Opinion
Tragedy Of An Electoral System
Images of underage voters trending in the social media on the recent local government election conducted in Kano State are disquieting reminiscences of malpractices that undermine the virtue of the electoral process in Nigeria.
Though the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has set up an investigative panel to examine the allegations, my discomposure has always been that pronouncements of such panels eventually end up on very dusty shelves
Underage voting contravenes both the 1999 Constitution and the 2010 Electoral Act (as amended) and therefore constitutes a criminal offence. The law obviously states the qualifications of an eligible voter one of which emphasizes that they must attain a minimum age of 18.
There is no doubt that the issue is a recurring tragedy in Nigeria, especially in the northern part of the country. It was widely reported in the 2015 general election that children voted generously in that part of the country. And it appears the current development confirms the 2015 depositions.
Since the law has established that underage voting is an offence which undermines the advancement of democracy in the country, something has to be done quickly to pull the plug.
But the unwillingness of stakeholders in our electoral process to eradicate this commination is rather amazing and utterly inexplicable. That is why the illegal act is widely countenanced. Can the electoral body and security agents claim that they are unable to identify legally ineligible persons before they are registered?
However, INEC alone cannot take the blameworthiness to the limit. Sometimes the failures that are attributed to the electoral body are indeed inadequacies of security agents under whose watch electoral officials are imperiled and compelled to violate electoral laws such as the enrolment of ineligible voters.
Unfortunately, the development gives unfair advantages to contestants whose strong support bases are in the localities where child voters are prevalent, especially during general elections. The situation could also provide fillip to the claim by some politicians that the 2019 elections are already being rigged.
No wonder the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) lately passed a vote of no confidence on the Chairman of INEC, Professor Mahmood Yakubu, and asked him to resign. The party’s position was based on the gross disdain of the Constitution and the electoral law by granting underage persons to be accommodated in the voters’ register.
Since INEC has somewhat accepted responsibility for the illegality of registering and issuing voters’ cards to the minor, it has to take decisive steps to restore the sanctity of its voters’ register, particularly in Kano and Katsina States.
Now, what is the way forward? The first step is for the electoral umpire to clear up the voters’ register having in mind that whatever questions the integrity of the register will affect the entire electoral process.
Second, security arrangements need to be heightened for all electoral processes, from registration, actual voting to the collation procedures. This measure will be resourceful in stemming the ugly inclination towards intimidation of electoral officials by mobs or hired thugs to jeopardize electoral laws.
Third and finally, the judiciary has to sit up. Judges must utilize their good offices to bring the ignominious rape of our democracy to a halt by acting firmly on election petitions including those that relate to underage voting.
I feel remarkably uptight and disenchanted that our law enforcement agents have reduced themselves to mere mannequins at electoral centres instead of enforcing the law or ventilating infractions to the appropriate quarters.
The Kano incident is an occasion for INEC to perfect one of the major transgressions of our electoral process and give it all the consideration. It will be great if the Kano State Independent Electoral Commission (KANSIEC) and the State governor, Dr. Abdullahi Ganduje, cooperate with Prof. Yakubu on this investigation.
Let us remember that “great power status” is not pre-ordained for Nigeria. If we don’t get our electoral system right, Nigeria could well remain a large, over-populated nation – maybe with the world’s largest foreign reserve.
Arnold Alalibo
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers3 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News3 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics3 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured3 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
-
News3 days ago
FG Explains Supply Disruption As Power Generation Drops To 3,659MW
-
Metro3 days ago
Port Harcourt Prepares For 10,000 Runners As International Marathon Returns
-
News3 days agoBille Gas Leak: Coalition Tasks FG On Proactive Measures
-
News3 days agoIGP Orders Arrest, Prosecution Of Campaign Billboard Vandals
