
Port Harcourt Prepares For 10,000 Runners As International Marathon Returns
-
News2 days agoBille Gas Leak: Coalition Tasks FG On Proactive Measures
-
News2 days agoIGP Orders Arrest, Prosecution Of Campaign Billboard Vandals
