Editorial

Tackling TB, HIV Scourge

Published

12 years ago

April 8, 2013

The Nigeria Medical Association (NMA) on March 24, raised serious concerns over rising spate of tu-berculosis and HIV infections and spread in Nigeria, saying that while significant progress has been made globally in the fight against the two diseases, Nigeria still topped the list of TB most infected nations in Africa and 10th in the world while ranking second in HIV prevalence on the global scale.

Speaking at the forum to mark 2013 World Tuberculosis Day, with the theme: “Stop TB In My Life Time”, in Lagos, President of NMA, Dr Osahon Enabulele, charged the Federal Government to make the fight against TB one of the priority projects of the centenary anniversary by massively investing in TB research activities towards the discovery of the much-needed anti-TB vaccine, while increasing budgetary allocations to programmes aimed at reducing the scourge of HIV/AIDS.

Enabulele revealed that there are more than 84,263 new infections and 27,000 deaths annually from tuberculosis, adding that those most vulnerable are between 25 and 34 years, representing 36.6 per cent of all infected, with Lagos, Kano, Oyo and Benue states harbouring the highest infections rate, and Ekiti and Bayelsa states with the lowest rate of infection.

He decried the lack of drugs and modern treatment facilities to treat TB, saying that the fact that it is an entirely preventable and easily curable disease, if simple public health regulations, hygiene practices and treatment guidelines are adhered to, makes the difficulties being faced in fighting the disease more disheartening and called on government to establish National Centre for Disease Control for effective surveillance and control of diseases.

While regretting that international funding allocations have dropped from 48 per cent in the previous year to 42 per cent with marginal rise from domestic budgetary allocation from 28 per cent to 30 per cent in the face of heightening spread of the disease, he said it may be impossible for Nigeria to achieve the goal of 50 per cent reduction in prevalence and death from TB, if aligned with the 1990 baseline by 2015, let alone eliminating it as a public health problem by 2050.

Enabulele’s concern was again, corroborated by Head, Grant Management Division of Global Fund, Mark Edington in Lagos, at the signing of $335million five grant agreements to march Federal Government’s ‘Saving One Million Lives’ $500million allocation to support programmes aimed at curbing AIDS, TB and malaria pandemic in Nigeria by 2015. Edington revealed that the country had second highest prevalence of people living with HIV in the world, with only 30 per cent of those requiring treatment having access to anti-retroviral therapy.

He noted that HIV epidemic in Nigeria is highly concentrated among high-risk groups with 20 per cent of infections attributed to female sex workers while injecting drug users and men who have sex with men account for 9 per cent and 10 per cent, respectively, of annual new infections, adding that the grant resources will be targeted to achieve very significant increase in number of patients receiving anti-retroviral therapy and prevention of mother-to-child transmission services.

The Tide feels particularly pained by these revelations and grim statistics of the prevalence rate and deaths attributable to both TB and HIV against the availability ratio and access to anti-TB vaccine and antiretroviral therapy. Even more troubling is the dwindling fund allocations, because what we see is obviously a nation at the verge of losing a mass of critical human capital required to drive its development process in all fields and sectors. This is why we insist that the time for swift stakeholders’ concerted action to address the fundamental challenges of resources allocation by significantly increasing funding to solve the most critical health problems of our time, is now.

It’s sad that at a time when most preventable diseases have been eliminated in developed countries, Nigeria is still topping the list of nations with the highest number of infections and deaths arising therefrom. Government must invest adequately in research and production of anti-TB vaccines while increasing availability of microscope, culture, drug susceptibility centres and reference liboratories across the country. TB and leprosy control centres must also be opened in all the states and local governments for effective coverage of infected persons and pursue of programmes aimed at reducing the spread of the epidemics.

Also, there is all urgent need for National Orientation Agency (NOA), the state and federal ministries of information and of health to embark on sustained enlightenment and re-orientation campaigns targeted at the most vulnerable of societal chain to ensure that the prevalence rate of these diseases are reduced to the barest minimum, if not completely eliminated from the list of our public health problems.

Improving investments and allocations in human capital development and economic empowerment initiatives may play a serious role in reversing this ugly trend. We, thus, appeal to governments at all levels and other stakeholders to continue to increase their commitments to programmes aimed at building the capacity of the people and ensure the creation of an economic foundation that would sustain rubost development and growth for posterity.

These steps would help save this generation of leaders the shame that the present TB, HIV and malaria prevalence rates have exposed us to as a people in such a resource-blessed nation.

Editorial

Charge Before New Rivers Council Helmsmen

Published

12 hours ago

September 29, 2025

The Tide

On the 30th of August, Rivers people trooped out to participate in local government elections conducted across the state. These elections, which produced new chairmen and councillors for the 23 local government areas (LGAs), were organised by the Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission (RSIEC). The exercise has ushered in a new crop of grassroots leaders whose shoulders now bear the responsibility of steering the affairs of their respective councils. With the polls concluded and winners duly announced, the time has come for the newly elected officials to roll up their sleeves and begin the hard work of governance.

According to the results declared by RSIEC, the All Progressives Congress (APC) secured a dominant lead, winning chairmanship seats in 20 of the 23 local government councils, while the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) clinched the remaining three. This outcome not only reflects the current political dynamics in the state but also places a significant weight of expectation on the shoulders of the APC-led councils to justify the confidence reposed in them by the electorate. It is imperative that political rhetoric now gives way to tangible development, especially at the grassroots level where government is felt most directly.

Following the elections, the successful chairmen were officially sworn into office by the former Sole Administrator of Rivers State, Vice Admiral (rtd) Ibok-Ete Ekwe Ibas. The solemn ceremony marked a transition from campaign promises to the reality of public service. With their inauguration complete, the time for celebration has ended; the time for delivery has commenced. The electorate now awaits meaningful action that reflects the hopes and aspirations of the voting public.

As helmsmen of their various LGAs, these leaders must quickly settle down to work. Their constituents expect them to provide direction, formulate policies, and execute programmes that will uplift communities long neglected. The local government tier is closest to the people and, as such, must rise above politicking to meet the everyday needs of the citizenry. It is not enough to occupy office; they must make their impact visibly and positively felt across their domains.

The Supreme Court ruling mandating direct allocation of funds to local governments—although not yet fully implemented—is a welcome development that underscores the autonomy of the third tier of government. Once this is operationalised, the excuses often cited for underperformance will no longer hold water. With funds directly accessed from the Federation Account, council administrations will be better empowered to meet the developmental needs of their localities, if only they manage resources judiciously and prioritise the right projects.

The onus is now on the chairmen to contribute meaningfully to the broader development of Rivers State. The state government cannot and should not be expected to do everything. Local government councils have defined responsibilities—ranging from rural infrastructure, primary healthcare, and basic education to waste management and local security—that must be adequately addressed. It is high time they stopped passing the buck and started acting as the elected leaders they are.

We extend our congratulations to all who emerged victorious in the elections. However, with this victory comes great responsibility. It is no longer about party affiliations or electoral campaigns; it is about governance. The chairmen must launch people-centred projects that will genuinely improve the lives of the rural populace—projects in water supply, road maintenance, school renovation, and youth empowerment, among others. Let their tenure be remembered for its impact, not its slogans.

Central to their mandate should be the welfare of workers. Council employees form the engine room of local governance, and their morale significantly affects service delivery. The new chairmen must ensure regular payment of salaries, staff training, and a conducive working environment. Neglecting this vital aspect will only hinder whatever grand plans they may have for their LGAs.

It is also essential to institute a robust peer review mechanism. The new LG officials should not operate in isolation; rather, they should learn from one another, share ideas, and compete constructively in a bid to outperform each other in service delivery. Healthy competition among council areas will drive innovation and foster accelerated development. Such a system will also help the public identify high-performing councils for emulation.

Given the typically short tenure of council administrations, it is crucial that they focus on projects that are realistic and impactful. Time and resources should not be wasted on white elephant ventures that are neither sustainable nor beneficial to the people. Instead, chairmen should pursue programmes that match their timelines and address immediate community needs.

Peace and security must remain a cardinal objective for all council steersmen. Regardless of who facilitated their election or what political loyalties they hold, they must ensure peace reigns in their areas. Development cannot thrive in an atmosphere of tension and distrust. These leaders must work closely with traditional rulers, youth groups, and civil society organisations to maintain law and order.

A critical understanding must also prevail—that chairmen are leaders of the people, not just leaders of political parties. They must conduct themselves as impartial administrators serving all constituents, irrespective of political affiliations. Additionally, they must work harmoniously with the state governor, who remains the leader of the state. Petty rivalries and political infighting serve no purpose in the development agenda.

Now that the elections are over and governance has begun, it is essential for these chairmen and councillors to adopt an inclusive approach. They must carry everyone along—party members and opposition alike—in their development plans. Creating division or playing favourites will only fracture communities and stall progress. Leadership at the grassroots demands fairness, equity, and a listening ear.

Rivers people have played their part by coming out to vote. The baton has now been passed to the new council helmsmen. They must seize the opportunity to leave lasting legacies in their communities. History will not judge them by the number of rallies they held or the speeches they gave, but by the quality of life they brought to their people. Let them not squander this moment.

Editorial

No To Political Office Holders’ Salary Hike

Published

7 days ago

September 22, 2025

The Tide

Nigeria’s Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) has unveiled a gratuitous proposal to increase the salaries of political and public office holders in the country. This plan seeks to fatten the pay packets of the president, vice-president, governors, deputy governors, and members of the National and State Assemblies. At a time when the nation is struggling to steady its economy, the suggestion that political leaders should be rewarded with more money is not only misplaced but insulting to the sensibilities of the ordinary Nigerian.

What makes the proposal even more opprobrious is the dire economic condition under which citizens currently live. The cost of living crisis has worsened, inflation has eroded the purchasing power of workers, and the naira continues to tumble against foreign currencies. The majority of Nigerians are living hand to mouth, with many unable to afford basic foodstuffs, medical care, and education. Against this backdrop, political office holders, who already enjoy obscene allowances, perks, and privileges, should not even contemplate a salary increase.

It is, therefore, not surprising that the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has stepped in to challenge this development. SERAP has filed a lawsuit against the RMAFC to halt the implementation of this salary increment. This resolute move represents a voice of reason and accountability at a time when public anger against political insensitivity is palpable. The group is rightly insisting that the law must serve as a bulwark against impunity.

According to a statement issued by SERAP’s Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, the commission has been dragged before the Federal High Court in Abuja. Although a hearing date remains unconfirmed, the momentous step of seeking judicial redress reflects a determination to hold those in power accountable. SERAP has once again positioned itself as a guardian of public interest by challenging an elite-centric policy.

The case, registered as suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/1834/2025, specifically asks the court to determine “whether RMAFC’s proposed salary hike for the president, vice-president, governors and their deputies, and lawmakers in Nigeria is not unlawful, unconstitutional and inconsistent with the rule of law.” This formidable question goes to the very heart of democratic governance: can those entrusted with public resources decide their own pay rises without violating the constitution and moral order?

In its pleadings, SERAP argues that the proposed hike runs foul of both the 1999 Nigerian Constitution and the RMAFC Act. By seeking a judicial declaration that such a move is unlawful, unconstitutional, and inconsistent with the rule of law, the group has placed a spotlight on the tension between self-serving leadership and constitutionalism. To trivialise such an issue would be harum-scarum, for the constitution remains the supreme authority guiding governance.

We wholeheartedly commend SERAP for standing firm, while we roundly condemn RMAFC’s selfish proposal. Political office should never be an avenue for financial aggrandisement. Since our leaders often pontificate sacrifice to citizens, urging them to tighten their belts in the face of economic turbulence, the same leaders must embody sacrifice themselves. Anything short of this amounts to double standards and betrayal of trust.

The Nigerian economy is not buoyant enough to shoulder the additional cost of a salary increase for political leaders. Already, lawmakers and executives enjoy allowances that are grossly disproportionate to the national average income. These earnings are sufficient not only for their needs but also their unchecked greed. To even consider further increments under present circumstances is egregious, a slap in the face of ordinary workers whose minimum wage remains grossly insufficient.

Resources earmarked for such frivolities should instead be channelled towards alleviating the suffering of citizens and improving the nation’s productive capacity. According to United Nations statistics, about 62.9 per cent of Nigerians were living in multidimensional poverty in 2021, compared to 53.7 per cent in 2017. Similarly, nearly 30.9 per cent of the population lives below the international poverty line of US$2.15 per day. These figures paint a stark picture: Nigeria is a poor country by all measurable standards, and any extra naira diverted to elite pockets deepens this misery.

Besides, the timing of this proposal could not be more inappropriate. At a period when unemployment is soaring, inflation is crippling households, and insecurity continues to devastate communities, the RMAFC has chosen to pursue elite enrichment. It is widely known that Nigeria’s economy is in a parlous state, and public resources should be conserved and wisely invested. Political leaders must show prudence, not profligacy.

Another critical dimension is the national debt profile. According to the Debt Management Office, Nigeria’s total public debt as of March 2025 stood at a staggering N149.39 trillion. External debt obligations also remain heavy, with about US$43 billion outstanding by September 2024. In such a climate of debt-servicing and borrowing to fund budgets, it is irresponsible for political leaders to even table the idea of inflating their salaries further. Debt repayment, not self-reward, should occupy their minds.

This ignoble proposal is insensitive, unnecessary, and profoundly reckless. It should be discarded without further delay. Public office is a trust, not an entitlement to wealth accumulation. Nigerians deserve leaders who will share in their suffering, lead by example, and prioritise the common good over self-indulgence. Anything less represents betrayal of the social contract and undermines the fragile democracy we are striving to build.