Editorial
Beyond Ban On Open Grazing
On April 26, 2018, the National Economic Council (NEC) approved the recommendations of a sub-committee set up by the Federal Government on the incessant clashes between herdsmen and farmers in the country.
The three-man body headed by Governor Dave Umahi of Ebonyi State was set up in February, 2018 to unravel the causes of the clashes between herdsmen and farmers and come up with a report to end the problem.
The NEC meeting presided over by Vice President, Professor Yemi Osinbajo, endorsed the committee’s recommendations to wit: Ban on open grazing in the country, among others.
Osinbajo explained that the council opted for the establishment of ranches, stressing that the major causes of the herdsmen/farmers conflict are understandable but the dimension of the involvement of criminals in cattle rustling, kidnappings, rape and killings are quite disturbing and must be checked.
Specifically, NEC okayed the need to educate livestock farmers on the benefits of ranching and the review of ECOWAS protocol on free movement of livestock and herdsmen across borders as a means of stopping the influx of criminal elements who pose as herdsmen into Nigeria.
While The Tide agrees with the ban on open cattle grazing, we, however, must chide the APC-led government for waiting too long before adopting such resolution.
Regrettably, under the present administration led by President Muhammadu Buhari, Benue State alone has recorded not fewer than 50 incursions by marauding herdsmen with over 9,000 innocent souls lost and properties estimated at over N10 billion destroyed. Several communities have also been displaced from their natural habitation.
Such avoidable loss of lives and properties were also recorded in Adamawa, Kogi, Zamfara, Kaduna, Plateau, Nassarawa, Edo, Delta, Ebonyi, Ekiti, Ondo, Cross River and Enugu States.
It is against this backdrop that the Methodist Archbishop of Abuja, the Most Reverend Joseph Oche-Job called for a determined action from the Federal Government to stop the senseless killings by terrorists and herdsmen across the country.
Similarly, Nobel Laureate, Professor Wole Soyinka and the Primate, Church of Nigeria, Most Reverend Nicholas Oko, asked Nigerians to demand the fulfillment of their social/security contract with the Federal Government, or resort to self-help.
We, therefore, expect the government to match words with action to ensure that open grazing would now be a thing of the past, by immediately forwarding an executive bill to the National Assembly to that effect.
The Cattle Breeders Association and other stakeholders should call their members to order and ensure that the ban is enforced. The association should also prevail on their members to establish ranches without further delay and ensure that their livestock are confined as a means of averting further clashes with their host communities.
While states like Ekiti, Benue and Taraba should be commended for enacting laws banning open grazing of cattles, we urge the Federal Government to act fast by giving the proposal a legal teeth, while also taking other proactive actions against reckless killings in the country.
The Buhari administration should ensure that criminal herdsmen and terrorists involved in all the killings and destruction of properties are identified, arrested and prosecuted, not only to serve as a deterrent to others, but also to boost confidence in the nation’s security architecture, especially in view of the accusations that some elements of the security services are accomplices of herdsmen. Enough of paying lip service to this national menace.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Politics19 hours agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics19 hours ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics19 hours agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
Rivers4 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News23 hours agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
News4 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics4 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured4 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
