Opinion

Rule Of Law Versus Presidential Directive

Published

2 years ago

January 10, 2024

The former Editor of Manchester Guardian, Charles Prestwich Scott (20th October 1864 to first January 1932), is widely quoted as saying, “Comment is free but facts are Sacred”.This maxim is not only realistic but also in tandem with the remarks of Jesus Christ when He, said, It is written, in Matthew Chapter 4, verse 4 in the story of temptation as written in the Bible. As if that is not enough, Pan Africanist and Ghanaian Leader, Kwame Nkrumah, is quoted as saying, “A principle is either wholly kept or wholly abandoned and that any slightest compromise means the total abandonment of the principle. From the fore going, the remarks of Jesus Christ, Charles Prestwich Scott, and Kwame Nkrumah are all needed to build an egalitarian society, including operating constitutional democracy and Rule of Law.
It is for this reason a textual analysis of the recent Presidential Directive is needed to evaluate the order by President Ahmed Bola Tinubu with regard to recent political crisis in Rivers State. President Tinubu not long ago summoned a meeting in the Presidential Villa to broker peace between Governor Siminalayi Fubara, FCT Minister, Nyesom Wike and other stakeholders comprising the Deputy Governor, Professor Ngozi Odu, defected former Speaker, Rivers State House of Assembly, Martin Amaewhule, Chief Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu, Chief of Staff, Femi Gbajabiamila, Chief Adokiye Amesimaka, David Briggs, among others.The truce emanating from the all-important meeting states an 8-point guidelines and they are as follows: All matters instituted in the courts by warring parties should be withdrawn immediately, all impeachment proceedings initiated against Governor Fubara by Rivers State House of Assembly be dropped immediately, to recognise the leadership of Martin Amaewhule of the Rivers State House of Assembly and not that of Edison Ehie and by implication recognise the 26 Legislators who had voluntarily defected to the APC.
The resolution include payment of the remuneration and benefits of all 26 legislators and their staff must be re-instated and Governor Fubara henceforth should not interfere with the full funding of the state Legislature while the Rivers State House of Assembly shall choose where they want to sit, the Governor of Rivers State shall re-present the state budget proposal to a properly constituted Rivers State House of Assembly.

The names of all commissioners of the state executive council who had resigned their appointments should be resubmitted to the House of Assembly for approval and lastly there should not be a caretaker committee for the LGAs in the state. It is worthy of note that the political crisis in Rivers State deepened when the Martin Amaewhule-led faction launched impeachment moves against Governor Siminalayi Fubara, suspended the majority leader, Edison Ehie, after which the hallowed chamber was burnt, accompanied by defection of 26 members to APC and demolition of the whole Rivers State House of Assembly Complex.
A scatting evaluation of the 8-point truce suggests a lopsided or one-sided truce in favour of former Governor Nyesom Wike and President Bola Ahmed Tinubu for which Governor Siminalayi Fubara just signed. It is on record that the lopsided truce has attracted mixed reactions, outright and widespread condemnations for about two weeks..Ijaw Leader and Elder Statesman, Chief Edwin Clark, Former Commissioner for Works, Rivers State, David Briggs, Ann Ann-kio Briggs, Amabipi Martin and some environmentalists in Ogoni tribe have all condemned the one-sided truce. Besides, the 8-point truce has opened up serious legal and constitutional matters in Nigerian polity few months after legal tussles that characterised Election Petitions Appeal that ended in the Supreme Court as well as off season elections in Imo, Kogi and Bayelsa States.
It remains a puzzle that the 26 State Legislators who resigned were asked to return to their seats with full financial benefits and remunerations to be indemnified, but nothing was said to them to return to their former party, the PDP. Worse still, Governor Fubara was also asked to re-present 2024 budget proposal to the House of Assembly and the Commissioners who voluntarily resigned should be reconsidered by Governor Fubara to be re-represented to the Rivers State House of Assembly. At this juncture, one may ask, is Nigeria running a constitution democracy based on Rule of Law or Rule of Man or Presidential Directive as exhibited by the government of President Ahmed Bola Tinubu.
The recent development of President Tinubu has called to memory the song of legendry singer, Sunny Oko-Sun, when he sang “which way Nigeria”This is because president Tinubu on the day of swearing in or inauguration swore an oath to govern, and rule by the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. For instance, section 109 sub section 1 (g) states that:(1) A member of a House of Assembly shall vacate his seat in the House if-(g) being a person whose election to the House of Assembly was sponsored by a political party, he becomes a member of another political party before the expiration of the period for which that House was elected:Provided that his membership of the latter political party is not as a result of a division in the political party of which he was previously a member or of a merger of two or more political parties or factions by one of which he was previously sponsored.Truly, comment is free but facts are sacred.
It is also on record that the Edison Ehie-led group obtained an exparte order restraining Martin Amaewhule and Dumle Maol as Speaker and Deputy Speaker, respectively while Amaewhule and Moal on the other hand went to another High Court of same jurisdiction to obtain another exparte order when the court orders have not been vacated.This is where the lamentation of American Essayists, Sylvia Pratt, who wrote in the famous poem, “Conversation Among the Ruined,” comes to mind, “which such blight wrought on our bankrupt estate, what ceremony of words can patch the havoc”. It is in-fact, appauling that Nigeria is declining from bad election, to courtocracy and rule of man in place of constitutional democracy.
The attention of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu should be drawn to the fact that he is not only taciturn but also evasive on Rale of Law but to build a virile society where the political class and leadership should not trivialise constitutional orders.I am glad that senior Advocate of Nigeria, Femi Falana, had drawn the attention of President Tinubu to this fact. Surprisingly, the PDP has not been vocal enough.The fact that Independent National Electoral Commission should go ahead and conduct election into the Vacant 26 seats of Rivers State House of Assembly is not strong enough but to test the efficacy of the constitution in court. No PDP Governor has visited Governor Fubara; whereas opposition party.Former Vice President Atiku Abubaka has also not visited and identified with Governor Fubara even as Governor Fubara has not opened-up enough to meet his party–the PDP.
The gap in the truce brokered by President Tinubu has left many with the mindset that the drama gives an impression that the scenario is tending towards forcing Governor Fubara and the entire State to be APC State before 2027 elections. It is therefore pertinent to appeal to well-meaning individuals, Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) to intervene more than ever, now that the political impasse has not resulted in bloodbath. One thing is necessary; Rivers People should not gravitate towards ethnic lines but avoid ethnic bias. It may be necessary for the FCT Minister and his supporters to remember that crisis does no’ one any good but people,.no one, be it President Tinubu or FCT Minister, Nyesom Wike should not constitute themselves as an appellate court while Governor Fubara must talk out so that Rivers people can know their prayer points to present to God. It is welcoming that Governor Siminalayi Fubara has indicated to pay any price for peace even as both sides need to sacrifice pride and personal aggrandisement to engender peaceful co-existence.
Sika is a social/political analyst

Opinion

Trans-Kalabari Road: Work In Progress

Published

2 days ago

January 12, 2026

The Tide

Quote:”This Dream project is one of the best things that have happened to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas in recent times.”

This is the concluding part of this story featured in our last edition.

Good road network helps farmers to convey their agro-allied products to commercial hubs where buyers and sellers meet periodically to transact business. Road network engineers and motivates people resident in unfriendly geographical terrains, like riverine areas, to own property and shuttle home with ease. Some people will prefer living in their own houses in a more serene and nature-blessed communities to living in the city that is fraught with pollution, and other environmental, social and economic hazards. Prior to the cult epidemic that ravaged parts of Rivers State, the Emohuas, Elemes, Ogonis, and Etches were known for rural dwelling. Most public servants from these areas do their official and private transactions from their villages. For them it was comparatively easier to live in the village and engage in a diversified economic endeavours through farming, fishing or other lucrative business without outrageous charges and embarrassment associated with doing business in Port Harcourt, where land is as scarce as the traditional needle.

That is why the decision to construct the Trans-Kalabari Road by the administration of Dr. Peter Odili was one of the best decisions that administration took. When Dr. Odili vacated office as the Rivers State Governor, Rt. Hon. Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi took over and awarded contracts for continuation of the road project which in my considered view is the felt need of the people of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. Unfortunately, Rt. Hon. Amaechi’s efforts to drive the project was sabotaged by some contractors some of whom are Kalabari people. The main Trans-Kalabari Road is one project that is dear to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas of Rivers State. This is because through the road commuters can easily access several communities in the three local government areas. For instance, the road when completed will enable access to eight of the ten communities in Degema Local Government Area, namely: Bukuma, Tombia, Bakana, Oguruama, Obuama, Usokun, Degema town and the Degema Consulate. It will also link 15 of the 16 communities in Asari Toru Local Government Area. The communities are: Buguma, the local government headquarters, Ido, Abalama, Tema, Sama, Okpo, Ilelema, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama, Krakrama, Omekwe-Ama, Angulama. The road will also connect 14 of 17 wards in Akuku Toru Local Government Area, and other settlements. It is interesting to note that It is faster, and far more convenient and economical for the catchment Communities on the Trans-Kalabari Road network to go to the State Capital than the East West Road. The people of the three local government areas will prefer to work or do their transactions in Port Harcourt from their respective communities to staying in Port Harcourt where the house rent and the general cost of living is astronomically high.

Consequently, development will seamlessly spread to the 28 out of 34 communities of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. The only Communities that are not linked by the road project are Oporoama in Asari Toru, the Ke and Bille Communities in Degema Local Government Area and the “Oceania” communities of Abissa, Kula, Soku, Idama, Elem Sangama of Akuku Toru Local Government Area. But because of the economic value of the unlinked Communities to Nigeria, (they produce substantial oil and gas in the area), the Federal, State Governments and the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC), can extend the road network to those areas just as Bonny is linked to Port Harcourt and the Lagos Mainland Bridge is connecting several towns in Lagos and neighbouring States.Kudos to previous administrations who had constructed the Central Group axis.

However, what is said to be the First Phase of the Trans-Kalabari Road project is actually a linkage of the “Central Group” Communities which consists of Krakrama, Angulama, Omekwe. Ama, Omekwe Tari Ama, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama. It is the peripheral of the Trans-Kalabari Road. The completion of the Main Trans Kalabari project will free Port Harcourt and Obio/Akpor areas from congestion. It will motivate residents and people of the three local areas to contribute to the development of their Communities. If the Ogonis, Etches, Emohuas, Oyigbos, Okrikas, Elemes can feel comfortable doing business in Port Harcourt from home, residents and people whose communities are linked to Port Harcourt through the Trans-Kalabari Road will no doubt, do likewise. The vast arable virgin land of the Bukuma people can be open for development and sustainable agricultural ventures by Local, State and Federal Government.

It is necessary to recall that the Bukuma community was host to the Federal Government’s Graduate Farmers’ Scheme and the Rivers State Government moribund School-to-Land Scheme under Governor Fidelis Oyakhilome. Bukuma was the only community in Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas that has the capacity to carry those agricultural programmes. However the lack of road to transport farm produce to Port Harcourt and facilitate the movement of the beneficiaries of the scheme who lived in the community which is several miles away from the farms, hampered the sustainability of the programme. The main Trans-Kalabari Road remains the best gift to the people of Degema, Asari Toru, and Akuku-Toru Local Government Areas. Kudos to Sir Siminilayi Fubara.

By: Igbiki Benibo

Opinion

That U.S. Capture of Maduro

Published

2 days ago

January 12, 2026

The Tide

Quote:”Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction.”

The first part of this story was published in our last edition.

In Africa and the Middle East, regime change—whether by invasion, proxy warfare, or sanctions—has often left behind fractured states, weakened institutions, and prolonged instability. Washington’s motivations in Venezuela are widely understood: vast oil reserves, alliances with U.S. rivals, and symbolic defiance of American influence in the Western Hemisphere. But none of these reasons confer legal or moral legitimacy. Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction. If every powerful nation acted on its grievances in this manner, global chaos would inevitably follow. International law provides mechanisms for accountability. Under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), individuals accused of crimes against humanity or other grave offences are subject to investigation and prosecution through judicial processes.

Likewise, extradition treaties, mutual legal assistance agreements, and Interpol mechanisms exist to ensure accountability while respecting due process. These frameworks were designed precisely to prevent unilateral enforcement of “justice” by military force. The most profound consequence of America’s action may not be in Caracas, but in the precedent it sets. If the world accepts that a superpower can unilaterally depose another country’s president, then the foundation of the international system is weakened. Sovereignty becomes conditional—no longer a right, but a privilege tolerated at the discretion of the powerful. Going forward, if another country invades its neighbour, will the United States retain the moral authority to impose sanctions or demand restraint? Some analysts already warn that parallels between Russia’s actions in Ukraine and America’s conduct in Venezuela risk further eroding global norms. Selective adherence to international law breeds cynicism and accelerates the drift toward a world governed by force rather than rules.

Power—military, economic, or political—should serve human progress and collective well-being, not domination and destruction. For African nations, many of which emerged from colonial rule through bitter struggle, this precedent is especially alarming. Sovereignty is not an abstract legal concept; it is a hard-won shield against external domination. Any erosion of that principle anywhere weakens it everywhere. Africa’s painful history of foreign interference makes this lesson especially urgent. For me, the real issue is not whether Nicolás Maduro is a good or bad leader. That judgment belongs, first and foremost, to the Venezuelan people. The larger issue is whether the international system still operates on law—or has quietly reverted to hierarchy. If America insists it is defending global order, it must ask itself a difficult question: can an order survive when its most powerful guardian feels entitled to violate it? Until that question is answered honestly, the capture of a foreign president will remain not a triumph of justice, but a troubling symbol of a world drifting from law toward force.

If the United States felt so strongly about the allegations of terrorism, drug trafficking against Maduro, were there no other lawful options? Judicial accountability, diplomacy, regional mediation, and multilateral pressure may be slow and imperfect, but they reflect respect for international law and sovereign equality. Military seizure is a blunt instrument. It humiliates institutions, radicalizes populations, and hardens resistance. It may remove a leader, but it rarely resolves the underlying crisis. History teaches that military interventions seldom result in stable democratic outcomes. More often, they breed resentment, resistance, and long-term instability. For the sake of global order and the rule of law, the United States should reconsider this path and recommit to diplomacy, legal cooperation, and respect for the sovereign equality of states. Former U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris reportedly described the invasion of Venezuela as “unlawful and unwise,” warning that such actions “do not make America safer, stronger, or more affordable.” Her words reflect a growing recognition, even within the United States, that force without legitimacy undermines both moral authority and global stability.

Should what happened in Venezuela serve as a wake-up call for corrupt African leaders who undermine the people’s right to choose their leaders? The answer is yes. The capture of Maduro should alarm African leaders who manipulate elections, weaken institutions, suppress opposition, undermine citizens’ rights, or cling to power at all costs. Venezuela faced widespread criticism over disputed elections and repression long before this episode, and that context shaped how the world reacted. This does not justify foreign military intervention, but it highlights an uncomfortable truth: prolonged democratic decay isolates nations and invites external pressure—from sanctions to diplomatic censure. Global opinion matters, and legitimacy at home strengthens sovereignty abroad. The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and several African leaders have rightly condemned the events in Venezuela, invoking the principles of sovereignty and non-interference enshrined in international and regional law.

Beyond condemnation, however, African leaders must look inward. The continent’s future cannot be built on repression, constitutional manipulation, and personal greed. Leadership must reflect the will of the people, not desperation for power. Two days ago, a social commentator on a radio station argued that Trump’s action—though condemnable—demonstrates how far a leader can go for his country’s interest. According to this view, he did not intervene in Venezuela for personal enrichment, but to strengthen his nation. In stark contrast, many African leaders plunder their own countries. They siphon public resources, impose crushing taxes and harmful policies, and leave their citizens poorer—all for selfish gain. That contradiction is the deeper lesson Africa must confront.True sovereignty is protected not only by international law, but by accountable leadership at home.

By: Calista Ezeaku

Opinion

Kudos Gov Fubara

Published

2 weeks ago

January 2, 2026

The Tide

Please permit me to use this medium to appreciate our able governor, Siminalayi Fubara for the inauguration of the 14.2-kilometre Obodhi–Ozochi Road in Ahoada-East Local Government Area. This inauguration marks a significant milestone in the history of our communities and deserves commendation. We, the people of Ozochi, are particularly happy because this project has brought long-awaited relief after years of isolation and hardship.

The expression of our traditional ruler, His Royal Highness, Eze Prince Ike Ehie, JP, during the inauguration captured the joy of our people. He said, “our isolation is over.” That reflects the profound impact of this road on daily life, economic activities, and social integration of the people of Ozochi and other neighbouring communities. The road will no doubt ease transportation, improve access to markets and healthcare, and strengthen links between Ahoada, Omoku, and other parts of Rivers State.

The people of Ahoada, Omoku, and indeed Rivers State as a whole are grateful to our dear governor for this laudable achievement and wish him many more successful years in office. We pray that God endows him with more wisdom and strength to continue to pilot the affairs of the state for the benefit of all. As citizens, we should rally behind the governor and support his development agenda. Our politicians and stakeholders should embrace peace and cooperation, as no meaningful progress can be achieved in an atmosphere of conflict. Sustainable development in the state can only thrive where peace prevails.

Samuel Ebiye