Opinion
That Amnesty To Niger Delta Militants
President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua deserves the commendations of the peace-loving and well-meaning Nigerians for his magnanimity in granting amnesty to the militants and other miscreants in the Niger Delta region. By this singular act, the president has again demonstrated his genuine desire in seeing an end to the embarrassing situation in the troubled region.
Since he assumed the mantle of leadership of our country in 2007, the president has placed the issues of the region in the front burner of his administration through the creation of the Ministry of the Niger Delta Affairs, the aborted international summit on Niger Delta, the setting up of the Niger Delta Technical Committee led by Barr. Ledum Mittee, the Joint Task Force (JTF) for the maintenance of peace in the region, the prompt release of funds to the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDC) and so on. It is painful, therefore, that despite these sincere efforts, the militants have refused to cooperate with the president towards resolving the lingering crisis.
Although, it is an international known fact, and of course nationally acknowledged that the Niger Delta region had over the years suffered criminal neglect and abandonment by the successive governments.
Even the Senate attested to this fact when its members converged in Port Harcourt two years ago for their annual retreat.
However, in every war and dispute, there must be a roundtable for dialogue, negotiation, agreement between and aggrieved parties. This is exactly what President Yar’adua’s administration is doing. It is a welcome development and should be supported by all.
And now that the amnesty has been granted and befitting conditions rolled out by the federal government, it behoves on the militants to reciprocate the gesture by laying down their arms. They should embrace the amnesty offer and embrace a new life aimed at transforming their lives. Ateke Tom’s style of renonouncing militancy today and back to the creek tomorrow is however unacceptable and should not be adopted.
Meanwhile, they should not listen to the people like Prof. Tam David-West, who opposed the amnesty and expressed pessimism of its workability. Prof. David-West was in Nigeria when the years of neglect of the region started. What did he do even as a Minister of Petroleum under Gen. Muhamadu Buhari’s government? Instead, he and some elders of the region contributed to the monumental injustice melted on the region. They aligned and hobnobbed with the power that marginalised us by accepting all manner of appointments. Now that the youths of the region have taken the challenge to correct the injustice, Prof. David-West and his cohorts have suddenly become activists and crusaders of the region’s decades of injustice of which they were indirect perpetrators. They are hypocritical pretenders and should be ignored.
However, my only worry is that President Yar-Adua did not alongside the amnesty tell us what happens to the thousands of law abiding jobless youths of the region who refrained themselves from being militants. Should they be given employment and attention only when they become militants and hop into the creeks? Should that be the panacea for empowering the youths of the region?
Federal Government should stop paying lip service to the empowerment of the Niger Delta youths. There have been years of unfulfilled promises of employment and empowerment of our people despite the presence of Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) and now Ministry of Niger Delta Affairs. The region cannot provide the resources that feed the nation and its people wallow in abject poverty.
Back to the amnesty issue, the governors of the region especially those of Rivers, Bayelsa and Delta states should be fully consulted and carried along by the Federal Government in this peace process to avoid singing different song with Federal Government. Multinational oil companies should be fully involved and be partakers in this peace process. The majority members of the Presidential Amnesty Committee and Presidential Implementation Committee should come from the Niger Delta while members of the committee should not see the assignment as an opportunity for self enrichment. They should be honest, dedicated and committed to ensue that the peace process and good intention of the federal government is not in vain.
Prince Ogbuehi, a journalist and human rights activist, wrote in from Port Harcourt.
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers3 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education3 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta3 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education3 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News3 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News3 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
Politics3 days ago2027: South-East Govs Insist On Tinubu’s Re-election
-
Politics3 days ago2027: RIVERS GUBER CANDIDATES SIGN CHARTER TO PRIORITIZE CITIZENS’ DEMANDS
