Editorial
That Wike’s Amnesty Offer
When Rivers State Governor, Chief
Nyesom Ezenwo Wike declared war
against cultists a couple of days ago, people largely waited to see how that was to be accomplished, but when he clarified his stand on the matter and offered to grant amnesty to repentant ones, tongues began to wag, some even made it a political issue.
Governor Wike said last Thursday that the State would grant amnesty to criminals and cultists who lay down their arms and embrace peace, even as the State works with relevant security agencies to ensure that Rivers State was safe for all. Clearly, declaring war on cultism without the opportunity for repentance would result in too many deaths among the Rivers youth.
While we sympathise with persons who reacted negatively to the amnesty offer because of the failed example at the federal level, the difference in the two needs to be understood in order that this opportunity to stop the wasting of young Rivers lives would succeed.
The Tide understands the feeling of people on the unacceptable path many young persons have taken in Rivers State but it does not remove from the fact that they make up the population of Rivers State. The point must be made that the youth, as distracted as they may be are the greatest assets of the State.
Already, rightly or wrongly, the State has lost hundreds of her young persons through avoidable violent acts. This has created huge vacuum for the State in the future, a reality that may not be visible now. Besides, humanity has accepted the fact, from time, that people do not throw away the child with the bathe water, no matter the degree of filth.
The Federal Government Amnesty did not achieve the desired results because the demand was for resource control which also gratified the yearning of the people of the Niger Delta. So, choosing the vocal ones to appease was more or less a tacit approval of violence. Besides, the conditions and scope of the deal were undefined.
On the other hand, the clashes that test the peace of Rivers State are of a different nature. There is no demand, popular or otherwise. It is a crisis fuelled largely by ill-motivated pleasure. It is either one cult group seeking supremacy or one group wanting to take possession of the financial benefits from an oil firm or one leader wanting to become the paramount ruler.
As a matter of fact, what makes the offer of amnesty for Rivers cultists divine is the fact that most of the young ones that are in cults were helplessly recruited. Some were brutalised and had no one to run to for help. They could not report to the police because of stories of compromise. Others joined to prevent constant harassment by cultists.
Clearly, no one can hold brief for many of the cultists because some actually got into it to feel among, or get the opportunity to get at perceived enemies or to make quick money. Some actually got into the cults without knowing that it would include criminality and killing.
These are the ones that the amnesty will help save for our State. It is possible that many of them have realised their mistakes, but labour under the impression that they have gone too far to return, afraid that such discretion could be injurious to them.
Because of this misadventure, many communities in Rivers State are no-go-areas. Nobody can estimate the number of young Rivers people that have been killed and how many people have had to die in their hands. Blood has become of very little value in the land and this has consequences.
It is easy to call them names and condemn them, if we do not forgive them and try to win them over with love, nothing would be seen standing soon. As a Christian family, the State must emulate our Lord Jesus the Christ whose primary responsibility was to save the lost. Besides, we have all sinned at one point or another and enjoyed forgiveness.
That is why we think that Governor Wike deserves not only our commendation but support in making the young ones believe in this programme and turn around. Rivers State is indeed blessed with a Governor that has the heart of a father and the love and compassion of a true Christian.
However, The Tide thinks that whatever is worth doing is worth doing well. The State must come up with a clear plan on how to protect the ones that would repent. There must be a process of re-orientation and re-integration. But any start-off arrangement for responsible living must only be once.
Finally, more enlightenment should be made to make the general public not to stigmatise or discriminate against them. It is the duty of all to join in this programme of welcoming back home our once lost children, now found.
Editorial
2027: Beyond IGP’s Billboards Protection Order
As Nigeria moves toward the 2027 general elections and campaign activities intensify, violence against opposition politicians has become an issue that can no longer be overlooked. What should be a season of competing ideas is increasingly turning into a test of intimidation, and early signs suggest that those challenging the ruling establishment are the primary targets.
It was, therefore, welcome news when the Inspector-General of Police, Olatunji Disu, warned politicians, political thugs and others against destroying, defacing or removing campaign posters, banners and billboards. In a statement issued in Abuja by the Force Public Relations Officer, CSP Ani Iniedu, the police condemned such acts as political intolerance, directed Commissioners of Police in all 36 States and the Federal Capital Territory to take preventive measures, and warned that sponsors would also face prosecution. The police rightly described such vandalism as a criminal act that undermines parties’ and candidates’ freedom to canvass for votes.
But billboards are replaceable; human lives are not. While applauding the IGP’s stance, we urge him to extend the same stern warning and enforcement zeal to thugs who assault opposition members during campaigns. A police force that punishes the tearing of a poster but ignores the breaking of a skull will have its priorities questioned. Allowing such attacks to continue could erode the foundations of our democracy.
Consider the African Democratic Congress (ADC) presidential campaign flag-off in Sokoto State on November 4, 2026. The party alleged that the State Government denied it access to public facilities, sealed its campaign venue and pressured hotels to reject its delegates, forcing it to hold the rally at its secretariat. The Sokoto authorities, however, denied instructing hotels to turn guests away. More seriously, two suspected ADC supporters were reportedly shot along the Sokoto–Wurno Road while travelling to the venue, allegedly by operatives of the Sokoto State Community Guards.
Whatever the truth of these competing accounts, a shooting demands more than press statements. It requires a transparent, independent investigation and prosecution where warranted. Sokoto was not an isolated incident. The following day in Birnin Kebbi, the ADC presidential campaign convoy was reportedly attacked by armed gangs. Amnesty International said vehicles were vandalised, people assaulted with cutlasses and roads blocked, while the party’s Kebbi governorship candidate, Abubakar Malami, alleged that media equipment was destroyed and tear gas deployed. His convoy had suffered a similar attack in the city in September 2025.
The Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) has suffered similar attacks. On November 4, hoodlums stoned the motorcade of its presidential candidate, Peter Obi, and running mate, Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, at Watt Market roundabout in Calabar, Cross River State. Police reported arresting a 27-year-old suspect, Victor Edet, although it remains unclear whether he has been arraigned. The State Government has denied suggestions that ruling-party supporters were responsible. Worse, in Asaba, Delta State, one person was killed and five injured when suspected thugs attacked an NDC rally. A death at a political rally is no longer a warning; it is a damning indictment of the prevailing political climate.
Even critics of the establishment who are not frontrunners have not been spared. Omoyele Sowore, presidential candidate of the African Action Congress (AAC), was attacked by suspected thugs at a restaurant in Ado-Ekiti on October 30. He alleged that the assailants were linked to the Ekiti State Government House and that the Department of State Services leaked his location. Both the State Government and the security service denied involvement, while the police reported a minor injury and a discreet investigation. These conflicting accounts make an independent, publicly reported inquiry indispensable.
What deepens the concern is the Federal Government’s apparent silence. We are unaware of any specific, forceful condemnation of these assaults, even as All Progressives Congress (APC) rallies appear to proceed nationwide without incident. Such silence can easily be misconstrued as complicity, regardless of intent.
According to the Centre for Democracy and Development, 109 election-related deaths were recorded in the build-up to the 2023 polls. The Kimpact Development Initiative separately documented 238 incidents and 24 deaths during the general elections. Beyond Nigeria, Kenya’s 2007–08 post-election violence claimed more than 1,000 lives, according to the Waki Commission. Ghana, by contrast, enacted the Vigilantism and Related Offences Act in 2019 to curb party vigilante groups, a model worth studying.
The remedies are neither exotic nor expensive. The IGP should extend his directive to cover assaults on individuals and disruptions of rallies, while establishing a dedicated investigative unit to probe the Sokoto shooting and the attacks in Kebbi, Calabar, Asaba and Ado-Ekiti. It should publish the status of each case within a fixed period. Suspects must be prosecuted and their sponsors, regardless of party or position, brought to justice. State-backed security outfits, including the Community Guards, should be audited and barred from partisan duties.
The Federal Government must speak and act unequivocally. President Tinubu should specifically condemn attacks on opposition candidates and direct all security agencies to guarantee equal protection for every party. Governors must ensure equal access to public facilities for registered parties. The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), which has warned of fines and imprisonment under the Electoral Act 2026 for inflammatory campaign conduct, should enforce the Code of Conduct for Political Parties. Working with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security, it should publish a joint security plan covering campaigns, polling, and collation. Parties must discipline their supporters, courts expedite electoral-violence trials, and civil society and the media maintain a public record of incidents and their outcomes.
The credibility of the 2027 elections is at stake. An election is credible only when every contender can campaign, travel, assemble and speak freely, without fear. Without a free opposition, there can be no meaningful democracy. Nigeria is not a one-party State, and law enforcement agencies must demonstrate their neutrality through action, not communiqués. The campaign atmosphere is too tense to be left to chance. Billboards deserve protection, certainly, but citizens deserve it far more.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
-
News2 days ago
RSG Reaffirms Commitment To STEM Education, Technological Advancement
-
Business2 days ago
‘NUJ, NPA’s Partnership Would Boost Port Producrivity, Economic Growth’
-
News2 days agoIGP Warns Police Officers Against Partisanship …Directs Regular Engagement With Journalists
-
Business2 days ago
Fire Threat Interrupts Asaba Air Peace Flight
-
News2 days agoCustoms To Deploy AI, Scanners Against Snuggling
-
Business2 days ago
Fish Production Deficit, A Major Investment Opportunity – Minister
-
Business2 days ago
NCDMB, NLNG Unveil $9m For Professorial Endowment Research Chairs In Six Varsities
-
Politics2 days ago2027: INEC Begins Deployment Of Non-Sensitive Materials
