Editorial

Implement NDDC Audit Report

Published

4 years ago

October 6, 2021

At last, the long-awaited forensic audit report on the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) has been submitted to President Muhammadu Buhari by the Minister of Niger Delta Affairs, Senator Godswill Akpabio. The report was received on behalf of the President on September 2, 2021 by the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami.
The earth-shattering revelation in the document is remarkably a confirmation of the long-held view of many informed Nigerians that NDDC is undoubtedly a cesspool of corruption. How can an interventionist agency have 362 unchecked bank accounts, 13,777 abandoned projects and present no more than the value of N6trilion? It is reprehensible and unpalatable. The perpetrators must be named, shamed, and prosecuted.
According to Malami, “It is on record that between 2001 and 2019, the Federal Government approved N3, 375,735,776,794.93 as budgetary allocation and N2,420,948,894,191.00 as Income from Statutory and Non-Statutory sources, which brings the total figure to the sum of approximately six trillion naira given to the Niger Delta Development Commission.”
The Justice Minister further declared, “The Federal Government is particularly concerned with the colossal loss occasioned by uncompleted and unverified development projects in the Niger Delta region, despite the huge resources made available to uplift the living standards of the citizens. We have on record over 13,777 projects, the execution of which is substantially compromised. The Federal Government is also concerned with the multitudes of Niger Delta Development Commission’s bank accounts amounting to 362 and lack of proper reconciliation of accounts.”
However, it is essential to note that budget allocation does not automatically mean that the total amount is backed by cash and remitted to the commission. Therefore, the claim that N6trillion budget allocation was squandered may be misrepresenting, unless there is evidence to the contrary. Malami should audaciously disclose the amount paid to NDDC from the overall budget during the period under review.
Notwithstanding, it requires to be understood how the mega interventionist agency has transformed into a cash cow for several Niger Delta elite who have been diverting contracts, imposing huge mobilisation fees and refusing to execute the task or, provide low quality projects. Several news reports abound how successive NDDC managers colluded with compelling interest groups to purloin the commission’s finances.
During the House of Representatives investigation of the agency last year, Akpabio dropped a blockbuster, asserting that some members of the National Assembly were among the biggest recipients of NDDC contracts. This disclosure led to the infamous “shut down the mic” comment, as the coordinator of the investigation team frantically struggled to forestall further consideration of the matter.
This incident shows that the federal lawmakers who should ensure adequate oversight of the agency are themselves heavily compromised. They employed their lofty positions to award contracts to themselves and their acquaintances and failed to honour the deals. This self-fulfilling and self-inflating conduct is part of our public service challenge.
While the NDDC was going through a forensic audit, the provisional administration, later dismissed by the court last year, was busy supporting families with outrageous expenses for palliative care related to Covid-19. According to media reports, the interim management committee headed by Ms Joy Nunieh and Professor Kemebradikumo Pondei spent N81.5 billion over five months.
So far, there is very little information about the forensic audit report. Nigerians deserve to know how much of the agency’s pecuniary resource has been misappropriated, how much should be refunded, and by whom. If there is no official information, this will provide capacity for rumours and fictitious news. At the very least, the summary of the report should be published to enable the public to know the undertakers.
Those indicted in the report must not be treated like the six Nigerians convicted and sentenced to jail terms by the United Arab Emirates (UAE) for financing Boko Haram, but later deported to Nigeria. While the government of the UAE has named the convicts, the identity of a Nigerian government official involved in sponsoring the terrorist group has yet to be revealed by the Nigerian authorities. Likewise, no action has been taken against the 400 alleged Boko Haram financiers arrested at the start of the year. It is unclear why they have not been prosecuted.
Buhari should muster the political will and rare candour to fulfill his pledge to, without hesitation, strategically implement all aspects of the audit report to promote probity and greater prosperity for the Niger Delta region and Nigeria as a whole. Anything less is unsatisfactory. The Office of the Attorney General of the Federation, whose task it is, should prepare a plan of action to achieve the implementation promised by the President.
Among the immediate steps indicated, which Nigerians earnestly await, is his execution scheme, consisting of, but not narrowed to “initiation of criminal investigations, prosecution, recovery of funds not properly utilised for the public purposes for which they were meant”. This includes the review of the NDDC Act to facilitate the provision of better services by the commission. The starting point will be to make the report available to all Nigerians and to engage civil society organisations in its execution with a view to strengthening transparency.
Expectedly, Governors of states in the South-South region have given fillip to this stance as they have urged the Federal Government to ensure that the report of the forensic audit is not swept under the carpet.
The governors, under the aegis of the BRACED Council, in a six point communiqué issued at the end of its meeting at the Government House, Port Harcourt last Monday, expressed the hope that the Federal Government would make the forensic audit report on the NDDC public and be courageous enough to deal justly and fairly with the report with a view to strengthening the capacity of NDDC to meet its obligations to the people of the region. This is indeed a wise counsel the Federal Government should not fail to heed.

Editorial

No To Political Office Holders’ Salary Hike

Published

1 day ago

September 22, 2025

Uchechukwu Okwum

Nigeria’s Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) has unveiled a gratuitous proposal to increase the salaries of political and public office holders in the country. This plan seeks to fatten the pay packets of the president, vice-president, governors, deputy governors, and members of the National and State Assemblies. At a time when the nation is struggling to steady its economy, the suggestion that political leaders should be rewarded with more money is not only misplaced but insulting to the sensibilities of the ordinary Nigerian.

What makes the proposal even more opprobrious is the dire economic condition under which citizens currently live. The cost of living crisis has worsened, inflation has eroded the purchasing power of workers, and the naira continues to tumble against foreign currencies. The majority of Nigerians are living hand to mouth, with many unable to afford basic foodstuffs, medical care, and education. Against this backdrop, political office holders, who already enjoy obscene allowances, perks, and privileges, should not even contemplate a salary increase.

It is, therefore, not surprising that the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has stepped in to challenge this development. SERAP has filed a lawsuit against the RMAFC to halt the implementation of this salary increment. This resolute move represents a voice of reason and accountability at a time when public anger against political insensitivity is palpable. The group is rightly insisting that the law must serve as a bulwark against impunity.

According to a statement issued by SERAP’s Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, the commission has been dragged before the Federal High Court in Abuja. Although a hearing date remains unconfirmed, the momentous step of seeking judicial redress reflects a determination to hold those in power accountable. SERAP has once again positioned itself as a guardian of public interest by challenging an elite-centric policy.

The case, registered as suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/1834/2025, specifically asks the court to determine “whether RMAFC’s proposed salary hike for the president, vice-president, governors and their deputies, and lawmakers in Nigeria is not unlawful, unconstitutional and inconsistent with the rule of law.” This formidable question goes to the very heart of democratic governance: can those entrusted with public resources decide their own pay rises without violating the constitution and moral order?

In its pleadings, SERAP argues that the proposed hike runs foul of both the 1999 Nigerian Constitution and the RMAFC Act. By seeking a judicial declaration that such a move is unlawful, unconstitutional, and inconsistent with the rule of law, the group has placed a spotlight on the tension between self-serving leadership and constitutionalism. To trivialise such an issue would be harum-scarum, for the constitution remains the supreme authority guiding governance.

We wholeheartedly commend SERAP for standing firm, while we roundly condemn RMAFC’s selfish proposal. Political office should never be an avenue for financial aggrandisement. Since our leaders often pontificate sacrifice to citizens, urging them to tighten their belts in the face of economic turbulence, the same leaders must embody sacrifice themselves. Anything short of this amounts to double standards and betrayal of trust.

The Nigerian economy is not buoyant enough to shoulder the additional cost of a salary increase for political leaders. Already, lawmakers and executives enjoy allowances that are grossly disproportionate to the national average income. These earnings are sufficient not only for their needs but also their unchecked greed. To even consider further increments under present circumstances is egregious, a slap in the face of ordinary workers whose minimum wage remains grossly insufficient.

Resources earmarked for such frivolities should instead be channelled towards alleviating the suffering of citizens and improving the nation’s productive capacity. According to United Nations statistics, about 62.9 per cent of Nigerians were living in multidimensional poverty in 2021, compared to 53.7 per cent in 2017. Similarly, nearly 30.9 per cent of the population lives below the international poverty line of US$2.15 per day. These figures paint a stark picture: Nigeria is a poor country by all measurable standards, and any extra naira diverted to elite pockets deepens this misery.

Besides, the timing of this proposal could not be more inappropriate. At a period when unemployment is soaring, inflation is crippling households, and insecurity continues to devastate communities, the RMAFC has chosen to pursue elite enrichment. It is widely known that Nigeria’s economy is in a parlous state, and public resources should be conserved and wisely invested. Political leaders must show prudence, not profligacy.

Another critical dimension is the national debt profile. According to the Debt Management Office, Nigeria’s total public debt as of March 2025 stood at a staggering N149.39 trillion. External debt obligations also remain heavy, with about US$43 billion outstanding by September 2024. In such a climate of debt-servicing and borrowing to fund budgets, it is irresponsible for political leaders to even table the idea of inflating their salaries further. Debt repayment, not self-reward, should occupy their minds.

This ignoble proposal is insensitive, unnecessary, and profoundly reckless. It should be discarded without further delay. Public office is a trust, not an entitlement to wealth accumulation. Nigerians deserve leaders who will share in their suffering, lead by example, and prioritise the common good over self-indulgence. Anything less represents betrayal of the social contract and undermines the fragile democracy we are striving to build.

Editorial

No To Political Office Holders’ Salary Hike

Published

1 day ago

September 22, 2025

The Tide

Editorial

Rivers’ Retirees: Matters Arising

Published

2 weeks ago

September 8, 2025

The Tide

The Rivers State Government deserves commendation for the manner in which it conducted the last biometric exercise for pensioners in the state. For the first time in many years, the verification process was not only efficient but also humane, a development that has brought relief to a category of citizens that often bears the brunt of neglect.

Unlike previous verification exercises that left pensioners exhausted and unattended, the latest exercise set a refreshing precedent. Retirees were given proper and sumptuous meals, and in addition, the government paid the sum of N10,000 into their accounts to cushion their transportation costs. Such gestures go a long way in demonstrating that those who had laboured for the state are not forgotten in their twilight years.

The measure was particularly necessary given that some pensioners had to travel long distances to reach their verification centres. For elderly men and women, such journeys come with physical and financial strain. By recognising these realities and easing the burden, the government has shown that pensioners deserve dignity, not disdain.

Beyond this laudable act of consideration, the authorities must reflect on the very structure of pension verification. The era of compelling retirees to be physically present for routine verification should be reconsidered. With digital tools and innovation, the government can adopt systems that capture and confirm data without the stress of physical assembly. This is crucial for pensioners residing in other states or even abroad.

While we acknowledge the importance of verification in cleaning up pension records, we cannot ignore the darker side of the matter. It is regrettable that some allowances continue to be paid to deceased pensioners, with relatives fraudulently collecting the funds. The latest biometrics, thankfully, exposed some of these sharp practices. The exercise, therefore, is not only about order but also about justice.

We urge families of deceased pensioners to be patriotic enough to inform the government of the deaths of their loved ones. It is deeply shameful that in some instances, individuals attempted to impersonate late pensioners during the biometrics. Such behaviour undermines the spirit of honesty and deprives genuine retirees of their due entitlements.

The exercise also revealed another important area of concern: the health of pensioners. It is reassuring to learn that the state government has reportedly promised to take over the medical treatment of some retirees who arrived for the biometrics in critical condition. This is a step in the right direction. Elderly citizens, after years of service, should have access to special health care facilities in the state. Setting aside hospitals or designated centres for the aged is not just desirable but necessary.

While pension payments in Rivers State have remained consistent, attention must now be directed towards gratuities. Senior citizens deserve to receive their retirement benefits without the bureaucratic hitches that have often marred the process. After years of loyal service, nothing is more demoralising than to see retirees languish for want of their gratuities. Every worker, as Scripture reminds us, is worthy of his wage.

Retirement, in any civilised society, should not be reduced to a sentence of suffering. In dealing with pensioners, government must consistently wear a human face. The humane manner displayed during this verification exercise should not be a one-off. It must become the norm in all dealings with retirees. Measures must continually be put in place to ensure that they do not feel abandoned by the state they served.

One welcome innovation has already been introduced. The Sole Administrator of Rivers State, Vice Admiral (Rtd) Ibok-Ete Ekwe Ibas, has altered the method of gratuity payment. Pensioners now receive their monies directly into their bank accounts, eliminating the cheque-based system that for years served as fertile ground for corruption. This reform is both pragmatic and forward-looking. Similarly, the implementation of the N32,000 pension harmonisation is also commendable.

Direct payments gratuities ensure transparency and drastically reduce the possibility of diversion of funds. More importantly, they restore confidence in the system and assure pensioners that their entitlements will reach them without interference. In this way, the government has not only safeguarded the process but also upheld the principle of accountability.

Seamless gratuity payment has a ripple effect on the workforce as a whole. When workers are confident that retirement will not plunge them into hardship, the temptation to falsify age in order to remain in service is eliminated. Such reforms, therefore, enhance efficiency, honesty, and productivity in the public service.

In sum, the Rivers State Government has struck a refreshing chord in its handling of pension verification. It has shown empathy, innovation, and accountability. However, the momentum must be sustained, and the focus must shift towards modernising verification methods and prioritising retirees’ welfare in health, gratuity, and dignity.

When retirees are treated with compassion and fairness, the message to those still in service is clear: faithful service to the state will not go unrewarded. The humane verification exercise, though a single event, offers a hopeful glimpse of what governance can look like when people, especially the elderly, are placed at the heart of policy.