Connect with us

Opinion

The Good Old Christmas

Published

on

Can anyone remember when governors mostly from then South-Eastern states used to compete over who would send the highest number of luxury buses to different parts of the country to convey their people home for Christmas? From the beginning of December and sometimes earlier, announcements would be made on various radio and television stations when buses would be sent to Borno, Adamawa, Zamfara, Sokoto, Niger and other Northern states to convey Igbos resident in those states to their home states for the Christmas and New Year celebrations. You can call it the good old days, if you think it fits into such a description. But the fact is that people from that region were encouraged to return home at least during the yuletide season to celebrate with their families, reconnect with their family members, friends and others. It is a known truth that many Igbos hardly celebrate the remembrance of the birth of Jesus Christ and the New Year outside Igboland. At this time of the year, Igbos both within and outside the country would be trooping to their villages for the celebrations. The yuletide season is significant to the South-Easterners not just because of Christmas and New year celebrations, it was a period of re-union. Major cultural, traditional, religious and family events are slated for the yuletide season which is around December 15 to January 15. Meetings and other engagements aimed at the development of the communities are held at this period. Marriages, funeral ceremonies, house warming and many other social activities are usually planned for this period, knowing that virtually everybody will be home.
It is also a period when the children who probably have not gone home throughout the year, some even since they were born have the opportunity of travelling to their villages, meeting their kith and kin and getting educated about their cultures and traditions. Virtually everybody from the South-East looked forward to the yuletide season.Today, the story is no longer the same because of the heightened insecurity situation in the region. South-Easterners now find it nightmarish travelling to their hometowns because of the killings, kidnappings, maiming and all manner of crime going on in the region. Of course, some people will still travel home, believing that their lives are in God’s hands and that God will protect them. Some will tell you that they cannot run away from their ancestral homes because of the fear of unknown gunmen or whatever they call the criminals. But the fact remains that many people from the South-East who have the means to travel this season are afraid of doing so. The continuous killing in the South-Eastern part of the country and the seeming inability of both the governors of the region and the federal government to tackle the ugly situation is heart-wrenching. In recent times, no day passes without the report of killings in different parts of the region. South-East, which used to be very peaceful, where the people went about their businesses without fear has become the epicentre of insecurity in the country and the people remain in perpetual tension. If it is not the killing of poor rural dwellers in Ehamufu and sacking them from their ancestral homes by herders, it is the murdering of innocent citizens by some unknown gunmen. If it is not the invasion of some communities by uniformed men to fish out some members of the Eastern Security Network (ESN) and the Independent People of Biafra (IPOB), who the authority claims to be the perpetrators of several crime in the zone, it is the killings as a result of cult clashes and all that. The continued senseless burning of INEC offices, attack on Police stations is still there. Not to mention the perennial Mondays sit-at-home IPOB order and the resultant effects.
This South-East region cannot continue like this. People cannot continue to live in fear. The governors from the region have been laid back for so long. They have for so long failed in their duties of protecting their people and providing responsive and responsible leadership that cater for the welfare of their people. In a recent article, the writer, Ndubisi Francis, traced the root of the current crisis between herders and the indigenes to the 2016, ‘Nimbo Massacre’ where over 40 inhabitants of Nimbo, in Uzo-Uwani Local Government Area of Enugu State, were reportedly slaughtered in cold blood, with many others maimed, while a Catholic church and dozens of houses were razed down by the rampaging attackers. The writer contended that the failure of the government to deal decisively with the case, gave rise to such attacks almost becoming routine in several communities across the South-East with daily clashes over farmlands that were turned into grazing areas by pastoralists. Can this be disputed? No doubt, insecurity happens in other parts of the country but the difference is that in some other states like Rivers, Benue and some South-Western States, their governors are seen taking decisive action and speaking up in the face of injustice against their people and challenging the security agencies and the federal government who controls all the security apparatus in the country to play their own role in securing their people.
Unfortunately, the South-Eastern governors, probably because of some selfish reasons, prefer to look the other way and appear helpless while their people are being killed and chased out of their ancestral homes by some herdsmen. Many indigenes of Eha Amufu, Enugu State are today refugees in many homes. My neighbour from that town currently has four elderly members of his family taking refuge in his home and it is not easy for him at all. What happened to the Ebubeagu security outfit set up by the South-East governors over a year ago to curtail the insecurity in the region just like Amotekun is doing in the South-Western region? How have the governors jointly supported the outfit to carry out its responsibility? We know that the federal government’s control of the Police and other security apparatus could be a clog in the wheel of the governors’ effort in fighting insecurity in their domain but there is still a lot they can do to secure their people and they know it. Governors of the South-East Zone should please do more to fight insecurity in the region. Political, religious and traditional leaders, youth, women groups and other leaders from the zone must join hands in fighting this menace. They cannot continue to fold their hands and watch their states and communities being overrun by criminals. Some of these criminals belong to known families. The self-appointed sectional leader of ESN, Simon Ekpa, who continues to issue destructive orders from his peaceful abode in Finland has family and friends back here in Nigeria. Can not they be used to reach him to stop the harm he is causing to the region and the people? Many times, we have heard the spokesperson for IPOB, Emma Powerful, debunk the accusation that the group is responsible for the mayhem going on in the zone, saying that other people, some non-Igbos, masquerading as IPOB are taking advantage of the situation in the zone. IPOB should not stop at the disclaimer. They and other youths from the zone should join hands with the government to reveal the identities of the criminals and uproot them from the zone and the country at large.
It is also high time IPOB and ESN took a look at their strategy for their agitation for secession. If the whole thing is causing untold hardship and pain to the region and the people you claim to be fighting for, why continue with it? It is also important that the federal government and other states of the federation do not sit aloof and watch the South-East destroyed. All hands must be on deck to arrest the situation. Together we must stand.

By: Calista Ezeaku

Continue Reading

Opinion

Trans-Kalabari  Road:  Work In Progress 

Published

on

Quote:”This Dream project  is one of  the best things that have happened  to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas in recent times.”
This is the concluding part of this story featured in our last edition.
Good road network helps farmers to convey their agro-allied products to  commercial hubs where buyers and sellers meet periodically to transact business. Road network engineers and motivates people resident in unfriendly geographical terrains, like riverine areas,  to own property and shuttle home with ease. Some people will prefer living in their own houses in a more serene and nature-blessed communities to living in the city that is fraught with  pollution, and other environmental, social and economic hazards. Prior to the cult epidemic that ravaged parts of Rivers State, the Emohuas, Elemes, Ogonis, and Etches were known for rural dwelling. Most public servants from these areas do their official and private transactions from  their villages. For them it was comparatively easier to live in the village and engage in a diversified economic endeavours through farming, fishing or other lucrative business without outrageous charges and embarrassment associated with doing business in Port Harcourt, where land is as scarce as the traditional needle.
That is why the decision to construct the Trans-Kalabari Road by the administration of Dr. Peter Odili was one of the best decisions that administration took. When Dr. Odili vacated office as the Rivers State Governor, Rt. Hon. Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi took over and awarded contracts for continuation of the road project which in my considered view is the felt need of  the people of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. Unfortunately, Rt. Hon. Amaechi’s efforts to drive the project was sabotaged by some contractors some of whom are Kalabari people. The main  Trans-Kalabari Road is one project that is dear to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas of Rivers State. This is because through the road commuters can easily access several communities in the three local government areas. For instance, the road when completed will enable access to eight of the ten communities in Degema Local Government Area,  namely: Bukuma, Tombia,  Bakana, Oguruama, Obuama, Usokun, Degema town  and the Degema Consulate. It will also link 15 of the 16 communities in Asari Toru Local Government Area. The communities are: Buguma, the local government headquarters, Ido, Abalama, Tema, Sama, Okpo, Ilelema, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama, Krakrama, Omekwe-Ama, Angulama. The road will also connect  14  of 17 wards in Akuku Toru Local Government Area, and other settlements. It is interesting to note that It is faster,  and far more convenient and economical for the catchment Communities on the Trans-Kalabari Road network to go to the State Capital than the East West Road.  The people of the three local government areas will prefer  to work or do their transactions in Port Harcourt from their respective communities to staying in Port Harcourt where the house rent and the general cost of living is astronomically high.
 Consequently, development will seamlessly spread to the 28 out of 34 communities of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. The only Communities that are not linked by the road project are Oporoama in Asari Toru,  the Ke and  Bille Communities in Degema Local Government Area and the “Oceania” communities of Abissa, Kula, Soku, Idama, Elem Sangama of Akuku Toru Local Government Area. But because of the economic value of the unlinked Communities to Nigeria, (they produce substantial oil and gas in the area), the Federal, State Governments and the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC), can extend the road network to those areas just as Bonny is linked to Port Harcourt and the Lagos Mainland Bridge is connecting several towns in Lagos and neighbouring States.Kudos to previous administrations who  had constructed the Central Group axis.
 However, what is said to be the First Phase of the Trans-Kalabari Road project is actually a linkage of the “Central Group” Communities which consists of Krakrama, Angulama, Omekwe. Ama, Omekwe Tari Ama, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama. It is the peripheral of the Trans-Kalabari Road. The completion of the  Main Trans Kalabari project will free Port Harcourt and Obio/Akpor areas from congestion. It will motivate residents and people of the three local areas to contribute to the development of their Communities. If the Ogonis, Etches, Emohuas, Oyigbos, Okrikas, Elemes can feel comfortable doing business in Port Harcourt from home, residents and people whose communities are linked to Port Harcourt through the Trans-Kalabari Road will no doubt, do likewise. The vast arable virgin land of the Bukuma people can be open for development and sustainable agricultural ventures by Local, State and Federal Government.
It is necessary to recall that the Bukuma community was host to the Federal Government’s Graduate Farmers’ Scheme and the Rivers State Government moribund School-to-Land Scheme under Governor Fidelis Oyakhilome. Bukuma was the only community in Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas that has the capacity to carry those agricultural programmes. However the lack of road to transport farm produce to Port Harcourt and facilitate the movement of the beneficiaries of the scheme who lived in the community which is several miles away from the farms, hampered the sustainability of the programme. The main Trans-Kalabari Road remains the best gift to the people of Degema, Asari Toru, and Akuku-Toru Local Government Areas. Kudos to Sir Siminilayi Fubara.
By: Igbiki Benibo
Continue Reading

Opinion

That  U.S. Capture of Maduro

Published

on

Quote:”Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction.”
The first part of this story was published in our last edition.
 
In Africa and the Middle East, regime change—whether by invasion, proxy warfare, or sanctions—has often left behind fractured states, weakened institutions, and prolonged instability. Washington’s motivations in Venezuela are widely understood: vast oil reserves, alliances with U.S. rivals, and symbolic defiance of American influence in the Western Hemisphere. But none of these reasons confer legal or moral legitimacy. Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction. If every powerful nation acted on its grievances in this manner, global chaos would inevitably follow. International law provides mechanisms for accountability. Under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), individuals accused of crimes against humanity or other grave offences are subject to investigation and prosecution through judicial processes.
Likewise, extradition treaties, mutual legal assistance agreements, and Interpol mechanisms exist to ensure accountability while respecting due process. These frameworks were designed precisely to prevent unilateral enforcement of “justice” by military force. The most profound consequence of America’s action may not be in Caracas, but in the precedent it sets. If the world accepts that a superpower can unilaterally depose another country’s president, then the foundation of the international system is weakened. Sovereignty becomes conditional—no longer a right, but a privilege tolerated at the discretion of the powerful. Going forward, if another country invades its neighbour, will the United States retain the moral authority to impose sanctions or demand restraint? Some analysts already warn that parallels between Russia’s actions in Ukraine and America’s conduct in Venezuela risk further eroding global norms. Selective adherence to international law breeds cynicism and accelerates the drift toward a world governed by force rather than rules.
Power—military, economic, or political—should serve human progress and collective well-being, not domination and destruction. For African nations, many of which emerged from colonial rule through bitter struggle, this precedent is especially alarming. Sovereignty is not an abstract legal concept; it is a hard-won shield against external domination. Any erosion of that principle anywhere weakens it everywhere. Africa’s painful history of foreign interference makes this lesson especially urgent.  For me, the real issue is not whether Nicolás Maduro is a good or bad leader. That judgment belongs, first and foremost, to the Venezuelan people. The larger issue is whether the international system still operates on law—or has quietly reverted to hierarchy. If America insists it is defending global order, it must ask itself a difficult question: can an order survive when its most powerful guardian feels entitled to violate it? Until that question is answered honestly, the capture of a foreign president will remain not a triumph of justice, but a troubling symbol of a world drifting from law toward force.
If the United States felt so strongly about the allegations of terrorism, drug trafficking  against Maduro, were there no other lawful options? Judicial accountability, diplomacy, regional mediation, and multilateral pressure may be slow and imperfect, but they reflect respect for international law and sovereign equality. Military seizure is a blunt instrument. It humiliates institutions, radicalizes populations, and hardens resistance. It may remove a leader, but it rarely resolves the underlying crisis. History teaches that military interventions seldom result in stable democratic outcomes. More often, they breed resentment, resistance, and long-term instability. For the sake of global order and the rule of law, the United States should reconsider this path and recommit to diplomacy, legal cooperation, and respect for the sovereign equality of states. Former U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris reportedly described the invasion of Venezuela as “unlawful and unwise,” warning that such actions “do not make America safer, stronger, or more affordable.” Her words reflect a growing recognition, even within the United States, that force without legitimacy undermines both moral authority and global stability.
Should what happened in Venezuela serve as a wake-up call for corrupt African leaders who undermine the people’s right to choose their leaders? The answer is yes. The capture of Maduro should alarm African leaders who manipulate elections, weaken institutions, suppress opposition, undermine citizens’ rights, or cling to power at all costs. Venezuela faced widespread criticism over disputed elections and repression long before this episode, and that context shaped how the world reacted. This does not justify foreign military intervention, but it highlights an uncomfortable truth: prolonged democratic decay isolates nations and invites external pressure—from sanctions to diplomatic censure. Global opinion matters, and legitimacy at home strengthens sovereignty abroad. The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and several African leaders have rightly condemned the events in Venezuela, invoking the principles of sovereignty and non-interference enshrined in international and regional law.
Beyond condemnation, however, African leaders must look inward. The continent’s future cannot be built on repression, constitutional manipulation, and personal greed. Leadership must reflect the will of the people, not desperation for power. Two days ago, a social commentator on a radio station argued that Trump’s action—though condemnable—demonstrates how far a leader can go for his country’s interest. According to this view, he did not intervene in Venezuela for personal enrichment, but to strengthen his nation. In stark contrast, many African leaders plunder their own countries. They siphon public resources, impose crushing taxes and harmful policies, and leave their citizens poorer—all for selfish gain. That contradiction is the deeper lesson Africa must confront.True sovereignty is protected not only by international law, but by accountable leadership at home.
 By:  Calista Ezeaku
Continue Reading

Opinion

Kudos  Gov Fubara

Published

on

Please permit me to use this medium to appreciate our able governor, Siminalayi Fubara for the inauguration of the 14.2-kilometre Obodhi–Ozochi Road in Ahoada-East Local Government Area.  This inauguration marks a significant milestone in the history of our communities and deserves commendation. We, the people of Ozochi, are particularly happy because this project has brought long-awaited relief after years of isolation and hardship.
The expression of our traditional ruler, His Royal Highness, Eze Prince Ike Ehie, JP, during the inauguration captured the joy of our people.  He said, “our isolation is over.”  That reflects the profound impact of this road on daily life, economic activities, and social integration of the people of Ozochi and other neighbouring communities. The road will no doubt ease transportation, improve access to markets and healthcare, and strengthen links between Ahoada, Omoku, and other parts of Rivers State.
The people of Ahoada, Omoku, and indeed Rivers State as a whole are grateful to our dear governor for this laudable achievement and wish him many more successful years in office. We pray that God endows him with more wisdom and strength to continue to pilot the affairs of the state for the benefit of all. As citizens, we should rally behind the governor and support his development agenda. Our politicians and stakeholders should embrace peace and cooperation, as no meaningful progress can be achieved in an atmosphere of conflict. Sustainable development in the state can only thrive where peace prevails.
Samuel Ebiye
Continue Reading

Trending