Opinion
Good Governance, Good Leadership
Many years ago at a conference held in the Friends’ International Centre, London, meeting place of the Quakers of old, the issue of good leadership featured as a theme. There is currently a publication by the Chandler Good Governance Index (CGGI) in whose 2021 report Nigeria was ranked as “third worst governed country”. Expectedly, Nigerian authorities would rise up in defence of the country’s image and integrity by refuting and challenging the CGGI report.
In the front page of The Tide newspaper of Wednesday, May 5, 2021, the CGGI report cited leadership as the basis for the ranking of the assessment of 104 countries which featured in the evaluation exercise. There was the credo that “Good governance begins with good leadership”. Incidentally, the 1981 conference on leadership held at the Quakers’ lodge in London had a similar credo of exemplary leadership as the basis of loyalty and good followership.
Among qualities which emerged from that conference as the gem of good leadership were ability to feel the pulse of the led; telling the people the truth, however bitter; empathy and concern for the common good; willingness to go the extra mile for the same of the masses and, above all, courage to stand for justice, “no matter whose ox is gored”. At that conference were representatives and speakers from over 104 countries, of which the man who spoke of the situation in Uganda, caused tears to flow from the eyes of many listeners at the occasion.
One Ugandan Ph.D student and a clergyman taking refuge in England, spoke with deep but frank emotion about causes of leadership failure in Africa. He pointed accusing fingers at the hypocrisy of Western nations and acts of brigandage of African military leaders. Many causes and examples were citied of how the mineral and natural resources of the African continent were of greater importance to the Western world than the masses suffering under bad leadership. Only two Nigerians were present at that conference.
Between 1981 and now, not much changes have taken place in the leadership position of African countries, except perhaps in the change from military to civilian actors. Even then, there is the recycling strategy of which former military strong men put on the dress of civilian politicians after retirement and the accumulation of enormous wealth. In the case of Nigeria, the era of military rule was characterised by scrambles for ownership of oil blocks, whose allocations were a clandestine affairs. Some foreign interests were partners in this project of privatisation of oil and gas patrimony.
What we find today is the enormous task of managing the fall-out of clandestine deals of yesteryears, thanks to Petroleum Decree No. 27 of 1969. Under war situation and the disadvantaged position of the elite class of the zone where the oil and gas resources were domiciled, no resistance attended the game of conspiracy and plunder. The next line of action was the game of stick and carrot, using oil block allocation to buy support and military might for intimidation purposes. No challenge!
Nobody spoke out when these malfeasance were going on, except late Senator Francis Ellah who was shouted down at the floor of the Senate, as he was presenting a motion that would have exposed a game plan. Creation of numerous states from the original 12-states structure, was a ready gambit of offering a Greek gift for the purpose of creating a euphoria. Thanks to military strategists and tacticians, Nigeria was piloted up to 1999, and politicians went on an election without seeing the document providing a road map.
Similar strategy of shouting down at the floor of the Senate those who try to raise issues capable of exposing in-house malfeasance, is still with us now; thanks to Godswill and “off your mike”. Obviously, governing and leading a great and large nation as Nigeria must be an unenviable task, demanding a great deal of wit, rather than witchcraft. Therefore, those who come into such a high-stake task must not only come with clean hands, but also a noble heart. The truth is that when a foundation is shrouded in shenanigans, the structure would hobble.
The obvious reluctance to address the issue of structural deficiencies and booby-traps, coupled with the manner that the President Goodluck Jonathan-administration’s effort at such remedy was thrown out, do suggest something sinister. Signs of sinister motives in governance emerge when a controversial Petroleum Industry Governance Bill (PIGB) can be passed by lawmakers within 23 minutes. In a similar way, state reaction to youths protest over police brutality can be an instrument for ranking a nation’s leadership posture. Nothing hides for too long!
Nobody should say that the report of Chandler Good Governance Index (CGGI), ranking Nigeria as “third worst governed country” is a global conspiracy against this country. For example, in a research project involving 13 postgraduate students under my supervision, it was shocking to know what top management personnel of multinational oil companies could say in confidence. For a foreigner to say that his “company is working for individual owners of oil block allocation rather than for the Nigerian nation”, carries a sinister message, to say the least.
Similarly, for the Nigerian Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI) from whose record Senator Ita Enang, could say that “Northerners owned 83% of all oil blocks in the country”, also carries a sinister message. What is good government or good leadership if transparency, accountability and justice are not seen to feature as a matter of course? Without going too far, can we claim that the international community is ignorant of the shenanigans over herders and farmers clashes in Nigeria? What lies behind?
To say that good governance begins with good leadership is not only a sound credo, but also a factual truth. Good leadership is infectious and capable of inspiring the masses, whereby patriotism and loyalty of followers come without begging. Similarly, good leadership goes with a strong feeling of shame, which is why, in the civilised world, holders of high public offices resign honourably once there is some controversy over their personal integrity.
Dr Amirize is a retired lecturer from the Rivers State University, Port Harcourt.
Opinion
Betrayal: Vice Of Indelible Scar
The line that separates betrayal and corruption is very thin. Betrayal and corruption are two sides of the same coin. Like the snail and its shell they are almost inseparable. They go hand-in-globe. Betrayal and corruption are instinctive in humans and they are birthed by people with inordinate ambition – people without principles, without regard for ethical standards and values. Looking back to the days of Jesus Christ, one of his high profile disciples-the treasurer, was a betrayer. Judas Iscariot betrayed Jesus Christ for just 30 pieces of silver. One of the characteristics of betrayers is greed.
So, when on resumption from his imposed suspension, the Rivers State Governor, Sir Siminilayi Fubara threatened to bring permanent secretaries who were found complicit in “defrauding” the State during the days of Locust and Caterpillar regime, he did not only decry a loot of the Treasury but the emotional trauma of betrayal perpetrated by those who swore to uphold the ethics of the civil service. Governor Siminilayi Fubara had least expected that those who feigned loyalty to his administration would soon become co-travellers with an alien administration whose activities were repugnant to the “Rivers First” mantra of his administration. The saying that if you want to prove the genuineness of a person’s love and loyalty feign death, finds consummate expression in the Governor Fubara and some of the key members of the State engine room
Some of those who professed love for Governor Siminilayi Fubara and Rivers State could not resist the lure and enticement of office in the dark days of Rivers State, like Judas Iscariot. Rather, they chose to identify with the locusts and the caterpillars for their selfish interest. Julius Caesar did not die from the stab of Brutus but by his emotional attachment to him, hence he exclaimed in utter disappointment, “Even you Brutus”. The wound of betrayal never heals and the scar is indelible. Unfortunately, today, because of gross moral turpitude and declension in ethical standards and values, betrayal and corruption are celebrated and rewarded. Corruption, a bane of civil/public service is sublime in betrayal. The quest to get more at the expense of the people is the root of betrayal and sabotage.
This explains why Nigeria at 65 is the World’s capital of poverty.
Nigeria is not a poor country, yet, millions are living in hunger, abject poverty and avoidable misery. What an irony. Nigeria, one of Africa’s largest economies and most populous nation is naturally endowed with 44 mineral resources, found in 500 geographical locations in commercial quantity across the country. According to Nigeria’s former Minister for Mines and Steel Development, Olamiekan Adegbite, the mineral resources include: baryte, kaolin, gymsium, feldspar, limestone, coal, bitumen, lignite, uranium, gold, cassiterite, columbite, iron ore, lead, zinc, copper, granite, laterite, sapphire, tourmaline, emerald, topaz, amethyst, gamer, etc. Nigeria has a vast uncultivated arable land even as its geographical area is approximately 923, 769 sq km (356,669 sq ml).
“This clearly demonstrates the wide mineral spectrum we are endowed with, which offers limitless opportunities along the value-chain, for job creation, revenue growth. Nigeria provides one of the highest rates of return because its minerals are closer to the suffer”, Adegbite said. Therefore, poverty in Nigeria is not the consequences of lack of resources and manpower but inequality, misappropriation, outright embezzlement, barefaced corruption that is systemic and normative in leaders and public institutions. According to the World Poverty Clock 2023, Nigeria has the awful distinction of being the world capital of poverty with about 84 million people living in extreme poverty today.
The National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) data also revealed that a total of 133 million people in Nigeria are classed as multi-dimensionally poor. Unemployment is a major challenge in the country. About 33 percent of the labour force are unable to find a job at the prevailing wage rate. About 63 percent of the population are poor because of lack of access to health, education, employment, and security. Nigeria Economic Summit Group (NESG) speculated that unemployment rate will increase to 37 percent in 2023. The implications, therefore, is increase in unemployment will translate to increase in the poverty rate. The World Bank, a Washington-based and a multi-lateral development institution, in its macro-poverty outlook for Nigeria for April 2023 projected that 13 million Nigerians will fall below the National Poverty line by 2025.
It further stated that the removal of subsidy on petroleum products without palliatives will result to 101 million people being poor in Nigeria. Statistics also show that “in 2023 nearly 12 percent of the world population of extreme poverty lived in Nigeria, considering poverty threshold at 1.90 US dollars a day”.Taking a cursory look at the Nigerian Development Update (NDU), the World Bank said “four million Nigerians were pushed into poverty between January and June 2023 and 7.1 million more will join if the removal of subsidy is not adequately managed.” These startling revelations paint a grim and bleak future for the social-economic life of the people.The alarming poverty in the country is a conspiracy of several factors, including corruption. In January, 2023 the global anti-corruption watchdog, Transparency International, in its annual corruption prospect index which ranks the perceived level of public sector corruption across 180 countries in the world says Nigeria ranked 150 among 180 in the index. Conversely, Nigeria is the 30th most corrupt nation in the ranking. It is also the capital of unemployment in the world.
Truth be told: a Government that is corruption-ridden lacks the capacity to build a vibrant economy that will provide employment for the teeming unemployed population. So crime and criminality become inevitable. No wonder, the incessant cases of violent crimes and delinquency among young people. Corruption seems to be the second nature of Nigeria as a nation . At the root of Nigerians’ poverty is the corruption cankerworm.How the nation got to this sordid economic and social precipice is the accumulation of years of corrupt practices with impunity by successive administrations. But the hardship Nigerians are experiencing gathered momentum between 2015 and 2023 and reached the climax few days after President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, who assumed power as president of Nigeria, removed the controversial petroleum subsidy. Since then, there is astronomical increase in transport fares, and prices of commodities. Living standard of most Nigerians is abysmally low, essential commodities are out of reach of the poor masses who barely eat once a day.
The Dollar to Naira exchange rate ratio at one dollar to N1,000, is the most economy-unfriendly in the annals of the history of Nigeria. The prohibitive prices of petroleum products with the attendant multi-dimensional challenges following the removal of the subsidy, has posed a nightmare better to be imagined than experienced. Inflation, has been on the increase, negatively affecting the purchasing power of low income Nigerians. Contributing to the poverty scourge is the low private investment due to.unfriendly business environment and lack of power supply, as well as low social development outcomes resulting in low productivity. The developed economies of the world are private sector-driven. So the inadequate involvement of the private sector in Nigeria’s economy, is a leading cause of unemployment which inevitably translates to poverty.
Igbiki Benibo
Opinion
Dangers Of Unchecked Growth, Ambition
In today’s fast-paced, hyper-competitive world, the pursuit of success and growth has become an all-consuming force. Individuals, organisations, and nations alike, are locked in a perpetual struggle to achieve more, earn more, and surpass their rivals. Yet, beneath this relentless drive for progress lies a silent danger—the risk of self-destruction. This perilous pattern, which I call the self-destruct trajectory, describes the path taken when ambition and growth are pursued without restraint, awareness, or moral balance. The self-destruct trajectory is fueled by an insatiable hunger for more—a mindset that glorifies endless expansion while disregarding the boundaries of ethics, sustainability, and human well-being. At first glance, it may appear to promise prosperity and achievement. After all, ambition has long been celebrated as a virtue. But when growth becomes the only goal, it mutates into obsession.
Individuals burn out, organisations lose their soul, and societies begin to fracture under the weight of their own excesses. The consequences are everywhere. People pushed beyond their limits face anxiety, exhaustion, and disconnection. Companies sacrifice employee welfare and social responsibility on the altar of profit. The entire ecosystems suffer as forests are cleared, oceans polluted, and air poisoned in the name of economic progress. The collapse of financial systems, widening income inequality, and global environmental crises are all symptoms of this same relentless, self-consuming pursuit. To understand this dynamic, one can turn to literature—and to Charles Dickens’ Oliver Twist. In one of the novel’s most haunting scenes, young Oliver, starving in the workhouse, dares to utter the words: “Please, sir, I want some more.” This simple plea encapsulates the essence of human desire—the urge for more. But it also mirrors the perilous craving that drives the self-destruct trajectory. Like Oliver, society keeps asking for “more”—more wealth, more power, more success—without considering the consequences of endless wanting.
The workhouse itself symbolises the system of constraints and boundaries that ambition often seeks to defy. Oliver’s courage to ask for more represents the daring spirit of human aspiration—but it also exposes the risk of defying limits without reflection. Mr. Bumble, the cruel overseer, obsessed with authority and control, embodies the darker forces that sustain this destructive cycle: greed, pride, and the illusion of dominance. Through this lens, Dickens’ tale becomes a timeless metaphor for the modern condition—a warning about what happens when ambition blinds compassion and growth eclipses humanity. Avoiding the self-destruct trajectory requires a radical rethinking about success. True progress should not be measured solely by accumulation, but by balance—by how growth serves people, planet, and purpose.
This calls for a more holistic approach to achievement, one that values sustainability, empathy, and integrity alongside innovation and expansion
Individuals must learn to pace their pursuit of goals, embracing rest, reflection, and meaningful relationships as part of a full life. The discipline of “enough”—knowing when to stop striving and start appreciating—can restore both mental well-being and moral clarity. Organisations, on their part, must reimagine what it means to succeed: prioritising employee welfare, practising environmental stewardship, and embedding social responsibility in the core of their mission. Governments and policymakers also play a vital role. They can champion sustainable development through laws and incentives that reward ethical practices and environmental responsibility. By investing in education, renewable energy, and equitable economic systems, they help ensure that ambition is channeled toward collective benefit rather than collective ruin.
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) provides a tangible pathway for this transformation. When businesses take ownership of their social and environmental impact—reducing carbon footprints, supporting local communities, and promoting fair labour—they not only strengthen society but also secure their own long-term stability. Sustainable profit is, after all, the only kind that endures. Ultimately, avoiding the self-destruct trajectory is not about rejecting ambition—it is about redefining it. Ambition must evolve from a self-centred hunger for more into a shared pursuit of the better. We must shift from growth at all costs to growth with conscience. The future will belong not to those who expand endlessly, but to those who expand wisely. By embracing restraint, compassion, and sustainability, we can break free from the cycle of self-destruction and create a new narrative—one where success uplifts rather than consumes, and where progress builds rather than burns.
In the end, the question is not whether we can grow, but whether we can grow without losing ourselves. The choice is ours: to continue along the self-destruct trajectory, or to chart a more balanced, humane, and enduring path toward greatness.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
Gridlock at the Gates
