Connect with us

Opinion

NPLF: A Meddlesome Interloper?

Published

on

“I wish Atiku, Goodluck”.

That was the reaction of this writer to the deluge of negative reactions from the North, that trailed the verdict of the Northern Political Leaders Forum (NPLF) which chose former Vice President Atiku Abubakar as the North’s consensus candidate for the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

The ire of the North is not just the credibility and viability of the Adamawa state-born maverick politician but the locus standi of the Adamu Ciroma-Ied NPLF, an assemblage of Northern elders, some from other political parties, to select a presidential candidate for the PDP.

Indeed, it is a case in which you can imagine a Barrister- at- Law urging the presiding judge in court thus:  “My lord, the plaintiff (NPLF) is a meddlesome interloper who has no locus standi in the choice of a PDP presidential aspirant”.

This point was aptly canvassed by the effervescent and radical youth wing of the PDP which also rejected the NPLF choice.

National Vice Chairman of the PDP National Youth Vanguard, Rilwan Abdullahi had said in his reaction to the choice of Atiku as the North’s consensus candidate, that since NPLF was made up of both PDP and non-PDP members, it lacked locus standi to speak for PDP in the North.

“We, the PDP National Youth Vanguard, as an umbrella body of all youth members of the PDP therefore reject the nomination of the former Vice President as the consensus candidate and whole heartedly endorse the candidacy of President Goodluck Jonathan and Architect Namadi Sambo for the PDP presidential ticket”, Abdullahi said.

Another pointed rejection of the self-appointed assignment of NPLF came from the PDP in the North Central geo-political zone.  It’s Vice Chairman, Alhaji Yusuf Ayilogo in rejecting Atiku said the former Vice President is not the preferred candidate of his zone nor of the whole of the North.

Ayilogo described the NPLF as a personal venture of Alhaji Adamu Ciroma that was neither spearheaded by the North nor the PDP in the North. The North, he said, did not give any mandate to the nine NPLF members that decided on the consensus candidate.

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) whose chairman, the cerebral, radical and distinguished Prof Attahiru Jega had sworn to give Nigeria a credible election, in the din caused by the NPLF choice, also made its position clear.

It’s Acting Director, Political Party Monitoring and Liaison, Regina Omo-Agege said INEC would not accept any consensus candidate that emerged through undemocratic arrangements within political parties and which failed to garner the support of all the aspirants involved.

It is therefore arguable whether Atiku, the product of NPLF’s screening for the PDP in the North, met the INEC standards.

Atiku was chosen by the nine NPLF wise men from three other contestants including the Maradonic former Military President, General Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida (Rtd), Former National Security Adviser, General Aliyu Gusau (Rtd) and Kwara State governor Dr. Bukola Saraki.

The former Vice President was a founding member of the PDP who, desperate to actualise his presidential ambition, abandoned the party to found the Action Congress (now Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) after a controversial eight year relationship with his boss-former President Olusegun Obasanjo.

Atiku’s return to the PDP after years of no-holds-barred war of attrition against Obasanjo and the PDP, confounded political analysts and the party stalwarts.

But it was also obvious that he returned to PDP which until the last few months when ACN reclaimed most of the South-West states, had no opposition-to pursue afresh, his presidential ambition.

His maverick nature, his record as a cantankerous and disloyal Vice President and plot to destroy PDP while in the AC had apparently made party men cautious and circumspect in their relationship with him, which may have informed the difficulty Atiku encountered in getting the PDP waiver which came his way on September 15, 2010 and qualified him to contest elections in the party.

The reported acceptance of the other three Northern aspirants of Atiku as the consensus candidate and the collapse of their campaign structures into that of the former Vice President may give the false impression of a battle between the North and the South, represented by President Goodluck Jonathan.

Jonathan, it would be recalled, sparked off the crusade for a Northern presidential candidate spearheaded by Ciroma, when he, taking advantage of the Nigeria and PDP constitution as well as the party’s clarification that he was eligible to contest, declared his interest in the party’s presidential primaries.

Ciroma, on the other hand, declared his opposition to President Jonathan when, following the 1st October 2010 twin car bombings in Abuja, called on him to resign within one week, failing which he called on the National Assembly to impeach him for allegedly plotting to frame-up Northerners in the tragedy.

However, it is obvious that Ciroma’s NPLF cannot change the direction and momentum of progressive Northern elements who believe that, for a truly united Nigeria to evolve, the South-South geo-political zone which bears the burden and hazards of providing the oil revenue that runs the nation and which is grossly marginalised, deserves to produce the President in 2011.

Indeed, from the day Ciroma began his campaign for zoning the Presidency to the North, the Arewa Youth Forum said: “We are not in support of zoning and therefore appeal to all advocates of zoning that they should be guided by the letters of the constitution and jettison any unconstitutional methods in their quest to grab power, they should apologise to Nigerians for criminally decentralising our Presidency in their own concept of reform and class consideration”.

The umbrella Arewa Consultative Forum (ACF) whose mission and vision is the promotion of North’s socio-political interests was measured, albeit being disappointed with the emergence of Atiku.

A source close to the  ACF said the body would have preferred a stronger Northerner with the capacity to square up with Jonathan at the primaries.

The consolation of the Niger Delta region should however, be in the massive support Jonathan is enjoying in the North as a candidate with a divine mandate to be Nigeria’s President for unification, come 2011.

Kaduna State governor, Mr. Patrick Yakowa captured the mood of the well-meaning North when he said those behind the consensus candidate should respect the zoning arrangement that providence has imposed on the country which is the candidacy of President Goodluck Jonathan.

Those agitating that Nigeria’s next President should come from the North, Yakowa said, should stop dissipating energy on a matter God himself had already decided.

Need Jonathan and the South-South fear any meddlesome interloper?

Continue Reading

Opinion

Kudos  Gov Fubara

Published

on

Please permit me to use this medium to appreciate our able governor, Siminalayi Fubara for the inauguration of the 14.2-kilometre Obodhi–Ozochi Road in Ahoada-East Local Government Area.  This inauguration marks a significant milestone in the history of our communities and deserves commendation. We, the people of Ozochi, are particularly happy because this project has brought long-awaited relief after years of isolation and hardship.
The expression of our traditional ruler, His Royal Highness, Eze Prince Ike Ehie, JP, during the inauguration captured the joy of our people.  He said, “our isolation is over.”  That reflects the profound impact of this road on daily life, economic activities, and social integration of the people of Ozochi and other neighbouring communities. The road will no doubt ease transportation, improve access to markets and healthcare, and strengthen links between Ahoada, Omoku, and other parts of Rivers State.
The people of Ahoada, Omoku, and indeed Rivers State as a whole are grateful to our dear governor for this laudable achievement and wish him many more successful years in office. We pray that God endows him with more wisdom and strength to continue to pilot the affairs of the state for the benefit of all. As citizens, we should rally behind the governor and support his development agenda. Our politicians and stakeholders should embrace peace and cooperation, as no meaningful progress can be achieved in an atmosphere of conflict. Sustainable development in the state can only thrive where peace prevails.
Samuel Ebiye
Continue Reading

Opinion

… And It Came To Pass

Published

on

Quote:“Leadership is not measured by how hard one strikes back, but by how steady one remains under provocation.”
Tell it  in Rivers State, publish it  in the streets of Port Harcourt, so  the daughters of the State could rejoice, and the daughters of the uncircumcised triumph and know that Fubara is not vindictive”. And it came to pass that Rivers State emerged from one of the most delicate chapters in its political journey, the period of emergency rule that spanned from March 18 to September 18, 2025. It was a season that tested institutions, strained loyalties, and exposed the fragile balance between power and principle. During that time, the suspended Governor, Sir Siminalayi Fubara DSSRS, was widely believed to have suffered not only political setbacks but personal betrayal, allegedly from some top civil servants within the state apparatus. These were individuals expected to uphold neutrality and professionalism, yet were accused in public opinion of taking sides against the very government they served.
As the emergency rule ended and Governor Fubara resumed office, expectations were shaped less by policy and more by emotion. Many assumed that revenge would quietly find expression through governance. The loudest suspicion centered on the 2025 Christmas bonus of ?100,000 traditionally paid to each worker. The thinking was simple and cynical: a wounded governor would surely withhold goodwill. Some voices even mocked workers  openly hoping that the governor would refuse to pay the bonus. To them, denial of the bonus would serve as proof of political strength and justified retaliation. In reality, such thinking revealed a troubling desire to see governance reduced to personal vendetta. Yet,  it came to pass, the governor chose a path that confounded suspicion. Against all expectations, the 2025 Christmas bonus was paid.
That single decision quietly but firmly reframed the narrative. It showed a leader focused on governance rather than grudges, on institutional continuity rather than emotional satisfaction. The payment was not a favor, nor was it a concession; it was a statement that public administration must rise above personal injury. By honoring the bonus, Governor Fubara demonstrated that leadership is not measured by how hard one strikes back, but by how steady one remains under provocation. He made it clear that workers’ welfare would not become collateral damage in political disagreements. This action also served as a moral rebuke to those who celebrated division and hoped for punishment. Governance is not validated by the suffering of workers, nor is leadership strengthened by withholding entitlements. At the same time, the issue of alleged sycophancy and betrayal within the civil service cannot be brushed aside. If proven, such conduct deserves firm, lawful, and institutional correction. Civil servants are bound by duty to the state, not to political conspiracies or shifting loyalties.
However, justice must never be confused with revenge. The strength of governance lies in correcting wrongs without destroying the system itself. Governor Fubara’s restraint suggested an understanding that the future of Rivers State mattered more than settling scores. For workers, this moment carried an important lesson. Celebration should be rooted in good governance, not in the expectation of another’s downfall. Rejoicing in rumors of denial or punishment undermines the very stability that protects workers’ welfare. Public service thrives where professionalism, mutual respect, and accountability are upheld. Pettiness, gossip, and political scheming only weaken institutions and erode trust. History often remembers leaders not for the crises they inherit, but for the character they display in response. In paying the 2025 Christmas bonus, Governor Fubara chose legacy over impulse, maturity over malice.
And so, it came to pass that focus defeated revenge, governance triumphed over bitterness, and Rivers State was reminded that true leadership is proven when restraint is expected least but delivered most. Beyond the symbolism of the Christmas bonus lies a deeper question about the kind of political culture Rivers State intends to cultivate in the years ahead. Periods of emergency rule, anywhere in the world, often leave behind residues of suspicion, fear, and silent realignments. Institutions do not emerge untouched; individuals recalibrate loyalties, some out of conviction, others out of self-preservation. What distinguishes stable democracies from fragile ones is not the absence of such moments, but the discipline with which leadership manages their aftermath. River.
King Onunwor
Continue Reading

Opinion

That Withdrawal of Police   Orderlies  From VIPs

Published

on

Quote:”Balancing VIP security with public safety remains a tightrope walk in a country where the majority of citizens are still under-protected.”
The Presidential announcement on the removal of police orderlies from persons in authority and their relations  ( Very Important Persons ) last month came as a relief to many Nigerians who felt deprived    of one major  role of government ; security of lives and property.The higher  population of Nigerians  missed needed security because the VIPs and the VVIPs kept  retinue of Police Officers  totalling over 100 ,000 to  themselves and their family members as if they are all that matter  while some  communities under attack of terrorists  have no single unit of  police station located there in. While many hailed the announcement , some said perhaps the government has just woken up to her major responsibility of securing the lives and property of all  citizens while many expressed indifference on the note that it may be one of those pronouncements which come only in words but no action .Many keep their fingers crossed watching how it will play out , how Mr President  will  go about the implementation of the seemingly dicey  policy .
Benjamin Franklin  said “well said is better than well done ”  It is sufficient today to say that many Nigerians including me are still waiting and watching to see  how well  and how long this  return  of the Police service to the ordinary people will go . Wishing hopes will not be crashed ,  It  is note worthy, that  the recent complaints by the VIPs of being exposed to attacks  may in a way affect the action on implementation. Recently, at Senate plenary , another worrisome  angle came up as Senator Abdul Ningi  coming through a motion    disclosed that he had only one police officer attached to him ( his office ) and that  the officer was recalled the week before following  Mr President’s directive  . Senator Ningi said the withdrawal exposed him to high risks but underscored the angle that while his orderly  was recalled , many other politicians , men  and women in authority, business concerns   foreigners  and even children of some  VIPs are still enjoying retinue of police protection ( officially attached to them ).
 It’s note  worthy also that the Deputy Senate President , Distinguished Senator Jibrin Barau,  who presided  over  the session revealed that the  leadership of both chambers are already in discussion with President Tinubu on the need  to exempt  the law makers  from the new policy .  Senator Ningi may not be  wrong . After all he emphasized he is okay  provided that the removal of the Police Orderlies be done across board . Senator Barau noted that talks are on  over the issue of law makers’    in line with international practice . Further details from the Presidency  noted  that   Presiding officers  will retain their  police officers ,  others would have Civil Defense  officers ( NSCDC) as orderlies while  any other VIP who feels he or she deserves personal police protection should get clearance from  his office . In the midst of all  issues weighing in on the proper implementation , it becomes necessary  to bear in mind that  the decision  hinges on  the realization that Nigeria has peculiar security issues (of kidnappings, banditry, and terrorism.) and that  majority of Nigerians   are under protected.
More so, that if well  implemented, Police officers will focus on core duties; even as 30,000 new police officers are to  recruited to enhance security .That implementation  must be made in a  way that leaves no room.for selective  treatment loss of confidence  and  controversies.  Looking at previous attempts of  implementation  of this policy  gives faint hope  as several  attempts consistently failed . Former  IGPs like Tafa Balogun (2003), Ogbonnaya Onovo (2009), and Ibrahim Idris (2018) tried  the policy but all  failed due to political resistance from various angles. All the failed attempts  were tied to lack of political will  mostly due to the fact that the directives came from police chiefs, not the president. Selective Enforcement was another killer to the policy  as  partial implementation  met  resistance   and   later  reversal . Egbetokun (2023) and Adamu (2020) saw minimal impact.
Further more entrenched corruption in the system saw  Politicians and VIPs quietly regain police escorts due to ‘transactional economics”and pressure. Worse still the mindset of the  police officers  withdrawn didn’t help the policy Underpaid police prioritize VIP duties for extra benefits. Many wish President Tinubu’s move can  break this cycle.  As at today, he  still  insists the move is non-negotiable while stressing collaboration with states to upgrade training facilities. As citizens look forward to  success of the policy  without undue exposure of both sides, balancing VIP security with public safety remains a tightrope walk. Talk fades ; action echoes.  How the Presidency  implements this policy.  has  much to tell on the governments stand on national / community  security , choice of priority and the ability to   stand uncomprised . The known  goal is clear:  The outcome is  not yet certain.  Fingers crossed , we await . Definitely , time will tell.
By: Nneka Amaechi-Nnadi.
s State stood at such a crossroads in September 2025. The temptation to rule with a long memory and a heavy hand was real. Yet, the choice made signaled a preference for healing over hardening. Leadership after crisis demands more than administrative competence; it requires moral clarity.
 Governor Fubara’s decision reminded the state that authority is not best exercised through silent punishment or selective generosity. Rather, it is strengthened when rules remain rules, irrespective of personal injury. By keeping faith with workers, the government preserved an essential firewall between politics and public service. That firewall, once breached, turns governance into a battlefield where livelihoods become weapons. Rivers State narrowly avoided that descent. In doing so, it affirmed that institutions must outlive tempers, and governance must not mirror the bitterness of political seasons. This moment also invites sober introspection within the civil service itself. Allegations of partisanship, if left unresolved, corrode professionalism and weaken public confidence. A civil service that drifts into political camps loses its moral authority and operational effectiveness.
Therefore, reform, where necessary, should be guided by due process, transparency, and institutional review—not whispers, witch-hunts, or mob verdicts. Accountability strengthens systems when it is fair; it destroys them when it is arbitrary. The restraint shown by the executive places a corresponding burden on administrative leadership to restore discipline, neutrality, and pride in public service. For the wider political class and the commentariat, the episode serves as a caution against normalizing cruelty as strategy. The eagerness with which some anticipated workers’ suffering revealed a dangerous appetite for scorched-earth politics. When governance becomes a spectator sport where pain is cheered and deprivation is weaponized, society inches toward moral exhaustion. Rivers State has seen enough turbulence to know that stability is not sustained by triumphalism, but by restraint.
The lesson is simple yet profound: power is fleeting, but institutions endure; leaders pass, but precedents remain. In the end, the payment of the 2025 Christmas bonus was more than a fiscal act—it was a civic statement. It told workers they were not expendable. It told political actors that revenge would not be policy. And it told the state that maturity in leadership is not weakness, but strength under control. In a climate where many expected fire, restraint prevailed; where bitterness was predicted, balance emerged. Thus, Rivers State was offered a rare reminder that governance, at its best, is an act of discipline, and leadership, at its highest, is the courage to rise above provocation.
Continue Reading

Trending