Editorial
For Super Eagles To Fly Again

Tuesday, March 29, 2022, will remain a spectre for most Nigerian soccer enthusiasts as that was the
day when their cherished Super Eagles failed to qualify for the 2022 World Cup in Qatar. The Black Stars of Ghana thwarted the Eagles with a superior goal tally. Had the Eagles soared above the Ghanaian Black Stars to Qatar, it would have been their seventh FIFA World Cup appearance and their fourth in a row.
The second round of the match took place at the Moshood Abiola Stadium in Abuja. Nigeria played a scoreless draw with Ghana in the opening round of the playoffs at the Baba Yala Stadium in Kumasi. Unfortunately, the three-time African champions failed to improve their game when it mattered the most, leaving their fans in peril and despair. The Black Stars dictated the pace and depth of the proceedings and put together a dynamic game plan.
Indeed, the loss was so vitriolic that some indignant devotees instantly voiced their outrage and dissatisfaction as they overran the MKO Abiola Stadium pitch and extirpated property when they could not get their hands on the players who inflicted them with searing pain. Although hurtful, we condemn the fans’ infantile and irrational reaction to the disastrous defeat of the Nigerian team.
The awful event of March 29 saw Nigeria fail to qualify for the senior World Cup for the second time since 1994. The first mishap happened in 2006 when the Super Eagles lost a Germany 2006 ticket to Angola in Kano on the away goals rule. The loss by the Super Eagles rudely alarmed many Nigerians as in recent times, the team had not relished the kind of irresistible support it got before the must-win clash with the Black Stars of Ghana.
Considering that the first leg of the CAF third round qualifiers in Kumasi had ended 0-0, and the Ghanaians going into the return leg in a more propitious position, the Federal Government and the Nigeria Football Federation (NFF) mobilised Nigerians to come out en masse to upraise the Super Eagles in the second leg of the fixture. To draw fans to the stadium, the authorities had provided more than 100 buses to provide free rides for supporters in Abuja and neighbouring states.
Intriguingly, the technique exploited by the Sports Ministry and the NFF produced favourable results as for the second time since it was launched in 2003, the mainbowl of the MKO Abiola National Stadium was full. It was the right ambience for the team to glide to Qatar. Sadly, the national team reiterated similar blunders in Kumasi that robbed them of at least an away goal that would have made the second leg less unpredictable for them.
Painfully, Nigeria’s technical adviser, Austine Eguavoen, floundered to organise his team to attack and the Black Stars capitalised on this technical drawback to the utmost benefit. The Super Eagles stayed predictable, unable to surprise their rivals. However, Napoli youngster, Victor Osimhen, did his best to save the team’s World Cup yearning, but all his endeavours came to nought as the Black Stars shone to their fourth World Cup.
For Eguavoen, this is nothing more than a dismal record as he was a member of the technical team that failed to qualify Nigeria for the 2006 World Cup in Germany. Therefore, 2022 offered him a rare opportunity to make amends, but he was outsmarted by his opposite number in Ghana’s dugout, Otto Ado, whose tactical tweak at half-time completely confounded the former Super Eagles captain.
In addition to Ghana, other African representatives at the Qatar event scheduled to take place in November/December 2022 include Senegal, Cameroon, Morocco and Tunisia. The absence of the Super Eagles at the Qatar World Cup offers us an opportunity to rethink the state of Nigerian football and chart the best course for the future. This is the time to really assess the nation’s football fortune and the best way to stimulate it in the years ahead.
With the exit of the senior national team from the mundial football event, the NFF and the handlers of the team should commence preparations for the next competition. Our ordeals in AFCON 2021 in Cameroon and the World Cup qualification ties have amply confirmed that we cannot do much without sufficient planning and groundwork. No team can get far in a regional or global football tournament without preparatory work.
The board of directors of the NFF led by Amaju Pinnick should resign honourably and give Nigerian football a chance to breathe. Board members would be doing a great disservice to the nation if they continue to misdirect the country’s football after the latest misadventure. We welcome the decision to terminate the Super Eagles technical team as it will provide a clean break.
The inability of the Eguavoen coaching team to make the necessary impact in Cameroon and World Cup qualification ties has boldly underlined the imperative of rejigging the technical crew to make it more effective and decisive in reading games and preparing the team for tournaments. For all his faults, however, Eguavoen is only a symptom, a manifestation of a broader cultural malaise in Nigerian football.
It is depressing that the NFF has killed the local league to such an extent that no player from the domestic game is deemed capable of playing for the Super Eagles. Nigeria’s football league is a pathetic state. There is no regularity in the league. It is inconsistent and has become a patronage system. Junior national teams no longer produce quality youth because of corruption that has killed age teams. These trends should be reversed immediately.
The government has to take its hands out of football entirely to avoid indiscretion and interference in the administration of the game. The national teams and professional clubs should find their means to be financially stable. It is not good enough for teams to always run to the government, begging for grants. The NFF, the national football teams and professional clubs must attract investors and sponsors to stay alive.
Editorial
No To Political Office Holders’ Salary Hike
Nigeria’s Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) has unveiled a gratuitous proposal to increase the salaries of political and public office holders in the country. This plan seeks to fatten the pay packets of the president, vice-president, governors, deputy governors, and members of the National and State Assemblies. At a time when the nation is struggling to steady its economy, the suggestion that political leaders should be rewarded with more money is not only misplaced but insulting to the sensibilities of the ordinary Nigerian.
What makes the proposal even more opprobrious is the dire economic condition under which citizens currently live. The cost of living crisis has worsened, inflation has eroded the purchasing power of workers, and the naira continues to tumble against foreign currencies. The majority of Nigerians are living hand to mouth, with many unable to afford basic foodstuffs, medical care, and education. Against this backdrop, political office holders, who already enjoy obscene allowances, perks, and privileges, should not even contemplate a salary increase.
It is, therefore, not surprising that the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has stepped in to challenge this development. SERAP has filed a lawsuit against the RMAFC to halt the implementation of this salary increment. This resolute move represents a voice of reason and accountability at a time when public anger against political insensitivity is palpable. The group is rightly insisting that the law must serve as a bulwark against impunity.
According to a statement issued by SERAP’s Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, the commission has been dragged before the Federal High Court in Abuja. Although a hearing date remains unconfirmed, the momentous step of seeking judicial redress reflects a determination to hold those in power accountable. SERAP has once again positioned itself as a guardian of public interest by challenging an elite-centric policy.
The case, registered as suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/1834/2025, specifically asks the court to determine “whether RMAFC’s proposed salary hike for the president, vice-president, governors and their deputies, and lawmakers in Nigeria is not unlawful, unconstitutional and inconsistent with the rule of law.” This formidable question goes to the very heart of democratic governance: can those entrusted with public resources decide their own pay rises without violating the constitution and moral order?
In its pleadings, SERAP argues that the proposed hike runs foul of both the 1999 Nigerian Constitution and the RMAFC Act. By seeking a judicial declaration that such a move is unlawful, unconstitutional, and inconsistent with the rule of law, the group has placed a spotlight on the tension between self-serving leadership and constitutionalism. To trivialise such an issue would be harum-scarum, for the constitution remains the supreme authority guiding governance.
We wholeheartedly commend SERAP for standing firm, while we roundly condemn RMAFC’s selfish proposal. Political office should never be an avenue for financial aggrandisement. Since our leaders often pontificate sacrifice to citizens, urging them to tighten their belts in the face of economic turbulence, the same leaders must embody sacrifice themselves. Anything short of this amounts to double standards and betrayal of trust.
The Nigerian economy is not buoyant enough to shoulder the additional cost of a salary increase for political leaders. Already, lawmakers and executives enjoy allowances that are grossly disproportionate to the national average income. These earnings are sufficient not only for their needs but also their unchecked greed. To even consider further increments under present circumstances is egregious, a slap in the face of ordinary workers whose minimum wage remains grossly insufficient.
Resources earmarked for such frivolities should instead be channelled towards alleviating the suffering of citizens and improving the nation’s productive capacity. According to United Nations statistics, about 62.9 per cent of Nigerians were living in multidimensional poverty in 2021, compared to 53.7 per cent in 2017. Similarly, nearly 30.9 per cent of the population lives below the international poverty line of US$2.15 per day. These figures paint a stark picture: Nigeria is a poor country by all measurable standards, and any extra naira diverted to elite pockets deepens this misery.
Besides, the timing of this proposal could not be more inappropriate. At a period when unemployment is soaring, inflation is crippling households, and insecurity continues to devastate communities, the RMAFC has chosen to pursue elite enrichment. It is widely known that Nigeria’s economy is in a parlous state, and public resources should be conserved and wisely invested. Political leaders must show prudence, not profligacy.
Another critical dimension is the national debt profile. According to the Debt Management Office, Nigeria’s total public debt as of March 2025 stood at a staggering N149.39 trillion. External debt obligations also remain heavy, with about US$43 billion outstanding by September 2024. In such a climate of debt-servicing and borrowing to fund budgets, it is irresponsible for political leaders to even table the idea of inflating their salaries further. Debt repayment, not self-reward, should occupy their minds.
This ignoble proposal is insensitive, unnecessary, and profoundly reckless. It should be discarded without further delay. Public office is a trust, not an entitlement to wealth accumulation. Nigerians deserve leaders who will share in their suffering, lead by example, and prioritise the common good over self-indulgence. Anything less represents betrayal of the social contract and undermines the fragile democracy we are striving to build.
Editorial
No To Political Office Holders’ Salary Hike
Nigeria’s Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) has unveiled a gratuitous proposal to increase the salaries of political and public office holders in the country. This plan seeks to fatten the pay packets of the president, vice-president, governors, deputy governors, and members of the National and State Assemblies. At a time when the nation is struggling to steady its economy, the suggestion that political leaders should be rewarded with more money is not only misplaced but insulting to the sensibilities of the ordinary Nigerian.
What makes the proposal even more opprobrious is the dire economic condition under which citizens currently live. The cost of living crisis has worsened, inflation has eroded the purchasing power of workers, and the naira continues to tumble against foreign currencies. The majority of Nigerians are living hand to mouth, with many unable to afford basic foodstuffs, medical care, and education. Against this backdrop, political office holders, who already enjoy obscene allowances, perks, and privileges, should not even contemplate a salary increase.
It is, therefore, not surprising that the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has stepped in to challenge this development. SERAP has filed a lawsuit against the RMAFC to halt the implementation of this salary increment. This resolute move represents a voice of reason and accountability at a time when public anger against political insensitivity is palpable. The group is rightly insisting that the law must serve as a bulwark against impunity.
According to a statement issued by SERAP’s Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, the commission has been dragged before the Federal High Court in Abuja. Although a hearing date remains unconfirmed, the momentous step of seeking judicial redress reflects a determination to hold those in power accountable. SERAP has once again positioned itself as a guardian of public interest by challenging an elite-centric policy.
The case, registered as suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/1834/2025, specifically asks the court to determine “whether RMAFC’s proposed salary hike for the president, vice-president, governors and their deputies, and lawmakers in Nigeria is not unlawful, unconstitutional and inconsistent with the rule of law.” This formidable question goes to the very heart of democratic governance: can those entrusted with public resources decide their own pay rises without violating the constitution and moral order?
In its pleadings, SERAP argues that the proposed hike runs foul of both the 1999 Nigerian Constitution and the RMAFC Act. By seeking a judicial declaration that such a move is unlawful, unconstitutional, and inconsistent with the rule of law, the group has placed a spotlight on the tension between self-serving leadership and constitutionalism. To trivialise such an issue would be harum-scarum, for the constitution remains the supreme authority guiding governance.
We wholeheartedly commend SERAP for standing firm, while we roundly condemn RMAFC’s selfish proposal. Political office should never be an avenue for financial aggrandisement. Since our leaders often pontificate sacrifice to citizens, urging them to tighten their belts in the face of economic turbulence, the same leaders must embody sacrifice themselves. Anything short of this amounts to double standards and betrayal of trust.
The Nigerian economy is not buoyant enough to shoulder the additional cost of a salary increase for political leaders. Already, lawmakers and executives enjoy allowances that are grossly disproportionate to the national average income. These earnings are sufficient not only for their needs but also their unchecked greed. To even consider further increments under present circumstances is egregious, a slap in the face of ordinary workers whose minimum wage remains grossly insufficient.
Resources earmarked for such frivolities should instead be channelled towards alleviating the suffering of citizens and improving the nation’s productive capacity. According to United Nations statistics, about 62.9 per cent of Nigerians were living in multidimensional poverty in 2021, compared to 53.7 per cent in 2017. Similarly, nearly 30.9 per cent of the population lives below the international poverty line of US$2.15 per day. These figures paint a stark picture: Nigeria is a poor country by all measurable standards, and any extra naira diverted to elite pockets deepens this misery.
Besides, the timing of this proposal could not be more inappropriate. At a period when unemployment is soaring, inflation is crippling households, and insecurity continues to devastate communities, the RMAFC has chosen to pursue elite enrichment. It is widely known that Nigeria’s economy is in a parlous state, and public resources should be conserved and wisely invested. Political leaders must show prudence, not profligacy.
Another critical dimension is the national debt profile. According to the Debt Management Office, Nigeria’s total public debt as of March 2025 stood at a staggering N149.39 trillion. External debt obligations also remain heavy, with about US$43 billion outstanding by September 2024. In such a climate of debt-servicing and borrowing to fund budgets, it is irresponsible for political leaders to even table the idea of inflating their salaries further. Debt repayment, not self-reward, should occupy their minds.
This ignoble proposal is insensitive, unnecessary, and profoundly reckless. It should be discarded without further delay. Public office is a trust, not an entitlement to wealth accumulation. Nigerians deserve leaders who will share in their suffering, lead by example, and prioritise the common good over self-indulgence. Anything less represents betrayal of the social contract and undermines the fragile democracy we are striving to build.
Editorial
Rivers’ Retirees: Matters Arising

-
Sports5 days ago
CAFCL : Rivers United Arrives DR Congo
-
Sports5 days ago
FIFA rankings: S’Eagles drop Position, remain sixth in Africa
-
Sports5 days ago
NPFL club name Iorfa new GM
-
Sports5 days ago
NNL abolishes playoffs for NPFL promotion
-
Sports5 days ago
NSF: Early preparations begin for 2026 National Sports Festival
-
Sports5 days ago
Kwara Hopeful To Host Confed Cup in Ilorin
-
Sports5 days ago
RSG Award Renovation Work At Yakubu Gowon Stadium
-
Politics4 days ago
Rivers Assembly Resumes Sitting After Six-Month Suspension