Opinion
Any Hope For Local Agricultural Products?
At the dawn of the current economic realities in Nigeria, no citizen or resident in the country needed a diviner to explain our hopelessness in the oil sector. Although the wells were not dry, neither have they ceased to flow, yet their content obviously lost the value it hitherto weighed. The reason behind this later development is yet to be unravelled.
However, the search, for sustainable means of livelihood in the face of adverse economic realities for its citizenry has led our great nation to consider and settle for agriculture as a venture that has the muscle to cope with the economic demands of the people in particular and the nation at large. The consensus for agriculture would not have been achieved had it not been experimented in the past and proven to be a worthy mainstay of Nigeria’s economy. That of course may not have been far from the fact that majority of the agricultural produce by Nigerians were locally utilised and the rest exported to the outside world.
The recognition of the locally produced foods by Nigerians at home, forced investors to give exceptional attention to the quality of products turned out at the end of the day which in turn, earned them international status, thus their enlistment as export products.No doubt, from past national leaders of Nigeria, efforts had been made to draw attention to locally made goods. These efforts were captured in series of ban policies on imported goods which are also produced locally. This administration of President Muhammed Buhari, did more to ban the importation of major food items that could be sourced locally.
Prominent among these bans on importation include; poultry meat, fish and rice, a development that encouraged local farmers to intensify effort and desire for land. No doubt with this policy strictly executed with all sincerity of purpose, food will not only be made available on the tables of Nigerians, it would also earn more foreign reserve for the country, develop the individual farmers, improve the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of the country, while repositioning the nation’s economy on a positive note.
Unfortunately, seven years into the administration of the present government, the Nigerian farmer is still dragging feet and unable to define his destination. Apart from struggling to thrive in an unfriendly investment climate that abhors development and industrialisation, he also contends with the risk of having his produce rot in his hands for lack of patronage. The Nigerian farmer has become the proverbial errand boy that was given salt and let out alone in the rain.
There is no gainsaying the fact that the ban policy by this administration could help a great deal in securing locally made food items, but this can only be achieved with strict compliance. What strategy has been put in place to ensure its implementation? Seven years down the line, is there any evaluation of the policy to see how well it is carried out and what positive result it has yielded? These and many more questions still beg for answers.
The farmer in Rivers State is not better of. Apart from the popular bottle-neck in accessing loans which is tied to certificate of occupancy (C of O) that is not easily gotten by the poor, his cost of production appears to top those of his other colleagues in neighbouring states. For instance, the poultry farmer in Rivers State does not only grapple with the case of high cost of feed and drugs, his colleagues from Owerri, Enugu, Asaba and Ibandan flood their backyards with poultry products, produced at a lesser cost which they sell far below his cost price, thus rendering his goods non-saleable.
He is therefore, forced to sell at the dictate of the foreign sellers to his detriment. This situation has led to the abandonment of many farm projects by their owners in the state. This condition, if not checked, will not augur well for the farmer and is capable of truncating the diversification agenda of the present administration. This writer, hopes that the presidential committee constituted by the Federal Government to “unravel challenges of doing business and proffer solution in Nigeria, “ would have been able to capture this great challenge.This can also be fixed by sincerely tightening the borders against the importation of the banned goods with a view to improving the qualities of locally made products that meet international standard.
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Opinion5 days ago
Ancestorial Worship: My Take (1)
-
Education2 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Rivers2 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Niger Delta2 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education2 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News2 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News2 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
News5 days agoFG Must Address Nigerians’ Concerns On Reforms -Shettima …Warns Against Misuse of AI, Social Media
