Opinion
Good Governance, Good Leadership
Many years ago at a conference held in the Friends’ International Centre, London, meeting place of the Quakers of old, the issue of good leadership featured as a theme. There is currently a publication by the Chandler Good Governance Index (CGGI) in whose 2021 report Nigeria was ranked as “third worst governed country”. Expectedly, Nigerian authorities would rise up in defence of the country’s image and integrity by refuting and challenging the CGGI report.
In the front page of The Tide newspaper of Wednesday, May 5, 2021, the CGGI report cited leadership as the basis for the ranking of the assessment of 104 countries which featured in the evaluation exercise. There was the credo that “Good governance begins with good leadership”. Incidentally, the 1981 conference on leadership held at the Quakers’ lodge in London had a similar credo of exemplary leadership as the basis of loyalty and good followership.
Among qualities which emerged from that conference as the gem of good leadership were ability to feel the pulse of the led; telling the people the truth, however bitter; empathy and concern for the common good; willingness to go the extra mile for the same of the masses and, above all, courage to stand for justice, “no matter whose ox is gored”. At that conference were representatives and speakers from over 104 countries, of which the man who spoke of the situation in Uganda, caused tears to flow from the eyes of many listeners at the occasion.
One Ugandan Ph.D student and a clergyman taking refuge in England, spoke with deep but frank emotion about causes of leadership failure in Africa. He pointed accusing fingers at the hypocrisy of Western nations and acts of brigandage of African military leaders. Many causes and examples were citied of how the mineral and natural resources of the African continent were of greater importance to the Western world than the masses suffering under bad leadership. Only two Nigerians were present at that conference.
Between 1981 and now, not much changes have taken place in the leadership position of African countries, except perhaps in the change from military to civilian actors. Even then, there is the recycling strategy of which former military strong men put on the dress of civilian politicians after retirement and the accumulation of enormous wealth. In the case of Nigeria, the era of military rule was characterised by scrambles for ownership of oil blocks, whose allocations were a clandestine affairs. Some foreign interests were partners in this project of privatisation of oil and gas patrimony.
What we find today is the enormous task of managing the fall-out of clandestine deals of yesteryears, thanks to Petroleum Decree No. 27 of 1969. Under war situation and the disadvantaged position of the elite class of the zone where the oil and gas resources were domiciled, no resistance attended the game of conspiracy and plunder. The next line of action was the game of stick and carrot, using oil block allocation to buy support and military might for intimidation purposes. No challenge!
Nobody spoke out when these malfeasance were going on, except late Senator Francis Ellah who was shouted down at the floor of the Senate, as he was presenting a motion that would have exposed a game plan. Creation of numerous states from the original 12-states structure, was a ready gambit of offering a Greek gift for the purpose of creating a euphoria. Thanks to military strategists and tacticians, Nigeria was piloted up to 1999, and politicians went on an election without seeing the document providing a road map.
Similar strategy of shouting down at the floor of the Senate those who try to raise issues capable of exposing in-house malfeasance, is still with us now; thanks to Godswill and “off your mike”. Obviously, governing and leading a great and large nation as Nigeria must be an unenviable task, demanding a great deal of wit, rather than witchcraft. Therefore, those who come into such a high-stake task must not only come with clean hands, but also a noble heart. The truth is that when a foundation is shrouded in shenanigans, the structure would hobble.
The obvious reluctance to address the issue of structural deficiencies and booby-traps, coupled with the manner that the President Goodluck Jonathan-administration’s effort at such remedy was thrown out, do suggest something sinister. Signs of sinister motives in governance emerge when a controversial Petroleum Industry Governance Bill (PIGB) can be passed by lawmakers within 23 minutes. In a similar way, state reaction to youths protest over police brutality can be an instrument for ranking a nation’s leadership posture. Nothing hides for too long!
Nobody should say that the report of Chandler Good Governance Index (CGGI), ranking Nigeria as “third worst governed country” is a global conspiracy against this country. For example, in a research project involving 13 postgraduate students under my supervision, it was shocking to know what top management personnel of multinational oil companies could say in confidence. For a foreigner to say that his “company is working for individual owners of oil block allocation rather than for the Nigerian nation”, carries a sinister message, to say the least.
Similarly, for the Nigerian Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI) from whose record Senator Ita Enang, could say that “Northerners owned 83% of all oil blocks in the country”, also carries a sinister message. What is good government or good leadership if transparency, accountability and justice are not seen to feature as a matter of course? Without going too far, can we claim that the international community is ignorant of the shenanigans over herders and farmers clashes in Nigeria? What lies behind?
To say that good governance begins with good leadership is not only a sound credo, but also a factual truth. Good leadership is infectious and capable of inspiring the masses, whereby patriotism and loyalty of followers come without begging. Similarly, good leadership goes with a strong feeling of shame, which is why, in the civilised world, holders of high public offices resign honourably once there is some controversy over their personal integrity.
Dr Amirize is a retired lecturer from the Rivers State University, Port Harcourt.
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers4 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education4 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta4 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education4 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News4 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News4 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
Politics4 days ago2027: RIVERS GUBER CANDIDATES SIGN CHARTER TO PRIORITIZE CITIZENS’ DEMANDS
-
Politics4 days ago2027: South-East Govs Insist On Tinubu’s Re-election
