Editorial

Towards Clean Energy Dev In Nigeria

Published

2 years ago

January 31, 2024

In the global bid to combat the adverse effects of climate change, sustainability has come to the forefront of world
wide conversations. As the world battles to reduce harmful greenhouse gas emissions, greater emphasis has been placed on the search for clean energy sources. On 26th January, the entire world collectively turned its attention to this green pursuit by observing the International Day of Clean Energy.
This commemorative day serves as a grim reminder of our collective responsibility to navigate towards a future, powered by clean, sustainable energy. Embracing the use of clean energy is crucial in the battle against climate change. A substantial portion of the greenhouse gases that envelop our planet and retain the sun’s warmth are produced as a result of energy generation, achieved by the combustion of fossil fuels such as oil, coal, and gas, to generate power and heat.
To mitigate climate change, the global community must cease dependency on fossil fuels and allocate resources towards clean, readily accessible, cost-effective, sustainable, and dependable alternative energy sources. Renewable energy sources, such as solar, wind, hydro, bioenergy, and geothermal, hold great potential, being abundantly available and replenished by natural processes, while emitting minimal greenhouse gases and pollutants into the atmosphere.
Energy presents a dual challenge of inclusivity and environmental preservation. The solution to this challenge heavily relies on the adoption of clean energy sources. Amidst the global struggle against climate change, clean energy assumes a vital role in curbing emissions while simultaneously addressing the needs of communities deprived of reliable access to power. Regrettably, a staggering number of over 675 million people continue to endure a lack of electricity, with the majority residing in Sub-Saharan Africa.
For populations without access to clean energy, the absence of dependable power poses obstacles to education, healthcare, and economic prospects. Furthermore, many of these developing regions continue to heavily rely on polluting fossil fuels in their daily lives, thus perpetuating poverty. If present patterns persist, it is projected that by 2030, one out of every four individuals will still resort to hazardous, unhealthy, and inefficient cooking methods, such as burning wood or dung.
The current state of affairs indicates that despite some progress, the global community is not making sufficient headway towards the attainment of Sustainable Development Goal 7 (SDG7). This goal aims to provide universal access to affordable, reliable, sustainable, and modern energy by the year 2030. Thankfully, to evaluate the advancements made and propose viable remedies, the General Assembly has scheduled a Global Stocktaking on SDG7 to take place in April 2024.
Considering the abysmal energy poverty prevalent in the nation, individuals and organisations involved in the energy sector have emphasised the necessity of implementing inventive tactics to achieve a comprehensive electrification of Nigeria. Current data reveals that Nigeria possesses the largest disparity in energy access globally, with more than 90 million individuals lacking electricity.
Known for having one of the least efficient national grids in Africa, Nigeria is the leading purchaser of petrol and diesel generators in Sub-Saharan Africa. It is responsible for acquiring three million out of the total 6.5 million generators utilised in the region. Consequently, both individuals and businesses expend a substantial amount of $22billion per year on fuelling these generators. Additionally, the country heavily depends on fossil fuels for its vehicle energy needs.
The necessity for transitioning towards clean energy in Nigeria cannot be overstated. Reliance on fossil fuels not only contributes to detrimental environmental consequences like air pollution and climate change, but also presents substantial economic and security risks. The nation’s economy is at high risk of instability because of its heavy dependence on oil exports, which makes it vulnerable to global oil price changes, as evidenced in the past.
Moreover, the use of fossil fuels not only has adverse effects on the environment, such as air pollution and deforestation, but also poses risks to the health and well-being of the population. In contrast, opting for clean energy sources presents a more sustainable and environmentally-friendly approach to address the increasing energy requirements of the country. Incorporating renewable sources like solar, wind, and hydroelectric power into Nigeria’s energy portfolio can lead to a reduction in carbon emissions, enhance energy security, and foster the creation of employment opportunities in the renewable energy industry.
Nigeria, being the largest economy in Sub-Saharan Africa, is currently facing challenges in its energy sector as it strives to cater to the demands of its steadily increasing population. The nation’s reliance on fossil fuels is essential, with oil and gas accounting for about 90 per cent of its overall energy consumption as cited by the World Bank in 2021. This heavy dependence is attributable to several factors, including the abundant reserves of oil and gas, and the relatively affordable nature of fossil fuels in the country.
Our country faces a multitude of challenges following its heavy dependence on fossil fuels. These challenges include restricted access to electricity, an unstable power supply, and exorbitant energy costs. Reports indicate that only about 45 per cent of Nigerians have access to electricity, and even those who are connected to the grid frequently endure fluctuating power supply. The expense of energy in Nigeria is notably high because of various factors, such as the nation’s dependence on imported oil and gas, the substantial cost of generating electricity, and the inefficiencies and financial troubles afflicting the power sector.
Nigeria possesses a wealth of diverse energy resources that offer tremendous potential for clean and renewable energy production. These resources include abundant sunlight for solar power, vast expanses of windy coastal and mountainous regions for wind power, substantial biomass resources and significant reserves of natural gas. Harnessing these resources could herald a new era of green energy production for the country and the region.
The road to cleaner energy in our country may be fraught with various challenges, yet the possibilities are endless, and the benefits far-reaching. Putting Nigeria on the path to clean energy development will not only ensure the nation’s energy security but also contribute to global efforts to combat climate change. The concerted effort of all stakeholders is critical in this journey, with a guiding beacon of sustainable development illuminating the path ahead. Nigeria’s journey towards clean energy, though challenging, represents a promising leap forward for the nation, the region, and indeed, the world.

Editorial

Charge Before New Rivers Council Helmsmen

Published

12 hours ago

September 29, 2025

The Tide

On the 30th of August, Rivers people trooped out to participate in local government elections conducted across the state. These elections, which produced new chairmen and councillors for the 23 local government areas (LGAs), were organised by the Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission (RSIEC). The exercise has ushered in a new crop of grassroots leaders whose shoulders now bear the responsibility of steering the affairs of their respective councils. With the polls concluded and winners duly announced, the time has come for the newly elected officials to roll up their sleeves and begin the hard work of governance.

According to the results declared by RSIEC, the All Progressives Congress (APC) secured a dominant lead, winning chairmanship seats in 20 of the 23 local government councils, while the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) clinched the remaining three. This outcome not only reflects the current political dynamics in the state but also places a significant weight of expectation on the shoulders of the APC-led councils to justify the confidence reposed in them by the electorate. It is imperative that political rhetoric now gives way to tangible development, especially at the grassroots level where government is felt most directly.

Following the elections, the successful chairmen were officially sworn into office by the former Sole Administrator of Rivers State, Vice Admiral (rtd) Ibok-Ete Ekwe Ibas. The solemn ceremony marked a transition from campaign promises to the reality of public service. With their inauguration complete, the time for celebration has ended; the time for delivery has commenced. The electorate now awaits meaningful action that reflects the hopes and aspirations of the voting public.

As helmsmen of their various LGAs, these leaders must quickly settle down to work. Their constituents expect them to provide direction, formulate policies, and execute programmes that will uplift communities long neglected. The local government tier is closest to the people and, as such, must rise above politicking to meet the everyday needs of the citizenry. It is not enough to occupy office; they must make their impact visibly and positively felt across their domains.

The Supreme Court ruling mandating direct allocation of funds to local governments—although not yet fully implemented—is a welcome development that underscores the autonomy of the third tier of government. Once this is operationalised, the excuses often cited for underperformance will no longer hold water. With funds directly accessed from the Federation Account, council administrations will be better empowered to meet the developmental needs of their localities, if only they manage resources judiciously and prioritise the right projects.

The onus is now on the chairmen to contribute meaningfully to the broader development of Rivers State. The state government cannot and should not be expected to do everything. Local government councils have defined responsibilities—ranging from rural infrastructure, primary healthcare, and basic education to waste management and local security—that must be adequately addressed. It is high time they stopped passing the buck and started acting as the elected leaders they are.

We extend our congratulations to all who emerged victorious in the elections. However, with this victory comes great responsibility. It is no longer about party affiliations or electoral campaigns; it is about governance. The chairmen must launch people-centred projects that will genuinely improve the lives of the rural populace—projects in water supply, road maintenance, school renovation, and youth empowerment, among others. Let their tenure be remembered for its impact, not its slogans.

Central to their mandate should be the welfare of workers. Council employees form the engine room of local governance, and their morale significantly affects service delivery. The new chairmen must ensure regular payment of salaries, staff training, and a conducive working environment. Neglecting this vital aspect will only hinder whatever grand plans they may have for their LGAs.

It is also essential to institute a robust peer review mechanism. The new LG officials should not operate in isolation; rather, they should learn from one another, share ideas, and compete constructively in a bid to outperform each other in service delivery. Healthy competition among council areas will drive innovation and foster accelerated development. Such a system will also help the public identify high-performing councils for emulation.

Given the typically short tenure of council administrations, it is crucial that they focus on projects that are realistic and impactful. Time and resources should not be wasted on white elephant ventures that are neither sustainable nor beneficial to the people. Instead, chairmen should pursue programmes that match their timelines and address immediate community needs.

Peace and security must remain a cardinal objective for all council steersmen. Regardless of who facilitated their election or what political loyalties they hold, they must ensure peace reigns in their areas. Development cannot thrive in an atmosphere of tension and distrust. These leaders must work closely with traditional rulers, youth groups, and civil society organisations to maintain law and order.

A critical understanding must also prevail—that chairmen are leaders of the people, not just leaders of political parties. They must conduct themselves as impartial administrators serving all constituents, irrespective of political affiliations. Additionally, they must work harmoniously with the state governor, who remains the leader of the state. Petty rivalries and political infighting serve no purpose in the development agenda.

Now that the elections are over and governance has begun, it is essential for these chairmen and councillors to adopt an inclusive approach. They must carry everyone along—party members and opposition alike—in their development plans. Creating division or playing favourites will only fracture communities and stall progress. Leadership at the grassroots demands fairness, equity, and a listening ear.

Rivers people have played their part by coming out to vote. The baton has now been passed to the new council helmsmen. They must seize the opportunity to leave lasting legacies in their communities. History will not judge them by the number of rallies they held or the speeches they gave, but by the quality of life they brought to their people. Let them not squander this moment.

Editorial

No To Political Office Holders’ Salary Hike

Published

7 days ago

September 22, 2025

The Tide

Nigeria’s Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) has unveiled a gratuitous proposal to increase the salaries of political and public office holders in the country. This plan seeks to fatten the pay packets of the president, vice-president, governors, deputy governors, and members of the National and State Assemblies. At a time when the nation is struggling to steady its economy, the suggestion that political leaders should be rewarded with more money is not only misplaced but insulting to the sensibilities of the ordinary Nigerian.

What makes the proposal even more opprobrious is the dire economic condition under which citizens currently live. The cost of living crisis has worsened, inflation has eroded the purchasing power of workers, and the naira continues to tumble against foreign currencies. The majority of Nigerians are living hand to mouth, with many unable to afford basic foodstuffs, medical care, and education. Against this backdrop, political office holders, who already enjoy obscene allowances, perks, and privileges, should not even contemplate a salary increase.

It is, therefore, not surprising that the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has stepped in to challenge this development. SERAP has filed a lawsuit against the RMAFC to halt the implementation of this salary increment. This resolute move represents a voice of reason and accountability at a time when public anger against political insensitivity is palpable. The group is rightly insisting that the law must serve as a bulwark against impunity.

According to a statement issued by SERAP’s Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, the commission has been dragged before the Federal High Court in Abuja. Although a hearing date remains unconfirmed, the momentous step of seeking judicial redress reflects a determination to hold those in power accountable. SERAP has once again positioned itself as a guardian of public interest by challenging an elite-centric policy.

The case, registered as suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/1834/2025, specifically asks the court to determine “whether RMAFC’s proposed salary hike for the president, vice-president, governors and their deputies, and lawmakers in Nigeria is not unlawful, unconstitutional and inconsistent with the rule of law.” This formidable question goes to the very heart of democratic governance: can those entrusted with public resources decide their own pay rises without violating the constitution and moral order?

In its pleadings, SERAP argues that the proposed hike runs foul of both the 1999 Nigerian Constitution and the RMAFC Act. By seeking a judicial declaration that such a move is unlawful, unconstitutional, and inconsistent with the rule of law, the group has placed a spotlight on the tension between self-serving leadership and constitutionalism. To trivialise such an issue would be harum-scarum, for the constitution remains the supreme authority guiding governance.

We wholeheartedly commend SERAP for standing firm, while we roundly condemn RMAFC’s selfish proposal. Political office should never be an avenue for financial aggrandisement. Since our leaders often pontificate sacrifice to citizens, urging them to tighten their belts in the face of economic turbulence, the same leaders must embody sacrifice themselves. Anything short of this amounts to double standards and betrayal of trust.

The Nigerian economy is not buoyant enough to shoulder the additional cost of a salary increase for political leaders. Already, lawmakers and executives enjoy allowances that are grossly disproportionate to the national average income. These earnings are sufficient not only for their needs but also their unchecked greed. To even consider further increments under present circumstances is egregious, a slap in the face of ordinary workers whose minimum wage remains grossly insufficient.

Resources earmarked for such frivolities should instead be channelled towards alleviating the suffering of citizens and improving the nation’s productive capacity. According to United Nations statistics, about 62.9 per cent of Nigerians were living in multidimensional poverty in 2021, compared to 53.7 per cent in 2017. Similarly, nearly 30.9 per cent of the population lives below the international poverty line of US$2.15 per day. These figures paint a stark picture: Nigeria is a poor country by all measurable standards, and any extra naira diverted to elite pockets deepens this misery.

Besides, the timing of this proposal could not be more inappropriate. At a period when unemployment is soaring, inflation is crippling households, and insecurity continues to devastate communities, the RMAFC has chosen to pursue elite enrichment. It is widely known that Nigeria’s economy is in a parlous state, and public resources should be conserved and wisely invested. Political leaders must show prudence, not profligacy.

Another critical dimension is the national debt profile. According to the Debt Management Office, Nigeria’s total public debt as of March 2025 stood at a staggering N149.39 trillion. External debt obligations also remain heavy, with about US$43 billion outstanding by September 2024. In such a climate of debt-servicing and borrowing to fund budgets, it is irresponsible for political leaders to even table the idea of inflating their salaries further. Debt repayment, not self-reward, should occupy their minds.

This ignoble proposal is insensitive, unnecessary, and profoundly reckless. It should be discarded without further delay. Public office is a trust, not an entitlement to wealth accumulation. Nigerians deserve leaders who will share in their suffering, lead by example, and prioritise the common good over self-indulgence. Anything less represents betrayal of the social contract and undermines the fragile democracy we are striving to build.