Opinion
Time To Re-Define Anti-Robbery Squad
Amidst decisions taken by Vice President Yemi Osinbajo, recently in the absence of President Muhammadu Buhari, Nigerians have continued to applaud the order to overhaul the “Special Anti-Robbery Squad.” For many, it is not only adjudged a welcome development, it is timely too.
SARS, the acronym for Special Anti-Robbery Squad, is a spin-off of the Nigerian Police Force. It is one of the timely interventionary measures Nigeria raises to correct anomalies in its system so as to put the nation on the right path.
The challenges to the security of lives and property faced by Nigerians in recent time, is a major reason behind the introduction of this squad. It was, therefore, designed and expected to address the security of Nigerians and their properties.
Thus the mere introduction of this outfit for this special purpose, in no mean measure, relieved Nigerians of their fears as they looked forward to a more secure society for their lives and property.
Unfortunately, the actions that most of the men of SARS carry out, seem by far, a deviation from their key job responsibility. Their attitude towards a people whose interest they are expected to protect, has kept the people in tears and increased their dread for them.
People are now at a crossroad as to the clear idea of the duties of the men of the Special Anti-Robbery Squad. Are they friends or foes has remained a question begging for an answer.
In the 80s, we were greeted with the slogan “police is your friend”. Then, police officers, through intuitive intelligence, detected criminals on merely sighting them. The audible heart beats and jittery posture of suspects, spake volumes of their involvement in criminal activities, which helped the police in apprehending them.
On the contrary, the 21st Century Nigerian Police seems to be operating from a different perspective. Apart from making indiscriminate arrest for no reason, there are allegations that they break into peoples’ homes at odd times all in the name of arresting their victims. Worst still, every of their victim is considered guilty right from the point of arrest and treated as such.
Unpleasant encounters of innocent citizens with the police, the “Special Anti-Robbery Squad” to be precise, have increased peoples’ dread for them. This is probably why a writer alleged that they are usually under the influence of alcohol and marijuana”, otherwise how could anyone explain this constant violation of peoples’ rights with ease?
Today, the activities of the men of the SARS are not only embarrassing, they constitute nightmares to Nigerians, whose feelings if I could guess right would suggest an outright scrapping of the outfit. To say that these men are creating nuisance of the Nigerian Police Force, is even an understatement.
Luckily, the action taken by the Vice-President to overhaul the squad, is a step in the right direction, coming on the heels of complaints and reports bordering on allegations of human rights violations by men of the squad.
On the order of the Vice-President, the Inspector-General of Police (IGP), Ibrahim Kpotun Idris, is expected to, with immediate effect, overhaul the management and activities of SARS to ensure that all operatives in the emerging unit conduct their operations in strict adherence to the rule of law and with due regard to international human rights law and the constitutionally guaranteed rights of suspects. They are also expected to bear proper identification anytime they are on duty.
For me, the Vice-President has not only reminded the Inspector-General of Police of the need to check the activities of his men, the content of his order, could be seen as a recap of the squad’s terms of reference on inception.
The writer, therefore, suggests that the process of overhauling should include a hunt for men who are intelligence-driven as they alone would have the know-how to champion this course for effective delivery. This is imperative because only men with a neutral conscience as such that can be restricted to the prevention, detection of armed robbery and kidnapping as well be apprehension of offenders linked to the stated offences and nothing more.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers3 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education3 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta3 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education3 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News3 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News3 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
Politics3 days ago2027: South-East Govs Insist On Tinubu’s Re-election
-
Politics3 days ago2027: RIVERS GUBER CANDIDATES SIGN CHARTER TO PRIORITIZE CITIZENS’ DEMANDS
