Opinion
Govs, FG And Niger Delta Development
The creeks and streets in the Niger Delta region have been relatively calm and safe in recent times. The isolated case of five youth corps members, who were kidnapped and released a few weeks ago, does not substantially subtract from this fact. Of course, the new found peace is attributable to the amnesty programme, which has so far, reined in the hitherto restive youths of the region. How long this tenuous peace will hold is a matter of conjecture. However, it would help if the post-amnesty programme is pursued with greater vigor and urgency. In this wise, development projects meant to create jobs and fully engage the youths must be executed with dispatch to prevent any resurgence of violence.
The political leaders of the region seem to have read the ominous signs and are frantically raising the red flag. The apparent unease among the elite stems from the sluggish way the development challenges of the region are being confronted. This tardiness manifests in one of the star projects, the East-West road, which traverses most states in the South-South zone. At the rate the construction is going, it may take another ten years for it to be completed.
This fear is confirmed by Mr. Michael Hachenberg, the Managing Director of Setraco, one of the contractors working on the East/West Road. He told the South-South caucus of the House of Representatives last year that it would take 10 years to complete this very important road link. Reason? The Federal Government is not releasing funds as and when due. This nonchalant attitude of the government if not seriously addressed will have dire consequences for the region.
Perhaps, determined to ensure that the gains of the amnesty programme were not eroded, governors of the six states of the South-South zone, converged in Port Harcourt recently to chart a new way forward. They met under the aegis of BRACED, an acronym for the states; Bayelsa, Rivers, Akwa-Ibom, Cross River, Edo and Delta tates, and signed an agreement for the take-off of a Regional Economic Cooperation Commission. According to the Governor of Cross Rivers State, Senator Liyel Imoke, who is the chairman of the group, they also agreed to conduct feasibility studies on regional economic projects.
However, the immediate concern of the governors was the execution of projects that would hasten the development of the Niger Delta. Apparently, the people they represent must have been putting pressure on them to rev up action on tangible projects that would impact positively on their lives. So, the governors turned the heat on the Federal Government, asking it to quicken the pace of work on the East-West road as well as kick-start, the actual construction of the coastal road and the East-West railway.
Now that the rains have started, the road between Port Harcourt and Warri, two main cities in the Niger Delta, is almost impassable. There are several gullies that make life unbearable for commuters. Serious accidents and avoidable deaths are common occurrences. Though Setraco is on site, the withdrawal of Julius Berger from participation has adversely affected the speed. What now calls for urgent attention is to fill the gullies and pot holes while the main work continues. The Federal Government should give strong directives to Setraco to immediately fix these death traps. Niger Deltans cannot wait for the East-West road to be completed before they can move from one part of the region to the other.
Last year, it took the intervention of the Niger Delta Development Commission, NDDC, to save the road from total collapse. All the while, neither the Federal Roads Maintenance Agency (FERMA) nor the Federal Ministry of Works lifted a finger to help. Isn’t that the height of negligence? Today, we are back to square one and those using the road in this horrible condition are cursing and swearing.
As if to douse the rising tension, the nation’s number two citizen, Architect Namadi Sambo, quickly put in a word for the President when he attended the convocation ceremony of the University of Port Harcourt just five days after the governors gave their warning signal. He re-assured the governors and leaders of the region that extensive work (the designs) had already been done on both the coastal road and the East-West railway.
The leaders of the region have continued to advise that there should be more action and less talk. Thank God that during his inaugural speech President Goodluck Jonathan acknowledged the dangers of further delay. He said: “The time for lamentation is over. This is the era of transformation. This is the time for action.” The president had in the course of his campaigns said that the lofty plans captured in the Regional Development Master Plan, facilitated by the NDDC would be pursued with renewed vigour.
“Let me assure you that I am irrevocably committed to the development of the Niger-Delta. We must develop the region to restore confidence and hope among our people and children. To this end, let me assure you that the Niger-Delta Master Plan for development is on course and we will assist the NDDC and all the state governments to faithfully implement it,” the President said.
The NDDC on its part is working through its Partners for Sustainable Development [PSD] Forum to get all the stakeholders fully involved in the development process and also use the body to harmonize projects in the region as enunciated in the plan.
Indeed, the first official assignment of the present NDDC Managing Director, Mr. Chibuzor Ugwuoha was the attendance of a workshop by the PSD Forum in Port Harcourt. His remarks at that occasion underscored the importance he attached to partnership. He said: “We know that the task of developing the Niger Delta is enormous. We cannot do it individually but together we can do it.” Ugwoha’s emphasis on the PSD Forum as a platform for collaboration is in line with his desire to engender further buy-in and commitment of all stakeholders to the Master Plan.
It is encouraging that the state governors in the region are beginning to take keen interest in the affairs of the commission which drives the master plan process. Recently, the hitherto dormant Advisory Committee of the NDDC, which comprises the governors and the principal officers of the commission, sprang into life after many years of in-action. The advisory committee intervened in the internal challenges that have confronted the interventionist agency of late. The long expected meeting of that moderating body also deliberated on how to aggressively implement the master Plan.
It is good to have the governors on the same page with the NDDC in the onerous task of bringing rapid development to the long-neglected people of the Niger delta. They should also work in synergy with the Ministry of Niger Delta Affairs. Such cooperation of all main stakeholders is imperative for the rapid socio-economic transformation of the oil-rich region.
The governors of the region should show more commitment to the development of their various states. With prudent management of their resources, they would make by far more impact on the lives of their people. True, a few of them have done creditably well. Others are, however, laggards because there is no comparison whatsoever between the revenue they have received and the development on ground. None of them should use the implementation of the N18,000 minimum wage as an alibi for dissatisfactory performance.
There is no doubt that there is a justification in the governors’ demand for an adjustment in the revenue allocation formula to put more money in the coffers of the states to enable them pay living wages and provide more basic infrastructure which would spur development in their states.
The Federal Government currently takes 52.68 per cent of the centrally collected revenues, leaving the states and local governments with 26.72 and 20.60 per cent respectively. Meanwhile, the states and the local governments are saddled with more responsibilities like paying teachers and funding health care services. Redressing the badly skewed allocation formula should engage the attention of the National Assembly as it settles down to business. In the meantime, the Federal Government, which takes the lion share of our collective wealth must rise to the occasion and respond immediately to the infrastructural deficit in the Niger Delta.
Ifeatu Agbu
The events that unfolded in Abuja on Tuesday November 11, 2025 between the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Chief Nyesom Wike and a detachment of soldiers guarding a disputed property, led by Adams Yerima, a commissioned Naval Officer, may go down as one of the defining images of Nigeria’s democratic contradictions. It was not merely a quarrel over land. It was a confrontation between civil authority and the military legacy that still hovers over our national life.
Nyesom Wike, fiery and fearless as always, was seen on video exchanging words with a uniformed officer who refused to grant him passage to inspect a parcel of land alleged to have been illegally acquired. The minister’s voice rose, his temper flared, and the soldier, too, stood his ground, insisting on his own authority. Around them, aides, security men, and bystanders watched, stunned, as two embodiments of the Nigerian state clashed in the open.
The images spread fast, igniting debates across drawing rooms, beer parlours, and social media platforms. Some hailed Wike for standing up to military arrogance; others scolded him for perceived disrespect to the armed forces. Yet beneath the noise lies a deeper question about what sort of society we are building and whether power in Nigeria truly understands the limits of its own reach.
It is tragic that, more than two decades into civil rule, the relationship between the civilian arm of government and the military remains fragile and poorly understood. The presence of soldiers in a land dispute between private individuals and the city administration is, by all civic standards, an aberration. It recalls a dark era when might was right, and uniforms conferred immunity against accountability.
Wike’s anger, even if fiery, was rooted in a legitimate concern: that no individual, however connected or retired, should deploy the military to protect personal interests. That sentiment echoes the fundamental democratic creed that the law is supreme, not personalities. If his passion overshot decorum, it was perhaps a reflection of a nation weary of impunity.
On the other hand, the soldier in question is a symbol of another truth: that discipline, respect for order, and duty to hierarchy are ingrained in our armed forces. He may have been caught between conflicting instructions one from his superiors, another from a civilian minister exercising his lawful authority. The confusion points not to personal failure but to institutional dysfunction.
It is, therefore, simplistic to turn the incident into a morality play of good versus evil.
*********”**** What happened was an institutional embarrassment. Both men represented facets of the same failing system a polity still learning how to reconcile authority with civility, law with loyalty, and service with restraint.
In fairness, Wike has shown himself as a man of uncommon courage. Whether in Rivers State or at the FCTA, he does not shy away from confrontation. Yet courage without composure often feeds misunderstanding. A public officer must always be the cooler head, even when provoked, because the power of example outweighs the satisfaction of winning an argument.
Conversely, soldiers, too, must be reminded that their uniforms do not place them above civilian oversight. The military exists to defend the nation, not to enforce property claims or intimidate lawful authorities. Their participation in purely civil matters corrodes the image of the institution and erodes public trust.
One cannot overlook the irony: in a country where kidnappers roam highways and bandits sack villages, armed men are posted to guard contested land in the capital. It reflects misplaced priorities and distorted values. The Nigerian soldier, trained to defend sovereignty, should not be drawn into private or bureaucratic tussles.
Sycophancy remains the greatest ailment of our political culture. Many of those who now cheer one side or the other do so not out of conviction but out of convenience. Tomorrow they will switch allegiance. True patriotism lies not in defending personalities but in defending principles. A people enslaved by flattery cannot nurture a culture of justice.
The Nigerian elite must learn to submit to the same laws that govern the poor. When big men fence off public land and use connections to shield their interests, they mock the very constitution they swore to uphold. The FCT, as the mirror of national order, must not become a jungle where only the powerful can build.
The lesson for Wike himself is also clear: power is best exercised with calmness. The weight of his office demands more than bravery; it demands statesmanship. To lead is not merely to command, but to persuade — even those who resist your authority.
Equally, the lesson for the armed forces is that professionalism shines brightest in restraint. Obedience to illegal orders is not loyalty; it is complicity. The soldier who stands on the side of justice protects both his honour and the dignity of his uniform.
The Presidency, too, must see this episode as a wake-up call to clarify institutional boundaries. If soldiers can be drawn into civil enforcement without authorization, then our democracy remains at risk of subtle militarization. The constitution must speak louder than confusion.
The Nigerian public deserves better than spectacles of ego. We crave leaders who rise above emotion and officers who respect civilian supremacy. Our children must not inherit a nation where authority means shouting matches and intimidation in public glare.
Every democracy matures through such tests. What matters is whether we learn the right lessons. The British once had generals who defied parliament; the Americans once fought over states’ rights; Nigeria, too, must pass through her own growing pains but with humility, not hubris.
If the confrontation has stirred discomfort, then perhaps it has done the nation some good. It forces a conversation long overdue: Who truly owns the state — the citizen or the powerful? Can we build a Nigeria where institutions, not individuals, define our destiny?
As the dust settles, both the FCTA and the military hierarchy must conduct impartial investigations. The truth must be established — not to shame anyone, but to restore order. Where laws were broken, consequences must follow. Where misunderstandings occurred, apologies must be offered.
Let the rule of law triumph over the rule of impulse. Let civility triumph over confrontation. Let governance return to the path of dialogue and procedure.
Nigeria cannot continue to oscillate between civilian bravado and military arrogance. Both impulses spring from the same insecurity — the fear of losing control. True leadership lies in the ability to trust institutions to do their work without coercion.
Those who witnessed the clash saw a drama of two gladiators. One in starched khaki, one in well-cut suit. Both proud, both unyielding. But a nation cannot be built on stubbornness; it must be built on understanding. Power, when it meets power, should produce order, not chaos.
We must resist the temptation to glorify temper. Governance is not warfare; it is stewardship. The citizen watches, the world observes, and history records. How we handle moments like this will define our collective maturity.
The confrontation may have ended without violence, but it left deep questions in the national conscience. When men of authority quarrel in the open, institutions tremble. The people, once again, become spectators in a theatre of misplaced pride.
It is time for all who hold office — civilian or military — to remember that they serve under the same flag. That flag is neither khaki nor political colour; it is green-white-green, and it demands humility.
No victor, no vanquish only a lesson for a nation still learning to govern itself with dignity.
By; King Onunwor
