Connect with us

Oil & Energy

Encouraging Local Participation In Oil And Gas Industry

Published

on

Being an address presented by the Executive Secretary, Nigerian Content Development and Monitoring Board, Engr. Ernest Nwapa at an enlightenment Forum on September 29, 2011 in Port Harcourt.

It gives me great pleasure to be here today at this event, one of the series of enlightenment progammes of the Nigerian Content Development and Monitoring Board (NCDMB) to keep oil producing states and communities abreast of opportunities in the oil and gas sector. The enlightenment events are aimed at constructively engaging the oil-bearing states and communities on the fundamentals of the Nigerian Oil and Gas Industry Content (NOGIC) 2010 Act, signed into law on April 22, 2010 by President Goodluck Jonathan.

The antecedents of the NOGIC 2010 Act are still vivid, especially to indigenous oil and gas operators and the oil-bearing communities. The story of the industry hitherto can be surmised as almost foreign, dominated with very little space available to qualified indigenous professionals and businesses. There was certainly less space for the participation of oil-bearing communities.

The former environment was characterized by:

(i)         Excessive importation of goods and services at the expense of local participation resulting in otherwise avoidable impoverishment and alienation of the people. A major contributor to the Niger Delta situation;

(ii)        Performance of the mega-projects of the industry abroad thereby eliminating opportunities to develop human and infrastructural capacity in Nigeria. – Capacity constraints in turn, limit the industry’s ability to perform sufficient work scope in Nigeria when designing, procuring and fabricating facilities, plants and assets or for after-sales support in the operations and maintenance phase;

(iii)       Our estimates that over 150 times more jobs are created in other countries than in Nigeria on the back of Nigerian projects at the expense of national development. Apart from the obvious negative impact of unemployment on the economy, the nation is denied opportunities for industrialisation and technology transfer;

(iv)       In absolute terms, less than 20% of $18bn average annual industry spent was retained in Nigeria.- such prolonged capital flight is a major factor for low economic performance, insignificant impact of the sector on national GDP and poor levels in local infrastructure investment despite heavy government expenditure in the sector.

Although some discretionary allocation of oil blocks were made by the military government to indigenous operators to promote the presence of Nigerian companies in the upstream in 1993, government also took the bold move to break the detrimental mould of low Nigerian upstream participation in 2004 by evoking the latent policy on Marginal Fields to admit Nigerian entrepreneurs. By that action, some 24 discoveries classified as Marginal Fields which had been left unattended for upward of 10 years and above were allocated to 31 indigenous companies under a strict technical and commercial evaluations.

Though the exercise is now often classified as a success, it was obvious that the composite in-country value addition to the oil and gas operations in Nigeria needed to be taken beyond the Marginal Fields to encompass the entire Exploration and Production value chain to meet expectations for significant growth. The establishment of Nigerian Content Division (NCD) by the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) in 2005 for the first time gave a formal structure to Nigerian Content issues and significantly positioned the policy for more holistic application in the industry. NCD also came up with focused directives and formally established Nigerian content base for every contract in the entire value chain of oil and gas operations. It further became the bridge to link the major operators with indigenous service companies on Nigerian Content issues.

The benefits of the NCD directives on the industry were clearly evident, especially in areas of domiciliation of Front End engineering design (FEED) fabrication and capacity building, especially in the engineering sector. The prescriptions on domiciliation of fabrication works significantly increased project work scope thereby boosting activities in hitherto dormant fabrication yards. Structured certification and training of welders and pupilage through work attachment were part of the significant achievements of the NCD initiatives.

Distinguished ladies and gentlemen, notwithstanding the NCD strides, it also became obvious that the challenges of developing and nurturing Nigerian Content beyond fringe participation required a focused statute. That necessitated the promulgation of the NOGIC Act, 2010 and the prompt assent of the President, Dr. Goodluck Ebele Jonathan to the Act on April 22, 2010.

Specifically, the NOGIC Act gave teeth to the fundamental aspirations of government for strong Nigerian E and P Sector and a virile indigenous service sector. The statute further established the process for Nigerian Content in all segments of the oil and gas value chain by prescribing minimum Nigerian Content benchmarks for the listed activities in contracting process. The Act also established the Nigerian Content Development and Monitoring Board (NCDMD) as the regulating body of Nigerian Content in the oil and gas industry. NCDMB headquarters is located in Yenagoa, Bayelsa State, in line with prescriptions of the law that mandates siting the body within the Niger Delta.

Whereas the headquarters’ office covers operation activities in Rivers and Bayelsa States, NCDMB has also established offices in Owerri to cover Imo and Abia States and in Warri to cover Delta and Edo States. Plans are at advanced stages to also establish offices in Akwa Ibom State, Cross River and Ondo States for complete coverage of all the oil and gas producing states.

Distinguished ladies and gentlemen, without pre-empting other speakers, please allow me to dwell briefly on the operational strategies and some programmes in place by the Board for implementation of the NOGIC Act.

First, we fully understand that successful Nigerian Content policy should be run on the back of projects. We are also aware that ample opportunities had been lost by Nigeria in the past by not leveraging on the multi-billion dollar upstream projects to develop capacity and grow indigenous participation. In line with the stipulations of the Act, therefore, the Board always ensures that no Invitation to Tender (ITT) goes out in the industry without explicit minimum Nigeria Content stipulation and that no tender gets pre-qualified without approved Nigerian Content plan.

Secondly, we understand the roles of competent skills in meaningful local participation, especially given the complex operational environment in the oil and gas industry. Training and curriculum development are required to grow in tandem with the industry needs to keep abreast of opportunities.

The Board has, therefore, set up elaborate programmes to ensure that annual training budgets in the industry are effectively utilized in ways that would add real values to the skills of our teeming youths, especially from the oil and gas communities. The Board has also met with the Oil and Gas Trainers’ Association of Nigeria (OGTAN) to deliberate on how to further enhance the industry training process to move beyond spending to adding the required values, in real terms, to our teeming youths and practitioners in the industry. Oil and gas companies had been put on notice that manpower training would henceforth be a vital index of the Nigerian Content performance.

Thirdly and corollary to the foregoing, the Board is decisively committed to structured attachment policy in the industry, especially for sub-surfacing and engineering graduates to enable young Nigerians gain relevant experience to qualify them for positions in the industry. I was particularly pleased to show case, at the anniversary of the NOGIC 2010 Act held recently in Abuja, some of the university graduates that have successfully passed through the NCDMB attachment training schemes and are gainfully employed in the industry. The future of Nigerian participation in the industry lies in its teeming youths. The Board is committed to ensuring the realisation of Nigeria’s potentials, especially in the oil bearing communities.

Distinguished ladies and gentlemen, past experiences have shown that the best way forward to realising the full potentials of Nigerian oil and gas resources is through peace and sustainable development of the communities. Establishment of the Board is a strong indication by government that it is indeed serious about growing indigenous capacity and improving local participation in the oil and gas industry. By providing that, the Board headquarters should be located in the Niger Delta as the law intends the oil-bearing communities to be the main focus of its activities.

We are here today to tell you about the activities of the Board since inception and also listen to your suggestions, especially on how the state and the oil-bearing communities can be better served. I am sure, we shall leave here mutually fulfilled that we have achieved our objectives.

I thank you for listening.

Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

No Subsidy In Oil, Gas Sector — NMDPRA

Published

on

The Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA) has said there are no subsidies in the oil and gas sector as Nigeria operates a completely deregulated market.
The Director, Public Affairs Department, NMDPRA, George Ene-Italy, made this known in an interview with newsmen, in Abuja, at the Weekend.
Reacting to the recent reports that the Federal Government has removed subsidies or increased the price of Compressed Natural Gas (CBG), Ene-Italy said, “What we have is a baseline price for our gas resources, including CNG as dictated by the Petroleum Industry Act”.
He insisted that as long as the prevailing CNG market price conforms to the baseline, then the pricing is legitimate.
 Furthermore, the Presidential –  Compressed Natural Gas Initiative (P-CNGI) had said that no directive or policy had been issued by the Federal Government to alter CNG pump prices.
The P-CNGI boss, Michael Oluwagbemi, emphasised that the recent pump price adjustments announced by certain operators were purely private-sector decisions and not the outcome of any government directive or policy.
For absolute clarity, it said that while pricing matters fell under the purview of the appropriate regulatory agencies, no directive or policy had been issued by the Federal Government to alter CNG pump prices.
The P-CNGI said its mandate, as directed by President Bola Tinubu, was to catalyse the development of the CNG mobility market and ensure the adoption of a cheaper, cleaner, and more sustainable alternative fuel and diesel nationwide.
Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

‘Nigeria’s GDP’ll Hit $357bn, If Power Supply Gets To 8,000MW’

Published

on

The Managing Director, Financial Derivatives Company Limited (FDC),  Bismarck Rewane, has said that Nigeria’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) could rise to $357b  if electricity supply would increase from the present 4.500MW to 8,000MW.
Rewane also noted that Nigeria has spent not less than $30 billion in the power sector in 26 years only to increase the country’s power generation by mere 500MW, from 4,500 MW in 1999 to 5,000MW in 2025 though the sector has installed capacity to generate 13,000 MW.
In his presentation at the Lagos Business School (LBS) Executive Breakfast Session, titled “Nigeria Bailout or Lights Out: The Power Sector in a Free Fall”, Rewane insisted that the way out for the power sector that has N4.3 trillion indebtedness to banks would be either a bailout or lights out for Nigeria with its attendant consequences.
He said, “According to the World Bank, a 1.0 per cent increase in electricity consumption is associated with a 0.5 to 0.6 per cent rise in GDP.
“If power supply rises to 8000MW, from current 4500MW, the bailout shifts money from government into investment, raising consumption and productivity. And, due to multiplier effects, GDP could rise to $357 billion.”
The FDC’s Chief Executive said “in the last 30 years, Nigeria has invested not less than $30 billon to solve an intractable power supply problem.
“The initiatives, which started in 1999 when the power generated from the grid was as low as 4,500MW, have proved to be a failure at best.
“Twenty-six years later, and after five presidential administrations, the country is still generating 5,000MW. Nigeria is ranked as being in the lowest percentile of electricity per capita in the world.
“The way out is a bailout, or it is lights out for Nigeria”, he warned.
He traced the origin of the huge debts of the power sector to its privatisation under President Goodluck Jonathan’s administration, when many of the investors thought they had hit a jackpot, only to find out to their consternation that they had bought a poisoned chalice.
Rewane, who defined a bailout as “injection of money into a business or institution that would otherwise face an imminent collapse”, noted that the bailout may be injected as loans, subsidies, guarantees or equity for the purpose of stabilising markets, protect jobs and restore confidence.
He said, “The President has promised to consider a financial bailout for the Gencos and Discos. With a total indebtedness of N4.3 trillion to the banking system, the debt has shackled growth in the sector.”
Rewane warned that without implementing the bailouts for the power sector, the GENCOs and DISCOs would shut down at the risk of nationwide blackout.
Rewane, however, noted that implementing a bailout for the power sector could have a positive effect on the country’s economy if Nigeria’s actual power generation could rise from today’s 4,500 MW to around 8,000 and 10,000 MW.
The immediate gains, according to him, would include improved power generation and distribution capacity, more reliable electricity supply to homes and businesses as well as cost reflective tariffs.
Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

NEITI Blames Oil, Gas Sector Theft On Mass Layoff 

Published

on

The Nigeria Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI) has blamed the increasing crude oil theft across the nation on the persistent layoff of skilled workers in the oil and gas sector.
The Executive Secretary, NEITI, Orji Ogbonnaya Orji, stated this during an interview with newsmen in Abuja.
Orji said from investigations, many of the retrenched workers, who possess rare technical skills in pipeline management and welding, often turn to illicit networks that steal crude from pipelines and offshore facilities.
In his words, “You can’t steal oil without skill. The pipelines are sometimes deep underwater. Nigerians trained in welding and pipeline management get laid off, and when they are jobless, they become available to those who want to steal crude”.
He explained that oil theft requires extraordinary expertise and is not the work of “ordinary people in the creeks”, stressing that most of those involved were once trained by the same industry they now undermine.
According to him, many retrenched workers have formed consortia and offer their services to oil thieves, further complicating efforts to secure production facilities.
“This is why we told the Nigerian Content Development and Monitoring Board (NCDMB) to take this seriously. The laying off of skilled labour in oil and gas must stop”, he added.
While noting that oil theft has reduced in recent times due to tighter security coordination, Orji warned, however, that the failure to address its root causes, including unemployment among technically trained oil workers would continue to expose the country to losses.
According to him, between 2021 and 2023, Nigeria lost 687.65 million barrels of crude to theft, according to NEITI’s latest report. Orji said though theft dropped by 73 per cent in 2023, with 7.6 million barrels stolen compared to 36.6 million barrels in 2022, the figure still translates to billions of dollars in lost revenues.
Orji emphasised that beyond revenue, crude oil theft also undermines national security, as proceeds are used to finance terrorism and money laundering.
“It’s more expensive to keep losing crude than to build the kind of monitoring infrastructure Saudi Arabia has. Nigeria has what it takes to do the same”, he stated.
Continue Reading

Trending