Editorial
Oil Marketers And Incessant Strikes
Recently, residents of Rivers State had their social and economic lives disrupted as petroleum tanker drivers and others under the auspices of the National Union of Petroleum and Natural Gas Workers (NUPENG), and the Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria, (IPMAN) embarked on an industrial action that shut down the distribution and sale of petroleum products in the state for two days.
This happened inspite of the spirited effort of the Rivers State Government to avert the action as some parties in conflict reneged in keeping faith with the understanding reached with government. The parties in dispute were the petroleum sector workers and security agencies, the military authorities of 6 Division of the Nigerian Army, Port Harcourt, in particular.
In a joint statement issued by IPMAN Chairman in Rivers State, Obele Ngei Chu, and Chairman of Licensed Petrol Station Owners (LIPSO) in Rivers State, Sunny Nkpe, the members of the unions had raised an alarm over what they described as incessant seizure of their trucks by operatives of the Nigerian Army.
They accused the soldiers of illegally impounding and keeping in their (Army) custody, no fewer than 14 trucks loaded with petroleum products and insisted on embarking on the industrial action unless the trucks were released to them.
The union leaders eventually made good their threat, notwithstanding the intervention of the state government through the Commissioner for Energy and Natural Resources, Dr Peter Medee, as the release of the trucks was not effected within the time frame envisaged by the angry petroleum products dealers.
Within only 48 hours that the strike held, Premium Motor Spirit or petrol sold for as high as N350 per litre in Port Harcourt; commuters got stranded on the roads while many had to trek long distances as transport fares went up to as high as 100 per cent in some routes within the city. This is just to mention only a few of the several concomitant disruptions, dislocations and crippling inconveniences the people endured.
Normalcy may have since returned with the calling off of the strike and resumption of business by the petroleum marketers, thanks to the robust intervention and demonstration of the highest level of responsibility and responsiveness demonstrated by the Rivers State Government in the quick resolution of the crisis, but The Tide thinks that the time is now for all stakeholders to engage in order to forestall the recurrent highly costly incident that hurts not only residents but the economy of the state as well.
Against this backdrop, we urge the state government to initiate a multi-sectoral stakeholders standing committee comprising the petroleum sector unions, the Department of Petroleum Resources (DPR), the security agencies, the state government and any other relevant bodies to deal with all issues pertaining to petroleum products distribution in the state. The thinking is that such a committee, when functional and effective, will be able to address and reduce to the barest minimum, if not eliminate, all misunderstandings, misgivings and misrepresentations between the dealers and law enforcement agencies before they snowball into conflicts.
That said, The Tide is also of the opinion that the leaderships of the petroleum sector unions need to do more to educate and enlighten their members to be better disciplined and law abiding. So far, it’s been obvious that their tendency to be indisciplined and lawless because of their capacity to cause socio-economic upheaval easily is very high.
Surely, the frequency of their altercation with the security agencies and other law enforcement personnel will be minimized if they are enlightened to understand that their right to operate does not supersede the rights of others to exist and operate their businesses as well without undue interference.
Members of IPMAN and LIPSO must also rein in their appetite for inordinate profits that lures them into engaging in sharp practices. While we concede to the dealers their obligation to protect their members, they must exhibit greater obligation to demonstrate patriotism to their fatherland by the sanctions they impose on saboteurs among them who indulge in products’ diversion, hoarding, inaccurate dispensing of products, selling above regulated price and sundry unwholesome activities.
Without undermining the brave, gallant, patriotic and sacrificial efforts of security agencies in undertaking the daunting challenge of enforcement of law and order in our society, it is very disturbing to note that most of the criminal elements in the distribution chain of petroleum products are aided, abetted, encouraged and given security cover by law enforcement agents of the state.
We believe that the level of economic sabotage experienced in the petroleum sector will be tolerable if some security personnel do not engage actively in the illegal business and refuse to be compromised. It is common knowledge that while those who are able to pay are allowed and aided to burst pipelines, steal crude oil, illegally refine and convey same to the market, others who attempt to play smart are usually caught in the dragnet and made a public show of. It is as well a common sight to behold security escorts accompanying products that are being diverted while impediments are placed on genuine and lawful endeavours for failure to grease their palms.
Our clarion call is for our security agents to exercise strict patriotism motivated discipline and professionalism in the discharge of their duties to the state, and that is to ensure that no criminal goes scot-free while the law abiding is not hindered or made to suffer unjustly under any guise. It is, indeed, every stakeholder’s responsibility to ensure a seamless availability of petroleum products to Nigerians at all times. The economy of the country and state will be the better for it as well.
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
Nigeria joined the world in commemorating the International Day of the Girl-Child on 11 March 2026, an observance dedicated to advancing girls’ rights and amplifying their voices. This year’s theme, “End Child Marriage and Invest in Girls’ Rights,” confronts a deep-rooted injustice and demands an end to sacrificing girls’ futures to prejudice and expediency.
The focus is child marriage, not as an unavoidable misfortune but as a preventable injustice. Though prevalent in many societies, the practice remains particularly troubling in parts of northern Nigeria, where it has become normalised. Reports of girls aged 10 to 13 being married off are disturbing. The controversy surrounding a Nigerian senator and former governor who married a 13-year-old girl further exposed the practice to global scrutiny, yet accountability at home appeared limited. When lawmakers disregard the law, society’s moral compass is compromised.
UNICEF’s statistics reveal the scale of the crisis. Globally, an estimated 650 million women and girls alive today were married before turning 18, while more than 12 million girls enter marriage annually before adulthood. In Nigeria, about 33 per cent of girls marry before 18 and 11 per cent before 15. The prevalence reportedly reaches 63 per cent in Jigawa and Zamfara States and 61 per cent in Sokoto and Katsina. These figures represent millions of childhoods interrupted and futures imperilled.
These statistics explain why the United Nations continues to campaign against child marriage and advocate investment in girls. The consequences are devastating. Girls whose bodies are not fully developed face increased risks of maternal death, obstetric fistula, sexually transmitted infections and psychological trauma. The economic cost is equally significant. A 2017 World Bank and International Centre for Research on Women Study estimated that ending child marriage could generate an additional $7.6 billion in earnings and productivity for Nigeria, as early marriage deprives girls of education, skills, and opportunities to contribute to national development.
Educating a woman benefits the entire society. As a mother, she often becomes her children’s first teacher and a vital influence on their character. An educated mother helps raise enlightened children, just as one candle can light many others without losing its flame. Denying women education undermines families and communities. To expect wisdom while deliberately withholding knowledge is to demand the impossible.
Several reasons are offered for marrying off young girls, including economic hardship, cultural practices and religious beliefs. In some households, daughters are treated as commodities, married early so that their bride price can finance their brothers’ education. While boys enter classrooms, their sisters are sent to matrimonial homes. This discriminatory practice is shortsighted, depriving the nation of half its human potential. A country cannot expect to run effectively after deliberately crippling one side of its capacity.
Beyond these justifications lies the entrenched belief that women ultimately belong in the kitchen, regardless of their education. This outdated notion is demonstrably false. Countries where women lead governments, businesses, research institutions and other sectors show what investment in female talent can achieve. Rwanda’s substantial female parliamentary representation is one example. Confining women to domestic roles limits not only their ambitions but also the nation’s progress.
A girl-child must not surrender her childhood to poverty or prejudice. Some traditions discourage women from attaining educational heights comparable to or greater than those of men, driven by the baseless fear that educated women will disrespect their husbands. Such thinking equates enlightenment with insubordination and empowerment with threat. This patriarchal mindset perpetuates inequality and keeps society trapped in backwardness.
Consequently, some parents consider educating their daughters a waste of resources, likening it to watering another man’s garden. This attitude is deeply misguided. Every girl deserves the opportunity to learn, grow and pursue her dreams. Early marriage mortgages her future, stifles her potential and traps her in circumstances she might otherwise overcome. No society can justify sacrificing a child’s prospects to outdated customs or immediate financial gain.
Ending child marriage must, therefore, go hand in hand with investing in girls’ education, safety and rights. Every girl should have the opportunity to realise her potential. This requires more than annual declarations, billboards, posters and seminars held in air-conditioned halls. Awareness without action is like a cloud without rain: promising, yet incapable of nourishing the ground.
The campaign must move beyond tokenism to practical intervention, particularly at the state level, where the problem is acute. Governments should formulate policies that protect girls and make education accessible. Scholarships, bursaries, conditional cash transfers, school feeding programmes and other incentives can help keep girls in school. When education is affordable and adequately supported, more girls can choose the classroom over the bridal chamber.
Civil society organisations, faith-based groups, and traditional institutions must intensify efforts to challenge child marriage and dismantle harmful beliefs disguised as religious or cultural obligations. Parents must also uphold their responsibility to protect and educate their daughters, despite economic pressures. A society that educates its girls invests in its future; one that marries them off in childhood mortgages that future at an incalculable cost.
-
Sports4 days agoNigerian Trio Target Titles At PFL Africa Finals
-
Education4 days agoFCE Yola Graduates 3,555 Teachers , Seeks Upgrade to University
-
Niger Delta5 days agoDiri Restates Stance On Lagos-Calabar Coastal Highway
-
Niger Delta5 days agoC’River, NUJ Pay Tribute To Late Guardian Editor
-
News5 days agoNDLEA Recovers Tons Of Illicit Drug Consignments In Nine States
-
Opinion5 days agoChecking Voter Apathy In Nigeria’s Electoral Process
-
Opinion13 hours ago
Ancestorial Worship: My Take (1)
-
Politics4 days ago2027: DICKSON’S EX-ALLY VOWS TO WORK AGAINST NDC INTEREST IN BAYELSA