As unsavoury as Nigeria’s political résumé tastes, particularly as it relates to her democratic misadventures and inconsistencies, not once has the rot blemished substantially the operational harmony that ought to thrive between the two chambers of the National Assembly, the Senate and the House of Representatives.
Once or twice in their legislative overlaps, both chambers might have differed on appraisal, understanding and conclusions on various enactments as is natural but never in contest over constitutional superiority, as each knows its reach and limits of the other’s duties, responsibilities and powers.
Frankly, in settling for a biparous legislative equation, the framers of the Nigerian Constitution envisaged a realistic complementation of one another and not in competition along egoistic lines. That is why, to become law, certain legislative enactments must pass through both chambers, not minding which is the originating arm.
Even in this regard, there has never been an argument over who between the two chambers is higher or lower, as equally practised in countries with similar bicameral legislatures. Without doubt, the 109-member Nigerian Senate is the upper chamber and the 359-member House of Representatives, the lower, but not necessarily inferior.
In perfect understanding of this, whenever there are demands for a joint sitting, the apparently more spacious House Chamber has often been a joint choice although in order of protocol, the Senate President, not the Speaker of the House, comes first.
This is why, we find it retrogressive, unnecessary and shameful, the antecedents that actuated deferment by President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua, of the long expected 2010 budget address, to a joint sitting of both arms of the National Assembly last Thursday, ominously due to an undisclosed power play between the Senate and House leadership.
On that day, two separate Army bands set up instruments at the two chambers, a sign that all was not well or that the lawmakers had been unable to resolve the rumoured differences early enough, to hear the President’s budget speech. In the past, only one band was usually detailed to render ceremonial airs and in one chamber – that of the House of Representatives. So, what went wrong?
We ask because, whatever there was, if not properly addressed, it could have negative impact on the entire nation, the least disastrous of which might well be yet another delay in the passage of the 2010 Budget.
Should this impasse endure longer ahead, neither chamber is likely to demonstrate the needed unity, cohesion and understanding in appraisal and eventual passage of the fiscal projections into law, and once again push the executive arm into articulating needless supplementary budget.
The Tide is pained by this rancour between two chambers of a national assembly whose leadership is substantially drawn from the same political platform – the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) which equally enjoys an overwhelming majority in both chambers.
The PDP and indeed the Presidency should be worried by this needless power tussle because not only does it potend danger to the entire nation, it shows, and very clearly too, that the party might well be divided against itself. It should not be so. And this, if not checked could result in further polarisation of the political class and make consensus-building on matters, of common good, impossible.
We are, however, relieved to learn that both the party leadership and President Yar’Adua have elected to wade into the lingering acrimony, with a view to re-inventing the cordiality and oneness that permeated National Assembly conduct in many years.
That, we think should be done with the urgency it deserves because a divided legislature is a wasteful luxury Nigeria can ill-afford at this time of pressing national demands of legislative nature, like Political Reforms.