After what looked like an endless wait, the result was finally announced! Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Professor Mahmood Yakubu, announced it at about 4:00am on Wednesday, February 27, 2019, the fourth day after the election.
Incumbent President, Mohammadu Buhari of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), as announced by the electoral umpire, polled 15,191,847 million, as against 11,262,978 million scored by his closest rival, Atiku Abubakar, of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP).
As has been characteristic of Nigerian politics, the real truth of how Buhari won the 2019 Presidential election can only be known years later, if and after an aggrieved key player in events leading to the win has cause to say so. Still in the usual Nigerian style, it will be at a point when such information may make little meaning, at least in Nigerian standard.
But that is for the future. Right now, Nigerians are divided between those who celebrate the APC win, and those who mourn it. For those who celebrate Buhari’s win, popularly called “Buharists”, no doubt it is a job well planned and executed. End of discussion.
On the other hand, for those who mourn the declared win, mostly a majority of the populace regarded as the common man, who have directly felt the brunt of what starvation has meant in the last three years plus, it is time to prepare for the worse.
Yes, this is the mindset of the average Nigerian. It has nothing to do with APC, PDP, or any other party for that matter. It’s all about how a people have fared under a given government. It doesn’t matter by what name anyone chooses to call it. The truth remains that but for the period the Nigerian Civil War lasted, Nigerians at whatever level have never been so impoverished the way they had been between 2015 and now. Only those who want to play politics with everything will disagree.
Even when they disagree, which is their constitutional right, they cannot genuinely take away the facts, they can only embellish it with comparisons and accusations of the time before. The best they can say is that the sufferings Nigerians have been subjected to since 2015 is a sacrifice that must be made to erase the ills of the preceding sixteen years of PDP leadership.
When they take the stance of justifying their own ills under the cover of the past, they will not even bother to imagine that the John Magufuli-led Tanzanian government that came into power in November 2015, six months after its Nigerian counterpart ascended the coveted seat, it took less than six months to set the country on the path of development.
The first thing they did was to cut key government excesses in expenditure wrongly instituted by the previous government, and invest funds therefrom in empirical aspects of the social needs of the country, such as health and agriculture. Proof was given of amounts realised from the effort, and invested in the sectors subsequently improved upon. It was made so transparent that even the opposition knew that any action against the President’s stance would amount to a subtle declaration for anti-development. This was to the amazement of the President’s party.
In some way, Tanzania’s current stance in pursuing democracy-induced development is what is believed to have informed the appointment of Tanzania’s former President, Jakaya Kikwete, was deemed fit and worthy to be appointed as Chairman of the Commonwealth observer group to Nigeria’s Presidential and National Assembly elections of February 23, 2019.
This should ordinarily be a major lesson to Nigeria’s government which, by global standards, seems to be more concerned about underdeveloping her populace than developing them.
It is in this context that Nigerians will be expectant of the proposed “Next Level” of the APC-led Government in the next four years, ceteris paribus.
In its most comprehensible context, Nigerians would not be so much bothered about grammars involved in a hitherto futile attempt at convincing them that the government is fighting corruption. They most obviously would not want to be told that all is well, when their kits and kin are languishing under the shrapnels of Boko Haram, herdsmen, and the like in different parts of the country, with scores of their brethren either maimed for life, or sent to early and avoidable graves.
Indeed, they will refuse to listen if told that they will be required to make so much unwarranted sacrifices to ensure that their children and wards go through tertiary education and still come out with virtually nothing to show for it in terms of being gainfully employed, for no other reason but that they do not have Godfathers.
At the end of the day, which may, this time, not take as long as it took from 2015, Nigerians would want to feel (not just be told) how whatever postulations of the “Change” mantra and its “Next Level” father would translate to a better life they could feel directly. Not in the context of pittance in the name of empowerment, but standardisation of economic realities favourable to their earning and purchasing power.
How, for instance, all of the grammars they have been told about a better Nigeria would translate into how much they must expend to have an appreciably tasty pot of soup, stew, rice, yam, plantain, etc., and, to what extent provision of basic social amenities such as water, light, good roads, affordable housing, etc., would no longer be talked about as mere political campaign tools.
As it is now, majority of starving Nigerians (not the key elitist political class) do not need a soothsayer to make them understand that the next level of anything can only be an improvement of the status quo, the thing before.
The reality, therefore, is that unless the Almighty intervenes, if the status quo (the last level) is (was) widespread starvation, increase in out-of-school children, loss of jobs, increase in criminality warranted by a quest to get out of starvation, and sundry issues, the next level can, at best, be imagined in the context of the worst to come.
All of these and more will also have to contend with such seemingly unbelievable but thought-provoking issues as the alleged gradual Islamisation of the country which has been awash in the social media space, and related issues.
But, come to think of it, if the proposed “Next Level” of 2019 actually becomes an improvement in the “Change” of 2015, what will Nigerians (particularly the common Nigerians) do?
As Nigerians attempt to come to terms with the “carrotic” Next Level, their minds would most probably also seek to answer the question of what they would, or can do, if the Next Level turns out the way its outgoing predecessor did.

Soibi Max-Alalibo