Opinion
Why Management Fails
Ultimate goal, emphasis and focus of every management process are to make optimal use of human and material resources to produce best results in any defined project, through the willing cooperation of stakeholders in the project. It is the art of guiding activities and energy of stakeholders towards the accomplishment of some defined goals. Management is enhanced by the application of bureaucratic principles whereby roles and powers are clearly specified, defined and assigned, based on competence and expertise. Possibility of monopoly or abuse of power is checked by the principles of accountability and transparency of operations.
Checklist for a sound management applies doctrines of Efficiency, Effectiveness, Continuity and Satisfaction. Efficiency entails the speed and economy it takes to get required results, based on sound division of labour, degree of cooperation and motivation among the personnel and a clear definition of authority and accountability. There is effectiveness where available resources are used with prudence and diligence to produce results and services which satisfy the stakeholders. Sound control measures and management intelligence facilitate effective service delivery.
Efficiency and effectiveness facilitate and sustain the continuity of any management, especially where management training programme and accountable use of resources are established as management culture. A sound management culture is rooted in the application of the ideas of bureaucracy with regard to impartiality in the hiering and firing of staff. But a situation where personnel can be engaged on the basis of patronage rather than competence, then there is a cause for possible failure.
Private sector establishments have been found to apply the ideals of bureaucracy better than public agencies. Bureaucratic principles prescribe authority hierarchy, with the higher controlling the lower one, but such control recognises division of labour and the distribution of responsibility. Autonomy and freedom from outside control or impositions are vital ideals of a bureaucracy, whereby all rules of engagement are documented and serve as guidelines in all operations. Impartiality in administrative machinery is meant to ensure that personal favouritism or bias does not jeopardise the rule of justice in management processes.
We find differences between management and administration in the handling of private and public establishments. A manager has greater autonomy and freedom from outside interferences than an administrator. Thus heads of public establishments are more of administrators than managers. Being such obedient servants, civility and servitude are the hallmarks of public-sector administrators. They are servants to political masters, whose capricious nature manifests in hiring of docile servants and the firing of radical or independent-minded professionals. Foundation for failures in public bureaucracy lies in this feature.
What is happening currently between university lecturers and the federal government should be an eye-opener to discerning Nigerians. Arms-twisting measures are among the strategies used by political paymasters to ensure malleability, docility and servitude of civil servants. Thus, competence, expertise and independent-mindedness can be sacrificed for civility, obedience and mediocrity. Then what do we have in the public sector? Failure!
This culture of civility, servitude and maintenance of the status-quo also reflects in the appointments of heads of tertiary institutions and the politicisation of education. Thus the arms-twisting culture has become a vital strategy for the installation and sustenance of corruption and tyranny in the polity; thanks to military tacticians. The option of joining them if you cannot beat them, served as an aphrodisiac or bait to lure “radical rebels” into the winning team of the game of gangsterism. Independent-minded members of the academia, serving and retired, with personal integrity, know of the shenanigans playing out in the educational sector.
Why is it that policies, plans and programmes in the public sector rarely work as envisaged? With the mantra of “public good” as a camouflage, it is obvious to any discerning Nigerian that what we have as politics is a clever system of gangsterism, which, for purpose of politeness, is named oligopoly. Military regime packaged it for obvious reasons, but majority of Nigerians remain ignorant, capable of being hoodwinked. Einstein, the man associated with the theory of Relativity, reminded us that politics is more difficult than physics, but we allow charlatans to dominate that activity!
Political interferences in public bureaucracy operate through the installation of Sapiental authority, Cabal and a cult of Spin-doctors, as faceless but ruthless manipulators. Thus, top hierarchy of public bureaucracy becomes an exclusive cult affair, of which only patrons and anointed persons are admitted into. Those who may pretend to be unaware of this system of management in Nigeria may continue in their pretences. Those looking for the root-cause and mechanism of corruption can do a research, using this clue as a leading hypothesis.
Those who are aware of these shenanigans as long-established management credo would not open their mouths to expose the operational secrets, for obvious reasons. It takes politics of integrity and accountability as well as sound management principles, to satisfy the greatest needs, aspirations and expectations of the greatest number. But politics of greed, chicanery, patronage and sinecure, destroy public confidence and warn citizens that a game of gangsterism wears the face of management of public affairs. Once this awareness takes root in a society, everybody looks for the ways and means of self survival, by hook or crook.
Electoral process as a means of installing a sane and credible system of public administration, has also been infected by the virus of corruption. To say that such virus has its tentacles everywhere, means that the electoral system is not left out. Neither is there any hope that a paradigm shift is about to take place. While there is a hope for Divine intervention when human recalcitrance gets to a crescendo, it is also possible that Divine gift can be rubbished by human failures. Despite provisions which bureaucracy and democracy make available for a good management of human affairs, human failures have rubbished these provisions.
Happily, current plight afflicting humanity and Nigerians in particular, are producing some positive results. Such results do not always manifest in radical aggressiveness but it can take the form of sober and determined resolution to stay alive in the face of threats through Gandhi’s philosophy. Non-co-operation can bring down any management system. Violent change will beget bloodshed, with armed hirelings of the establishment ready for mass slaughter.
By: Bright Amirize
Dr Amirize is a retired lecturer in Rivers State University, Port Harcourt.
Opinion
Empowering Youth Through Agriculture
Quote:”While job seeking youths should continuously acquire skills and explore opportunities within their immediate environment as well as in the global space through the use of digital platforms, government, corporate/ multinational organizations or the organised private sector should generate skills and provide the enabling environment for skills acquisition, through adequate funding and resettlement packages that will provide sustainable economic life for beneficiaries”.
The Governor of Rivers State, Sir Siminalayi Fubara, recently urged youths in the Rivers State to take advantage of the vast opportunities available to become employers of labour and contribute meaningfully to the growth and development of the State. Governor Fubara noted that global trends increasingly favour entrepreneurship and innovation, and said that youths in Rivers State must not be left behind in harnessing these opportunities. The Governor, represented by the Secretary to the State Government, Dr Benibo Anabraba, made this known while declaring open the 2026 Job Fair organised by the Rivers State Government in partnership with the Nigeria Employers’ Consultative Association (NECA) in Port Harcourt. The Governor acknowledged the responsibility of government to create jobs for its teeming youth population but noted that it is unrealistic to absorb all job seekers into the civil service.
“As a government, we recognise our duty to provide employment opportunities for our teeming youths. However, we also understand that not all youths can be accommodated within the civil service. This underscores the need to encourage entrepreneurship across diverse sectors and to partner with other stakeholders, including the youths themselves, so they can transition from being job seekers to employers of labour,” he said. It is necessary to State that Governor Fubara has not only stated the obvious but was committed to drive youth entrepreneurship towards their self-reliance and the economic development of the State It is not news that developed economies of the world are skilled driven economies. The private sector also remains the highest employer of labour in private sector driven or capitalist economy though it is also the responsibility of government to create job opportunities for the teeming unemployed youth population in Nigeria which has the highest youth unemployed population in the subSahara Africa.
The lack of job opportunities, caused partly by the Federal Government’s apathy to job creation, the lack of adequate supervision of job opportunities economic programmes, lack of employable skills by many youths in the country have conspired to heighten the attendant challenges of unemployment. The challenges which include, “Japa” syndrome (travelling abroad for greener pastures), that characterises the labour market and poses threat to the nation’s critical sector, especially the health and medical sector; astronomical increase in the crime rate and a loss of interest in education. While job seeking youths should continuously acquire skills and explore opportunities within their immediate environment as well as in the global space through the use of digital platforms, government, corporate/ multinational organizations or the organised private sector should generate skills and provide the enabling environment for skills acquisition, through adequate funding and resettlement packages that will provide sustainable economic life for beneficiaries.
While commending the Rivers State Government led by the People First Governor, Sir Siminilayi Fubara for initiating “various training and capacity-building programmes in areas such as ICT and artificial intelligence, oil and gas, maritime, and the blue economy, among others”, it is note-worthy that the labour market is dynamic and shaped by industry-specific demands, technological advancements, management practices and other emerging factors. So another sector the Federal, State and Local Governments should encourage youths to explore and harness the abounding potentials, in my considered view, is Agriculture. Agriculture remains a veritable solution to hunger, inflation, and food Insecurity that ravages the country. No doubt, the Nigeria’s arable landmass is grossly under-utilised and under-exploited.
In recent times, Nigerians have voiced their concerns about the persistent challenges of hunger, inflation, and the general increase in prices of goods and commodities. These issues not only affect the livelihoods of individuals and families but also pose significant threats to food security and economic stability in the country. The United Nations estimated that more than 25 million people in Nigeria could face food insecurity this year—a 47% increase from the 17 million people already at risk of going hungry, mainly due to ongoing insecurity, protracted conflicts, and rising food prices. An estimated two million children under five are likely to be pushed into acute malnutrition. (Reliefweb ,2023). In response, Nigeria declared a state of emergency on food insecurity, recognizing the urgent need to tackle food shortages, stabilize rising prices, and protect farmers facing violence from armed groups. However, without addressing the insecurity challenges, farmers will continue to struggle to feed their families and boost food production.
In addition, parts of northwest and northeast Nigeria have experienced changes in rainfall patterns making less water available for crop production. These climate change events have resulted in droughts and land degradations; presenting challenges for local communities and leading to significant impact on food security. In light of these daunting challenges, it is imperative to address the intricate interplay between insecurity and agricultural productivity. Nigeria can work toward ensuring food security, reducing poverty, and fostering sustainable economic growth in its vital agricultural sector. In this article, I suggest solutions that could enhance agricultural production and ensure that every state scales its agricultural production to a level where it can cater to 60% of the population.
This is feasible and achievable if government at all levels are intentional driving the development of the agricultural sector which was the major economic mainstay of the Country before the crude oil was struck in commercial quantity and consequently became the nation’s monolithic revenue source. Government should revive the moribund Graduate Farmers Scheme and the Rivers State School-to-Land agricultural programmes to operate concurrently with other skills acquisition and development programmes. There should be a consideration for investment in mechanized farming and arable land allocation. State and local governments should play a pivotal role in promoting mechanized farming and providing arable land for farming in communities. Additionally, allocating arable land enables small holder farmers to expand their operations and contribute to food security at the grassroots level.
Nigeria can unlock the potential of its agricultural sector to address the pressing needs of its population and achieve sustainable development. Policymakers and stakeholders must heed Akande’s recommendations and take decisive action to ensure a food-secure future for all Nigerians.
By: Igbiki Benibo
Opinion
Of Protests And Need For Dialogue
Quote:“.Across Abuja, Anambra, and Lagos, a common thread emerges: a disconnect between authority and empathy. Government actions may follow policy logic, but citizens respond from lived experience, fear, and frustration. When these realities collide without dialogue, the streets become the arena of engagement”
It was a turbulent week in the country, highlighting the widening gap between government intentions and public perception. From Abuja to Anambra and Lagos, citizens poured into the streets not just over specific grievances but in frustration with governance that often appears heavy-handed, confrontational, or insufficiently humane. While authorities may genuinely act in the public interest, their methods sometimes aggravate tensions rather than resolve them.
In Abuja, the strike by workers of the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA) and the Federal Capital Development Authority (FCDA) under the Joint Union Action Committee (JUAC) brought the capital to a near standstill. Their demands included five months’ unpaid wages, hazard and rural allowances, promotion arrears, welfare packages, pension and National Housing Fund remittances, and training and career progression concerns. These are core labour issues that directly affect workers’ dignity and livelihoods. Efforts to dialogue with the FCT Minister reportedly failed. Even after a court ordered the strike to end, workers persisted, underscoring the depth of discontent. Threats and sanctions only hardened positions.
The FCT crisis shows that industrial peace cannot be enforced through coercion. Dialogue is not weakness; it is recognition that governance is about people. Meeting labour leaders, listening attentively, clarifying grey areas, and agreeing on timelines could restore trust. Honesty and negotiation are far more effective than threats.
In Anambra, protests by Onitsha Main Market traders followed the government’s closure of the market over continued observance of a Monday sit-at-home, linked to separatist agitation. Governor Chukwuma Soludo described compliance as economic sabotage, insisting Anambra cannot operate as a “four-day-a-week economy.” While the governor’s concern is understandable, threats to revoke ownership, seize, or demolish the market risk escalating tensions. Many traders comply out of fear, not ideology. Markets are social ecosystems of families, apprentices, and informal networks; heavy-handed enforcement may worsen resistance. A better approach combines persuasion, dialogue with market leaders, credible security assurances, and gradual confidence-building. Coordinated political engagement with federal authorities could also reduce regional tensions.
In Lagos, protests erupted over demolition of homes in low-income waterfront communities such as Makoko, Owode Onirin, and Oworonshoki. The state defended these actions as necessary for safety, environmental protection, and urban renewal. While objectives are legitimate, demolitions drew criticism for lack of notice, compensation, and humane resettlement. Urban development without regard for human consequences risks appearing elitist and anti-poor. Where demolitions are unavoidable, transparent engagement, fair compensation, and realistic relocation must precede action to maintain public trust and social stability.
Across Abuja, Anambra, and Lagos, a common thread emerges: a disconnect between authority and empathy. Government actions may follow policy logic, but citizens respond from lived experience, fear, and frustration. When these realities collide without dialogue, the streets become the arena of engagement.
Democracy cannot thrive on decrees, threats, or bulldozers alone. Leaders must listen as much as they command, persuade as much as they enforce. Minister Wike should see labour leaders as partners, Governor Soludo must balance firmness with sensitivity, and Lagos authorities should align urban renewal with compassion and justice. Protests are signals of communication failure. Dialogue, caution, and a human face in governance are not optional—they are necessities. Police and security agencies must respect peaceful protest as a constitutional right.
By: Calista Ezeaku
Opinion
Empowering Youth Through Agriculture
-
Sports4 days agoArsenal Women End Man City’s Invincibility
-
Sports4 days agoU-20 WWC: Falconets claim qualifier win
-
Sports4 days agoInsurance Deepen Enyimba’s Trouble
-
Sports4 days agoYouth Olympics preparation Gears up
-
Sports4 days agoCologne Youth Team Set Crowd Record
-
Sports4 days agoTornadoes Set For NPFL exit over Stadium Ban
-
Sports4 days agoBarca Pull Out Of Super League Project
-
Sports4 days agoPalmer Stars As Chelsea Compound Wolves Woes
