Editorial
Census Put-Off: Thumbs Up For FG

The Population and Housing Census, which was initially scheduled for May 3–7, 2023, has been post-
poned indefinitely by President Muhammadu Buhari, following deliberations with select Ministers and Nasir Isa-Kwarra, Chairman of the National Population Commission (NPC). The resolve to delay the headcount was taken to stem prevailing circumstances that indicated an impending national crisis. This decision has transferred the responsibility to the President’s successor, hence, averting a potentially disastrous situation.
Despite the unwavering commitment of the NPC to execute the national project, it became apparent that both the agency and the relevant government bodies, as well as the citizens, were ill-prepared. It is a clear sign of astuteness for President Buhari to have thought it wise to avoid the risk of escalating this already precarious situation.
A new census for development planning was declared by Buhari, who asserted that the nation needed an updated one, given that the previous one took place 17 years ago in 2006. Nonetheless, the President did not specifically reference any potential hurdles that may be encountered in this undertaking. It is anticipated that the NPC will assume responsibility for this task.
In the editorial of this newspaper dated July 20, 2022, it was observed that the scheduled census for April 2023 was poorly timed owing to its proximity to the general election and the prevailing security challenges in the country. The census result could be negatively affected by various situations. Even the NPC’s pre-census tests were hindered in certain areas as a result of safety concerns in some states.
We had stated that if the current administration failed to conduct the census exercise at least a year before the end of their tenure, there would be no justification for rushing to conduct it just two months before their exit. As predicted, the postponement of the census and the reasons given have proven our argument to be correct.
Similarly, many stakeholders criticised the scheduled May date and urged for its delay because of poor timing. The decision to hold both nationwide elections and the census in an election year, with the challenges posed by their conduct and outcomes in the country, was deemed as notably imprudent. The Buhari’s administration has been berated for its apparent preoccupation with carrying out certain tasks instead of delegating them to the succeeding government.
The proposal has failed to garner inspiration among the Nigerian populace, given the plethora of intricate issues that surround it. The post-general election aftermath has thrown the country into a state of disarray, with stakeholders raising grave concerns about the conduct and outcome of the presidential, governorship, National Assembly and State Assembly elections.
Nigerians are still ruing their losses from the cash crunch that prevented them from accessing their money, causing widespread suffering. The police are struggling to contain the resulting unrest, and all law enforcement agencies are overwhelmed in their efforts to combat criminal activity, including insurgency, terrorism, banditry, kidnapping, armed robbery, cultism, and other crimes.
Many Nigerians across the country face daily attacks, eventuating in deaths, injuries, and kidnappings. These crimes are often motivated by purely criminal motives, leaving victims entirely on their own. The police are overburdened and often choose to ignore these incidents, only intervening when a high-profile individual is involved. This leaves some Nigerians at the mercy of their criminal abductors, relying solely on their relatives to assuage the situation.
Therefore, the NPC’s initial insistence on conducting a census during this period was over-ambitious and laid the foundation for another controversial headcount. Shoddy preparation typically leads to shoddy outcomes, as Nigerians have seen in past national assignments. It was clear that the commission was planning to fail.
For a successful national census, adequate preparation is crucial to ensure desired results and minimal hitches. The politicisation of the headcount has made it one of the thorniest issues in the country. However, if properly executed, the exercise can correct previous mistakes and provide a reliable population figure. A convivial environment must be created to achieve this.
Conducting a credible census requires total buy-in from all segments of the country. It should be a collaborative national assignment with the federal, the 36 states, and the 774 local government areas. Massive publicity and awareness campaigns from the grassroots upwards are required to ensure the success of the census. The NPC should return to the drawing board to guarantee that all obligatory steps are taken to achieve a credible headcount.
The task at hand poses seminal challenges. The expanse of the country’s road network is vast, with only a third of it being paved. The unpaved roads are prone to flooding, deterioration, and drought, making it arduous for census officials to reach all regions of the country promptly. Meticulous planning is necessary to overcome the major obstacles of funding and logistics.
The funding for the initiative needs to be properly addressed since the government’s proposal to establish a collective fund under the auspices of the United Nations Population Fund has encountered setbacks. Out of the N869 billion budgeted, only N291.5 billion has been disbursed, while another N327.2 billion approved has not yet been transferred to the NPC.
Buhari’s decision to postpone the headcount was judicious. It is incumbent upon the President-elect, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, to schedule a new date and implement measures to improve the process. The forthcoming count should be technology-driven, accurate, and reliable to gain the support of Nigerians.
Editorial
Addressing The State Of Roads In PH

Editorial
Charge Before New Rivers Council Helmsmen

Editorial
No To Political Office Holders’ Salary Hike
Nigeria’s Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) has unveiled a gratuitous proposal to increase the salaries of political and public office holders in the country. This plan seeks to fatten the pay packets of the president, vice-president, governors, deputy governors, and members of the National and State Assemblies. At a time when the nation is struggling to steady its economy, the suggestion that political leaders should be rewarded with more money is not only misplaced but insulting to the sensibilities of the ordinary Nigerian.
What makes the proposal even more opprobrious is the dire economic condition under which citizens currently live. The cost of living crisis has worsened, inflation has eroded the purchasing power of workers, and the naira continues to tumble against foreign currencies. The majority of Nigerians are living hand to mouth, with many unable to afford basic foodstuffs, medical care, and education. Against this backdrop, political office holders, who already enjoy obscene allowances, perks, and privileges, should not even contemplate a salary increase.
It is, therefore, not surprising that the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has stepped in to challenge this development. SERAP has filed a lawsuit against the RMAFC to halt the implementation of this salary increment. This resolute move represents a voice of reason and accountability at a time when public anger against political insensitivity is palpable. The group is rightly insisting that the law must serve as a bulwark against impunity.
According to a statement issued by SERAP’s Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, the commission has been dragged before the Federal High Court in Abuja. Although a hearing date remains unconfirmed, the momentous step of seeking judicial redress reflects a determination to hold those in power accountable. SERAP has once again positioned itself as a guardian of public interest by challenging an elite-centric policy.
The case, registered as suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/1834/2025, specifically asks the court to determine “whether RMAFC’s proposed salary hike for the president, vice-president, governors and their deputies, and lawmakers in Nigeria is not unlawful, unconstitutional and inconsistent with the rule of law.” This formidable question goes to the very heart of democratic governance: can those entrusted with public resources decide their own pay rises without violating the constitution and moral order?
In its pleadings, SERAP argues that the proposed hike runs foul of both the 1999 Nigerian Constitution and the RMAFC Act. By seeking a judicial declaration that such a move is unlawful, unconstitutional, and inconsistent with the rule of law, the group has placed a spotlight on the tension between self-serving leadership and constitutionalism. To trivialise such an issue would be harum-scarum, for the constitution remains the supreme authority guiding governance.
We wholeheartedly commend SERAP for standing firm, while we roundly condemn RMAFC’s selfish proposal. Political office should never be an avenue for financial aggrandisement. Since our leaders often pontificate sacrifice to citizens, urging them to tighten their belts in the face of economic turbulence, the same leaders must embody sacrifice themselves. Anything short of this amounts to double standards and betrayal of trust.
The Nigerian economy is not buoyant enough to shoulder the additional cost of a salary increase for political leaders. Already, lawmakers and executives enjoy allowances that are grossly disproportionate to the national average income. These earnings are sufficient not only for their needs but also their unchecked greed. To even consider further increments under present circumstances is egregious, a slap in the face of ordinary workers whose minimum wage remains grossly insufficient.
Resources earmarked for such frivolities should instead be channelled towards alleviating the suffering of citizens and improving the nation’s productive capacity. According to United Nations statistics, about 62.9 per cent of Nigerians were living in multidimensional poverty in 2021, compared to 53.7 per cent in 2017. Similarly, nearly 30.9 per cent of the population lives below the international poverty line of US$2.15 per day. These figures paint a stark picture: Nigeria is a poor country by all measurable standards, and any extra naira diverted to elite pockets deepens this misery.
Besides, the timing of this proposal could not be more inappropriate. At a period when unemployment is soaring, inflation is crippling households, and insecurity continues to devastate communities, the RMAFC has chosen to pursue elite enrichment. It is widely known that Nigeria’s economy is in a parlous state, and public resources should be conserved and wisely invested. Political leaders must show prudence, not profligacy.
Another critical dimension is the national debt profile. According to the Debt Management Office, Nigeria’s total public debt as of March 2025 stood at a staggering N149.39 trillion. External debt obligations also remain heavy, with about US$43 billion outstanding by September 2024. In such a climate of debt-servicing and borrowing to fund budgets, it is irresponsible for political leaders to even table the idea of inflating their salaries further. Debt repayment, not self-reward, should occupy their minds.
This ignoble proposal is insensitive, unnecessary, and profoundly reckless. It should be discarded without further delay. Public office is a trust, not an entitlement to wealth accumulation. Nigerians deserve leaders who will share in their suffering, lead by example, and prioritise the common good over self-indulgence. Anything less represents betrayal of the social contract and undermines the fragile democracy we are striving to build.