Opinion
Why LGAs Should Be Revolutionised
The third tier system of government otherwise known as the local government system was reformed in 1976 from what it was originally called (NA) Native Authority.
There are 774 local government councils in the country and many more have been illegally created in some states like Lagos and Bayelsa just to mention a few in the name of even development of society.
Initially, the reasons for their establishment were to bring the government nearer to the people and relieving the central government of the burden of over-centralisation and providing and catering of the needs of the people at the third tier of governance.
Local governments also provide recreational facilities, build and maintain schools, health centres, maternity homes, markets and transportation.
The local government system has simplified the administration of justice at the local levels and because of this, they build and maintain customary courts where cases on marriages, divorce and inheritance are settled on local traditions.
In order to function effectively and efficiently as corporate entities by an Act of Parliament establishing it, they are empowered to collect rates, which is one of its main source of revenue.
Other sources of revenue are tolls from motorparks, slaughter houses, markets, marriages and grants from states and central governments which could be invested in lucrative ventures.
Conversely, local governments have blantantly refused to adhere to the laid down principles of the Act establishing them probably due to the huge sums of statutory allocations given to them by the government.
Some local governments have become inefficient because of corruption/ embezzlement and fraud is rampant.
Contracts are inflated and at times awarded to incompetent people and there is no adequate arrangement for accountability.
This non-challant attitude of councils not to adhere to the principles which established them calls for the need for their being checked.
Based on the fact that the local government councils are established by an Act of Parliament they are subject to checks and consequent disciplinary actions.
That the third tier system of government established to bring government closer to the people has failed woefully is not news but what is news is evidence of the degree of recklessness and corruption in the system beyond allegations.
Recently, the Rivers State House of Assembly dissolved the Ogba/Egbema/Ndoni local government council to sustain the corporate existence of the state and local government.
Also, the Assembly ordered the sacking of the Andoni local government chairman and suspension of his Okrika local government colleague over financial misconduct and non-compliance with financial regulations and blantantly refusing to give account of the council’s budget for year 2009.
While the chairman of Ikwerre local government was admonished for building a swimming pool in the council rather than invest in a project like fish farm which would have been more beneficial to the people of the area.
This shows that the system is being run by self-centered people to whom the needs of the people are of no consequence.
This is why the Rivers State House of Assembly must be commended for its action on Ogba/Egbema/Ndoni, Andoni and Okrika local governments but beyond these men, it must beam its light on all and condemn acts that might undermine an unbiased discharge of this function like allowing the chairmen to build structures in their names.
There should be constant and regular checks of the activities of the local government councils in line with the Act that established them.
Stringent measures or actions to be taken against such defaulters should be done when the culprits are still in office and not when they have gone out of office.
By so doing, defaulting councils/officials will learn lessons which can prevent future occurrences to sanitise the local government system towards improvement and development of the grassroots.
Ogundu, resides in Port Harcourt.
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Opinion4 days ago
Ancestorial Worship: My Take (1)
-
News13 hours agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
Niger Delta12 hours ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Rivers11 hours ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education12 hours agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Education12 hours agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News13 hours ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
News3 days agoFG Must Address Nigerians’ Concerns On Reforms -Shettima …Warns Against Misuse of AI, Social Media
