Connect with us

Opinion

 Still On Nigerian Youth And Ritual Killing

Published

on

Video clips of some alleged online scammers, popularly known as Yahoo-Yahoo boys who ran amok on the streets of Enugu,  went viral on the social media a few days ago. A young woman was seen in the video running after one of them who had yanked off his clothes, trying to cover him with a wrapper.
This has become a regular occurrence, young boys suddenly losing it mentally and doing all kinds of unthinkable things in the open. Recall the story of a young man in his early 20s said to be a ‘yahoo-yahoo’ boy, who ran mad and stabbed himself to death with a broken bottle in Ugheli, Delta State, some years back.
It is really getting out of hand. Young girls are getting killed for ritual purposes, young men are going crazy and dying for ritual killing. Who will save Nigerian youth?
Our youth, in a bid to get rich quick, are doing all manner of unimaginable things including taking lives and harvesting the body parts of their victims for rituals in support of their Internet fraud “business”. From Yahoo boys where they use their internet dexterity to commit series of cybercrimes, they graduated to Yahoo plus, which requires the use of charm for protection and to hypnotise unsuspecting victims, to the latest – Yahoo plus-plus which involves the harvesting of human parts for the preparation of magic concoctions to boost their cybercrime success. A writer described Yahoo plus-plus this way, it “involves the use of human parts and may need kidnapping other human beings for rituals, which is not necessary in ‘Yahoo Plus’. In Yahoo Plus Plus, the use of things such as victims’ finger nails, rings, carrying of corpses, making incision on their body, sleeping in the cemetery, chanting of incantation, using their fingers for rituals, and having sex with ghosts are common.”
Unfortunately, female parts seem to be the favourite item for the ritual. Recall the killing of a 300-level student of the University of Jos (UNIJOS), Jennifer Anthony, by a suspected ritualist in a hotel in Jos, the Plateau State capital. Spokesman of the Plateau State Police Command, Ubah Gabriel Ogaba, said Miss Anthony, who was declared missing on December 30, 2021 was later found dead in a hotel in Jos with eyes gouged out of their sockets.
A few weeks back, another girl, Rofiat, was killed by her boyfriend and two of his friends at Oke Aregba, Abeokuta, Ogun State. The girl was said to have been strangled, her head cut off and burnt in a local pot by Soliu, her boyfriend, and two others for money ritual. However, luck ran out on them when a local community guard sighted their activities and alerted the police, which led to their arrest.
While some of these girls fall prey because of their longings for free food, free drinks and other material considerations, others like late Elozino Ogege, a 300-level Mass Communication student of the Delta State University was no such. Her kidnapping and killing was masterminded by a security guard in the university, who promised to help her with information regarding available rooms for rent within the school’s staff quarter. Some of them were victims of love. The same men they loved and who claimed to love them in return, were the ones who killed and mutilated them just to be rich, buy the latest cars, rent expensive houses, belong to the group of big boys and have other good things that money can buy.
But how did we get to this level where material things are now more valuable than human lives?  How is it that our young men have mortgaged their consciences and now see nothing wrong in spilling blood?  The most worrisome thing is that some parents, being fully aware of their sons’ criminal acts, support them. I remember someone I know telling people who came to report her son’s suspicious acts in school, to leave him alone that it is through the pressing of phones and computers that her son pays his school fees and caters for his other needs.  To her, it was a mere punching of the devices’ keyboard, as if they were minting machines. Stories are told of some parents who personally take their sons to where they will be taught the “business”.  What about women who encourage their husbands to engage in criminal acts?
At a gathering recently, a question was asked whether there should be harsher penalty for Internet fraud as against a fine of up to N10 million or a term of imprisonment of five years as provided in Nigeria’s Cybercrime Act 2015 and surprisingly, some of the people there including mothers, fathers and young people objected.  They said the fine should rather be reduced. A particular young man said that only ‘mugus’ fall victims of Internet fraud, so it should not have been made a crime in the first place.
There are others who claim that Internet crime is thriving in the country because of various reasons – poor leadership both at national and state levels, high level of unemployment, poor parenting, social media and peer group influence and many more.
Definitely, there is the need for government at all levels to be more responsive to the needs of the people, use the proceeds from the nation’s abundant natural resources to develop the country,  provide conducive environment for businesses to thrive so that more jobs will be provided for the teeming unemployed youth; our leaders, the celebrities, who many young ones look up to as their role models should cut down on the expensive lifestyle; efforts should be made towards narrowing the wide gap between the rich and the poor in our society. Employment, particularly in government establishments, should be on merit rather than based on who one knows or how much he has to pay for the job so that the deserving people will get the jobs.
But, should these problems be enough reason for our young men to resort to crime, ritual as a means of livelihood? Of course not!  It is certain that despite the multitudinous challenges facing the country, many people are still making it legitimately here. By dint of sheer hard work, countless youths in the country have moved from grass to grace. So, our youth should jettison the prevailing get-rich-quick syndrome and think of positive, legitimate ways of using their talent and youthful energy to better themselves and the nation. As a popular saying goes, “success is not easy and is certainly not for the lazy”. You are a school dropout, you refuse to learn a trade, you do not want to do any menial job and you want to drive the type of a senator’s car, how can that be?
Parents should also wake up to their responsibilities towards their children. To be a parent is far more than just giving birth to a child. In the words of Alain de Botton, “To be a parent is to be chief designer of a product more advanced than any technology and more interesting than the greatest work of art”. The duty of a mother or father is to direct the steps of their children, making sure that they do not go astray and when they derail, call them back.
The rate of youths’ enrolment into Yahoo boys and the likes should be of a great concern to all Nigerians as it is capable of destroying this generation and the ones after,  if not checked and the task of curtailing it is for everybody. The Police and other economic crime- fighting agencies of the government have done well but they can do better. There is the need to strengthen the sanctioning system. Offenders should be duly punished to serve as a deterrent for many.
Most importantly, unless we begin to de-emphasise materialism in our society and begin to frown at material acquisition through illegal means, we may not succeed in stopping the Yahoo business and that will mean a bleak future for the country.
Lastly, a poser for our young people – A list of the richest young men in the world was released recently. How many Yahoo-Yahoo boys were there?

By: Calista Ezeaku

Continue Reading

Opinion

Poor Federal Roads: The Oshiomhole’s  Outburst

Published

on

Quote:”Although the Federal Ministry of Works is responsible for road construction and rehabilitation while the Federal Roads Maintenance Agency (FERMA) oversees maintenance, road maintenance has consistently taken a back seat”

The recent outburst by the lawmaker representing Edo North Senatorial District, Senator Adams Oshiomhole, over the deplorable condition of federal roads in Edo and Delta states has once again drawn national attention to one of Nigeria’s most persistent infrastructure challenges. During Senate plenary last Wednesday, Oshiomhole criticized the Minister of Works, David Umahi, accusing the Federal Ministry of Works of neglecting major federal highways in Edo and Delta while prioritizing new road projects. According to him, the government should focus on rehabilitating existing roads that have become impassable before embarking on new construction. He identified the Benin-Warri, Benin-Asaba, Benin-Auchi and Auchi-Okene highways as strategic economic corridors that have deteriorated to alarming levels, making travel difficult for commuters and motorists while increasing the cost of transporting goods and services.

The senator also alleged that road projects affecting Edo and Delta states were repeatedly omitted from budgetary provisions and that some interventions were only undertaken following directives from President Bola Tinubu. Ironically, the Federal Government has consistently reiterated its commitment to reconstructing and rehabilitating federal roads across the country. The Minister of Works has repeatedly assured Nigerians that the government is deploying reinforced concrete technology to build more durable highways capable of withstanding the country’s climatic conditions. Despite these assurances, vast sections of federal road across the country remain in deplorable condition. The consequences are enormous. Federal highways serve as the backbone of the nation’s economy, carrying more than 90 per cent of passengers and freight.

They connect ports, airports, industrial centres, state capitals and agricultural belts, facilitating the movement of food, fuel, cement and manufactured goods. When these roads fail, the entire economy suffers. Although the Federal Ministry of Works is responsible for road construction and rehabilitation while the Federal Roads Maintenance Agency (FERMA) oversees maintenance, road maintenance has consistently taken a back seat. The result is a recurring cycle in which newly completed roads quickly deteriorate while existing ones are left to collapse. The economic consequences are severe. Bad roads increase transportation costs, contribute to food inflation, delay the movement of goods from ports to markets, increase vehicle maintenance expenses and lead to avoidable road crashes that claim countless lives every year.

To address these challenges, the Federal Government has introduced initiatives such as the Highway Development and Management Initiative (HDMI), which seeks to attract private investment into road maintenance through concessions and tolling. While the initiative holds promise, public acceptance will depend largely on visible improvements in road quality and transparent management of toll revenues. Similarly, the Road Infrastructure Tax Credit Scheme is designed to encourage companies to finance the reconstruction of strategic highways in exchange for tax credits. While the scheme has shown promise, its ability to address road infrastructure challenges equitably across the country remains to be seen. Other countries facing similar infrastructure challenges have demonstrated that sustainable road management requires a different approach.

Rwanda and Morocco, for instance, have prioritized dedicated road maintenance funds, performance-based contracts that reward quality rather than kilometers constructed, and policies that allocate a significant proportion of road budgets to maintenance instead of new construction. Nigeria can draw useful lessons from these experiences. Maintenance funding should be increased and protected because preventive maintenance is far cheaper than complete reconstruction. Public-private partnerships should be expanded with adequate safeguards, transparent tolling policies and independent monitoring. Development finance institutions should support contractors with affordable financing to minimize disruptions caused by delayed government payments. Road designs should withstand heavier rainfall and flooding, while compensation and right-of-way issues must be resolved before projects begin to avoid unnecessary delays.

FERMA should also prioritize durable, high-quality road maintenance over the shoddy repairs that have become all too common. Ultimately, Nigerians are not asking for perfect roads; they simply want roads that are safe, durable and properly maintained. While new highways are desirable, a well-maintained five-kilometer stretch is often far more valuable to road users than a much longer road that quickly falls into disrepair. The media, civil society, the National Assembly and Nigerians must continue to hold the government accountable by monitoring road projects and demanding better results. Good roads are not a privilege but a right of every citizen. With tax credit schemes, concessions and other funding mechanisms already in place, what is now required is political will, transparency and consistent implementation. However, Senator Oshiomhole’s criticism also invites legitimate public reflection. 

Many Nigerians have asked what the condition of these same federal roads was during his eight-year tenure as Governor of Edo State. Several governors, including those of Rivers State at different times, undertook repairs on critical federal roads within their states and subsequently sought reimbursement from the Federal Government. It is therefore fair to ask whether similar interventions were pursued during Oshiomhole’s administration. Public officials, whether serving or former, should be judged by the same standard. Constructive criticism is essential in a democracy, but it carries greater weight when matched by a demonstrable record of action. Nigerians expect those entrusted with public office to address pressing challenges while they have the authority to do so, rather than becoming vocal critics only after leaving office

By:  Calista Ezeaku
Continue Reading

Opinion

Sacrificing Humanity for Politics? 

Published

on

“Politics is temporary, but humanity is permanent. No politician is worth sacrificing genuine friendships, family bonds, or peaceful coexistence.””Politics is temporary, but humanity is permanent”.

Every election season leaves behind more than ballot papers and campaign posters. It often leaves broken friendships, divided families, fractured communities, and hearts filled with resentment. In the heat of political competition, many people forget a simple but profound truth: politics is temporary, but humanity is permanent. Across our communities, it has become increasingly common to see people sever lifelong relationships simply because they support different political parties or candidates. Individuals who once shared meals, celebrated milestones, and stood by each other during difficult times suddenly become strangers not because they committed any personal offence, but because they exercised their democratic right to think differently. This growing trend should concern every citizen. Politics is designed to provide leadership, shape public policy, and improve society.

It was never intended to become a weapon for destroying relationships or creating permanent enemies. When politics begins to erode our humanity, it ceases to serve its true purpose. A democratic society thrives on diversity of thought. Every citizen possesses the constitutional right to support any political party, candidate, or ideology without fear of intimidation or hatred. Political disagreement is not a crime; rather, it is evidence that democracy is alive and functioning. The true measure of political maturity is not our ability to silence opposing voices but our willingness to respect them. Unfortunately, many people have mistaken political loyalty for personal hostility. Instead of debating ideas, they attack personalities. Instead of discussing policies, they spread insults and misinformation. Instead of building bridges, they construct walls of bitterness.

Such behaviour weakens not only our relationships but also the democratic values we claim to defend. The reality is simple: elections are temporary. Political offices have fixed tenures. Governments change. Political alliances shift. Today’s political rivals may become tomorrow’s allies, while today’s allies may become tomorrow’s opponents. History has repeatedly demonstrated that politicians who once exchanged harsh words eventually sit together at negotiation tables in pursuit of shared interests. Yet ordinary citizens often remain trapped in unnecessary hatred long after political leaders have reconciled.This reality offers an important lesson. No politician should be worth sacrificing genuine friendships, family bonds, or peaceful coexistence. Political support should never require personal hatred. We can campaign passionately for our preferred candidates while still respecting those who choose differently.

Democracy flourishes when disagreement remains civil. One of the most dangerous habits in politics is inheriting other people’s enemies. Far too often, supporters adopt the personal conflicts of political leaders as though they were their own. People who have never met begin insulting one another on social media, damaging relationships, and sometimes engaging in violence simply because influential figures disagree.Such misplaced loyalty serves no meaningful purpose. Political leaders often possess the opportunity to reconcile, negotiate, and move forward after elections. Their supporters, however, are frequently left with damaged relationships, regret, and lasting divisions within their communities. Wisdom demands that citizens distinguish between political competition and personal relationships. Rather than inheriting hostility, we should cultivate independent judgment.

Judge individuals by their character, integrity, honesty, and personal conduct not merely by the colour of the political party they support. A person’s political affiliation does not automatically define their values, competence, or humanity. Equally important is the need to elevate the quality of our political conversations. Instead of engaging in personal attacks, we should focus on issues that genuinely affect people’s lives. Discussions should revolve around education, healthcare, infrastructure, security, economic growth, employment, agriculture, and accountable governance. These are the matters that determine the future of our nation not endless exchanges of insults. Social media has further amplified political intolerance. Behind anonymous profiles and smartphone screens, many people say things they would never express in person.

Every post, comment, and shared message has the potential either to promote understanding or to deepen division. Responsible citizenship requires restraint, accuracy, and respect, especially during politically sensitive periods. Politics should inspire service, not hostility. Leadership should unite rather than divide. Citizens should be free to disagree without becoming enemies. After all, beyond our political preferences, we remain neighbours, colleagues, business partners, classmates, worshippers, and fellow citizens who share the same hopes for peace, prosperity, justice, and national development. As another political season approaches, let us remember what truly matters. Campaigns will end. Elections will pass. Winners will celebrate, and losers will regroup. But the relationships we preserve, the respect we extend, and the humanity we uphold will remain long after the campaign slogans have faded.

The greatest victory in politics is not defeating an opponent at the polls; it is preserving our values while participating in democracy. Let us choose dialogue over division, understanding over intolerance, and respect over hatred. Above all, let us never forget this timeless principle: Politics should never be more important than humanity. And perhaps the wisest political advice anyone can embrace is this: Never inherit people’s enemies. In doing so, we preserve not only our relationships but also the very spirit of democracy itself.

By: Michael T. Abraham

Continue Reading

Opinion

Making the Out-of-School Children Survey Count 

Published

on

Quote: “Reliable data may reveal the scale of Nigeria’s out-of-school crisis, but only sustained political will and practical action can ensure that every child is given the opportunity to learn, thrive and contribute to national development.”

The Minister of Education, Dr. Tunji Alausa, recently announced that the Federal Government, in partnership with the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), will conduct a nationwide household survey to determine the actual number of out-of-school children in Nigeria. The exercise is intended to provide reliable data for evidence-based education policies and targeted interventions. Current estimates put the number of out-of-school children at between 15 million and 20 million, placing Nigeria among the countries with the highest number of children excluded from formal education. At first glance, this is a commendable initiative. One of Nigeria’s greatest developmental challenges has been the absence of accurate and reliable data. Without dependable statistics, planning becomes difficult, implementation inefficient, and evaluation of government programmes almost impossible.

The nation’s actual population also remains uncertain because of the absence of an up-to-date national census. Estimates range from below 200 million to over 250 million, making effective planning a daunting task. Sound policies on education, healthcare, housing, employment and infrastructure all depend on credible population statistics. Against this backdrop, the proposed survey deserves commendation. If government succeeds in generating reliable figures, it will be better positioned to allocate resources equitably, identify areas of greatest need and design interventions based on facts rather than assumptions. Accurate data will also make it easier to monitor progress and assess whether efforts to reduce the number of out-of-school children are achieving the desired results.

However, beyond the good intentions lie important questions. Will state governments provide the enabling environment for an objective and transparent survey? Since education is on the concurrent legislative list, the cooperation of state governments will largely determine the credibility of the exercise. Politics could easily influence the process. States with higher numbers of out-of-school children may qualify for greater intervention funds from the Federal Government and development partners. Would this tempt some states to inflate their figures? On the other hand, high numbers could portray a state government as performing poorly in the education sector. Would some governors therefore seek to understate the figures to protect their image? These concerns are legitimate because whenever statistics are tied to political interests or financial benefits, the temptation to manipulate them cannot be ignored.

Equally important are questions about the survey itself. When will it begin? How long will it last? What methodology will be adopted? Will every household be covered, including those in remote rural communities and areas plagued by insecurity? Does the government have the manpower, funding, technology and security arrangements needed for such a nationwide exercise? Nigeria has witnessed several well-intentioned national programmes that fell short because of poor planning and inadequate logistics. Many Nigerians will remember that the proposed national population census scheduled a few years ago was postponed despite extensive preparations. Funding constraints and logistical challenges contributed to its suspension. What guarantees are there that this survey will not suffer a similar fate? More importantly, what becomes of the findings after the exercise? Nigeria is not short of reports or data collection initiatives.

The recurring challenge has been the lack of political will to translate findings into concrete policies and sustained action. The survey must not become another document gathering dust on government shelves. Instead, it should serve as the basis for measurable interventions, continuous monitoring and improved educational outcomes. Beyond producing accurate figures, the survey must also uncover the reasons children remain outside the classroom. Addressing the crisis requires more than counting affected children. It demands an understanding of the social, economic and cultural factors responsible for the problem. Issues such as the Almajiri system and other practices that discourage formal education should be carefully examined while respecting cultural values and protecting every child’s right to quality education. Poverty remains a major barrier, as many parents cannot afford school-related expenses, forcing children into street trading or child labour

Insecurity has also led to the closure of schools in several communities, depriving thousands of children of learning opportunities.Government must therefore complement the survey with practical measures. Strengthening social protection for vulnerable families, improving school infrastructure, recruiting and retaining qualified teachers, enhancing security around schools and enforcing compulsory basic education are all essential. Equally important is sustained collaboration with traditional rulers, religious leaders, civil society organisations and development partners to address the root causes of school exclusion. The proposed survey presents an opportunity to replace guesswork with credible evidence. However, its true value will not be measured by the number of households visited or questionnaires completed. Its success will depend on whether the findings inspire bold policies, adequate funding and sustained action that ensure every Nigerian child, regardless of location or background, has access to quality education. Only then will the exercise move beyond statistics to become a genuine instrument for national development.

By: Calista Ezeaku

Continue Reading

Trending