Opinion
Efficacy Of Surrendering To God’s Will
One evening in Egbema, Ogba/Egbema/Ndoni Local Government Area (ONELGA), Rivers State, Nigeria, a thirty-five-year-old father of three, Orisa, ran to his father’s compound drenched in his own blood screaming thus: “Toke, my friend, what wrong did I do to you that you shot me? I give you money every month end. What wrong did I do to you?” He fell in front of his father’s house. Nwalaga rushed out and saw his son writhing in pain in a pool of blood; naturally, he went into shock. Relatives gathered immediately and rushed Orisa to the hospital; he was declared dead on arrival. The bullet hit a major blood vessel resulting in excessive haemorrhage. Orisa was shot by his friend Toke who was a member of one of the dreaded cult groups in the community; this was during the height of the volatility that ravaged the Niger Delta.
For fear of further calamity perpetrated by the rampaging cult groups, Nwalaga instructed that his son be buried immediately in line with the same-day burial tradition of Egbema. At the graveside, Nwalaga was invited to offer a eulogy. Oh so slowly, he gathered a palmful of red earth in his left hand, took what seemed a studied look around as if counting the mourners, looked at the coffin bearing the corpse of his first child and said thus: “Bear me witness oh earth on which I stand, the air I breathe, the water I drink, the sun that shines on humanity! My ancestors, please bear me witness! In our tradition, it is abnormal for a father to offer eulogy at his child’s funeral but here I stand. I don’t know what to say”. He paused momentarily; looking up the sky in tears, he added “Oh God, if what has happened to me is Your will, I accept it wholeheartedly; however, if it is not Your will, I beseech You to do what makes you God.”
At this, he poured the earth into the grave and walked into his house. He wept bitterly till morning light. That morning, the Police visited but Nwalaga refused to make any statement. Firmly believing that he had laid his complaint where it mattered most, which is where he expects justice, he did not want to press charges; not when he is familiar with the shenanigans and the resultant come-today-come-tomorrow associated with the jaundiced justice delivery system in Nigeria. Again, he did not possess the means and energy to confront the deadly Toke, either in the Police, court or community. He had taken his case to the court above the Supreme Court; he was confident he will receive justice, not mere judgement.
The community went into mourning and by the evening, the town crier proclaimed an emergency meeting of village heads and the executives of the community development committee, youths association and women association at the town hall; a fine of one goat and seven tubers of yam for every absentee was decreed. The severity of the penalty for absenteeism was indicative of the seriousness with which the community viewed the case. Since tradition requires him to stay at home for eight days without attending any occasion, Nwalaga sent an emissary to the meeting to inform the community that he disassociated himself and his entire family with whatever measure they planned on taking; furthering that he had left the matter in the hands of God.
Orisa was a peaceful and respectful young man. He had gained employment in an oil company in the community six months earlier following an extended period of unemployment after completing the mandatory one-year National Service. In its relationship with the multinational, which struck oil in the community in 1964, it had been the desire of the community for its sons and daughters to be employed in the well-paying company. Orisa‘s employment was seen as a blessing for the entire community hence, everyone was pained by the tragedy. Two weeks thereafter, Toke was the lone casualty of a cult group supremacy fight; his body was dismembered and scattered on a roadside battleground. Immediately, surviving members of his group wheeled his remains in a wheelbarrow to his father’s house
Standing at the door in an obvious mix of shock and disgust, Toke’s father instructed that his remains should not be brought into his compound and directed that Toke should be taken to the evil forest immediately. There were no burial rights; Toke was buried in a shallow grave. The lesson of this narrative is hinged on the potency of completely surrendering whatever situation one finds oneself to the will of God in prayers. Had the sexagenarian Nwalaga sought revenge either through the judiciary or “jujuciary”, Toke and his group might have unleashed more havoc on his family. Rather, Nwalaga left everything at the feet of God who promptly took over the battle and finished it neatly and completely. Irrespective of modern day derision, newfound aspersions cast and doubts on the spirituality of the Holy Bible, it remains a veritable roadmap for man’s spiritual journey towards oneness with his Source.
What is required is that Holy Books should be studied with the intellect switched on and not read like a novel. “The battle is mine’ says the Lord” (2 Chronicles, 20:15). Nwalaga committed his supplication to God, and He answered swiftly and deftly. Nwalaga did not say his prayers in the tradition of any of the Abrahamic Religions, which are alien religions that constitute the bane of Nigeria’s unity and development; rather, he prayed directly to God without going through any human intermediary; he deferred only to his ancestors and the elements, which are part of the existential realities of man. Most of all, Nwalaga demonstrated absolute belief and confidence in the judgement of God. The essence of this piece is universal; it transcends gender, ethnicity, culture, situation, location and the man-made divisive hedgerows of institutional religion. “He that hath ears to hear, let him hear” (Matthew 11:15).
By: Jason Osai
Osai is a Professor of Development Studies, Rivers State University. Port Harcourt.
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers2 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News2 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics2 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured2 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
-
News2 days ago
FG Explains Supply Disruption As Power Generation Drops To 3,659MW
-
Metro2 days ago
Port Harcourt Prepares For 10,000 Runners As International Marathon Returns
-
News2 days agoBille Gas Leak: Coalition Tasks FG On Proactive Measures
-
News2 days agoIGP Orders Arrest, Prosecution Of Campaign Billboard Vandals
