Opinion

Hunger Is No Excuse

Published

2 years ago

March 8, 2024

A consensus among analysts and many people who have voiced their concern on the spate of looting of warehouses and trucks conveying food and raw materials by suspected hoodlums in some parts of the country is that looting is a crime and hunger cannot be an excuse for anyone to engage in such a criminal act. Yes, the economy is biting harder by the day; arguably, President Bola Tinubu’s government has made some economic decisions that aggravated the harsh economic situation in the country but should that justify the stealing of food items from trucks in traffic as reportedly happened along Kaduna Road in Suleja, Niger State? Should that be a viable reason for the looting and vandalising of the warehouse belonging to the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Department of Agriculture in Tasha, Abuja last Sunday morning?
A hungry man is an angry man, late Bob Marley sang, but hunger should not cloud our sense of reasoning not to consider the effect of our actions on ourselves, other people and the nation we call our own.
Reports have it that some of the trucks and warehouses being looted belong to private individuals. How then can we, in a bid to quench our hunger inflict pain on others? Already, the organised private sector has threatened to shut down their businesses and lay off workers should the looting of their wares continue. Who will suffer if that happens – Tinubu, ministers, law makers, governors? Nigerian masses, be reasonable. Nigeria is a nation of laws and it is expected that the fifteen suspects arrested over the Tasha incident will be dealt with in accordance with the law to serve as a deterrent to others. As a matter of fact, stemming the ugly trend of looting depends on how the law enforcement authorities handled this case. We cannot expect the country to grow when lawlessness among people in both high and low places is the order of the day.
The Minister for Works, David Umahi, a few days back, joined his boss, Tinubu and family to appeal for calm and patience in the face of the challenges currently facing the country, insisting that the present hunger affecting the country was caused by the past governments. Much as it steers anger hearing such words from a member of the same political party that has been in power for almost a decade, changing nothing, rather worsening the woes of the people, patience and hope are what Nigerians need now. Tinubu and his economic team have constantly assured Nigerians that there will be light at the end of the tunnel. Though many people do not believe that, going by the policy somersaults and lack of critical thinking displayed by the current government, there is hope for any glimpse of lightant time soon. But so long as Tinubu remains the president, we must have to wear our patience gabs and support the government as much as we can, to succeed. We must understand that we all have roles to play in making Nigeria better.
In the viral video clip of the looting at Tasha, a man was heard urging the people to loot the items because “na government property, our property”. This is the mentality that propels some citizens to misuse public facilities. We hardly see any reason to protect “government property” established for our use with taxpayers’ money. That certainly is not the way to go but it is surprising how we do not seem to learn from the past. During Covid-19 lockdown, warehouses were looted because the state governors failed to distribute the Covid-19 palliatives as and when due. Palliative items were donated by well-meaning individuals and groups and for many months these items were not distributed and the people under lockdown were dying of hunger. Some people sniffed out where these items were kept and the unfortunate nation-wide looting and plundering of government and private property followed.
Currently Nigerians are hungry. The purchasing power of the nation’s currency has been hampered by poor economic decisions of those in authority. In January, the inflation figures were reported to had reached 29.90 percent, no thanks to the irrational act of announcing an end to the payment of subsidy, the floating of the Naira, the increasing of the interest rate and other policies that have dealt a heavy blow on the nation’s economy, making life unbearable for many citizens. As a way of cushioning the effects of these economic realities, the president in January promised to release 42,000 metric tonnes of grains to Nigerians. One month later, the Presidency told the citizens that the distribution of the grains had not commenced due to the encumbrances involved in bagging of grains at strategic reserves. This is March, and the distribution is yet to take place? Haba!
One thinks that the government should be more prompt in responding to the needs of the people. The right actions need to be taken at the right time to forestall some of these embarrassing occurrences. It is also important that the authorities address the citizens regularly on the affairs of the nation. Let the people know what the government is doing, efforts being made to address the precarious situation in the country. The time of keeping the citizens in the dark should be over. Otherwise, they will get information from whatever sources and react in whichever way they deem fit. It is high time we had purposeful, sincere, transparent, accountable, people-oriented leadership at all levels in the country. We cannot continue with the age-long cosmetic approach to the problems of the country, especially poverty alleviation, job creation, education and youth engagement, if we do not want a more devastating rage of the poor in future.
A lot of people have called for a detour of the subsidy removal policy as that is the main reason for the present quagmire in the country. Energy security is something no nation jokes with. The International Energy Agencies (IEA) define energy security as “the uninterrupted availability of energy sources at an affordable price.” It plays a pivotal role in promoting economic stability, national security, job creation, environmental sustainability, and overall well-being of a nation. Policymakers and industry leaders all over the world often prioritise strategies that address energy security to build a robust and sustainable economic foundation. There is no doubt that all the people that pushed for fuel subsidy removal never knew how devastating the resultant effect could be. Now that everybody’s eyes are open and we are faced with the reality, the best thing to be done by President Tinubu is to reverse the decision and save the nation from crumbling. The nation’s refineries should be made functional. Is it not high time the government kept its promises of bringing the refineries back to life? What about improvement on electricity generation, available and affordable electricity?
For over two months now, many parts of the country, including the Federal Capital Territory, have experienced unstable power supply. All the food many families stored in their deep freezers have gone to waste because of lack of power supply and no money to buy petrol at the exorbitant price of N680,00 and above to fuel their generators. Apparently, there is nothing, no sector of the economy that will function well without adequate power supply at an affordable rate. Recently, a lot has been said on the need for many states to invest in mechanised agriculture as a way of solving the food crisis in the country. That is very laudable, but it still has to do with affordable and constant energy supply. The Governor of Borno State, Babagana Umara Zulum, recently announced his plan to provide petrol for farmers in the state at subsidised rates to enhance food security among residents. That is a man that understands the importance of affordable energy to the agricultural sector. Other governors should take a cue from him.Need I state that without sincere measures to deal with insecurity across the states to enable farmers to go back to their farms and carry on with their farming activities safely, that the food crisis in the country will not abate? Further delay may be very dangerous

Calista Ezeaku

Opinion

Agony In Ivory Tower

Published

3 days ago

March 9, 2026

The Tide

Quote: A university that tolerates missing scripts, result manipulation and ‘sorting’ is not merely failing students—it is quietly destroying the moral foundation of education itself.”

The sad cases of missing scripts, compulsory Sorting, inputting of wrong results and other obnoxious practices in some public universities, leave much to be desired. One cannot imagine how a student will be compelled to suffer consequences of the flagrant negligence of a Head of Department, a lecturer, Department staff or an ICT staff.Many academic and non academic staff in several public universities seem to be performing far below standard, thus unproductive to the university system. The unacceptable cases of sorting, missing scripts, missing results, inputting of wrong grades to students, should not be mentioned in a university, not even in any academic community. This is because people who are employed to work in various positions should have cognate work experience and unquestionable competence. They should not be seen as certificate welding illiterates but people who have been proven to be worthy in learning and character, diligent and competent to carry out assigned responsibilities with minimal or no supervision.

The university as a citadel of learning should boast of men of integrity, people who are repositories of applied knowledge and competence to drive the much desired holistic development in a nation that functions on quality teaching and learning. A situation where a student having gone through the crucibles of learning and written a prescribed semester examination or class-based evaluation test, is told that his or her script is missing or that he or she did not participate in that academic exercise, or must sort to pass, is an unpardonable error and a height of callousness. In fact some lecturers and staff of Departments are using the seeming systemic defect (which is their architecture) as an opportunity to extort students. Sometimes it is discovered much to students chagrin that the supposed missing script was later discovered when a ransom was paid.

Since a lecturer, or Head of Department has in their disposal both Yam and the knife and determines who takes what (if they wish to give without strings), students have no alternative but to submit to their importunate demands in order to graduate at record time.Such practices should be unheard of in an institution that should be a vanguard of moral and ethical values and conduct. What people learn in school constitute their behavioural patterns in the society. Where the school as an agency of socialisation cannot drive positive change first in its immediate environment, then the objective of education as a bedrock for the development of society, is inevitably compromised and counter-productive. The German Reformer, Dr. Martins Luther was quoted as saying, “I advise parents not to put their wards or children in any school where the Bible is not being used as a rule of life because such institutions will unnecessarily be corrupt”.

Gleaning from Luther’s sentiment one can deduce that the lack of respect and regard for values as well as the absence of the fear of God is the greatest undoing of most public schools. Another major challenge is that lack of Information, Communication and Technology literacy or compliance on the part of some lecturers and heads of department, may have informed the decision to give students’ scripts to secretaries to compile and input students results thereby making the secretaries the determinants of students’ fate. It is not saying a new thing that some of the secretaries in the process of compiling results have inputted wrong results, omitted names or down graded some students or given unmerited grades to others.Society today is ICT-driven and ICT-literacy enhances efficiency, speed and a reasonable degree of accuracy if the person behind the computer is level headed, articulate, competent, alive to responsibilities and is aware that negligence on his or her part is not only tantamount to a disservice to the university but to the students who may not graduate at record time because of his or her (computer operator’s) gross ineptitude or carelessness.

The ICT era makes the carrying of hard copy of results obsolete as lecturers through the Heads of Department can log on to the central server of the Exams and Records (if any) or ICT unit and input students’ results directly. By so doing the incessant cases where result on spread sheet is different from the one published online, more often than not, caused by abject negligence, will be avoided. The process will also end the intermediary services of some staff in the universities’ Information, Communication and Technology Department which has become a money spinner-a lucrative source of income to many of them. In fact some ICT staff reserved the power to award grades to students depending on students’ degree of compliance to terms and conditions. They can dubiously make or unmake a student. The university community should be considered too lofty to have careless, negligent, immoral and academic or professionally deficient people as academic or non-academic staff.

The Governing Councils and Senates of universities should be proactive in addressing the menace of missing Script, inputting of wrong results and sorting. This is necessary to end the slogan “Education is scam” so the system can produce quality students who are truly found worthy in learning and in character by operators who exemplify diligence, moral and ethical values. The much-needed reform must begin within the institutions themselves, because the future of any society is shaped in its classrooms.

By: Igbiki Benibo

Opinion

Strength of Emotional Equality

Published

3 days ago

March 9, 2026

The Tide

Quote: “Love thrives not when one gives more, but when both give fully — not in competition, not in performance, but in partnership.”

In every healthy relationship, there exists an invisible balance. It is not measured in grand gestures, expensive gifts, or public displays of affection. It is measured in something quieter and far more significant: emotional equality. When couples stand on equal emotional grounds, love becomes less of a negotiation and more of a partnership. Emotional equality does not mean both individuals express love in identical ways. It does not require matching personalities or mirroring temperaments. Rather, it speaks to balance — a shared willingness to invest, to communicate, to be vulnerable, and to grow. It is the difference between two people walking side by side and one person constantly trying to catch up.

In many relationships, imbalance begins subtly. One partner initiates most conversations. One apologizes more frequently. One carries the emotional labor — remembering important dates, managing conflicts, sensing tension, and attempting reconciliation. Over time, this uneven distribution of emotional effort breeds exhaustion. The partner who gives more begins to feel unseen. The one who gives less may grow comfortable in emotional passivity. Love, in such a space, starts to tilt — slowly at first, then significantly. Resentment can creep in quietly, disguising itself as patience. Silence may replace honest dialogue. What once felt effortless begins to feel heavy.

When couples stand on equal emotional grounds, responsibility is shared. Both people are accountable for the health of the relationship. If conflict arises, neither hides behind silence nor dominates through control. Instead, they engage. They listen. They speak honestly without weaponizing words. Equality creates safety — and safety strengthens intimacy. It allows both individuals to express needs without fear of ridicule or rejection. One of the most overlooked aspects of emotional equality is vulnerability. True connection requires courage. It demands that both partners risk being misunderstood. But when vulnerability is one-sided, it becomes exposure rather than intimacy. If one person consistently opens up while the other remains guarded, trust cannot fully deepen.

Equality ensures that emotional risks are mutual. Where one shares fears, the other shares too. Where one admits weakness, the other responds with openness rather than judgment. In such a space, authenticity flourishes. Another crucial element is validation. In emotionally balanced relationships, both partners feel heard. Their concerns are not dismissed as “overreactions.” Their feelings are not minimized or compared. When couples operate on equal emotional ground, they acknowledge each other’s experiences as legitimate. They may not always agree, but they always respect. Validation does not mean surrendering one’s viewpoint; it means recognizing that another’s emotional reality matters.

Equality also protects individuality. Contrary to popular belief, healthy love does not erase personal identity — it enhances it. When both partners are emotionally secure, they do not feel threatened by each other’s independence. Personal ambitions are encouraged, not resented. Friendships are respected, not restricted. Growth is celebrated, not feared. Standing on equal emotional grounds means neither person shrinks to accommodate the other. Instead, both expand, knowing the relationship is strong enough to hold their evolution. Power dynamics often expose emotional inequality. When one partner controls communication — appearing and disappearing unpredictably, withholding affection, or using silence as leverage — imbalance emerges.

Emotional dominance weakens intimacy. It creates anxiety instead of assurance. But when couples share emotional power, there is consistency. There is clarity. There is no need to decode affection because it is offered freely and intentionally. It is important to understand that equality does not imply perfection. Couples will still disagree. They will face stress, miscommunication, and moments of frustration. However, when emotional footing is equal, conflict does not threaten the foundation. Instead, it becomes an opportunity for understanding. Both partners approach challenges as teammates rather than opponents. They choose resolution over ego and repair over pride.

Time often reveals whether emotional equality truly exists. In the early stages of love, intensity can disguise imbalance. Enthusiasm feels mutual. Effort appears equal. But as routine settles in and novelty fades, the structure of the relationship becomes clearer. Who still initiates? Who still invests? Who still shows up consistently? Sustainable love requires sustained balance. It is built not merely on attraction, but on deliberate reciprocity. Standing on equal emotional grounds requires intentionality. It demands honest conversations about needs and expectations. It requires both partners to examine their habits — whether they withdraw during tension, avoid accountability, or rely on the other to carry the emotional weight. Emotional maturity is not about avoiding conflict; it is about handling it responsibly and returning, again and again, to shared ground.

Perhaps the greatest benefit of emotional equality is peace. There is no constant anxiety about where one stands. No guessing games about commitment. No fear that affection may suddenly disappear. Instead, there is stability. There is reassurance. There is mutual effort. In a world where relationships often blur the lines between attention and commitment, equality offers clarity. It reminds us that love should not feel like competition or performance. It should feel like partnership. When couples stand on equal emotional grounds, they build something resilient. They build trust that does not fracture easily. They build respect that does not depend on mood. They build a connection rooted not only in passion but in balance. And in that balance, love finds its strength — not in who gives more, but in how both give fully.

By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi

Opinion

NDDC: Time To Illuminate Homes

Published

2 weeks ago

March 2, 2026

The Tide

Quote:“Twenty-five years on, the Niger Delta cannot celebrate illuminated streets while families sit in darkness. Development must begin inside the home — where children study, businesses grow, and lives are built — before it glows on the roadside.”

The Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) was established in 2000 with a clear and urgent mandate: to facilitate the rapid, even, and sustainable development of Nigeria’s oil-producing Niger Delta region. The creation of the Commission followed decades of agitation over environmental degradation, infrastructural neglect, and socio-economic marginalization in the region. Its core mandate included the development of roads, bridges, electricity, water supply, health facilities, education, housing, environmental remediation, and economic empowerment initiatives. At inception, expectations were high that the Commission would transform the Niger Delta into a model of regional development. Over the years, the NDDC has indeed implemented numerous projects across the nine Niger Delta states. Roads have been constructed and rehabilitated in several communities, easing transportation challenges.

Schools have been renovated, and new classroom blocks have been provided in underserved areas. Health centres have been built or upgraded, improving access to primary healthcare services. The Commission has also awarded scholarships to students, including foreign postgraduate scholarships, empowering thousands of youths academically.Skills acquisition and youth empowerment programmes have helped many young people gain vocational competencies.Through various interventions, the NDDC has contributed to job creation and local economic stimulation.Solar-powered street lighting projects have been widely implemented in urban and semi-urban communities. These streetlights have improved visibility at night and contributed to enhanced security in some areas. Markets, highways, and public spaces illuminated by solar lights have experienced extended business hours.

For these efforts, the Commission deserves acknowledgment and commendation. However, development must always align with foundational mandates and pressing grassroots realities. A growing concern among residents is that while streets are illuminated, many homes remain in darkness. Rural electrification and household power access remain inconsistent and inadequate across large parts of the region. In riverine and remote communities, families still rely on generators, kerosene lamps, or complete darkness after sunset. The irony of brightly lit streets juxtaposed with powerless homes cannot be ignored. Electricity at the household level directly impacts education, health, and small-scale enterprise. Students cannot effectively study at night without reliable indoor lighting.Families cannot preserve food or power essential appliances without stable electricity.

Micro and small businesses struggle to grow without dependable energy access. While street lighting enhances public aesthetics and security, it does not substitute for domestic electrification. The proverb “charity begins at home” is especially relevant in this context. True community development must first empower households before beautifying public spaces. The Commission’s original mandate emphasizes integrated and sustainable development, not isolated infrastructural gestures. Balanced development requires that energy interventions prioritize homes alongside streets. Solar technology presents a unique opportunity for decentralized household electrification in off-grid communities. Extending solar solutions to individual homes would have a transformative social impact. Home-based solar systems could power lights, fans, small appliances, and communication devices.

Such interventions would reduce poverty, improve living standards, and stimulate grassroots productivity. By broadening its energy focus, the Commission would better reflect the spirit of its founding legislation. This is not a call to abandon street lighting projects, which have their merits. Rather, it is an appeal for balance, inclusivity, and alignment with core developmental objectives. Strategic planning should ensure that rural electrification and household access form a central pillar of ongoing interventions. Community engagement and needs assessments can help determine priority areas for household solar deployment. Twenty-five years after its establishment, the NDDC stands at a reflective moment in its institutional journey. The people of the Niger Delta say: thank you for the efforts so far—but not very much—because true appreciation will come when development begins at home and radiates outward, not merely when streets shine while houses remain in darkness.

By: King Onunwor