Opinion
Nigerian Youth And Ritual Killing
It is really getting out of hand. It used to be a once-in-a-while story mostly associated with occultic men and women or native doctors. Today, killing human beings for ritual purposes is almost a daily occurrence in Nigeria and the youth are painfully taking the lead.
Our youth, in a bid to get rich quick are doing all manner of unimaginable things including taking lives and harvesting the body parts of their victims for rituals in support of their Internet fraud “business”. From Yahoo boys where they use their Internet dexterity to commit series of cybercrimes, they graduated to Yahoo plus, which requires the use of charm for protection and to hypnotise unsuspecting victims, to the latest – Yahoo plus-plus which involves the harvesting of human parts for the preparation of magic concoctions to boost their cybercrime success. A writer described Yahoo plus-plus this way, it “involves the use of human parts and may need kidnapping other human beings for rituals, which is not necessary in ‘Yahoo Plus’. In Yahoo Plus Plus, the use of things such as victims’ finger nails, rings, carrying of corpses, making incision on their body, sleeping in the cemetery, citing of incantation, using their fingers for rituals, and having sex with ghosts are common.”
Unfortunately, female parts seem to be their favourite for the ritual. Recall the killing of a 300-level student of the University of Jos (UNIJOS), Jennifer Anthony, by a suspected ritualist in a hotel in Jos, the Plateau State capital. Spokesman of the Plateau State Police Command, Ubah Gabriel Ogaba, said Miss Anthony, who was declared missing on December 30, 2021 was later found dead in a hotel in Jos with eyes gouged out of its socket.
Last week, another girl, Rofiat, was killed by her boyfriend and two of his friends at Oke Aregba, Abeokuta, Ogun State. The girl was said to have been strangled, her head cut off and burnt in a local pot by Soliu, her boy friend, and two others for money ritual. However, luck ran out on them when a local community guard, sighted their activities and alerted the police which led to their arrest.
While some of these girls fall prey because of their longings for free food, free drinks and other material considerations, others like late Elozino Ogege, a 300-level Mass Communication student of the Delta State University was no such. Her kidnapping and killing was masterminded by a security guard in the university, who promised to help her with information regarding available rooms for rent within the school’s staff quarter of the institution. Some of them were victims of love. The same men who they loved and who claimed to love them in return, were the ones who killed and mutilated them just to be rich, buy the latest cars, rent expensive houses, belong to the group of big boys and have other good things that money can buy.
But how did we get to this level where material things are now more valuable than human lives? How is it that our young men have mortgaged their consciences and now see nothing wrong in spilling blood? The most worrisome thing is that some parents, being fully aware of their sons’ criminal acts, support them. I remember someone I know telling people who came to report her son’s suspicious acts in school, to leave him alone that it is through the pressing of phones and computers that her son pays his school fees and caters for his other needs. To her, it was a mere punching of the devices’ keyboard, as if they were minting machines. Stories are told of some parents who personally take their sons to where they will be taught the “business”. What about women who encourage their husbands to engage in criminal acts?
At a gathering recently, a question was asked whether there should be harsher penalty for Internet fraud as against a fine of up to N10 million or a term of imprisonment of five years as provided in Nigeria’s Cybercrime Act 2015 and surprisingly, some of the people there including mothers, fathers and young people objected. They said the fine should rather be reduced. A particular young man said that only ‘mugus’ fall victims of Internet fraud, so it should not have been made a crime in the first place.
There are others who claim that Internet crime is thriving in the country because of various reasons, poor leadership both at national and state levels, high level of unemployment in the country, poor parenting, social media and peer group influence and many more.
Definitely, there is the need for government at all levels to be more responsive to the needs of the people, use the proceeds from the nation’s abundant natural resources to develop the country, provide conducive environment for businesses to thrive so that more jobs will be provided for the teeming unemployed youth; our leaders, the celebrities, who many young ones look up to as their role models should cut down on the expensive lifestyle; efforts should be made towards narrowing the wide gap between the rich and the poor in our society. Employment, particularly in government establishments, should be on merit rather than based on who one knows or how much he has to pay for the job so that the deserving people will get the jobs.
But, should these problems be enough reason for our young men to resort to crime, ritual as a means of livelihood? Of course not! It is certain that despite the multitudinous challenges facing the country, many people are still making it legitimately here. By dint of sheer hard work, countless youths in the country have moved from grass to grace. So, our youth should jettison the prevailing get-rich-quick syndrome and think of positive, legitimate ways of using their talent and youthful energy to better themselves and the nation. As a popular saying goes, “success is not easy and is certainly not for the lazy”. You are a school dropout, you refuse to learn a trade, you do not want to do any menial job and you want to drive the type of a senator’s car, how can that be?
Parents should also wake up to their responsibilities towards their children. To be a parent is far more than just giving birth to a child. In the words of Alain de Botton, “To be a parent is to be chief designer of a product more advanced than any technology and more interesting than the greatest work of art”. The duty of a mother or father is to direct the steps of their children, making sure that they do not go astray and when they derail, call them back.
The rate of youths’ enrolment into Yahoo boys and the likes should be of a great concern to all Nigerians as it is capable of destroying this generation and the ones after if not checked and the task of curtailing it is for everybody. The Police and other economic crime fighting agencies of the government have done well but they can do better. There is the need to strengthen the sanctioning system. Offenders should be duly punished to serve as a deterrent for many.
Most importantly, unless we begin to de-emphasise materialism in our society and begin to frown at material acquisition through illegal means, we may not succeed in stopping the Yahoo business and that will mean a bleak future for the country.
By: Calista Ezeaku
Opinion
A Renewing Optimism For Naira
Opinion
Don’t Kill Tam David-West
Opinion
Fuel Subsidy Removal and the Economic Implications for Nigerians
From all indications, Nigeria possesses enough human and material resources to become a true economic powerhouse in Africa. According to the National Population Commission (NPC, 2023), the country’s population has grown steadily within the last decade, presently standing at about 220 million people—mostly young, vibrant, and innovative. Nigeria also remains the sixth-largest oil producer in the world, with enormous reserves of gas, fertile agricultural land, and human capital.
Yet, despite this enormous potential, the country continues to grapple with underdevelopment, poverty, unemployment, and insecurity. Recent data from the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS, 2023) show that about 129 million Nigerians currently live below the poverty line. Most families can no longer afford basic necessities, even as the government continues to project a rosy economic picture.
The Subsidy Question
The removal of fuel subsidy in 2023 by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has been one of the most controversial policy decisions in Nigeria’s recent history. According to the president, subsidy removal was designed to reduce fiscal burden, unify the foreign exchange rate, attract investment, curb inflation, and discourage excessive government borrowing.
While these objectives are theoretically sound, the reality for ordinary Nigerians has been severe hardship. Fuel prices more than tripled, transportation costs surged, and food inflation—already high—rose above 30% (NBS, 2023). The World Bank (2023) estimates that an additional 7.1 million Nigerians were pushed into poverty after subsidy removal.
A Critical Economic View
As an economist, I argue that the problem was not subsidy removal itself—which was inevitable—but the timing, sequencing, and structural gaps in Nigeria’s implementation.
- Structural Miscalculation
Nigeria’s four state-owned refineries remain nonfunctional. By removing subsidies without local refining capacity, the government exposed the economy to import-price pass-through effects—where global oil price shocks translate directly into domestic inflation. This was not just a timing issue but a fundamental policy miscalculation.
- Neglect of Social Safety Nets
Countries like Indonesia (2005) and Ghana (2005) removed subsidies successfully only after introducing cash transfers, transport vouchers, and food subsidies for the poor (World Bank, 2005). Nigeria, however, implemented removal abruptly, shifting the fiscal burden directly onto households without protection.
- Failure to Secure Food and Energy Alternatives
Fuel subsidy removal amplified existing weaknesses in agriculture and energy. Instead of sequencing reforms, government left Nigerians without refinery capacity, renewable energy alternatives, or mechanized agricultural productivity—all of which could have cushioned the shock.
Political and Public Concerns
Prominent leaders have echoed these concerns. Mr. Peter Obi, the Labour Party’s 2023 presidential candidate, described the subsidy removal as “good but wrongly timed.” Atiku Abubakar of the People’s Democratic Party also faulted the government’s hasty approach. Human rights activists like Obodoekwe Stive stressed that refineries should have been made functional first, to reduce the suffering of citizens.
This is not just political rhetoric—it reflects a widespread economic reality. When inflation climbs above 30%, when purchasing power collapses, and when households cannot meet basic needs, the promise of reform becomes overshadowed by social pain.
Broader Implications
The consequences of this policy are multidimensional:
- Inflationary Pressures – Food inflation above 30% has made nutrition unaffordable for many households.
- Rising Poverty – 7.1 million Nigerians have been newly pushed into poverty (World Bank, 2023).
- Middle-Class Erosion – Rising transport, rent, and healthcare costs are squeezing household incomes.
- Debt Concerns – Despite promises, government borrowing has continued, raising sustainability questions.
- Public Distrust – When government promises savings but citizens feel only pain, trust in leadership erodes.
In effect, subsidy removal without structural readiness has widened inequality and eroded social stability.
Missed Opportunities
Nigeria’s leaders had the chance to approach subsidy removal differently:
- Refinery Rehabilitation – Ensuring local refining to reduce exposure to global oil price shocks.
- Renewable Energy Investment – Diversifying energy through solar, hydro, and wind to reduce reliance on imported petroleum.
- Agricultural Productivity – Mechanization, irrigation, and smallholder financing could have boosted food supply and stabilized prices.
- Social Safety Nets – Conditional cash transfers, food vouchers, and transport subsidies could have protected the most vulnerable.
Instead, reform came abruptly, leaving citizens to absorb all the pain while waiting for theoretical long-term benefits.
Conclusion: Reform With a Human Face
Fuel subsidy removal was inevitable, but Nigeria’s approach has worsened hardship for millions. True reform must go beyond fiscal savings to protect citizens.
Economic policy is not judged only by its efficiency but by its humanity. A well-sequenced reform could have balanced fiscal responsibility with equity, ensuring that ordinary Nigerians were not crushed under the weight of sudden change.
Nigeria has the resources, population, and resilience to lead Africa’s economy. But leadership requires foresight. It requires policies that are inclusive, humane, and strategically sequenced.
Reform without equity is displacement of poverty, not development. If Nigeria truly seeks progress, its policies must wear a human face.
References
- National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). (2023). Poverty and Inequality Report. Abuja.
- National Population Commission (NPC). (2023). Population Estimates. Abuja.
- World Bank. (2023). Nigeria Development Update. Washington, DC.
- World Bank. (2005). Fuel Subsidy Reforms: Lessons from Indonesia and Ghana. Washington, DC.
- OPEC. (2023). Annual Statistical Bulletin. Vienna.
By: Amarachi Amaugo
-
Oil & Energy3 days agoHysteria Clashes with Missing Oil Barrels
-
Rivers2 days ago
Shippers Council moves To Enhance Service Delivery At Nigerian Ports
-
Editorial3 days agoStrike: Heeding ASUU’s Demands
-
Oil & Energy3 days agoOil Theft: Economic Council Urges NNPC To Strengthen Security In Creeks
-
News3 days agoAir Peace Begins Direct Flight From Abuja To London
-
Business3 days agoNigeria Exits FATF Grey List For Global Financial Crime ………..NFIU
-
Nation2 days agoCommunity Health Practitioners Marks 2025 Week
-
Sports3 days agoFBN, C’River gov partner to boost tourism
