Editorial

Amaechi’s Supreme Court Victory And Democracy

Published

13 years ago

October 26, 2012

mandate of Rt. Hon. Chibuike Amaechi, as duly elected candidate of the Rivers State Chapter of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) for the April 2007 Governorship elections.

The crux of the litigation stemmed from a protest by the PDP candidate challenging his substitution by the party’s leadership without cogent and verifiable reasons and to which he was neither allowed fair hearing nor confronted with facts for defense. The questions for determination, from a layman’s perspective, thus became whether or not a party leadership had the power to unilaterally deny a duly elected candidate, his constitutional right to be voted for. Secondly, whether such disqualification was in tandem with party laws, and if not, whether his eventual replacement by Sir Celestine Omehia, who did not contest the party primaries, was proper or not.

Important as these questions were, they, inadvertently challenged the constitutional supremacy of political parties which hitherto enjoyed unbridled and far-reaching powers over their own internal affairs. With that understanding, and based on the familiar conclusion that party primaries were indeed internal affairs of political parties, hence, not justiceable in conventional courts or risk expulsion, not many legal pundits gave Rt. Hon. Amaechi a chance.

It was even more so, when, following the acceptance by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), of Amaechi’s eventual replacement, Sir Celestine Omehia contested and won the elections and was later sworn-in as governor.

But in a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court literarily averred that by the nation’s choice of a multi-party democracy, the political parties themselves ought to represent the foundation for the building of an enduring democratic culture, based on laws, respect for members’ constitutional rights and above all, defense of equity, fairness and honesty. For, if these values were allowed to suffer, political parties would, rather than be the basis for democratic growth, become machines of lawlessness, autocratic rule and imposition of candidates in elections.

It was in avoidance of that looming state of anarchy that the apex court ruled that the most important constitutional basis for selection of candidates for general elections must first and foremost be the party primaries. And if after wards, any substitution was needfull, such must be based on cogent and verifiable reasons. Unfortunately, since by the estimation of the apex court, the PDP’s excuse for substituting Amaechi failed that preliminary test, it ought to be declared ultra vices, null and void.

Today, The Tide recalls with a rare sense of pride and judicial fulfillment, the rare courage demonstrated by the nation’s Supreme Court, in handing down such landmark judgment, and indeed, against a government in power, whose leader, as President and Commander-In-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Chief Olusegun Obasanjo personally voiced the disqualification of a duly elected party candidate, at a rally in Port Harcourt, with the ‘K-Leg’ theory.

Ordinarily, the Supreme Court could hide behind countless legal loopholes to dismiss the matter in favour of the government and indeed the ruling party, but it must have considered the immense benefits of truly democratic parties as basis for growth of enduring democratic culture, as an imperative for a participatory government grounded in popular will.

By that choice, the Supreme Court did well to restore the fast eroding intra-party democracy and delivered the political party structure from the strangle-hold and dictates of a few self seeking political leaders, against the largest interest of the helpless majority.

Yes, the judgment might have restored Amaechi’s mandate and brought him on the seat of Governor of Rivers State, but what Nigeria annually celebrates is indeed higher than the person and struggle of the serving State Chief Executive. It is indeed a celebration of the victory of truth over falsehood, of light over darkness, of democracy over dictatorship, of the rule of law over constitutional recklessness, of the equity over the culture of impunity and above all else, of the awesome presence of the Hand of God, in the affairs of men.

Surely, wherever these realities are allowed pre-eminence in the affairs of men, speedy growth is equally enhanced, and nation-building made easy. Little wonder, the modest achievements recorded in Rivers State under Governor Amaechi’s watch, after the restoration, indeed attest to these facts which The Tide thinks must be sustained in our political lives, especially by political parties.

As we recall that epochal date exactly five years yesterday, it becomes even more instructive to admonish that political parties be constantly reminded of the essence and immense benefits of intra-party democracy, and also challenge other courts within the judicial realm of an even greater need to draw some inspiration from the kind of lofty redemption, the Supreme Court bequeathed to posterity.

The Tide considers it fit and proper to also congratulate Governor Amaechi, even for the umpteenth time, for his doggedness, resilience, faith in God and the Judiciary, unwavering commitment to and unusual patience in his fight for what he believed in, without which October 25, would have been meaningless.

Essentially, Amaechi had other choices; to obey and endure his party’s order, no matter how unconstitutional he perceived it, and negotiate other juicy appointments or monetary gestures in recompense, or surrender to fear but it was the choice of being steadfast in search of justice that produced the landmark judgment, we today celebrate.

That in truth, is the often over-looked element in the Supreme Court’s historic judgment and the rewards derivable therefrom.

Editorial

No To Political Office Holders’ Salary Hike

Published

14 hours ago

September 22, 2025

Uchechukwu Okwum

Nigeria’s Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) has unveiled a gratuitous proposal to increase the salaries of political and public office holders in the country. This plan seeks to fatten the pay packets of the president, vice-president, governors, deputy governors, and members of the National and State Assemblies. At a time when the nation is struggling to steady its economy, the suggestion that political leaders should be rewarded with more money is not only misplaced but insulting to the sensibilities of the ordinary Nigerian.

What makes the proposal even more opprobrious is the dire economic condition under which citizens currently live. The cost of living crisis has worsened, inflation has eroded the purchasing power of workers, and the naira continues to tumble against foreign currencies. The majority of Nigerians are living hand to mouth, with many unable to afford basic foodstuffs, medical care, and education. Against this backdrop, political office holders, who already enjoy obscene allowances, perks, and privileges, should not even contemplate a salary increase.

It is, therefore, not surprising that the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has stepped in to challenge this development. SERAP has filed a lawsuit against the RMAFC to halt the implementation of this salary increment. This resolute move represents a voice of reason and accountability at a time when public anger against political insensitivity is palpable. The group is rightly insisting that the law must serve as a bulwark against impunity.

According to a statement issued by SERAP’s Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, the commission has been dragged before the Federal High Court in Abuja. Although a hearing date remains unconfirmed, the momentous step of seeking judicial redress reflects a determination to hold those in power accountable. SERAP has once again positioned itself as a guardian of public interest by challenging an elite-centric policy.

The case, registered as suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/1834/2025, specifically asks the court to determine “whether RMAFC’s proposed salary hike for the president, vice-president, governors and their deputies, and lawmakers in Nigeria is not unlawful, unconstitutional and inconsistent with the rule of law.” This formidable question goes to the very heart of democratic governance: can those entrusted with public resources decide their own pay rises without violating the constitution and moral order?

In its pleadings, SERAP argues that the proposed hike runs foul of both the 1999 Nigerian Constitution and the RMAFC Act. By seeking a judicial declaration that such a move is unlawful, unconstitutional, and inconsistent with the rule of law, the group has placed a spotlight on the tension between self-serving leadership and constitutionalism. To trivialise such an issue would be harum-scarum, for the constitution remains the supreme authority guiding governance.

We wholeheartedly commend SERAP for standing firm, while we roundly condemn RMAFC’s selfish proposal. Political office should never be an avenue for financial aggrandisement. Since our leaders often pontificate sacrifice to citizens, urging them to tighten their belts in the face of economic turbulence, the same leaders must embody sacrifice themselves. Anything short of this amounts to double standards and betrayal of trust.

The Nigerian economy is not buoyant enough to shoulder the additional cost of a salary increase for political leaders. Already, lawmakers and executives enjoy allowances that are grossly disproportionate to the national average income. These earnings are sufficient not only for their needs but also their unchecked greed. To even consider further increments under present circumstances is egregious, a slap in the face of ordinary workers whose minimum wage remains grossly insufficient.

Resources earmarked for such frivolities should instead be channelled towards alleviating the suffering of citizens and improving the nation’s productive capacity. According to United Nations statistics, about 62.9 per cent of Nigerians were living in multidimensional poverty in 2021, compared to 53.7 per cent in 2017. Similarly, nearly 30.9 per cent of the population lives below the international poverty line of US$2.15 per day. These figures paint a stark picture: Nigeria is a poor country by all measurable standards, and any extra naira diverted to elite pockets deepens this misery.

Besides, the timing of this proposal could not be more inappropriate. At a period when unemployment is soaring, inflation is crippling households, and insecurity continues to devastate communities, the RMAFC has chosen to pursue elite enrichment. It is widely known that Nigeria’s economy is in a parlous state, and public resources should be conserved and wisely invested. Political leaders must show prudence, not profligacy.

Another critical dimension is the national debt profile. According to the Debt Management Office, Nigeria’s total public debt as of March 2025 stood at a staggering N149.39 trillion. External debt obligations also remain heavy, with about US$43 billion outstanding by September 2024. In such a climate of debt-servicing and borrowing to fund budgets, it is irresponsible for political leaders to even table the idea of inflating their salaries further. Debt repayment, not self-reward, should occupy their minds.

This ignoble proposal is insensitive, unnecessary, and profoundly reckless. It should be discarded without further delay. Public office is a trust, not an entitlement to wealth accumulation. Nigerians deserve leaders who will share in their suffering, lead by example, and prioritise the common good over self-indulgence. Anything less represents betrayal of the social contract and undermines the fragile democracy we are striving to build.

Editorial

No To Political Office Holders’ Salary Hike

Published

15 hours ago

September 22, 2025

The Tide

Editorial

Rivers’ Retirees: Matters Arising

Published

2 weeks ago

September 8, 2025

The Tide

The Rivers State Government deserves commendation for the manner in which it conducted the last biometric exercise for pensioners in the state. For the first time in many years, the verification process was not only efficient but also humane, a development that has brought relief to a category of citizens that often bears the brunt of neglect.

Unlike previous verification exercises that left pensioners exhausted and unattended, the latest exercise set a refreshing precedent. Retirees were given proper and sumptuous meals, and in addition, the government paid the sum of N10,000 into their accounts to cushion their transportation costs. Such gestures go a long way in demonstrating that those who had laboured for the state are not forgotten in their twilight years.

The measure was particularly necessary given that some pensioners had to travel long distances to reach their verification centres. For elderly men and women, such journeys come with physical and financial strain. By recognising these realities and easing the burden, the government has shown that pensioners deserve dignity, not disdain.

Beyond this laudable act of consideration, the authorities must reflect on the very structure of pension verification. The era of compelling retirees to be physically present for routine verification should be reconsidered. With digital tools and innovation, the government can adopt systems that capture and confirm data without the stress of physical assembly. This is crucial for pensioners residing in other states or even abroad.

While we acknowledge the importance of verification in cleaning up pension records, we cannot ignore the darker side of the matter. It is regrettable that some allowances continue to be paid to deceased pensioners, with relatives fraudulently collecting the funds. The latest biometrics, thankfully, exposed some of these sharp practices. The exercise, therefore, is not only about order but also about justice.

We urge families of deceased pensioners to be patriotic enough to inform the government of the deaths of their loved ones. It is deeply shameful that in some instances, individuals attempted to impersonate late pensioners during the biometrics. Such behaviour undermines the spirit of honesty and deprives genuine retirees of their due entitlements.

The exercise also revealed another important area of concern: the health of pensioners. It is reassuring to learn that the state government has reportedly promised to take over the medical treatment of some retirees who arrived for the biometrics in critical condition. This is a step in the right direction. Elderly citizens, after years of service, should have access to special health care facilities in the state. Setting aside hospitals or designated centres for the aged is not just desirable but necessary.

While pension payments in Rivers State have remained consistent, attention must now be directed towards gratuities. Senior citizens deserve to receive their retirement benefits without the bureaucratic hitches that have often marred the process. After years of loyal service, nothing is more demoralising than to see retirees languish for want of their gratuities. Every worker, as Scripture reminds us, is worthy of his wage.

Retirement, in any civilised society, should not be reduced to a sentence of suffering. In dealing with pensioners, government must consistently wear a human face. The humane manner displayed during this verification exercise should not be a one-off. It must become the norm in all dealings with retirees. Measures must continually be put in place to ensure that they do not feel abandoned by the state they served.

One welcome innovation has already been introduced. The Sole Administrator of Rivers State, Vice Admiral (Rtd) Ibok-Ete Ekwe Ibas, has altered the method of gratuity payment. Pensioners now receive their monies directly into their bank accounts, eliminating the cheque-based system that for years served as fertile ground for corruption. This reform is both pragmatic and forward-looking. Similarly, the implementation of the N32,000 pension harmonisation is also commendable.

Direct payments gratuities ensure transparency and drastically reduce the possibility of diversion of funds. More importantly, they restore confidence in the system and assure pensioners that their entitlements will reach them without interference. In this way, the government has not only safeguarded the process but also upheld the principle of accountability.

Seamless gratuity payment has a ripple effect on the workforce as a whole. When workers are confident that retirement will not plunge them into hardship, the temptation to falsify age in order to remain in service is eliminated. Such reforms, therefore, enhance efficiency, honesty, and productivity in the public service.

In sum, the Rivers State Government has struck a refreshing chord in its handling of pension verification. It has shown empathy, innovation, and accountability. However, the momentum must be sustained, and the focus must shift towards modernising verification methods and prioritising retirees’ welfare in health, gratuity, and dignity.

When retirees are treated with compassion and fairness, the message to those still in service is clear: faithful service to the state will not go unrewarded. The humane verification exercise, though a single event, offers a hopeful glimpse of what governance can look like when people, especially the elderly, are placed at the heart of policy.