Opinion
Still On Poor JAMB, O’ Level Results
“If you do not seal the holes, you will have to rebuild the walls,” (Swahili Proverb).
Year on year, the failure
rate in external examinations across the country keeps increasing without much sincere effort to tackle the anomaly. Time was when Joint Admission and Matriculation Board (JAMB) candidates for professional courses like law, engineering, medicine had cut-off marks above 300 out of 400 points. Candidates with 250 marks were not sure of gaining admission into the universities.
Today, a candidate who scores 250 marks is being celebrated. The result of the 6th edition of the Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME) released last week indicated that only 47 candidates scored 250 and above, in the Paper Pencil Test (PPT) and Dual Based Test (DBT) modes of the UTME conducted across the country few weeks ago.
In 2013, out of 1,644,110, who sat for PPT and DBT, 10 candidates scored 300 marks and above, while 127,017 candidates scored 1-159 marks.
The result was so woeful that the House of Representatives had to summon the JAMB Registrar, Prof Dibu Ojerinde, for questioning.
The result of the previous year, 2012, was not any better. It revealed that out of over 1.5 million candidates who sat for entrance examination into tertiary institutions, only three scored 300 and above, while 601,151 got marks ranging from 200 to 249. In all, only 673,397 scored above 200 which could enable them gain admission into universities.
The O’ Level results could even be said to be worst with some years recording abysmal performance rate of above 70 per cent failure.
Expectedly, some people have expressed disappointment over these results, but honestly, I am not surprised at all.
As a matter of fact, I think these results are very impressive compared to the appalling standard of education in the country and if something is not done urgently, we may be in for worse situations.
Records shows that a particular school in Ghana has half of its population made up of Nigerian students. Many Nigerians today, send their children and wards to different African countries, Europe, America and even Asia in search of quality education, thereby enriching those countries.
But don’t be quick to condemn them. A tour of some public schools in the country would reveal a complete infrastructural decay. What of the quality of teaching and instructional materials? In many countries like Norway, the best graduating students of the year are engaged as teachers which explain the unbeatable academic record they have had over the years. In Nigeria, many people go into teaching due to unemployment or lack of better things to do. People with any qualification are employed as teachers and paid meagerly. Stories have it that some school certificate holders or even school drop-outs who were engaged by some private schools as care givers are also used as nursery schools teachers. In this case, you begin to wonder what those children were being taught.
The fact that more than half of the students who sat for university entrance examinations these past years failed raises questions on the quality of teachers that prepared them for the examinations. Teachers may want to accuse the students of being lazy and not taking their academic work seriously. They will blame students for spending most of their time on social networking, playing computer games and watching films. But the teachers can do better if they put more efforts and show more commitment, interest and zeal to their duties.
But then, it is impossible for one to give what he does not have. A recent newspaper report had it that some school proprietors raised alarm over the poor quality of graduates produced by various higher institutions in the country.
Indeed, the falling standard of education can be traced to so many factors. Education in Nigeria is poorly funded. This has led to poor infrastructure, inadequate hostel accommodation for under graduates, poor laboratory facilities and out dated teaching aids in the tertiary institutions. The direct results are the incessant strike actions by the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU), the on-going strike actions by Academic Staff Union of Polytechnics (ASUP) poor academic and research work which translates to chunning out of half-baked graduates.
In the past, pupils who did not perform well in examinations were asked to repeat same classes. Today, the situation is different. Mass Promotion is the new trend. Even proprietor wants to prove that his pupils are the most brilliant; and to prove’ it they embark on mass promotion even when some of them barely know anything.
What of the parents? What are they doing towards ensuring that their children get quality education? Parents, particularly the fathers believe that having paid their children’s school fees, they have discharged their duties. Some parents don’t even care whether their children do their home work or not, or even take time to go through their school work. All their interest is in making money, believing that with money, they can buy quality education for their children.
That probably explains why some parents and even husband go to the extent of writing JAMB, WAEC for their children and wives. Some that might consider this measure extreme buy question papers or machineries to write exams for their children. One wonders what the future of such children will be like.
Obviously, the problem of education sector in Nigeria is multi-faceted and it needs a multi-faceted effort to tackle it if we must achieve vision 20:20:20. We’re talking about from the family up to the government; we all have a role to play. Unless we stop paying lip service to education, we will continue to have more failures.
It will amount to wishful thinking if parents think their children and wards will perform better in future examinations if they do not start now to pay attention to their academic works and guide them right.
For us to solve the problem of examination mass failure permanently, we must deal with the causes for as the Gullah proverb says, “You need to take care of the root in order to heal the tree.”
Calista Ezeaku
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Opinion3 days ago
Ancestorial Worship: My Take (1)
-
News7 hours ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
News7 hours agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News3 days agoFG Must Address Nigerians’ Concerns On Reforms -Shettima …Warns Against Misuse of AI, Social Media
-
Niger Delta6 hours ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Rivers5 hours ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education6 hours agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Featured3 days agoTinubu Jets To S’Arabia For Lesser Hajj …Unveils Free Healthcare For Pensioners
