Editorial

Another Feather In Mary Odili’s Cap

Published

2 years ago

April 14, 2023

Justice Mary Ukaego Peter-Odili, a retired Supreme Court judge, has recently been in the news for all the
right reasons. She was confirmed as the 51st Chairperson of the Body of Benchers, succeeding Wole Olanipekun, SAN, who took office as the 50th chairman in March 2022 and became vice-chairman on March 30, 2021.
Justice Peter-Odili has an impeccable judicial record and possesses all the qualities of an excellent judge, including judicial temperament, intelligence, morals, courage, integrity, experience, and education. We congratulate her on her elevation and hope she draws strength, wisdom and experience from the Rivers State Governor, Nyesom Wike, who himself is a lifelong Bencher.
The Nigerian Body of Benchers is a professional body concerned with the admission of successful candidates at the Nigerian Law School Bar Final Examination into the legal profession. Members of the body are called Benchers. The body also regulates the call of graduates of law school to the Nigerian Bar, as well as the regulation of the legal profession in the country.
Without doubt, Peter-Odili’s appointment constitutes a perfect key to a greater development of legal jurisprudence and dispensation of justice in Nigeria. It will fetch the Body a new synergy and strengthen the principles of the legal organisation. Her contributions to Nigerian jurisprudence are so outstanding that they have continued to elicit accolades among legal practitioners.
Justice Peter-Odili’s service and the fecundity of her jurisprudential knowledge have continued to give unquantifiable boosts to the legal profession, not only in Nigeria but also across Africa. We can truly describe her emergence as putting a square peg in a square hole. It is a demonstration of true merit such that an author, Amit Kalantri, says, “It is like steel and not like cotton, that seems small from the outside but weighs heavy on the inside.”
Mary retired from the Supreme Court last year as the first woman from Rivers State to be elevated to the apex court in Nigeria. She was appointed to the court to fill the vacancy created by Justice Nikki Tobi’s retirement. In appreciation of her exemplary service, Governor Wike built a judicial training institute, saddled with the responsibility of training judges and magistrates, in her honour.
The eminent jurist is the wife of Dr Peter Odili who served as Governor of Rivers State from 1999 to 2007. While serving as the First Lady, her Non-Governmental Organisation (NGO), The Adolescent Programme (TAP), trained several youths and women in the state on various skills and provided them with starter packs to make them self-reliant and productive. She has not only proven her mettle in her chosen carrier, but she is also a quintessential wife and mother.
Given her professional orbit and all-embracing knowledge of the Nigerian judicial system, her tenure in her new-found position will be a remarkable success. Because she is a titan in the legal profession, who has contributed to the ideological conduct of legal professionals through great works, enviable comportment and unbending principles, the Body of Benchers cannot be in better hands.
Beyond her appointment as chairperson of the organisation, she must start strongly, particularly as her tenure will last for only a year. We urge her not to lose sight of the unpleasant happenings bedevilling the legal job. The profession is under attack and aggression. Members of the Body of Benchers must join hands with her to identify and address the myriad of challenges facing the Nigerian legal occupation currently.
The vulnerabilities that have been noticed and exposed in the legal carrier are disturbing. Peter-Odili’s appointment provides the opportunity for deep introspection and self-assessment. The Benchers must make efforts to ensure that the practice of the legal occupation and the courts always measure up to the moral, ethical and statutory standards they subscribe to.
Legal education is crucial; any neglect would amount to a fatal consequence in the entire process of justice adjudication. However, the state of legal education in Nigeria is regrettable. It is far from the international standard. This is taking its toll on the entire system of justice administration at every step of our journey as a nation. The development has always been reflected in the quality of lawyers in our nation.
Consequently, the Body must take tough steps and end poor funding of legal education. Successive governments are guilty of this. This case of clear neglect on the side of the government has kept legal education in stagnation for years. Shamefully, no faculty of law in Nigeria has modern facilities to train a 21st-century lawyer. The traditional method of bombarding students with notes and handouts is still in place, slowing the pace of learning.
Also, the proliferation of law faculties is another factor militating against legal education in Nigeria. The more law faculties we have, the more substandard. In 1962, there were four faculties of law in the country and one Nigerian law school located in Lagos. Today, over fifty law faculties exist in federal, state, and private universities. This results in a monumental disproportionate student–lecturer ratio.
Likewise, the law school curriculum remains the same. This hinders innovation that could have repositioned legal research and the industry as a whole. The obsolete programmes offered by the various law schools in Nigeria also persist and largely unimproved, thus leaving students in an uncongenial academic predicament.
Indeed, the challenges facing legal education and the legal profession in the country are considerable. Justice Peter-Odili and her team of Benchers must pull out all the stops to salvage a dangerous situation. Where necessary, pressure should be brought to bear on relevant stakeholders and the government to prevent our “legal ship” from sinking entirely.

Editorial

No To Political Office Holders’ Salary Hike

Published

2 days ago

September 22, 2025

Uchechukwu Okwum

Nigeria’s Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) has unveiled a gratuitous proposal to increase the salaries of political and public office holders in the country. This plan seeks to fatten the pay packets of the president, vice-president, governors, deputy governors, and members of the National and State Assemblies. At a time when the nation is struggling to steady its economy, the suggestion that political leaders should be rewarded with more money is not only misplaced but insulting to the sensibilities of the ordinary Nigerian.

What makes the proposal even more opprobrious is the dire economic condition under which citizens currently live. The cost of living crisis has worsened, inflation has eroded the purchasing power of workers, and the naira continues to tumble against foreign currencies. The majority of Nigerians are living hand to mouth, with many unable to afford basic foodstuffs, medical care, and education. Against this backdrop, political office holders, who already enjoy obscene allowances, perks, and privileges, should not even contemplate a salary increase.

It is, therefore, not surprising that the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has stepped in to challenge this development. SERAP has filed a lawsuit against the RMAFC to halt the implementation of this salary increment. This resolute move represents a voice of reason and accountability at a time when public anger against political insensitivity is palpable. The group is rightly insisting that the law must serve as a bulwark against impunity.

According to a statement issued by SERAP’s Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, the commission has been dragged before the Federal High Court in Abuja. Although a hearing date remains unconfirmed, the momentous step of seeking judicial redress reflects a determination to hold those in power accountable. SERAP has once again positioned itself as a guardian of public interest by challenging an elite-centric policy.

The case, registered as suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/1834/2025, specifically asks the court to determine “whether RMAFC’s proposed salary hike for the president, vice-president, governors and their deputies, and lawmakers in Nigeria is not unlawful, unconstitutional and inconsistent with the rule of law.” This formidable question goes to the very heart of democratic governance: can those entrusted with public resources decide their own pay rises without violating the constitution and moral order?

In its pleadings, SERAP argues that the proposed hike runs foul of both the 1999 Nigerian Constitution and the RMAFC Act. By seeking a judicial declaration that such a move is unlawful, unconstitutional, and inconsistent with the rule of law, the group has placed a spotlight on the tension between self-serving leadership and constitutionalism. To trivialise such an issue would be harum-scarum, for the constitution remains the supreme authority guiding governance.

We wholeheartedly commend SERAP for standing firm, while we roundly condemn RMAFC’s selfish proposal. Political office should never be an avenue for financial aggrandisement. Since our leaders often pontificate sacrifice to citizens, urging them to tighten their belts in the face of economic turbulence, the same leaders must embody sacrifice themselves. Anything short of this amounts to double standards and betrayal of trust.

The Nigerian economy is not buoyant enough to shoulder the additional cost of a salary increase for political leaders. Already, lawmakers and executives enjoy allowances that are grossly disproportionate to the national average income. These earnings are sufficient not only for their needs but also their unchecked greed. To even consider further increments under present circumstances is egregious, a slap in the face of ordinary workers whose minimum wage remains grossly insufficient.

Resources earmarked for such frivolities should instead be channelled towards alleviating the suffering of citizens and improving the nation’s productive capacity. According to United Nations statistics, about 62.9 per cent of Nigerians were living in multidimensional poverty in 2021, compared to 53.7 per cent in 2017. Similarly, nearly 30.9 per cent of the population lives below the international poverty line of US$2.15 per day. These figures paint a stark picture: Nigeria is a poor country by all measurable standards, and any extra naira diverted to elite pockets deepens this misery.

Besides, the timing of this proposal could not be more inappropriate. At a period when unemployment is soaring, inflation is crippling households, and insecurity continues to devastate communities, the RMAFC has chosen to pursue elite enrichment. It is widely known that Nigeria’s economy is in a parlous state, and public resources should be conserved and wisely invested. Political leaders must show prudence, not profligacy.

Another critical dimension is the national debt profile. According to the Debt Management Office, Nigeria’s total public debt as of March 2025 stood at a staggering N149.39 trillion. External debt obligations also remain heavy, with about US$43 billion outstanding by September 2024. In such a climate of debt-servicing and borrowing to fund budgets, it is irresponsible for political leaders to even table the idea of inflating their salaries further. Debt repayment, not self-reward, should occupy their minds.

This ignoble proposal is insensitive, unnecessary, and profoundly reckless. It should be discarded without further delay. Public office is a trust, not an entitlement to wealth accumulation. Nigerians deserve leaders who will share in their suffering, lead by example, and prioritise the common good over self-indulgence. Anything less represents betrayal of the social contract and undermines the fragile democracy we are striving to build.

Editorial

No To Political Office Holders’ Salary Hike

Published

2 days ago

September 22, 2025

The Tide

Editorial

Rivers’ Retirees: Matters Arising

Published

2 weeks ago

September 8, 2025

The Tide

The Rivers State Government deserves commendation for the manner in which it conducted the last biometric exercise for pensioners in the state. For the first time in many years, the verification process was not only efficient but also humane, a development that has brought relief to a category of citizens that often bears the brunt of neglect.

Unlike previous verification exercises that left pensioners exhausted and unattended, the latest exercise set a refreshing precedent. Retirees were given proper and sumptuous meals, and in addition, the government paid the sum of N10,000 into their accounts to cushion their transportation costs. Such gestures go a long way in demonstrating that those who had laboured for the state are not forgotten in their twilight years.

The measure was particularly necessary given that some pensioners had to travel long distances to reach their verification centres. For elderly men and women, such journeys come with physical and financial strain. By recognising these realities and easing the burden, the government has shown that pensioners deserve dignity, not disdain.

Beyond this laudable act of consideration, the authorities must reflect on the very structure of pension verification. The era of compelling retirees to be physically present for routine verification should be reconsidered. With digital tools and innovation, the government can adopt systems that capture and confirm data without the stress of physical assembly. This is crucial for pensioners residing in other states or even abroad.

While we acknowledge the importance of verification in cleaning up pension records, we cannot ignore the darker side of the matter. It is regrettable that some allowances continue to be paid to deceased pensioners, with relatives fraudulently collecting the funds. The latest biometrics, thankfully, exposed some of these sharp practices. The exercise, therefore, is not only about order but also about justice.

We urge families of deceased pensioners to be patriotic enough to inform the government of the deaths of their loved ones. It is deeply shameful that in some instances, individuals attempted to impersonate late pensioners during the biometrics. Such behaviour undermines the spirit of honesty and deprives genuine retirees of their due entitlements.

The exercise also revealed another important area of concern: the health of pensioners. It is reassuring to learn that the state government has reportedly promised to take over the medical treatment of some retirees who arrived for the biometrics in critical condition. This is a step in the right direction. Elderly citizens, after years of service, should have access to special health care facilities in the state. Setting aside hospitals or designated centres for the aged is not just desirable but necessary.

While pension payments in Rivers State have remained consistent, attention must now be directed towards gratuities. Senior citizens deserve to receive their retirement benefits without the bureaucratic hitches that have often marred the process. After years of loyal service, nothing is more demoralising than to see retirees languish for want of their gratuities. Every worker, as Scripture reminds us, is worthy of his wage.

Retirement, in any civilised society, should not be reduced to a sentence of suffering. In dealing with pensioners, government must consistently wear a human face. The humane manner displayed during this verification exercise should not be a one-off. It must become the norm in all dealings with retirees. Measures must continually be put in place to ensure that they do not feel abandoned by the state they served.

One welcome innovation has already been introduced. The Sole Administrator of Rivers State, Vice Admiral (Rtd) Ibok-Ete Ekwe Ibas, has altered the method of gratuity payment. Pensioners now receive their monies directly into their bank accounts, eliminating the cheque-based system that for years served as fertile ground for corruption. This reform is both pragmatic and forward-looking. Similarly, the implementation of the N32,000 pension harmonisation is also commendable.

Direct payments gratuities ensure transparency and drastically reduce the possibility of diversion of funds. More importantly, they restore confidence in the system and assure pensioners that their entitlements will reach them without interference. In this way, the government has not only safeguarded the process but also upheld the principle of accountability.

Seamless gratuity payment has a ripple effect on the workforce as a whole. When workers are confident that retirement will not plunge them into hardship, the temptation to falsify age in order to remain in service is eliminated. Such reforms, therefore, enhance efficiency, honesty, and productivity in the public service.

In sum, the Rivers State Government has struck a refreshing chord in its handling of pension verification. It has shown empathy, innovation, and accountability. However, the momentum must be sustained, and the focus must shift towards modernising verification methods and prioritising retirees’ welfare in health, gratuity, and dignity.

When retirees are treated with compassion and fairness, the message to those still in service is clear: faithful service to the state will not go unrewarded. The humane verification exercise, though a single event, offers a hopeful glimpse of what governance can look like when people, especially the elderly, are placed at the heart of policy.