Editorial
On Wechie’s Volte-Face
Recently, the Executive Director of the Integrity Group, a Port Harcourt-based civil society organisation, Mr. Livingstone Wechie made a volte-face by publicly disowning the documents he tendered under an oath to the Senate and the Justice Omereji Judicial Commission of Inquiry on the alleged mismanagement of Rivers State funds and sale of assets by the former administration of Mr. Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi, the Minister of Transportation.
In a maladroit manner, Wechie, while as a guest of Gbenga Areluba’s Focus Nigeia on AIT, made diverse sensational vituperations among which was that the documents he allegedly obtained from the Rivers State Government and upon which the former governor of Rivers State, Amaechi was indicted, were forged by both him and some persons within the state government.
In the live telecast that traversed across the nation, Wechie asserted to know the eccentric details of the atrocious height of concoction of inaccuracy perpetrated and targeted to rubbish the former governor of the state, and not necessarily to prosecute him since the details were false.
However, the Integrity Group, in a statement endorsed by its secretary, Uyi Meshak, described Wechie’s flip-flop as not only embarrassing, but an act of betrayal and a complete deviation from the noble cause of the group to cleanse the society of corrupt acts.
The group went further to clarify that at no time it took such decision to disown the documents, which it said were thoroughly investigated.
“After we tendered the documents to the Senate on October 12, 2015 and the legal fireworks that followed it, which is now before the Supreme Court, we have never sat to either withdraw the said petition, disown it, nor discussed it further, since it would be subjudice,” the group declared.
While The Tide does not want to question the authenticity or otherwise of the said documents, we take strong exception to the morality of Wechie’s sudden about-turn on issues he and his Integrity Group pursued and defended under oath before the Senate, the Justice Omereji Judicial Commission of Inquiry and the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).
That Wechie, a man supposedly imbued with superfluous integrity, told the whole world that he, being fully aware of the fabrication of falsehood, still went ahead to swear to an affidavit of falsehood before a Federal High Court and tendered same to the Senate and a judicial commission of inquiry is both reprehensible and condemnable. It is a clear case of perjury and moral depravity, and therefore demands serious legal reprimand.
We, therefore, call on the Senate to, without further delay, subject Mr. Livingstone Wechie to judicial scrutiny under Section 117 of the Criminal Code of the Federal Republic of Nigeria which deals with perjury.
As much as The Tide welcomes the decision by the Civil Liberties Organisation to withdraw the membership of Wechie, we are saddened by the undignified silence of the Senate and security agencies to the self-inflicting outburst of Mr. Wechie.
It is rather unfortunate that in a country guarded by law, the nation’s highest law making body and the security apparatus would turn deaf ear and feign ignorance to Wechie’s criminal act that deluded the entire nation into errantly believing a lie.
We hold strongly that Wechie has, by this singular act, run against the values, beliefs, and principles that define the word ‘integrity’ and has also stripped himself of the moral standing and credibility to speak again on or involve himself in any public discourse or debate aimed at eliminating corruption in the society.
Given the character assassination and public ridicule his claims and counter-claims have caused all the parties involved in the issue, we urge the security agencies to, without further delay, invite Wechie for interrogation and possibly prosecute him for perjury to serve as a deterrent to others like him who may want to score cheap political points ahead of the crucial 2019 general elections.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Politics2 days agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics2 days ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics2 days agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
News2 days agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
Politics5 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured5 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
-
Business2 days agoNigeria Loses N17tr Yearly To Abandoned Projects
-
News5 days ago
FG Explains Supply Disruption As Power Generation Drops To 3,659MW
