Opinion
Energy Efficiency: A Win-Win Solution
Energy efficiency is basically achieved by reducing energy use and cutting down on energy waste, thereby making energy more affordable for the end users.We can reduce energy bills, make our energy system more sustainable, and drive down greenhouse gas emissions through energy efficiency implementation.
Too often, government institutions and corporate organisations have neglected the role that energy demand reduction can play in managing our energy system which impacts on business operations and economy. Yet measures that reduce demand can contribute in a more cost-effective way in meeting our energy and climate goals than supply-side measures. This is why energy efficiency – as a way of reducing demand – takes pride of place at the centre of a win-win solution.
Reducing energy demand saves money, improves affordability by the customers and cuts pollution, while enhancing grid reliability and resiliency. This strategy sets the direction for energy efficiency policy.
According to Jose Correia Nunes, the EU Head of Cooperation, “Investing in energy efficiency reduces demand, saves cost, improves energy security and delivery of more services to consumers, as well as,fosters economic growth”
Energy efficiency is a measure of energy used for delivering a given service. Improving energy efficiency means getting more from the available energy that is used.
There are different ways to improve energy efficiency including innovation, which could lead to greater output with less energy, and cutting out wasted energy using efficient appliances, which reduces energy needed while maintaining output level.
There is no cheaper, cleaner energy than energy that isn’t needed. Not only does energy efficiency save money and reduce emissions, it also promotes innovation and creates jobs in a large value chain that spans the country, making our economy stronger, with higher per capita income; which makes it easier for the energy consumers to offset their energy bills as at when due.
Obviously, conserving energy is an important issue for every energy user. By saving energy, it can help reduce costs, preserve natural resources and mitigate the climate impacts associated with energy production and use. So, the message is twofold: Energy-efficient technology is essential for our digital future and these technologies can enable energy savings across the entire economy. As more systems are enabled with energy-efficient digital technology, end users save money and energy suppliers have more energy to distribute with lesser impact on the distribution networks.
Hence, implementing energy efficiency projects would lead to the following: reduced aggregate technical, commercial and collection (ATC&C) losses; reduced loading on our feeders; deferred investment on feeder construction or relief/reinforcement transformer installations; increased collection efficiency at the areas targeted; better community relations with PHED; reduced complaints and dispute with communities; more power available to other customers; more reliable service to these areas; as well as reduced regulatory exposure.
And to optimize the benefits of energy efficiency programme projects, the following strategies could be utilized: provision of incentive prices by the National Electricity Regulatory Council (NERC) that reflect the real energy costs; the establishment of appropriate institutional and regulatory frameworks; a collaboration between the public and private sector to develop complete energy efficiency services, including access to funding; good planning, a regular strengthening and proper enforcement of regulations; quality control of equipment coming into the country and certification processes; institutional promotion of innovative measures, and extensive public awareness on energy efficiency potentials.
It is hoped that with the deregulation of the power sector, consumers will surely benefit from the energy efficiency implementation. Meanwhile, more hopes are on the Port Harcourt Electricity Distribution Company to set the leadership pace in the heart of energy efficiency programme in Nigeria, through project executions within her network areas.
Ajaegbu is Manager, Energy Efficiency Programme / Demand Side Management, Port Harcourt Electricity Distribution Company.
Franklin Ajaegbu
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Opinion4 days ago
Ancestorial Worship: My Take (1)
-
Education1 day agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta1 day ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Rivers1 day ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education1 day agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News1 day agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News1 day ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
News4 days agoFG Must Address Nigerians’ Concerns On Reforms -Shettima …Warns Against Misuse of AI, Social Media
