Opinion
Still On World Mothers’ Report
Last year, Nigeria was
rated 123rd out of 165 worst places to be a mother in the world by an international non-governmental organization, Save The Children in its annual report.
A few days ago, the 2014 report released by the same body, ranked the country 171st among 178 worst nations for mothers and children to live in, indicating an appreciable decline in the rating. According to the report, Nigeria is among the bottom 10 countries after Cote d’Ivoire, Chad, Sierra-Leone, Central African Republic, Guinea-Bissau, Mali, Niger, Democratic Republic of Congo, and Somalia, as a result of its recent record of violence, political upheavals and poverty.
To many, the report is an understatement going by what women and children go through in the country. The violent clashes in many parts of the country, the growing insecurity and terrorism, the constant kidnapping of our girls and women by terrorists and kidnappers have made life hellish for many women and children. Many women have been made widows, living them with the sole responsibility of catering for their families. Likewise, thousands of children are today orphans, motherless or fatherless and being forced to thread the rugged paths of life all by themselves, no thanks to terrorism and other violent cases in the country.
Even in the homes, the story is not different. Many women have died brutalised or maimed for life by their violent male counterparts. Of course, it could be argued that domestic violence is a global problem but the ability of a country to formulate and enforce laws that would ensure appropriate punishment for such in human act makes a great difference.
What of incessant rape cases in different parts of the country, which has made life meaningless for many women and children. The news media are daily inundated with stories of rape cases involving all categories of women – old, young, students, kids and others.
In other parts of the country, especially the northern region, young girls are forced into marriage, some are denied the right to education. The story of 14-year-old girl, Wasila Umaru, who allegedly killed her 35-year-old husband with rat poison after being forced into marriage is still fresh in our mind.
Indeed, the vulnerability of Nigerian women is an incontestable fact despite the ratification by the country of a number of international standards which sanctions gender discrimination, violence and inequality.
Again, one cannot agree more with the “Save The Children,” report that poverty is a big issue among women in Nigeria. Reports have it that 70 per cent of Nigerian women are living below poverty line. The Minister of Women Affairs and Social Development, Hajiya Zainab Maina, recently observed that, “Several inter-related socio-economic factors have led to poor economic status of a large segment of Nigerian women such that 70 per cent of people living below the poverty line are women.
The minister also noted that many Nigerian women die prematurely, especially from preventable circumstances, because of inadequate health incentives for health personnel, ignorance and cultural taboos adding that Nigeria has one of the highest maternal deaths.
“By implication, every 10 minutes, a woman dies from pregnancy related complications in Nigeria with high prevalence in rural areas,” said the minister.
Incidentally, all these are happening in a country blessed with rich human and natural resources which if well managed would have made the country envious of other nations.
So, I don’t think we should expect a better report in coming years except we begin to do the right thing, shun corruption, embezzlement, greed, selfishness and other vices which are dragging the country down.
Rather than being dismissive of the World’s Mother’s Report as our leaders may be tempted to do, they should address the areas focused by the report viz violence, political upheavals and poverty, empowerment, adequate health care for mothers and children.
They should find out from countries like Finland, Norway, Australia and Sweden, what they may be doing to have consistently come tops on the list of best places to be a mother and apply them.
Calista Ezeaku
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers2 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News2 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics2 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured2 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
-
News2 days ago
FG Explains Supply Disruption As Power Generation Drops To 3,659MW
-
Metro2 days ago
Port Harcourt Prepares For 10,000 Runners As International Marathon Returns
-
News2 days agoBille Gas Leak: Coalition Tasks FG On Proactive Measures
-
News2 days agoIGP Orders Arrest, Prosecution Of Campaign Billboard Vandals
