Opinion
Civil Servants And Pension Matters
Those referred to as
public or civil servants are those who have been employed and paid by the government. In order words, those who the government pays salaries qualify as civil or public servants.
The New Webster’s Comprehensive Dictionary of Encyclopedic Edition gave a better definition of the term. It describes civil servant as “one employed in the civil service which includes branches of governmental service that are neither military, naval, legislative or judicial”. Civil servants are the body of persons employed in these branches.
The dictionary’s definition makes it clearer that a civil or public servant is one employed by the government and works in a government department. The explanation of who a civil servant is clearly makes the government responsible not only for their salaries, but also for their pension when they disengage eventually.
Unfortunately, civil servants are not treated well by the government in pension matters. Before this time, workers were paid their pension and gratuities once they retired. They were not expected to make any form of contribution. Today, that order has changed. The world has begun to blow in that direction.
The current trend is that both government and their employees contribute about 7.5 per cent to a pension fund. This practice is called contributory pension which is alien to many government workers.
As a result of the new pension disbursement and administration, several cases of fraud have been reported particularly at the federal level. I think the pension arrangement is an unfair contraption. Were civil servants consulted and their consent gotten before the implementation of the new pension policy?
Were government workers in Rivers State consulted before the new pension policy came into effect? I am not sure. The same way the new pension scheme was introduced was how the National Housing policy was equally introduced.
In the case of the housing scheme, the state government suddenly distributed forms in 1999 to the various ministries and parastatals which also included tertiary institutions in the state.
In the Rivers State University of Science and Technology, RSUST, where I work, deductions were effected on our salaries for the housing scheme, which was lodged at Federal Mortgage Bank. One of the benefits the scheme had was that the subscriber gains access to loan after contributing for six months. I did that just in the way everybody did.
Unfortunately, after nine months of effective contribution, I applied for a loan and I was given stringent conditions including the production of a certificate of occupancy, C of O, which I was unable to produce. But what is even shock was I was told that I could have such benefit of my contribution at retirement.
If I should wait till my retirement before benefiting from the scheme, what then is my benefit? Is it at retirement that I should own a property or before retirement ? I don’t see any benefit in both the pension and retirement schemes.
Now, back to the retirement issue which I was discussing earlier, every retiree looks forward to receiving his or her pension and gratuity immediately upon retirement. The contributory pension issue which gives pension a different dimension is what I do not understand. What is the essence of working all through one’s active years if one does not go home smiling in the end?
Contributory pension scheme is unacceptable. It is not beneficial to public sector workers who are paid poor remuneration. It is a method employed for the administration of pension scheme for private sector workers, whose salaries are usually prodigious.
Civil servants have suffered humiliation as a result of bad policies reeled out by various administrations in the country.
The policy somersault has dehumanised civil servants in the country. In those days, the civil service was decent and was so treated by the then government. But in the last few years, we watched the military gradually debasing that sacred institution. And today civil service only exists on paper. It is actually no more.
Civil servants are very important because with out them, there cannot be any government. How can there be government? Who will implement government policies?
Let the government revisit the contributory pension scheme and revert to the old one. The new scheme has proved to be a failure. That was why the Nigeria Police Force pulled out of it completely.
Pension matters are the sole responsibility of government. If they want to place civil servants at par with workers in the private sector, they should demonstrate it by first placing the salaries of both sets of workers at parity before adopting their own pension scheme.
Ominyanwa is a public affairs analyst.
Goddey Ominyanwa
Opinion
Man and Lessons from the Lion
Opinion
Marked-Up Textbooks:A Growing Emergency
Opinion
Humanity and Sun Worship

-
News4 days ago
WE’VE DUTY TO MAKE PEACE IN RIVERS PERMANENT – FUBARA …..Says He Won’t Take Mr President’s Kindness For Granted
-
Maritime4 days ago
NCS Sensitises Stakeholders On Automated Overtime Cargo Clearance System
-
News4 days ago
NDDC Organizes ADR Capacity Building for Staff
-
Opinion4 days ago
Marked-Up Textbooks:A Growing Emergency
-
Oil & Energy4 days ago
Dangote Refinery Resumes Gantry Self-Collection Sales, Tuesday
-
News4 days ago
Scrap JAMB Age Limit Admission, Parents Beg FG
-
Sports4 days ago
Sunderland Keep Villa Winless
-
News4 days ago
Fubara’s Return Excites NCSU … As Hope Rises For Civil Servants