Connect with us

Opinion

2015 Polls: The Media And CSOs (11)

Published

on

Board Chairman, Nigeria Railway Corporation, Alhaji Bamanga Turkur (right) with Abia State Governor, Theodore Orji, during the official commissioning of Nigeria Railway Corporation in Port Harcourt, recently.

Board Chairman, Nigeria Railway Corporation, Alhaji Bamanga Turkur (right) with Abia State Governor, Theodore Orji, during the official commissioning of Nigeria Railway Corporation in Port Harcourt, recently.

In Akwa Ibom, violence resulted in the killing of a police
officer just as in Anambra State, a person was killed, in Calabar metropolis, students went on rampage upon discovering  that their names were not on the voters register. In other cases, polling officers and election observers were held at gun-point for the purpose of carrying out election malpractices.  Another challenge witnessed during the 1998/99 elections was the lack of effective communication, which made it difficult for security operatives to request for reinforcement in the event of breakdown of law and order.  These problems must be redressed  as a means for improving the conduct of the 2015 elections.  INEC must ensure adequate preparation by providing adequate electoral materials such as the Permanent Voter Cards (PVCs), ballot papers resulting in the disenfranchisement of some voters, adequate transportation, counting and announcement of results during which malpractices may spark off disputes.
Although some Nigerians are kicking against the militarization of the 2015 elections, but some see it as being appropriate in view of the way and manner some politicians and their followers are going about the exercise. Their utterances stimulate doubts in the minds of Nigerians as to whether we are sure of peaceful, free, fair and credible polls.  One thing that agitated my mind while writing this piece was whether the peace accord signed by the political actors of 11 parties is just for the fun of it.  No, one would not think so because Nigerians have over-grown the level of deceit.
But that soon after the restriction orders were signed and several attacks unleashed at rally arenas, including President Jonathan’s campaign convoy is quite amazing .  This means that the party leaders are not communicating their decisions to their supporters sincerely.
They should be able to investigate any violent action linking their followers to enable them identify manifestations of violence and to slam the necessary sanctions on perpetrators in the interest and credibility of their parties and themselves, the contestants.
In pre-colonial Africa, the democratic idea was an element of the political order of which representation and accountability were prominent features in the system of government.
There were various checks and balances on the exercise of power reinforced by social structures such as the traditional rulers, age grade associations, warrior bands, religious institutions, civil societies, professional organizations as well as the media, among others. They constituted the political institutions that regulated governance and electoral behaviour.
There is the need to restructure and energize the entire political system of Nigeria so as to stimulate effective response to the democratic process and elections in particular. In doing this, the whole of civil society, the media, religious bodies, social organizations, youth bodies, the traditional institution and other relevant stakeholders should be mobilized to monitor the 2015 elections towards ensuring peaceful, free, fair and credible exercise. These groups should be dynamic in their activities as watchdogs of the electoral process.  They should investigate  past electoral processes to enable them identify areas of possible violence and to provide appropriate interventions for this year’s elections, and also expose any traits of malpractices.
It is also pertinent to organize massive campaigns to create awareness on the threat this 2015 elections are posing to the survival of the entire democratic process, just as civic education for Nigerians, particularly the youths, to re-orientate and re-educate them on this election and other democracy related areas is necessary.  There is need for a generational change in the current body polity.  The political scene in Nigeria has  been dominated by a particular age group, so it is important to re-organise towards effecting the transfer of power to a new  breed of political actors.
Observations have shown that the country’s democratic institutions are weak and therefore lack adequate capability to pursue the interests of the people.  Election violence, poverty, monetized politics, gender insensitivity and lack of moral values have characterised our electoral process and this calls for the reinvigoration of the civil society organizations (CSOs) and the formation of other movements that will effectively check the activities of both opposition and ruling parties in Nigerian politics.  Political office seekers and holders should be held in dialogue to present a political agenda for the nation during elections.  CSOs, the media and other organizations must not relent in checking authoritarian tendencies of governments and the manipulation of state resources and institutions for election activities by incumbent political office holders.
While we encourage opposition politics in the current polity, such exercise of political right should not be made to endanger the growth of our democracy.  No vacuum should be allowed for ethnic nationalism and religious fanaticism or fundamentalism which could produce anarchy. The type of opposition which smacks of violence is not for genuine reasons, but for selfish motives to be bribed or settled by the ruling government.  In the past polity of Nigeria, there existed intolerance for opposition, so the emergency of several political parties now should not be a framework or platform for the exhibition of unruly behaviours and utterances capable of triggering off violence.  It should be for the purpose of acquiring political power that will be of general interest instead of personal benefits.
The current political gladiators have signed a pact to ensure violence-free elections, it is, therefore, expected that they abide by the rules and uphold their integrity while there should be an inclusive government that should address the real yearnings of the citizenry.
Opposition is recognised in politics not for the purposes of heating up the polity nor to destroy the ruling government, but to bring about corrective ideas that would restructure or transform the nation.
Civil society organizations and the media must continue to act as checks and balances on the actions of political parties and their members and constitute themselves as watch-dogs for the programmes and activities  of government to ensure that it is responsible to the people.  They should also educate political parties, including the opposition to play by the rules of the game and organize debates for political groups towards facilitating the development of an agenda.
This is why the election debate arranged by the Rivers State NUJ, NAWOJ, the Nigerian Institute of Public Relations, Civil Society Organisations, Silverbird Communications, among others penultimate  week is commendable, as it was aimed at driving a message of violence-free election and provided a forum for all parties candidates to reel out their agenda for Rivers people.
Concluded.

 

Shedie Okpara

Continue Reading

Opinion

Trans-Kalabari  Road:  Work In Progress 

Published

on

Quote:”This Dream project  is one of  the best things that have happened  to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas in recent times.”
This is the concluding part of this story featured in our last edition.
Good road network helps farmers to convey their agro-allied products to  commercial hubs where buyers and sellers meet periodically to transact business. Road network engineers and motivates people resident in unfriendly geographical terrains, like riverine areas,  to own property and shuttle home with ease. Some people will prefer living in their own houses in a more serene and nature-blessed communities to living in the city that is fraught with  pollution, and other environmental, social and economic hazards. Prior to the cult epidemic that ravaged parts of Rivers State, the Emohuas, Elemes, Ogonis, and Etches were known for rural dwelling. Most public servants from these areas do their official and private transactions from  their villages. For them it was comparatively easier to live in the village and engage in a diversified economic endeavours through farming, fishing or other lucrative business without outrageous charges and embarrassment associated with doing business in Port Harcourt, where land is as scarce as the traditional needle.
That is why the decision to construct the Trans-Kalabari Road by the administration of Dr. Peter Odili was one of the best decisions that administration took. When Dr. Odili vacated office as the Rivers State Governor, Rt. Hon. Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi took over and awarded contracts for continuation of the road project which in my considered view is the felt need of  the people of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. Unfortunately, Rt. Hon. Amaechi’s efforts to drive the project was sabotaged by some contractors some of whom are Kalabari people. The main  Trans-Kalabari Road is one project that is dear to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas of Rivers State. This is because through the road commuters can easily access several communities in the three local government areas. For instance, the road when completed will enable access to eight of the ten communities in Degema Local Government Area,  namely: Bukuma, Tombia,  Bakana, Oguruama, Obuama, Usokun, Degema town  and the Degema Consulate. It will also link 15 of the 16 communities in Asari Toru Local Government Area. The communities are: Buguma, the local government headquarters, Ido, Abalama, Tema, Sama, Okpo, Ilelema, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama, Krakrama, Omekwe-Ama, Angulama. The road will also connect  14  of 17 wards in Akuku Toru Local Government Area, and other settlements. It is interesting to note that It is faster,  and far more convenient and economical for the catchment Communities on the Trans-Kalabari Road network to go to the State Capital than the East West Road.  The people of the three local government areas will prefer  to work or do their transactions in Port Harcourt from their respective communities to staying in Port Harcourt where the house rent and the general cost of living is astronomically high.
 Consequently, development will seamlessly spread to the 28 out of 34 communities of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. The only Communities that are not linked by the road project are Oporoama in Asari Toru,  the Ke and  Bille Communities in Degema Local Government Area and the “Oceania” communities of Abissa, Kula, Soku, Idama, Elem Sangama of Akuku Toru Local Government Area. But because of the economic value of the unlinked Communities to Nigeria, (they produce substantial oil and gas in the area), the Federal, State Governments and the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC), can extend the road network to those areas just as Bonny is linked to Port Harcourt and the Lagos Mainland Bridge is connecting several towns in Lagos and neighbouring States.Kudos to previous administrations who  had constructed the Central Group axis.
 However, what is said to be the First Phase of the Trans-Kalabari Road project is actually a linkage of the “Central Group” Communities which consists of Krakrama, Angulama, Omekwe. Ama, Omekwe Tari Ama, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama. It is the peripheral of the Trans-Kalabari Road. The completion of the  Main Trans Kalabari project will free Port Harcourt and Obio/Akpor areas from congestion. It will motivate residents and people of the three local areas to contribute to the development of their Communities. If the Ogonis, Etches, Emohuas, Oyigbos, Okrikas, Elemes can feel comfortable doing business in Port Harcourt from home, residents and people whose communities are linked to Port Harcourt through the Trans-Kalabari Road will no doubt, do likewise. The vast arable virgin land of the Bukuma people can be open for development and sustainable agricultural ventures by Local, State and Federal Government.
It is necessary to recall that the Bukuma community was host to the Federal Government’s Graduate Farmers’ Scheme and the Rivers State Government moribund School-to-Land Scheme under Governor Fidelis Oyakhilome. Bukuma was the only community in Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas that has the capacity to carry those agricultural programmes. However the lack of road to transport farm produce to Port Harcourt and facilitate the movement of the beneficiaries of the scheme who lived in the community which is several miles away from the farms, hampered the sustainability of the programme. The main Trans-Kalabari Road remains the best gift to the people of Degema, Asari Toru, and Akuku-Toru Local Government Areas. Kudos to Sir Siminilayi Fubara.
By: Igbiki Benibo
Continue Reading

Opinion

That  U.S. Capture of Maduro

Published

on

Quote:”Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction.”
The first part of this story was published in our last edition.
 
In Africa and the Middle East, regime change—whether by invasion, proxy warfare, or sanctions—has often left behind fractured states, weakened institutions, and prolonged instability. Washington’s motivations in Venezuela are widely understood: vast oil reserves, alliances with U.S. rivals, and symbolic defiance of American influence in the Western Hemisphere. But none of these reasons confer legal or moral legitimacy. Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction. If every powerful nation acted on its grievances in this manner, global chaos would inevitably follow. International law provides mechanisms for accountability. Under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), individuals accused of crimes against humanity or other grave offences are subject to investigation and prosecution through judicial processes.
Likewise, extradition treaties, mutual legal assistance agreements, and Interpol mechanisms exist to ensure accountability while respecting due process. These frameworks were designed precisely to prevent unilateral enforcement of “justice” by military force. The most profound consequence of America’s action may not be in Caracas, but in the precedent it sets. If the world accepts that a superpower can unilaterally depose another country’s president, then the foundation of the international system is weakened. Sovereignty becomes conditional—no longer a right, but a privilege tolerated at the discretion of the powerful. Going forward, if another country invades its neighbour, will the United States retain the moral authority to impose sanctions or demand restraint? Some analysts already warn that parallels between Russia’s actions in Ukraine and America’s conduct in Venezuela risk further eroding global norms. Selective adherence to international law breeds cynicism and accelerates the drift toward a world governed by force rather than rules.
Power—military, economic, or political—should serve human progress and collective well-being, not domination and destruction. For African nations, many of which emerged from colonial rule through bitter struggle, this precedent is especially alarming. Sovereignty is not an abstract legal concept; it is a hard-won shield against external domination. Any erosion of that principle anywhere weakens it everywhere. Africa’s painful history of foreign interference makes this lesson especially urgent.  For me, the real issue is not whether Nicolás Maduro is a good or bad leader. That judgment belongs, first and foremost, to the Venezuelan people. The larger issue is whether the international system still operates on law—or has quietly reverted to hierarchy. If America insists it is defending global order, it must ask itself a difficult question: can an order survive when its most powerful guardian feels entitled to violate it? Until that question is answered honestly, the capture of a foreign president will remain not a triumph of justice, but a troubling symbol of a world drifting from law toward force.
If the United States felt so strongly about the allegations of terrorism, drug trafficking  against Maduro, were there no other lawful options? Judicial accountability, diplomacy, regional mediation, and multilateral pressure may be slow and imperfect, but they reflect respect for international law and sovereign equality. Military seizure is a blunt instrument. It humiliates institutions, radicalizes populations, and hardens resistance. It may remove a leader, but it rarely resolves the underlying crisis. History teaches that military interventions seldom result in stable democratic outcomes. More often, they breed resentment, resistance, and long-term instability. For the sake of global order and the rule of law, the United States should reconsider this path and recommit to diplomacy, legal cooperation, and respect for the sovereign equality of states. Former U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris reportedly described the invasion of Venezuela as “unlawful and unwise,” warning that such actions “do not make America safer, stronger, or more affordable.” Her words reflect a growing recognition, even within the United States, that force without legitimacy undermines both moral authority and global stability.
Should what happened in Venezuela serve as a wake-up call for corrupt African leaders who undermine the people’s right to choose their leaders? The answer is yes. The capture of Maduro should alarm African leaders who manipulate elections, weaken institutions, suppress opposition, undermine citizens’ rights, or cling to power at all costs. Venezuela faced widespread criticism over disputed elections and repression long before this episode, and that context shaped how the world reacted. This does not justify foreign military intervention, but it highlights an uncomfortable truth: prolonged democratic decay isolates nations and invites external pressure—from sanctions to diplomatic censure. Global opinion matters, and legitimacy at home strengthens sovereignty abroad. The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and several African leaders have rightly condemned the events in Venezuela, invoking the principles of sovereignty and non-interference enshrined in international and regional law.
Beyond condemnation, however, African leaders must look inward. The continent’s future cannot be built on repression, constitutional manipulation, and personal greed. Leadership must reflect the will of the people, not desperation for power. Two days ago, a social commentator on a radio station argued that Trump’s action—though condemnable—demonstrates how far a leader can go for his country’s interest. According to this view, he did not intervene in Venezuela for personal enrichment, but to strengthen his nation. In stark contrast, many African leaders plunder their own countries. They siphon public resources, impose crushing taxes and harmful policies, and leave their citizens poorer—all for selfish gain. That contradiction is the deeper lesson Africa must confront.True sovereignty is protected not only by international law, but by accountable leadership at home.
 By:  Calista Ezeaku
Continue Reading

Opinion

Kudos  Gov Fubara

Published

on

Please permit me to use this medium to appreciate our able governor, Siminalayi Fubara for the inauguration of the 14.2-kilometre Obodhi–Ozochi Road in Ahoada-East Local Government Area.  This inauguration marks a significant milestone in the history of our communities and deserves commendation. We, the people of Ozochi, are particularly happy because this project has brought long-awaited relief after years of isolation and hardship.
The expression of our traditional ruler, His Royal Highness, Eze Prince Ike Ehie, JP, during the inauguration captured the joy of our people.  He said, “our isolation is over.”  That reflects the profound impact of this road on daily life, economic activities, and social integration of the people of Ozochi and other neighbouring communities. The road will no doubt ease transportation, improve access to markets and healthcare, and strengthen links between Ahoada, Omoku, and other parts of Rivers State.
The people of Ahoada, Omoku, and indeed Rivers State as a whole are grateful to our dear governor for this laudable achievement and wish him many more successful years in office. We pray that God endows him with more wisdom and strength to continue to pilot the affairs of the state for the benefit of all. As citizens, we should rally behind the governor and support his development agenda. Our politicians and stakeholders should embrace peace and cooperation, as no meaningful progress can be achieved in an atmosphere of conflict. Sustainable development in the state can only thrive where peace prevails.
Samuel Ebiye
Continue Reading

Trending