Opinion
Academic Culture And Automatic Writing
Borehole drillers would tell us that the deeper the drilling penetrates into the soil, the smoother and less stressful the sinking, especially after reaching the level of underground water. This observable principle applies in every human engagement which demands diligent application of ability and volition. Initial stress and strain in the process of any activity are normal and meant to separate worthwhile need and aspiration, from desultory prospecting or gambles. The old cliché saying that “the higher you go, the cooler it becomes”, is quite correct. Same the deeper also.
Aeronautic engineers would also tell us that it takes a greater thrust power for an aircraft to take off from the ground, than required for cruising. In academic learning engagement, this same principle also applies, such that those who do not have dogged persistence and zeal to learn, often drop out from the endeavours. Dogged persistence and zeal can be translated to mean making some personal sacrifices which sociologists call deferred gratification. The concept of deferent gratification means investing in a worthwhile future goal by foregoing present comfort.
Academic culture includes the personal discipline of remaining focused, persistent and committed to the task at hand. The tag of “withdrawal for academic failure” (WAF) can be quite traumatic, but it is a tag depicting unseriousness on the part of any student dropping out from academic engagement.
Like borehole drilling, academic culture seeks to drill students up to the point of reaching the level of underground water, through the discipline of dogged persistence. Without such discipline or impetus, it would be difficult to get to the point of cruising independently on self-grown wings. There is a common flaw in the academic culture, just at the point of reaching the zone of underground water. It is not commonly recognised that there are underground spring flow of water, and then the common pool or basin.
It is a great joy to reach a cruising level and even a greater joy to converge at an assembly pool where one can romp and rest. Very rare drillers of the academic hue seek to recognise the source of the spring water, rather than remain in the common pool or basin. The result of this complacent attitude is seen quite visibly in the products of academic endeavours. Getting high-sounding certificates requires demonstrating that the academic driller has interacted with and absorbed the knowledge from the custodians of the pool of wisdom. A fitness test of diligent drilling!
A 180-page scholarly thesis or dissertation would be richly adorned with a long bibliographical references of 140 citations, made up of books, journals and every proof that one has read vast volumes of literature. Without such academic ritual it would be difficult to impress and convince board of examiners that one is fit to be admitted into the hallowed chamber of academic gurus. So, long bibliographical references make the wise academia.
Yet, there is a danger of missing out something quite vital. Drillers recognise the truth that beyond the first level of underground water, there are various other mansions and springs of purer water. Yet, beyond all water resources, there are other rarer gems rarely known to majority of humans. This is where the issue of automatic writing comes in. despite many books on every conceivable area of knowledge and activity available, we cannot say that every knowledge comes from books or ends in books.
The academic culture of debating and arguing forward and backward, often called brain-storming, gives the impression that no one knows it all. It is also true that the concept of knowledge does not place any limit or boundary on the knowledge bank. Yet, dogmatic assertions and arrogance are common traditions of the academic industry, whereby camps exist for the custody and preservation of theory-based knowledge. For certain aspects and limits of knowledge there can be camps and absolute claims, but wisdom flows irrespective of such claims.
Like a vast and limitless ocean, there is a spring from which endless water of wisdom flows and also accessible to a few people who recognise the mechanism of its dynamics. Like the borehole driller, drilling stops when there is enough water-yield, but that limit does not define total volume of underground water. Neither can anyone exhaust the contents of the fountains of wisdom. The most any one can do is to take according to need and ability.
A few people who meet the necessary requirements find that when deeply absorbed in the exploration of some values, the brain gets open to absorb some radiations. As they sit down to write down ideas flowing into their consciousness, the pen they hold and their hands merely flow freely and automatically but effortlessly. During such moments, they would neither consult any literary material nor want to be distracted. The pen flows on paper automatically as ideas flow in their consciousness. Once this automatic flow is disrupted, the flow of ideas ceases, neither can a reconnection resume immediately, until another session, or the ideas vanish.
Similarly, once there is the urge to consult some authority or literary sources, the free flow of ideas would stop. In many cases, the automatic writer would wonder how and where the ideas which he writes with much ease, come from. Going through the written work, many of the ideas, even though quite logical, would appear strange and uncommon. Then there can be the temptation to reshape and re-cast the script, so that it would be agreeable to a mundane public. This is how inspired writings come about.
The automatic writer can be described as a medium who merely writes down ideas dictated to his consciousness from some rarefied channels of wisdom. Time and space often vanish in this process, making it possible for events of remote past, in distant places, to flood into the mind as if they are being experienced. There can also be a glimpse into future events.
Dr Amirize is a retired lecturer from the Rivers State University, Port Harcourt.
Opinion
Empowering Youth Through Agriculture
Quote:”While job seeking youths should continuously acquire skills and explore opportunities within their immediate environment as well as in the global space through the use of digital platforms, government, corporate/ multinational organizations or the organised private sector should generate skills and provide the enabling environment for skills acquisition, through adequate funding and resettlement packages that will provide sustainable economic life for beneficiaries”.
The Governor of Rivers State, Sir Siminalayi Fubara, recently urged youths in the Rivers State to take advantage of the vast opportunities available to become employers of labour and contribute meaningfully to the growth and development of the State. Governor Fubara noted that global trends increasingly favour entrepreneurship and innovation, and said that youths in Rivers State must not be left behind in harnessing these opportunities. The Governor, represented by the Secretary to the State Government, Dr Benibo Anabraba, made this known while declaring open the 2026 Job Fair organised by the Rivers State Government in partnership with the Nigeria Employers’ Consultative Association (NECA) in Port Harcourt. The Governor acknowledged the responsibility of government to create jobs for its teeming youth population but noted that it is unrealistic to absorb all job seekers into the civil service.
“As a government, we recognise our duty to provide employment opportunities for our teeming youths. However, we also understand that not all youths can be accommodated within the civil service. This underscores the need to encourage entrepreneurship across diverse sectors and to partner with other stakeholders, including the youths themselves, so they can transition from being job seekers to employers of labour,” he said. It is necessary to State that Governor Fubara has not only stated the obvious but was committed to drive youth entrepreneurship towards their self-reliance and the economic development of the State It is not news that developed economies of the world are skilled driven economies. The private sector also remains the highest employer of labour in private sector driven or capitalist economy though it is also the responsibility of government to create job opportunities for the teeming unemployed youth population in Nigeria which has the highest youth unemployed population in the subSahara Africa.
The lack of job opportunities, caused partly by the Federal Government’s apathy to job creation, the lack of adequate supervision of job opportunities economic programmes, lack of employable skills by many youths in the country have conspired to heighten the attendant challenges of unemployment. The challenges which include, “Japa” syndrome (travelling abroad for greener pastures), that characterises the labour market and poses threat to the nation’s critical sector, especially the health and medical sector; astronomical increase in the crime rate and a loss of interest in education. While job seeking youths should continuously acquire skills and explore opportunities within their immediate environment as well as in the global space through the use of digital platforms, government, corporate/ multinational organizations or the organised private sector should generate skills and provide the enabling environment for skills acquisition, through adequate funding and resettlement packages that will provide sustainable economic life for beneficiaries.
While commending the Rivers State Government led by the People First Governor, Sir Siminilayi Fubara for initiating “various training and capacity-building programmes in areas such as ICT and artificial intelligence, oil and gas, maritime, and the blue economy, among others”, it is note-worthy that the labour market is dynamic and shaped by industry-specific demands, technological advancements, management practices and other emerging factors. So another sector the Federal, State and Local Governments should encourage youths to explore and harness the abounding potentials, in my considered view, is Agriculture. Agriculture remains a veritable solution to hunger, inflation, and food Insecurity that ravages the country. No doubt, the Nigeria’s arable landmass is grossly under-utilised and under-exploited.
In recent times, Nigerians have voiced their concerns about the persistent challenges of hunger, inflation, and the general increase in prices of goods and commodities. These issues not only affect the livelihoods of individuals and families but also pose significant threats to food security and economic stability in the country. The United Nations estimated that more than 25 million people in Nigeria could face food insecurity this year—a 47% increase from the 17 million people already at risk of going hungry, mainly due to ongoing insecurity, protracted conflicts, and rising food prices. An estimated two million children under five are likely to be pushed into acute malnutrition. (Reliefweb ,2023). In response, Nigeria declared a state of emergency on food insecurity, recognizing the urgent need to tackle food shortages, stabilize rising prices, and protect farmers facing violence from armed groups. However, without addressing the insecurity challenges, farmers will continue to struggle to feed their families and boost food production.
In addition, parts of northwest and northeast Nigeria have experienced changes in rainfall patterns making less water available for crop production. These climate change events have resulted in droughts and land degradations; presenting challenges for local communities and leading to significant impact on food security. In light of these daunting challenges, it is imperative to address the intricate interplay between insecurity and agricultural productivity. Nigeria can work toward ensuring food security, reducing poverty, and fostering sustainable economic growth in its vital agricultural sector. In this article, I suggest solutions that could enhance agricultural production and ensure that every state scales its agricultural production to a level where it can cater to 60% of the population.
This is feasible and achievable if government at all levels are intentional driving the development of the agricultural sector which was the major economic mainstay of the Country before the crude oil was struck in commercial quantity and consequently became the nation’s monolithic revenue source. Government should revive the moribund Graduate Farmers Scheme and the Rivers State School-to-Land agricultural programmes to operate concurrently with other skills acquisition and development programmes. There should be a consideration for investment in mechanized farming and arable land allocation. State and local governments should play a pivotal role in promoting mechanized farming and providing arable land for farming in communities. Additionally, allocating arable land enables small holder farmers to expand their operations and contribute to food security at the grassroots level.
Nigeria can unlock the potential of its agricultural sector to address the pressing needs of its population and achieve sustainable development. Policymakers and stakeholders must heed Akande’s recommendations and take decisive action to ensure a food-secure future for all Nigerians.
By: Igbiki Benibo
Opinion
Of Protests And Need For Dialogue
Quote:“.Across Abuja, Anambra, and Lagos, a common thread emerges: a disconnect between authority and empathy. Government actions may follow policy logic, but citizens respond from lived experience, fear, and frustration. When these realities collide without dialogue, the streets become the arena of engagement”
It was a turbulent week in the country, highlighting the widening gap between government intentions and public perception. From Abuja to Anambra and Lagos, citizens poured into the streets not just over specific grievances but in frustration with governance that often appears heavy-handed, confrontational, or insufficiently humane. While authorities may genuinely act in the public interest, their methods sometimes aggravate tensions rather than resolve them.
In Abuja, the strike by workers of the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA) and the Federal Capital Development Authority (FCDA) under the Joint Union Action Committee (JUAC) brought the capital to a near standstill. Their demands included five months’ unpaid wages, hazard and rural allowances, promotion arrears, welfare packages, pension and National Housing Fund remittances, and training and career progression concerns. These are core labour issues that directly affect workers’ dignity and livelihoods. Efforts to dialogue with the FCT Minister reportedly failed. Even after a court ordered the strike to end, workers persisted, underscoring the depth of discontent. Threats and sanctions only hardened positions.
The FCT crisis shows that industrial peace cannot be enforced through coercion. Dialogue is not weakness; it is recognition that governance is about people. Meeting labour leaders, listening attentively, clarifying grey areas, and agreeing on timelines could restore trust. Honesty and negotiation are far more effective than threats.
In Anambra, protests by Onitsha Main Market traders followed the government’s closure of the market over continued observance of a Monday sit-at-home, linked to separatist agitation. Governor Chukwuma Soludo described compliance as economic sabotage, insisting Anambra cannot operate as a “four-day-a-week economy.” While the governor’s concern is understandable, threats to revoke ownership, seize, or demolish the market risk escalating tensions. Many traders comply out of fear, not ideology. Markets are social ecosystems of families, apprentices, and informal networks; heavy-handed enforcement may worsen resistance. A better approach combines persuasion, dialogue with market leaders, credible security assurances, and gradual confidence-building. Coordinated political engagement with federal authorities could also reduce regional tensions.
In Lagos, protests erupted over demolition of homes in low-income waterfront communities such as Makoko, Owode Onirin, and Oworonshoki. The state defended these actions as necessary for safety, environmental protection, and urban renewal. While objectives are legitimate, demolitions drew criticism for lack of notice, compensation, and humane resettlement. Urban development without regard for human consequences risks appearing elitist and anti-poor. Where demolitions are unavoidable, transparent engagement, fair compensation, and realistic relocation must precede action to maintain public trust and social stability.
Across Abuja, Anambra, and Lagos, a common thread emerges: a disconnect between authority and empathy. Government actions may follow policy logic, but citizens respond from lived experience, fear, and frustration. When these realities collide without dialogue, the streets become the arena of engagement.
Democracy cannot thrive on decrees, threats, or bulldozers alone. Leaders must listen as much as they command, persuade as much as they enforce. Minister Wike should see labour leaders as partners, Governor Soludo must balance firmness with sensitivity, and Lagos authorities should align urban renewal with compassion and justice. Protests are signals of communication failure. Dialogue, caution, and a human face in governance are not optional—they are necessities. Police and security agencies must respect peaceful protest as a constitutional right.
By: Calista Ezeaku
Opinion
Empowering Youth Through Agriculture
-
Sports2 days agoArsenal Women End Man City’s Invincibility
-
Sports2 days agoInsurance Deepen Enyimba’s Trouble
-
Sports2 days agoU-20 WWC: Falconets claim qualifier win
-
Sports2 days agoYouth Olympics preparation Gears up
-
Sports2 days agoTornadoes Set For NPFL exit over Stadium Ban
-
Sports2 days agoCologne Youth Team Set Crowd Record
-
Environment2 days agoRivers State Government Suspend Fire Service Collection Levies
-
Environment2 days agoLASEMA pushes attitudinal change to cut fire outbreaks in Lagos
